0% found this document useful (0 votes)
68 views3 pages

Dell's Build-to-Order Strategy in 1993

The document discusses several competitive forces shaping the computer industry in 1993: - Threat of new entrants increased competition through more manufacturers and product differentiation. - Increasing software applications and operating systems acted as substitutes in the software industry. - Many manufacturers gave buyers increased bargaining power with less willingness to pay for service. - High demand for raw materials gave suppliers increased bargaining power over manufacturers. - Tough competition between major companies like IBM, Apple, and Texas increased industry rivalry. The document then discusses Dell's transition to a new 18-month structured development process in 1993 to improve on inconsistencies and unpredictability from its previous informal approach. This aimed to better manage increasing industry

Uploaded by

Mike Pence
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
68 views3 pages

Dell's Build-to-Order Strategy in 1993

The document discusses several competitive forces shaping the computer industry in 1993: - Threat of new entrants increased competition through more manufacturers and product differentiation. - Increasing software applications and operating systems acted as substitutes in the software industry. - Many manufacturers gave buyers increased bargaining power with less willingness to pay for service. - High demand for raw materials gave suppliers increased bargaining power over manufacturers. - Tough competition between major companies like IBM, Apple, and Texas increased industry rivalry. The document then discusses Dell's transition to a new 18-month structured development process in 1993 to improve on inconsistencies and unpredictability from its previous informal approach. This aimed to better manage increasing industry

Uploaded by

Mike Pence
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

1. What competitive forces are shaping the computer industry in 1993?

 
Competitive forces shaping computer industry in 1993:

Threat of New Entrants:


The entry of new manufacturers boosted the public demand for computers. This led to increasing
product differentiation and competitive pricing posed a threat from new entrants.

Threat of Substitutes:
Increasing number of software applications and operating systems were acting as substitutes in
the software industry.

Bargaining power of buyers:


As many number of manufacturers were coming up in the industry the buyers had increasing
bargaining power. The customers were less willing to pay for service and handholding.

Bargaining power of suppliers:


There was an increase in number of manufacturers; the suppliers had the bargaining power
because of increase in demand of the raw materials.

Rivalry within Industry:


Tough competition between IBM, Apple, and Texas increased rivalry within industry.

Increasing clockspeed: Shorter PC product cycles have enhanced the importance of


depreciation and time-to-market considerations in determining location decisions. In the words
of a Taiwanese PC executive, “Even if you manufacture a machine at very low cost in Asia and
save 5% on the manufacturing cost, by the time it gets shipped to the U.S., the price erosion is
10%.”

Mass customization: The build-to-order strategies of PC makers such as Dell and Gateway have
segmented the PC market into individual customers, creating a demand for more customized PC
configurations. This puts greater pressure on the entire supply chain to respond quickly to shifts
in demand for particular components, peripherals and software, rather than just general product
lines.

Outsourcing: Some PC companies have long outsourced much of the production process,
relying on contract manufacturers (CMs) to produce subassemblies and complete products. Other
companies such as Compaq, IBM, Apple and Toshiba relied more on in-house production,
including motherboard assembly (motherboard production is often considered the dividing line
between manufacturing and simple assembly in PCs). In recent years, however, these PC makers
have sold off board assembly plants to CMs, turned notebook PC production over to Taiwanese
suppliers and even turned to outside suppliers for design, engineering and logistics services. PC
makers still do much of their own final assembly for desktop and laptop PCs, especially for more
complex build-to-order models, but even final assembly is being outsourced in some cases.
Electronic commerce: Selling directly on the Internet has accelerated the industry’s clockspeed
by shortening the distance between the PC vendor and end customer. It also has further increased
the demand for customization as customers can easily configure products and compare prices
online. On the other hand, e-commerce and the Internet have made it easier for PC makers to
respond to the pressures of clockspeed and customization. Online configurators replace
telephone sales representatives, online support replaces call centers, and e-commerce
technologies are used to link PC makers with suppliers and service partners in real time. Supply
chain integration through electronic commerce is being used to respond to the industry’s product
cycle and customization trends.

2. What has been the state of Dell prior to and in 1993? Its customer base? Its product
quality and product development process? Contrast that with the new development
process.
 

State of Dell prior to and in 1993:


 
Financial Situation:
In 1991 dell’s annual sale were $890 M. And it increased to $2 B in 1992. In 1993 dell’s
sales were $2.8 B. However, the net income (after taxes) in 1991 was $51 M, in 1992 it was
$102 M and in 1993 it decreased to $10 M. Its stocks from $12 plunged to $7 a share in 1993
after the announcement of profits.
 
Customer Base:
Following is the market info. Of Dell prior to and in 1993:

 
Product Quality:
Dell assured product quality by extensively pre-testing all the configuration options it offered.
Customized products depending upon customer’s configuration were provided to them in early
1990s. However, in 1993 designed products were frequently “thrown over the wall” to
manufacturing, and in some cases quality issues were addressed too late in the Development
process.
 
Product Development process:
Product development at Dell in the early nineties i.e. before 1993 had remained an informal
process, run by autonomous teams that often centered around experienced developers.
While such an approach delivered several successful products, the results were neither consistent
nor predictable.
Dell management started in early 1993 to organize product development around “core teams” of
development professionals from several different functions. These teams, led by
nominated core team leaders, were to take charge of the product’s success from start to
finish. Thus, through daily contact between different core team members, and through phase
reviews, core teams hoped to avoid the pitfalls of the previous era.

3. Why has Dell’s senior management introduced the new 18-month development process?
What are they trying to change or improve?

Dell’s senior management realized the need for a more structured approach adapted to the
increasingly rapid product development cycles in the computer industry. Through daily contact
between different core team members, and through phase reviews, core teams hoped to avoid
pitfalls of the previous era. A part of the reason for the reorganization was to speed decision-
making in an industry with ever-shortening product development cycles.

4. Which battery option should Holliday’s team select? Stay with the proven NiHi battery
technology? Go with the new LiOn battery technology under development at Sony? Or
should they defer the decision until the qualification phase review? What are the
advantages and disadvantages of the three options?

Holliday’s team should select defer commitment until qualification phase review. By using this
method, the gross margin (if LiOn) works = $594 M, and if LiOn fails = $495 M. If the LiOn
fails, then Dell can drop them and move on to option 1 i.e. NiHi technology.

Common questions

Powered by AI

Electronic commerce in 1993 significantly impacted supply chain and distribution strategies by shortening the product cycle and customization processes . With direct Internet sales, the distance between vendors and customers diminished, allowing for real-time product configuration and price comparisons online . This enabled PC makers to integrate their supply chains more tightly with suppliers and service partners . Online platforms replaced traditional sales representatives and call centers, enhancing efficiency and responsiveness in a highly competitive and fast-evolving market .

In 1993, the computer industry was influenced by several competitive forces including the threat of new entrants, substitutes, bargaining power of buyers and suppliers, and industry rivalry. The entry of new manufacturers increased product differentiation and competitive pricing, intensifying competition. Buyers had increasing negotiating power due to the abundance of manufacturers, leading to a decreased willingness to pay for services . Suppliers also gained bargaining power as demand for raw materials rose with the increasing number of manufacturers . The rivalry within the industry was heightened by fierce competition among major players like IBM, Apple, and Texas Instruments . Strategies like mass customization and outsourcing were adopted to cater to diverse customer demands and reduce costs, respectively . Electronic commerce began to gain traction, allowing companies to accelerate their supply chains and customize products swiftly to compete effectively .

Prior to 1993, Dell's informal product development processes led to inconsistent and unpredictable product outcomes . With autonomous teams lacking structured oversight, some products succeeded, but many faced quality issues due to delayed addressing of problems and a lack of coordinated efforts . This lack of formalized processes resulted in inefficiencies and hampered Dell's ability to swiftly adapt to evolving market demands, emphasizing the need for systematic development approaches to ensure quality and timeliness in product launches .

Mass customization strategies fundamentally altered PC market dynamics by shifting focus towards individualized customer interactions and tailored product configurations . Companies like Dell used build-to-order models to meet specific consumer demands, enhancing customer relationships by providing personalized computing solutions . This approach segmented the market, creating niches for specific needs rather than broad product lines . The emphasis on customization increased pressure on the supply chain to rapidly adjust to unique component requirements, significantly impacting inventory and logistical strategies to maintain flexibility and market responsiveness .

Dell's senior management introduced the 18-month development process to adapt to the fast-paced product cycles in the industry, ensuring structured and predictable outcomes . By organizing development around core teams that facilitated cross-functional collaboration and phase reviews, management sought to streamline decision-making and avoid the delays and quality issues of prior informal development processes . This reorganization aimed to enhance product quality and time-to-market efficiency while maintaining competitiveness .

Outsourcing played a critical role in the early 1990s computer industry as it allowed companies to reduce costs and focus on their core competencies. Firms outsourced production tasks like subassemblies and complete product manufacturing to contract manufacturers . Dell benefited from outsourcing by turning notebook production over to Taiwanese suppliers, and outsourcing design, engineering, and logistics services, which helped lower production costs while maintaining product flexibility . This approach enabled Dell to enhance its value chain efficiency and focus on its strengths in product design and sales .

E-commerce technologies in the early 1990s revolutionized supply chain management by facilitating real-time integration between PC makers, suppliers, and service partners . By selling directly over the Internet, companies could quickly respond to customer preferences, reducing the distance between production and end-users . This shift enabled efficient inventory management and faster customization, as products could be configured online and ordered just-in-time, minimizing excess inventory . It also replaced traditional sales and support infrastructures with more agile online systems, facilitating better demand forecasting and inventory control .

Strategically, Dell weighed the proven NiHi battery technology against the emerging LiOn battery technology being developed at Sony. The NiHi battery was reliable, but LiOn offered potentially better performance. The recommendation to defer the decision until the qualification phase review allowed Dell to evaluate the viability and market readiness of LiOn further without prematurely committing resources. If LiOn proved successful, the gross margin could be $594 million; if it failed, the fallback to NiHi would yield a $495 million margin . This approach mitigated risk while allowing flexibility for optimal decision-making .

Dell experienced significant sales growth from $890 million in 1991 to $2.8 billion in 1993; however, its net income dropped to $10 million in 1993, with share prices falling from $12 to $7 . Operationally, Dell's product quality was maintained by pre-testing configurations, but product development processes were informal and inconsistent prior to 1993 . In 1993, Dell revamped its product development by organizing around core teams, aiming for more structured and consistent outputs, partly in response to the unpredictability and speed of the industry .

The increasing clockspeed in the PC industry, characterized by shorter product cycles, influenced companies to prioritize time-to-market considerations in manufacturing decisions . As product life spans decreased, the cost savings from manufacturing in low-cost regions like Asia could be offset by price erosion due to shipping delays . This necessitated the adoption of strategies like mass customization and quicker response times to demand shifts, pressuring supply chains to meet specific component needs promptly . Some companies opted for closer-to-market manufacturing to reduce lead times and stay competitive .

You might also like