Scribd
Upload
3 views4 pages

Meta-Analysis of COVID-19 Risks

The document contains 4 tables that provide rating scales and results from meta-analyses. Table 1 lists a 12-point rating scale for evaluating articles and literature on clinical studies. Table 2 presents a meta-analysis of male gender, age over 65, and smoking among critical and non-critical COVID-19 cases. Table 3 shows results from a meta-analysis of clinical manifestations. Table 4 displays expert and public assessments of risk.

Uploaded by

samiza1122
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
3 views4 pages

Meta-Analysis of COVID-19 Risks

The document contains 4 tables that provide rating scales and results from meta-analyses. Table 1 lists a 12-point rating scale for evaluating articles and literature on clinical studies. Table 2 presents a meta-analysis of male gender, age over 65, and smoking among critical and non-critical COVID-19 cases. Table 3 shows results from a meta-analysis of clinical manifestations. Table 4 displays expert and public assessments of risk.

Uploaded by

samiza1122
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

CHAPTER IV

DUMMY TABLE

Table 1.

Article/ Literature rating scale

***Rating scale: ①A clearly stated aim;②Inclusion of consecutive patients;

③Prospective collection of data;④ Endpoints appropriate to the aim of the

study;⑤Unbiased assessment of the study endpoint;⑥Follow-up period appropriate to

the aim of the study;⑦Loss to follow up less than 5%;⑧ Prospective calculation of the

30
study size.⑨Appropriate selection of control group;⑩Synchronization of control group;

⑪Baseline comparable between groups ⑫Appropriately statistical analysis. The global

ideal score being 24 for comparative studies.

Table 2.

Meta-analysis

31
*** Meta-analysis for male, age>65 years old and current smoking in COVID-19 cases.

Heterogeneity analysis was carried out using Q test, the among studies variation (I 2

index). Forest plots depict the comparison of the incidences of male, age>65 years old

and current smoking in critical/mortal and non-critical patients.

Table 3.

Results of meta-analysis of the clinical manifestation

Table 4.

Expert and public assessments of risk

32
33

You might also like