1585
A publication of
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING TRANSACTIONS
The Italian Association
VOL. 32, 2013 of Chemical Engineering
[Link]/cet
Chief Editors: Sauro Pierucci, Jiří J. Klemeš
Copyright © 2013, AIDIC Servizi S.r.l.,
ISBN 978-88-95608-23-5; ISSN 1974-9791
Phase Inversion Emulsification
Valentina Preziosi, Antonio Perazzo, Sergio Caserta*, Giovanna Tomaiuolo,
Stefano Guido
Chemical Engeneering at the Micro-Scale Lab, Dipartimento di Ingegneria Chimica, dei Materiali e della Produzione
Industriale, Università Federico II, [Link] Tecchio 80, 80125 Napoli, Italy.
[Link]@[Link]
Phase inversion refers to a phenomenon that occurs when agitated oil in water emulsion, reverts to a
water in oil and vice versa. Emulsification via phase inversion is widely used in fabrication of cosmetic
products, pharmaceutical products (e.g., vesicles for drug delivery), foodstuff and detergents.
Emulsification process is strongly affected by preparation method; very different droplet size distribution
could be achieved, which is strictly linked to the product stability. Phase inversion process leads to the
formation of finely dispersed droplets in a continuous phase. In this work an experimental investigation of
phase inversion emulsification to produce stable samples has been performed. The emulsion morphology
has been characterized in detail by direct observation via optical and confocal microscopy.
1. Introduction
Emulsions are fluids systems composed of at least two immiscible phases. An emulsion can be considered
(meta)stable if its kinetic evolution toward the thermodynamic equilibrium, i.e. complete phase separation,
is slow enough (Leal-Calderon et al., 2007). These systems present a dispersed phase, usually in form of
droplets, surrounded by a continuous matrix. In some conditions the dispersed phase can be the one
present in smaller quantity in the system. One phase is usually organic and is called “oil phase”. The
inorganic one is called “aqueous phase”. There is a variety of phenomena acting to influence the system
morphology and eventually lead to the phase separation: coalescence (two droplets merge into one)
(Caserta et al., 2004) , collision (Caserta et al., 2007), creaming and sedimentation (density driven
separation), flow induced droplet re-arranging (Caserta et al., 2005), diffusion (De Luca et al., 2008)
involving at least of the low molecular weight fraction in each of the phases (Jonas et al., 2010) of one
phase into the other through the continuous phase (Ostwald ripening). Phase separation can be flow
induced (Caserta et al., 2008) in order to minimize the viscous dissipation (Caserta and Guido, 2012), or,
even in static conditions, due to sedimentation or creaming. By equating viscous and gravitational forces
acting on a droplet immersed in the continuous phase we can obtain the Stokes’ law, that expresses the
gravitational separation velocity. From Stokes’ law is clear that in order to slow down the drop
sedimentation it is possible:
i) Reduce the density difference between the two phases
ii) Reduce the droplet radius (coupling with a narrow droplet size distribution)
ii) Increase continuous phase viscosity
It is known for example that oil in water (o/w) emulsion are unstable due to the creaming that becomes
significant when droplet radius is greater than 0.5 μm.
The main mechanism responsible for the increase of droplet size is coalescence, that can be inhibited by
using surfactants (Di Scipio et al., 2011; Pommella et al., 2012), amphiphilic molecules which migrate from
the bulk to the interface where they act to lower the interfacial tension and to elicit Marangoni stresses.
The Marangoni effect slows down the drainage of the continuous phase film between two opposing
1586
droplets, which is an essential step leading to coalescence. In general, is very important the understanding
of the relation flow dynamics vs emulsion morphology structure (Caserta et al., 2006).
Phase inversion, i.e. the phenomenon by which the dispersed phase become the continuous phase and
vice-versa, can be considered an useful route to produce emulsion made of very fine droplets.
A phenomenon always accompanying phase inversion is the spontaneous change in the surfactants
arrangements at the oil-water interface. Phase inversion can be brought about by changing the
temperature of the system, by changing the volume fraction of the phases, by adding salts or by imposing
particular flows; e.g. extensional flow (Akay et al., 2000). This process is defined by some authors as a
catastrophic event (Fernandez et al., 2004), because it appears to be a sudden and dramatic change in
morphology caused by a gradual change in experimental conditions. Galindo-Alvarez and co-workers
(Galindo-Alvarez et al., 2011) showed the influence of oil viscosity and process conditions on catastrophic
phase inversion. Jahanzad et al. (Jahanzad et al., 2009) showed the formation of multiple emulsion
accompanying catastrophic phase inversion. Sajjadi et al. (Sajjadi et al., 2004) pointed out the catastrophic
phase inversion of abnormal emulsions in the vicinity of phase inversion point, and nanoemulsion
formation by catastrophic phase inversion (Sajjadi et al., 2006). Shinoda & Arai were the first (Shinoda &
Harai, 1964) to point out the effect of temperature on phase inversion. They founded that, by increasing
temperature, non-ionic surfactants become more hydrophilic, so they change their chemical configuration
and physical arrangement promoting phase inversion.
Emulsification via phase inversion is widely used in fabrication of cosmetic products, pharmaceutical
products (e.g., vesicles for drug delivery), foodstuff and detergents.
Emulsification process is strongly affected by preparation methods that can lead to very different droplet
size distribution, which is strictly related to the final product stability. Processes that involve phase
inversion can lead to the formation of finely dispersed droplets in a continuous phase, while the typical
emulsion preparation process, which consists in dissolving the surfactant in the continuous phase and
adding the dispersed phase under appropriate agitation can typically result in the formation of unstable
macroemulsions. Achieving phase inversion by changing temperature is the so-called "phase inversion
temperature" (PIT) method (Shinoda & Arai, 1964), where miscibility of the two phases plays a key role.
Another way is to increase gradually the amount of the minor phase up to the "emulsion inversion point",
EIP (Fernandez et al., 2004) (also known as “phase inversion concentration”, PIC).
This work has been focused on emulsification of mixtures composed by water, oil and two non-ionic
surfactants, with the objective to define protocols able to produce o/w emulsions stable over an extended
time frame i.e., systems that show no significant phase separation after several months.
Temperature, flow (such as stirring rate) and surfactant concentration play a key role in the in the control of
the system morphology. The methodology we followed is based on the “emulsion inversion point” method.
In this way it has been possible to produce long term stable emulsions with great energy saving, due to: i)
low energy mixing requirement, ii) room temperature process of emulsification. Static images of the
emulsion acquired by optical microscopy and confocal light scanning microscopy have been reported, in
order to evaluate the emulsification evolution based on system morphology. In addition, static light
scattering (Horiba) was used to assess emulsion stability. This methodology can be a valid tool for
industrial process development, that is one of the key issue of chemical engineering (Asprion et al., 2011)
2. Materials and Methods
The emulsification was carried out at room temperature. Mineral oil and surfactants (polyoxyethylene
sorbitan fatty acid esters, Tween, Sigma Aldrich and sorbitan fatty acid esters, Span, Sigma Aldrich) were
poured together in a beaker. The surfactant concentration was optimized in order to obtain long term
stability. Water was then added drop by drop until a concentration of 76-80% wt was reached. The vessel
was agitated with a magnetic stirrer at 250 rpm, that is the minimum speed required to ensure emulsion
stability (low energy mixing). Static images of the emulsion acquired by optical microscopy have been
analysed in order to evaluate the system stability, based on fluid morphology. In addition, static light
scattering (Horiba) has been used to assess emulsion stability
3. Results and Discussion
By this process methodology, long term stable emulsions characterized by very small average diameter,
i.e. 0,17 µm, and narrow droplets size distribution has been obtained. The droplet, given their reduced
1587
size, have been observed to show random brownian motion. In Figure 1 we report an optical microscopy
image of the final emulsion, and the droplet size distribution.
Figure 1: Optical image of the finished emulsion and correspondent droplet size distribution, water weight
fraction is 76%.
By adding a fluorescent dye into the aqueous phase (Pommella et al., 2012), confocal light scanning
microscopy was used to follow emulsion morphology evolution as a function of water concentration. In
Figure 2 images acquired at different water concentration are reported, the fluid was placed on the
microscope slit directly from the stirred vessel; about 10-30 second elapsed between the sampling and
image acquisition. Since the process starts by adding water drops into the oil plus surfactants mix, an
initial w/o emulsion was obtained. Despite the gradual alimentation of water, a sudden change in
morphology, often named "catastrophic" event, was observed around the 20 %wt of water concentration,
thus showing a bicontinuous morphology structure. After further water feeding, the bicontinuous structure
disappeared quite fast, leading to the formation of an o/w emulsion. Therefore, around to the 20%wt of
water concentration, the dispersed and continuous phase invert. Finally, water was fed, up to the final
water concentration of 76%wt. In Figure 3 a magnification of the confocal image at 76 %wt of water is
reported, it is possible to observe the complexity of the morphology that point out the presence of droplets
in droplets in the bigger emulsion droplets. Probably, the intermediate bicontinuous structure favours the
trapping of one phase into the other, leading to the formation of droplets in droplets inclusion.
1588
Figure 2: Confocal image at different water concentration, percentages are in weight.
Figure 3: Confocal image, water weight fraction is 76%. It is possible to observe the presence of multiple
emulsions.
1589
4. Conclusions
In this work we reported an experimental investigation of phase inversion emulsification to produce stable
samples. The emulsion morphology has been characterized in detail by direct observation in confocal
microscopy. Long term stable emulsions have been obtained with great energy saving. Higher emulsions
stability is associated with both small droplet size and low polydispersity of the droplet size distribution.
Confocal microscopy can be exploited to follow the time evolution of the phase inversion process.
Confocal imaging clearly shows the formation of bicontinuous structure during the emulsification process,
that signs the two phases point of inversion. Furthermore, this bicontinuous phase, can eventually trap one
of the two phase into the other, thus creating a complex morphology that presents inclusion of droplets in
droplets.
Acknowledgement
This study is related to the activity of the European network action COST MP1106 “Smart and green
interfaces - from single bubbles and drops to industrial, environmental and biomedical applications".
References
Asprion N., Blagov S., Ryll O., Welke R., Winterfeld A., Dittel A., Bortz M., Kufer K-H., Burger J.,
Scheithauer A., Hasse H., 2011, Decision support for process development in the chemical industry,
Chemical Engineering Transactions, 24, 30-306, DOI: 10.3303/CET1124051
Akay G., Tong L., 2000, Intensive structuring: intensive processing of microstructured materials by flow
induced phase inversion, Che. Eng. Technol., 23, 285-288, DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-
4125(200003)23:3<285::AID-CEAT285>[Link];2-0.
Caserta S., Guido S., 2012, Vorticity banding in biphasic polymer blends, Langmuir, 28, 16254–16262,
DOI: 10.1021/la303232w.
Caserta S., Simeone M., Guido S., 2004, Evolution of drop size distribution of polymer blends under shear
flow by optical sectioning, Rheol. Acta, 43, 451-501, DOI: 10.1007/s00397-004-0373-8.
Caserta S., Sabetta L., Simeone M., Guido S., 2005, Shear-induced coalescence in aqueous biopolymer
mixtures”, Chem. Eng. Sci., 60, 1019-1027, DOI: 10.1016/[Link].2004.09.076.
Caserta S., Simeone M., Guido S., 2006, A parameter investigation of shear-induced coalescence in PIB-
PDMS semi-dilute polymer blends. Effects of shear rate, volume fraction, and viscosity, Rheol. Acta,
45, 505-512, DOI: 10.1007/s00397-006-0087-1.
Caserta S., Simeone M., Guido S., 2008, Shear banding in biphasic liquid-liquid systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.,
100, 137801, DOI: 10.1103 / PhysRevLett. 100.137801.
Caserta S., Reynaud S., Simeone M., Guido S., 2007, Drop deformation in sheared polymer blends, J.
Rheol., 51, 761-774, DOI: 10.1122/1.2723148.
De Luca A. C., Rusciano G., Pesce G., Caserta S., Guido S., Sasso A., 2008, Diffusion in polymer blends
by Raman microscopy, Macromolecules, 41, DOI: 10.1021/ma800866m.
Di Scipio S., Blanco D., Diaz A., Mireles A., Murillo A., 2011, Influence of egg yolk/Tween60 surfactant
blends on the behavior of o/w concentrated emulsions, Chemical Engineering Transactions, 24, 577-
582, DOI: 10.3303/CET1124097.
Fernandez P., André V., Rieger J., Kuhnle A., 2004, Nano-emulsion formation by emulsion phase
inversion, Coll. Surf. A, 251, 53-58, DOI:10.1016/[Link].2004.09.029
Galindo-Alvarez J. G., Sadtler V., Choplin L., Salager J., 2011, Viscous Oil Emulsification by Catastrophic
Phase Inversion: Influence of Oil Viscosity and Process Conditions ,Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 50, 5575-
5583, DOI:10.1021/ie102224k
Jahanzad, F., Crombie G., Innes R., Sajjadi S., 2009, Catastrophic phase inversion via formation of
multiple emulsions; a prerequisite for formation of fine emulsions, Chemical Engineering Research and
Design, 87, 492 – 498, 13th European conference on mixing: new developments towards
Jonas A., De Luca A. C., Pesce G., Rusciano G., Sasso A., Caserta S., Guido S., Marrucci G., 2010,
Diffusive Mixing of Polymers Investigated by Raman Microspectroscopy and Microrheology, Langmuir,
26, 14223–14230, DOI: 10.1021/la101498h.
Leal-Calderon, F., Thivilliers F., Schmitt V., Structured emulsions, 2007, Curr. Op. Coll. Int. Sci., 12, 206-
212, DOI:10.1016/[Link].2007.07.003
Liu L., Matar O.K., E., Perez de Ortiz S., Hewitt G.D., 2005, Experimental investigation of phase inversion
in a stirred vessel using LIF, Chem. Eng. Sci., 60, 85-94, DOI:10.1016/[Link].2004.07.066
Pommella A., Caserta S., Guida V., Guido S., 2012, Shear-Induced Deformation of Surfactant
Multilamellar Vesicles , Phys. Rev. Lett., 108, 138301, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.138301
1590
Sajjadi S., Jahanzad F., Yainneskis M., 2004, Catastrophic phase inversion of abnormal emulsions in the
vicinity of the locus of transitional inversion, Coll. Surf. A, 240, 149-155,
DOI:10.1016/[Link].2004.03.012
Sajjadi S., 2006, Nanoemulsion formation by phase inversion emulsification: on the nature of inversion,
Langmuir, 22, 5597-5603, DOI:10.1021/la060043e.
Shinoda K., Arai H., 1964, The correlation between phase inversion temperature in emulsion and cloud
point in solution of nonionic emulsifier, J. Phys. Chem., 68, 3485-3490.