Scribd
Upload
33 views2 pages

Plaintiff's Written Statement in Civil Case

The document is a written statement filed by the defendant, Putin, in response to a lawsuit by the plaintiff, Prakash, regarding a money lending dispute. The defendant admits to being a money lender but denies the plaintiff's claims about the existence of a money lending license and any agreement to repay a loan. The defendant requests the court to dismiss the suit and asserts that the allegations made by the plaintiff are untrue.

Uploaded by

Harshad
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
33 views2 pages

Plaintiff's Written Statement in Civil Case

The document is a written statement filed by the defendant, Putin, in response to a lawsuit by the plaintiff, Prakash, regarding a money lending dispute. The defendant admits to being a money lender but denies the plaintiff's claims about the existence of a money lending license and any agreement to repay a loan. The defendant requests the court to dismiss the suit and asserts that the allegations made by the plaintiff are untrue.

Uploaded by

Harshad
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

IN THE COURT OF THE JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE

JUNIOR CIVIL COURT……………….

OS No. _____________of 2020

Between:

Prakash

S/o………..aged 45 years

R/o Hyderabad Plaintiffs

Versus

Putin

S/o………….aged 42 years Desfendant

Occ……Money lender

R/o Hyderabad

WRTTEEN STATEMENT OF PLAINTIFF FILED UNDER ORDER VIII RULE I OF


CPC

1. With reference to para 1 of the plaint the defendant admits that the plaintiff is a money
lender, and he has been carrying on the business of money lending; but the defendant
denies that the plaintiff has got any license of the business of money lending. Let the
Plaintiff be put to the strict proof that he has got money lending license. The rest of the
contents of Para 1 are are correct and admitted by the defendant.
2. With refrence to the Para 2of the plaint, the defendant denies that there is no admissibility
of the evidence as barred by relevant provisions of law regarding the schedule property
mentioned by the plaint.
3. With reference to the Para 3 of the plaint, it is submitted that I have no acquaintance with
the plaintiff and did not approach at any time for the hand loan. The defendant further
denies that he did not agree to execute the simple mortgage of his house in favor of
plaintiff os collateral security for the mentioned payment
4. The defendant denies the Para 4 of the plaint. The defendant says that the defendant is
neither liable to pay the plaintiff Rs. 30,000 and interest @10% for 5 years p.a thereon
nor any part thereof . The question that the defendant failed to returned the amount
30,000 and its interest to plaint on one pretext or the other does not arise at all
5. With reference to Para 5 of the plaint, the defendant denies the contents therof and says
that the plaintiff’s advocate letter dated on …….. has been replied by the defendant
through his advocate’s letter dated…..Annexed hereto and marked as Exhibit ‘a’ is the
copy of the defendant’s advocate’s letter.

6. The other allegations of the plaint which are not specifically admitted herein are denied .
The plaintiff is put to strict proof to same,

Hence, it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleaded to dismiss the suit along with
the costs.

Counsel for the Defendant Defendant


_______________________ ___________________

Verification
I, Punit, S/o aged about 42 years ,Occ: money lender declare the facts stated in para 1 to 6
are true and correct to the best of my knowledge ,I believe same to be true and correct.
Hence verified on thid day…….at ………

Defendant

You might also like