Scribd
Upload
4 views1 page

Jurisdiction Over Indispensable Parties

Jurisdiction over indispensable parties is crucial for a court to issue valid judgments, as it requires proper service of summons or voluntary appearance. If a defendant is not summoned, the court lacks jurisdiction, rendering any judgment against them null and void. The Rules of Court mandate that all indispensable parties must be joined in an action for a final determination, and failure to do so results in dismissal of the case.

Uploaded by

kaye choi
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
4 views1 page

Jurisdiction Over Indispensable Parties

Jurisdiction over indispensable parties is crucial for a court to issue valid judgments, as it requires proper service of summons or voluntary appearance. If a defendant is not summoned, the court lacks jurisdiction, rendering any judgment against them null and void. The Rules of Court mandate that all indispensable parties must be joined in an action for a final determination, and failure to do so results in dismissal of the case.

Uploaded by

kaye choi
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

HELD: Yes.

Jurisdiction over the Persons of Indispensable Parties

True, the above dispositions refer to jurisdiction over the subject matter. Basic
considerations of due process, however, impel a similar holding in cases involving
jurisdiction over the persons of indispensable parties which a court must acquire before
it can validly pronounce judgments personal to said defendants. Courts acquire
jurisdiction over a party plaintiff upon the filing of the complaint. On the other hand,
jurisdiction over the person of a party defendant is assured upon the service of
summons in the manner required by law or otherwise by his voluntary appearance. As a
rule, if a defendant has not been summoned, the court acquires no jurisdiction over his
person, and a personal judgment rendered against such defendant is null and void. 29
A decision that is null and void for want of jurisdiction on the part of the trial court is
not a decision in the contemplation of law and, hence, it can never become final and
executory. 30

Rule 3, Section 7 of the Rules of Court, defines indispensable parties as parties-in-


interest without whom there can be no final determination of an action. As such, they
must be joined either as plaintiffs or as defendants. The general rule with reference to
the making of parties in a civil action requires, of course, the joinder of all necessary
parties where possible, and the joinder of all indispensable parties under any and all
conditions, their presence being a sine qua non for the exercise of judicial power. 31 It
is precisely "when an indispensable party is not before the court (that) the action
should be dismissed." 32 The absence of an indispensable party renders all subsequent

You might also like