REFERENCES
1) Bray, R. M., & Kerr, N. L. (1982). Methodological considerations in the study of the
psychology of the courtroom. In N. L. Kerr & R. M. Bray (Eds.), The psychology of the
courtroom (pp. 287-323). New York: Academic Press.
2) Bulkley, J. A., & Horowitz, M. J. (1994). Adults sexually abused as children: Legal
actions and issues. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 12, 65-88.
3) Golding, J. M., Sego, S. A., Sanchez, R. P, & Hasemann, D. (1995). The believability of
repressed memories. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 569-592.
4) Hayes, M. (1994). The necessity of memory experts for the defense in prosecutions for
child sexual abuse based upon repressed memories. American Criminal Law Review, 32, 69-
85.
5) Key, H. G., Warren, A. R., & Ross, D. F (1996). Perceptions of repressed memories: A
reappraisal. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 555-563.
6) State v. Gray, 917 S.W 2d 668 (Tenn. 1996).
7) United States v. Marion, 404 U.S. 307, 92 [Link]. 455, 30 [Link].2d 468 (1971).
8) Weiten, W, & Diamond, S. S. (1979). A critical review of the jury simulation paradigm:
The case of defendant characteristics. Law and Human Behaviour, 3-71-93.
9) Amina Memon, Aldert Vrij & Ray Bull (19980. Truthfulness, Accuracy and Credibility.
Psychology and Law. 7,147-164