CHAPTER II
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
Covid-19 classification
According to [44], SARS-CoV-2 is a novel human-infecting
betacoronavirus. Based on a Phylogenetic analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 genome,
the virus is closely related (with 88% identity) to two bat-derived SARS-like
coronaviruses collected in 2018 in eastern China (bat-SL-CoVZC45 and bat-SL-
CoVZXC21) and genetically distinct from SARS-CoV (with about 79% similarity)
and MERS-CoV [44]. In a further study using the genome sequences of SARS-
CoV-2, RaTG13, and SARS-CoV, the researchers found out that the virus is
more related to BatCoV RaTG13. It is a bat coronavirus that was previously
detected in Rhinolophus affinis from Yunnan Province, with a 96.2% overall
genome sequence identity [45]. In the study of [45], they found out that no
evidence of recombination events detected in the genome of SARS-CoV-2 from
other viruses originating from bats such as BatCoV RaTG13, SARS-CoV and
SARSr-CoVs. Altogether [44][45], these findings suggest that bats might be the
original host of this virus.
Transmission
The possibility of propagation of the virus in the Huanan Seafood
Wholesale Market is unclear. Many COVID-19 cases were linked to this market,
suggesting that SARS-CoV-2 transmission is from animals to humans [46].
However, a genomic study has provided evidence that the virus came from
17
another unknown location where human-to-human transmission may have
occurred earlier [47]. Many infected family members and medical frontlines have
confirmed that the virus can be transmitted person-to-person[48]. Likewise, less
than 10% of patients had market exposure, while more than 70% had no
exposure to the market [46]. Person-to-person transmission can occur among
close contacts mainly via respiratory droplets produced when an infected person
coughs or sneezes. Fomites may be a substantial source of transmission, as
SARS-CoV could persist on surfaces up to 4 days [49] and other coronaviruses
for up to 9 days [50].
Whether or not there is an asymptomatic transmission of the number of
cases is increasing. The first reported asymptomatic transmission was last
January 30, 2020 [51], but later it was found out that the researchers had not
interviewed the patient, who did have symptoms before transmitting disease
[53].
The findings of disease characteristics are rapidly changing and subject to
selection bias. A study indicated that the mean incubation period was 5.2 days
(95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 4.1–7.0) [46]. The incubation period is as long
as 19 or 24 days [53], [54], although case definitions typically rely on a 14-day
window [55].
The necessary reproductive number (R0) has varying results and
interpretations. R0 measures the average number of infections that could result
from one infected individual in a fully susceptible population [56]. Studies from
18
previous outbreaks found R0 to be 2.7 for SARS [57] and 2.4 for the 2009
pandemic H1N1 influenza [58]. One study estimated that the primary
reproductive number (R0) was 2.2 (95% CI: 1.4–3.9) [46]. However, later in a
further analysis of 12 available studies found that R0 was 3.28 [59]. Because R0
represents an average value, it is also essential to consider the role of
international traveler carriers, who may be hugely responsible for outbreaks
within large clusters but who would not largely influence the value of R0 [60].
During the acute phase of the outbreak or pre-pandemic, R0 may be unstable
[56].
In pregnancy, a study of nine pregnant women who developed COVID-19
in their later days of pregnancy suggested COVID-19 did not lead to substantially
worse symptoms than in non-pregnant persons, and there is no evidence for
intrauterine infection caused by vertical transmission [61].
In a hospital setting, 41% of patients fall under hospital-associated
transmission [62]. Furthermore, another study on 425 patients found that the
proportion of cases in health care workers gradually increased by the time [46].
These cases likely reflect exposure to a higher concentration of virus from
sustained contact in close quarters.
Risk factors
According to [63, 62, 53, 64], SARS-CoV-2 infection incidence prominent
in male adult patients between 34 and 59 years old. People with chronic
comorbidities such as cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases and diabetes
19
were also at risk [65]. In the research of [62] and [63] found out that adults ≥60
years of age have the highest proportion of severe cases and those with certain
underlying conditions, such as cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases and
diabetes. Severe manifestations may also be associated with coinfections of
bacteria and fungi [65].
For children less than 15 years, [63], [62], [53], [64] reported that there
are few COVID-19 cases. In a study of [46], [33] on 425 COVID-19 patients in
Wuhan, which were published on January 29, they found that there were no
cases in children under 15 years of age. Nevertheless, 28 pediatric patients have
been reported by January 2020 [66]. The clinical features of infected pediatric
patients vary, but most have had mild symptoms with good prognosis and no
fever or pneumonia[66]. There was also a study in which the researcher found
that despite the child had radiological ground-glass lung opacities, the child was
asymptomatic [67]. Thus, children might be less likely to be infected or, if
infected, present milder manifestations than adults; therefore, it is possible that
their parents will not seek treatment, leading to underestimating COVID-19
incidence in this age group.
Control measure
Quarantine and isolation measures, as well as useful screening and the
diagnostic tool, was institutionalized to control the spread of COVID-19. Likewise,
the WHO released a guideline on case surveillance of COVID-19 to differentiate
other respiratory infections that may be more common in a local community[55].
20
For a person who meets specific criteria, WHO recommends the first screening
for more common causes of respiratory illness, given the season in the country
and location. If the result is negative, the sample is sent to a referral laboratory
for SARS-CoV-2 detection.
Case definitions can vary by country and evolving as the epidemiological
circumstances change in a given location. In China, a confirmed case from
January 15, 2020, required an epidemiological linkage to Wuhan within 2 weeks
and clinical symptoms such as fever, pneumonia, and low white blood cell count.
After three days, the epidemiological criterion includes contact with anyone who
had a travel history in Wuhan in the past 2 weeks [68]. Later, the case definitions
removed the epidemiological linkage.
The WHO has put forward case definitions [55]. Suspected cases of
COVID-19 are persons with (a) severe acute respiratory infections (history of
fever and cough) and with no other etiology that thoroughly describe the clinical
manifestations, and a history of travel to or residence of China during the 14 days
before symptom onset; or (b) a patient with an acute respiratory illness and at
least one of the following during the 14 days before symptom onset: contact with
a confirmed or probable case of SARS-CoV-2 infection or visited a hospital with
confirmed or probable SARS-CoV-2 acute respiratory disease patients were
being treated. For those for whom testing for SARS-CoV-2 is inconclusive or test
positive, probable cases are tested using a pan-coronavirus assay and without
laboratory evidence of other respiratory pathogens. A confirmed case is one with
21
laboratory confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 infection, irrespective of clinical signs
and symptoms.
For patients who meet diagnostic criteria for SARS-CoV-2 testing, the
CDC recommends a collection of the nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swab
and, if possible, the lower respiratory tract (sputum, tracheal aspirate, or Broncho
alveolar lavage) [69]. In other countries, the tests were performed by laboratories
designated by the government.
Treatments
Same with MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV, there is still no specific antiviral
treatment for COVID-19 [70]. Isolation and supportive care, including oxygen
therapy, fluid management, and antibiotics treatment for secondary bacterial
infections, are recommended [71]. Some COVID-19 patients progressed rapidly
to ARDS and septic shock, which was eventually followed by multiple organ
failure [53], [65]. Therefore, the effort on initial management of COVID-19 must
be addressed to the early recognition of the suspect and contain the disease
spread by immediate isolation and infection control measures [72].
Currently, no vaccination is available, but even if one was available,
uptake might be suboptimal. A study of intention to vaccinate during the H1N1
pandemic in the United States was around 50% at the start of the pandemic in
May 2009 but had decreased to 16% by January 2010 [73].
Neither is a treatment available. Therefore, the management of the
disease has been mostly supportive, referring to the disease severity, which has
22
been introduced by the WHO. The empiric antibiotic should be administered
based on clinical diagnosis and local epidemiology and susceptibility information
if there is an identified sepsis. Routine glucocorticoid administration should not
be used unless there is another indication [74]. Clinical evidence also does not
support corticosteroid treatment [75]. The use of intravenous immunoglobulin
might help for severely ill patients [65].
Evaluation of drugs is in line with past investigations into treatments for
SARS and MERS [76]. Overall, there is no robust evidence that these antivirals
can significantly improve clinical outcomes A. Antiviral drugs such as oseltamivir
combined with empirical antibiotic treatment was also used to treat COVID-19
patients [77]. The developed Remdesivir, which is for the Ebola virus, has been
used to treat imported COVID-19 cases in the US [77]. A brief treatment
combination of Lopinavir/Ritonavir, Arbidol, and Shufeng Jiedu Capsule
(SFJDC), a traditional Chinese medicine, showed a clinical benefit to three of
four COVID-19 patients [78]. There is an ongoing clinical trial evaluating the
safety and efficacy of lopinavir-ritonavir and interferon-α 2b in patients with
COVID-19 [71]. Ramsedivir, a broad spectrum antivirus, has demonstrated in
vitro and in vivo efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 and has also initiated its clinical
trial [79], [80]. Other potential drugs from existing antiviral agents have also been
proposed [81], [82].
23