0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views6 pages

Financial Performance Analysis 2008-2010

The document analyzes key financial metrics of a company over three years. It shows that sales and profit after tax increased each year except 2009 when expenses rose. Current and quick ratios decreased from 2009-2010 due to loans taken on. The debt-equity ratio was also higher in 2010 with increased debt. Returns on assets and equity declined slightly but remained positive, indicating generally good profitability relative to assets and shareholders' equity.

Uploaded by

Akshay Bhonagiri
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views6 pages

Financial Performance Analysis 2008-2010

The document analyzes key financial metrics of a company over three years. It shows that sales and profit after tax increased each year except 2009 when expenses rose. Current and quick ratios decreased from 2009-2010 due to loans taken on. The debt-equity ratio was also higher in 2010 with increased debt. Returns on assets and equity declined slightly but remained positive, indicating generally good profitability relative to assets and shareholders' equity.

Uploaded by

Akshay Bhonagiri
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

1. Sales

Interpretation:

From the above graph it can be interpreted that the company saw a continuous upward
trend in sales. The reason for it is that company is coming with new products.

2. Profit After Tax (PAT)

Interpretation:

We can interpret from the graph that PAT is increasing continuously except 2009. As in year
2009 operating expenses are increased & operating income remains same hence PAT is
decreased in year 2009 (decreased by 21%).
3. EPS

Interpretation:

➢ We can interpret from graph that EPS is varying due to the change in the Dividend
given by the company.

Financial Analysis Using Ratios:


1. Current Ratio:
➢ Current Ratio = Current Assets / Current Liabilities
➢ The current ratio is a measure of the firm’s Short term solvency. It indicates the
availability of current assets in Rs for every one rupee of current liability.
➢ Standard Current Ratio of the firm is 2:1

Mar-08 Mar-09 Mar-10

Current Assets 216.62 414.6 457.73

Current Liabilities 143.63 150.8 185.13

Current Ratio 1.51 2.75 2.47

Interpretation:

➢ It can be seen from the graph that Current ratio is decreasing from 2009 to 2010. This
is because of the loans taken by the company in the year 2010.

1. Quick Ratio

➢ Quick Ratio : (Current Assets – Inventories) / Current Liabilities


➢ The quick ratio or the acid-test ratio is a liquidity indicator that further refines the
current ratio by measuring the amount of the most liquid current assets there are to
cover current liabilities.
Mar-08 Mar-09 Mar-10

Current Assets 216.62 414.6 457.73

Inventories 78.62 85.97 96.48

Current Liabilities 143.63 150.8 185.13

Quick Ratio 0.96 2.18 1.95

Interpretation:

➢ The Quick Ratio is decreased from 2009 to 2010 which is a good sign because a
company having high quick ratio can suffer from shortage of funds if it has a slow
paying, doubtful and long-duration outstanding debtors.

1. Debt-Equity Ratio:

➢ Debt-Equity Ratio = Total Debt / Shareholders Equity Fund


➢ The debt-equity ratio is a leverage ratio that compares a company's total liabilities to
its total shareholders' equity.
➢ This is a measurement of how much suppliers, lenders, creditors and obligors have
committed to the company versus what the shareholders have committed.

Mar-08 Mar-09 Mar-10

Total Debt 143.63 165.1 250.52

Shareholders Equity 605.83 606.76 640.5

Debt-Equity Ratio 0.24 0.27 0.39

Interpretation:
➢ We can see from the graph that Debt-Equity ratio is increased in year 2010 because of
Higher Debt in year 2010.

1. Return on Assets:

➢ Return on Assets : Net Income / Total Assets


➢ This ratio indicates how profitable a company is relative to its total assets.
➢ The return on assets (ROA) ratio illustrates how well management is
employing the company's total assets to make a profit.
➢ The higher the return, the more efficient management is in utilizing its asset
base.

Mar-08 Mar-09 Mar-10

Net Income 552.09 572.93 635.99

Total Assets 671.44 772.33 891.03

Return On Assets 0.82 0.74 0.71

Interpretation:

5. Return On Equity:
➢ ROA = PAT / Shareholders Equity
➢ This ratio indicates how profitable a company is by comparing its net income to its
average shareholders' equity.
➢ The return on equity ratio (ROE) measures how much the shareholders earned for
their investment in the company. The higher the ratio percentage, the more efficient
management is in utilizing its equity base and the better return is to investors.

Mar-08 Mar-09 Mar-10

Profit After Tax 32.58 25.21 40.22

Shareholders Equity 605.83 606.76 640.51

Return On equity 5% 4% 6%

Interpretation:

Common questions

Powered by AI

The Return on Assets (ROA) exhibits a declining trend from 0.82 in 2008 to 0.71 in 2010. This downward trend suggests that management's efficiency in utilizing assets to generate profit has decreased over these years, indicating either higher costs or less effective asset utilization .

The Debt-Equity Ratio increased from 0.24 in 2008 to 0.39 in 2010, reflecting a higher reliance on debt financing. This trend may pose risks due to potential pressure from increased debt obligations, affecting net income from interest expenses. For investors, this could indicate greater financial risk, possibly leading them to demand higher returns for investment risk compensation .

In 2010, the current ratio decreased to 2.47 from 2.75 in 2009, indicating a decreased buffer of current assets over liabilities likely due to increased liabilities from loans. Conversely, the quick ratio also decreased from 2.18 to 1.95, which is interpreted as a positive sign implying reduced risk of cash flow problems due to better management of short-term liabilities and less reliance on quick assets .

In 2009, the company's Profit After Tax (PAT) experienced a decrease of 21%. This anomaly can be interpreted as a result of increased operating expenses, while operating income remained unchanged, which squeezed profit margins and led to reduced profitability for that year .

In 2010, the Return on Equity (ROE) rose to 6% from 4% in 2009, showing an improvement in shareholder investment returns. This indicates that the company's use of equity to generate profits was more effective in 2010 compared to previous years, suggesting better financial performance or profit allocation strategies .

The debt-equity ratio increased from 0.27 in 2009 to 0.39 in 2010 due to higher debt levels. This increase suggests a higher leverage, which may enhance growth opportunities when managed well but also elevates financial risk, potentially affecting the stability by increasing reliance on borrowed funds compared to shareholder's equity .

Variations in the Dividend can impact the company's Earnings Per Share (EPS) as changes in Dividend will influence retained earnings available as a memory against EPS calculation. If dividends increase, the retained earnings part of EPS will decrease, potentially leading to lower EPS, assuming profit remains unchanged .

The company's launch of new products led to a continuous upward trend in sales, as indicated by the sales graph. This trend reflects enhanced customer interest and increased revenue from these new offerings. The supporting data is the continuous rise in sales figures over the years, attributed specifically to product innovation .

Maintaining a standard current ratio of 2:1 suggests that the company holds twice as many current assets as its current liabilities. This is considered a benchmark of healthy liquidity and short-term solvency, indicating the firm's ability to cover its short-term obligations promptly, which is essential for financial stability and creditor confidence .

From 2008 to 2010, the increase in inventories led to a decrease in the Quick Ratio from 2.18 to 1.95. This suggests that while current assets still cover liabilities effectively, a higher proportion of these assets are tied up in inventories, which are less liquid than cash or receivables, affecting the immediate liquidity position negatively .

You might also like