0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views2 pages

Historical Argument Evaluation Criteria

The document provides criteria for evaluating the historical quality and clarity of presentation of a documentary project. It evaluates historical quality based on the strength of the historical argument, use of research, integration of primary sources, historical context, perspectives, accuracy, and analysis of significance and impact. Presentation is evaluated on the appropriateness and clarity of audio/visuals, narration quality, and audio volume. The evaluator provides feedback on strengths and areas for improvement.

Uploaded by

api-224825075
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views2 pages

Historical Argument Evaluation Criteria

The document provides criteria for evaluating the historical quality and clarity of presentation of a documentary project. It evaluates historical quality based on the strength of the historical argument, use of research, integration of primary sources, historical context, perspectives, accuracy, and analysis of significance and impact. Presentation is evaluated on the appropriateness and clarity of audio/visuals, narration quality, and audio volume. The evaluator provides feedback on strengths and areas for improvement.

Uploaded by

api-224825075
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

DOCUMENTARY

HISTORICAL QUALITY - 80%

SUPERIOR EXCELLENT GOOD FAIR NOT EVIDENT

…… Well-formulated …… Historical argument …… Basic historical …… Weak historical


historical argument supported by some argument supported by argument with little or
HISTORICAL supported by thorough analysis basic analysis no analysis
ARGUMENT analysis
…… Annual theme woven …… Annual theme …… Annual theme …… Annual theme
throughout the project addressed in the project mentioned in the project connection is unclear

…… Integrates body of …… Provides a body of …… Provides a body of …… Provides a body


WIDE credible research into a detailed and credible credible information of mostly credible
RESEARCH fully developed historical information information
argument

…… Primary sources …… Primary sources …… Primary sources …… Primary sources


PRIMARY develop the historical support the historical illustrate the historical are present, but do not
SOURCES argument argument argument connect to the historical
argument

…… Analyzes the …… Identifies the short- …… Explains the causes …… Identifies key people,
HISTORICAL short-term and long-term term and long-term of the historical event(s) events, and ideas leading
CONTEXT causes of the historical causes of the historical to the historical event(s)
event(s) event(s)

…… Integrates multiple …… Demonstrates how …… Includes more than …… Provides only one
MULTIPLE
perspectives throughout multiple perspectives one perspective perspective
PERSPECTIVES
the historical argument shape the topic

…… Historical information …… Historical information …… Historical information …… Historical information


HISTORICAL is accurate includes only minor includes several includes major
ACCURACY errors errors that impede errors that impede
understanding understanding

…… Draws an evidence- …… Draws a reasoned …… Draws a conclusion …… Attempts to draw


based conclusion about conclusion about the about the topic’s a conclusion about the
the topic’s significance in topic’s significance in significance in history topic’s significance in
SIGNIFICANCE history history history
IN HISTORY
…… Analyzes the short- …… Explains the short- …… Explains the short- …… Attempts to explain
term and long-term term and long-term term OR long-term the short-term OR long-
impact impact impact term impact

…… Student ideas, …… Student ideas are …… Student ideas reflect …… Student ideas are
analysis, argument, and distinct from research research difficult to discern from
STUDENT VOICE
conclusions are original research
and persuasive

STRENGTHS & AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT

OVER
CLARITY OF PRESENTATION - 20%

SUPERIOR EXCELLENT GOOD FAIR NOT EVIDENT

…… Presents audio that …… Presents audio that is …… Presents audio that is …… Presents audio that is
enhances topic and appropriate to topic and somewhat appropriate to not appropriate to topic
is clear and easy to easy to understand topic and can usually be or is hard to follow
AUDIO AND understand followed
VISUALS …… Provides visual …… Provides visual …… Provides visual …… Provides visual
sources that enhance sources that are sources that are sources that are not
topic appropriate to topic somewhat appropriate appropriate to topic
to topic

…… Provides articulate …… Provides narration …… Provides narration …… Provides narration


narration that does not that contains minor that contains several that contains major
contain grammatical or grammatical or grammatical or grammatical or
mechanical errors mechanical errors mechanical errors mechanical errors that
impede understanding
TECHNICAL …… Provides visuals that …… Provides visuals …… Provides visuals with …… Provides visuals with
are clearly focused that are mostly clearly some blurriness significant blurriness
focused
…… Volume of audio …… Volume of audio …… Volume of audio …… Volume of audio
components is even components is mostly components is uneven components is mostly
even at times uneven

Time is ≤ ten minutes.  Yes  No


Entry is student-produced.  Yes  No
Entry includes source credits at the end.  Yes  No
Process Paper is submitted.  Yes  No
Annotated Bibliography is submitted.  Yes  No
Process Paper word count is listed on the Title Page.  Yes  No
GENERAL COMMENTS

OVER

You might also like