i wane, am uy (aves) i Save OA (cose lb eer = ‘Comrnissioner of Railway Sefety Se ‘Cental Circle a = ‘2nd Floor, Churchgate Sin. a "ee hegd none m2" ‘Anmexe, M. K. Road, Mumbat - 40¢ se oa “Tele Fax : 022 + 22056058 ef. Br: 022 22058058 cf ed 30.08.2038 Noca/asya0ie/ 715 pated : 30.08.20 entra alway SD —stumbat eso, sub: pletion for proposals of ROB/RUEYFOS/RFOS and Raway Bridges Cec. Ret : 1. Commission's. letter Ho.8/8(9}/2018/705 dated 08.08.2018 2. Commision sete No.C/8(3/2038/769 dsted27/30.082038, Incontnuation to shove, the cect tobe endosed with proposals of RO8/RUB/FODYAFOs and falway Ses has been updated andi forwarded for your infrmatlon and necessary ‘tin, The chest duly filed needs to besubrtted alongwith the application for sanction of ‘minor wees late to ROB/RUB/FOR/RFO and Ralway Bridges SSA manne +The appleation forthe works of ROB/RUB/RFO/Eriges exqauted by Railay should be ited to Commision by C3. in eas the wort i being executed by Construction Organisation, the sppliation may be | smite elon. 1+ Incaze te work i being exeeted by SU or ther Department, the application should be ‘submited by OB. + inca of 08 being eneevted by Oso, the application may be submited by ORM. Away the shove practi sein followed by NER and NCR. Necessary instructions may be vn to Oivson/Construction| teponeraen Q (8 Revised Cec. : WE Seon sam ‘2p 10:CAO/ternomaton nd necesar at, oe ora TRE lain Scaimned by CamScanner© Revised checks tobe submitted wth all proposals cf ROB way Bridges! FOBS (et canmisazns eterna CBBI}POIETTE clad 30.08.20) Tem | Relevant for ‘Check List = General ‘nse 7 | General ‘Whather the GAD and cher relevant bear Ge PCE office plan numbers? © | Caner ‘Whether the GAD has name and designation ofthe officiate with date, wha has signed 7 3] Ganeat Whether the appicalin is fr commenceme’t ‘ofthe work of for launching or for both? Hits for ‘aunching only, reference of sanction for commencement may ba given. | Geneat Whether technisl note. of CBE Ras best attached for the proposed scheme? Whether GAD has been prepared 65 per check fst issued by ROSO vide letter no, CBSIDERIMPIPofcy dated | 02.11.2017? Pra wise compliance of the check list to be = [ean Whether the GAD has been prepared wilh key plan showing existing alignment with al General Whether folowing has been writen ‘night botom comer? (i) Name ofthe work (obo mentioned correct Le. Nama of Ralvay, Division, Project, Werk wih lacation name of consultant ete) Scale (io be mentioned consol, size of ‘rang o be not less (han 1. on ltacing paper (tobe converte to racing cloth afer execution) GH Reference (Reference of PRT lhes, em no. with name of sanctioned work fo ementioned clery) a [eo TOTES: Water notes (76 bo wiley {the right side of plan) pat ve (@ Dimensions- To be writen Geary (Peteaby in mm and evel in meter Size should be reasonal 47d easily readable, ae (@ Color: Whether the colar of esting work ‘and proposed work nas been indicated? ‘Direction. Whether North direction has LL____|__been shown in the plan?” Scanned by CamScanner(i) Whether Plan, section and elevaion be W Whether direction to Field Engineers has. been Incorporated (Directions 0 Field Engineore before exocution sh bbe mentioned clearly Le. verifcalion of various levels including rail level, formation level, HFL, max obs0rved| ‘scour level on upsiream, foundation level, bore fog deta, ype of soi, bearing ‘cepacily etc. Clear directions in case ‘here is apprehension of damsge 10 nearby structures et.) per scale? Seale tobe mentioned. | _____) Wy Co-ordination - Clear direction 10 executive department to consut / intimate to oher concemed departments Ti Traffic diversion. In case of ‘atic diversion during execution, the same to ‘be mentioned with details tke chainege cof takeot points on both the ends es. Wii) Speed resticton- Clear mention of ‘speed restrictions to be followed before! uring’ alter he execution THY Reference Drawings- Tho drawings to be refered for detaing to be mentoned leary. ) Miscellaneous details: Misceiianeous otails tke skin. reinforcement no plastering! cement wash, dry stone pitching, ween holes, backft . Inspection platform, pedestal, toley refuges, OE. ‘mast, safety measures , service cables, launching scheme, protective coatiig to felnforcement & concrete, station names with their MSL, ralway boundary, medus- ‘operandi eto,"to be mentioned inthe notes ise, (Ge) Whether codes and specificaione have been mentioned? - Reference ot Railway codes, bridge rules, IS codes, IRC codes wis their preferential order ‘and specifications to be followed and ‘should be clearly mentioned ‘Scanned by CamScannerfie ee i 9 GAD Technical delails- Whether GAD coniains a! technica! dais? (Al technical data used for referee io proparaon of GAD fo be writen Ine tabular frm Bo lattude Inge, tack on singer dovble a, bige on UP line oF Dw tne, grace, rl lvl, formation level on approaches, FL, LIL, bed lve fee board, Vertical clesrance, ines waterway, stancard of oadng, Ope of supersincue, ype of bearing, typeof sub suture, typo ot foundation, design ischrge, catchment are, sine ono, wind ono, sub-zone waterway eatulaon » exposure canltan, Giver corer to rfocement , provision ards, rack on sraight or on curve, 277 ‘Rar? RaW wan 60 km on upsteem, cross siope, nae of ar seem et. All reduced oO levels fo be mentioned wrt. MSL.) 70} aD ikeiner deals of existing bridge Tany | has been Incorporated? (Deis of existing {ai badge! road igge 10 be writen it 8 {abular frm outing bide na location, Span, pe of sub. sinclurefoundaton, stance tom esising brage, rai lel maton vel 8 foundation fre, waterway tnd onieal tees. any major incident tapoenod fo these bidpes in past oe) — iT [GAD Ti) Whether detalis of trial pllbore Tog have beon incorporated? (ihe details of focation with chainage, reduced ove! at lp of tia pit/ bore fg, SBC value for ‘ach satum © be shown In a tabular form) (ii) Whether GPS location of the bore tog L “has been given? 1 [GAD Wether the arangemenis Tor proiecon of worksite a3 per provisions of IRPWM and Ratway, Bart Insvuctons cary indeed 75 [GAD Whether the drainage avangement has baen clearly indicated on the plan eneuting that there wil be no incidence of water fall on ot [|__| near running track below? ‘Scanned by CamScannerpe Aa RL anges me pet Reliway ‘Superatructure: For selecting the typ Brugehus - — |supersiucire, wheter Boars guseloes m {Slowed not whether Board's approval has been taken. = 15 [All Non-RDSO|in case, non-standard neous have ane ORR | ar propores used, wheter aeons Roprmuarroy” | forte save hat ben razed ard ae FosrRanway [the 'satstacton” of CB? wheter § Brages Tinerancs anual hasbeen ceveoped giving guidelines to fleld engineers for Non; Bos Spars S| ROBRUBIRFO | wren ae Cearnces Toque’ et IRGOD. paseaany pa 7e00 8 11 of Sater hs beat cet inated on pln TROBRFO — cass at ROBIE | O)"Wener ters is_any_ sanctioned worusuney af adtionl nel) onde! | the ROBIRFO? If so, the space below | the. ROBO“ adequate 19 | accommodate actitna! inet) wh proposed ascents. Winer te sppoachey of ROURFO have at ast ee epan on bah ie(s) 2 vat? took wheter du Censtaiis oy ate to. ober Teaser? Betas shoud bs bough out j Tay “Wether tho structure eat 90 degree To the tack alignment or tsk angle? Shon, the angie of skew" maybe | indated Tah of i adap a a ocalon oF ROSRUBn) a Wheter ples) oF abUEMentGy a 6a the Ratwey land iy or party? yes whether atemt has been made. tS oop ‘Raiway land. tee. for hire txpansionto the exten posse? a Wartetares |) Water &maienance agreement agreement MOU hasbeen drawn. and signe, ABemuareror | — cesrly specyng the responses, Fos tor oer] melhodlogy? : departments | (i) Whether a copy of MOU" has been a ashes? = ds 30" | Raway agee |W Wether most economical optan has way bridges | () con considered in selection of spans? Proper and. adequate justicaton Eojocion of span oberon = ‘Scanned by CamScanner i B i* : fence TH Whether overal Tengir & more than xr baat enue 8, sgoosone hero Whether overal’ngih ese than ‘sting bridgowator cause? Is, the sons there of Thy Whether design dachage hes Best Calcuslec! provided a8. per_ code Wholhor dlscharge due fo RAT/ RAW in upsraam has also teen taken into account? [ee | TW Water Tes board and vera] ‘earance have been provided as per sada proions? Tai Whaier proposed wale way has Beet provided Esper coda provisions? ‘TAT Wiener maximum scour depth Balow HAL at por and sbulment has been considered as per coda provisions? ‘VA Wiener sizeof ple ebument cap Fas boon provided se per sede including insgacon arangements? TH Vihether sale bearing capacly has been calculated by appropriate mmemo? ; i Bn case of ple Teundaton, whather pl cap level and foundation evel nas bogn | akulated/ provided au por codes? Gin ease. of wel foundation, whether | provisions Including scour depth has been calouated 7 provides as per codes? Ti) Wineher distance Daweh existing and proposed bridge hes been edequately | provided? Ti Vikeher lean of propssed piers and abuments aye inthe ine of existing bvidge? ino the reasons there of Tri Wietner GAD has been prepared Wir hal plan at top and haf plan at boom wi longitudinal seeton, sectional elevation and key plan? Bay Whether the dimensions of plan; slevation, cross. section, longitutinal sealon are matching? Gai) Whether —backfil mairal being | ++ | abutments, wing wats, RCC bores ete L+-—___1_~_havebeen shown? "| mi Scanned by CamScannerve bee rasa ar ten with oross- section, in case of box oa rea a PTS Tai) Wihether trolley refugestman refuges aia wea a, es te aera a nS ca area ERIE cay tv ‘aetna dst Sarees Geil) Whether weep “flesh |} ‘Whether fiver Waining works required? W $0, | 20 | Ralway Badges whether these have been provided as per bridge manual? Fi Ratway Bridges In case of jackeing of abuiment 7 pier whether the decreased wateway Is more than the required waterway? This should be carted by a sutable note inthe drawing, | ROBRUGFOBT |Winether the stipulations regarding speed RFOIReiway | restclion, trafic and power block ete. have Bridges been firmed up and indicated in GAD? 23 | ROBIRUBS ‘Whether ine stipulation regarcing closure of LC or otherwise has been clearly made in GAD for ROBS/RUBS? Ti] BiiigesRFOs | In case of elecified sections, whether ONE arrangement on superstructure of bridges and RFO has been planned as per ROSO standard arrangement? If non-standard arrangement has been proposed, whether the same has been checked and certified? Whether 100% standby arrangement for OHE mast has been planned on plays? ‘Scanned by CamScannercy 2 | a U cd LN ROBIRFOT Ratway Brges For ROBFORaiway bridge, Wheher & ‘copy of approved alignment ‘plans up 10 ‘adjacent statons/curveyon both sides has ‘been Submited for better appreciation? Ralway Brages Tn ease of Ralay bridges for doubling gaUa conversion, (Whether safety of existing structure anc bark has been examined ard the proposed new eanstzueton/ extersion is (Whether hydologlcal investgatian has been cared ouf? (Note: Hydrdogia! invesigaton sou iwvaraby » De fared out tora projects of new fe nd oven for the badges in deubina, Gc proses) (ay Whether completion drawings of the tristng bridge nave been submited? (jy Winetner tere i any inconaatnoy in the pepoved work wet completion tring of exiting bridge? (Whether the. bridges have | been hacked and ceifed for design bading indate nthe craving? (0) Whether he abgnment of the project fae been fnaleed and. approved BY é pen ine anda copy of entre agnment SPine project has been submited 10 onmiston wth tis application or with ‘any of the application “sent eater {ference may be given)? (vip Winther soft copy of the alignment of the project hee Been submited to commission? (uit) Whether in case ofexaing Arch bridge, toad testing has been done ‘or tie proposed loading to cei fess for the proposed loading (Generally 251)? (uw) Whether he toad of the new tine is coming on the existing bridge? tf so whether the existing bridge has been certified for proposed new loading {generaly 257)? ROBRUBIRFOT allway Bridges Tr case temporary arangémant fe proponed, tihether the detaied design and craving, Nes Been submited by the executing agency 10 CBE and have been checked and cried BE? Scanned by CamScannera been Taunehing Whether” launching scheme fe scheme Sporoved by CBE? (As per conection SEP PO | 8B%cated 27-03-2018 to IREM the taunching Seneme. of a ROBRUBIReivay Bridges! FOBSIRFOs et are required to te approved by CBE. GSE whie approving launching ‘theme shal ensue al tems of ie check fst | ang certty {|____ | Cauneting Wihetier the Taunching scheme fas been scheme Checked and approved" (While approving the Scheme all sepecs. lke design, method Statements, se assessment, sifely, CAP. Stand-by arrangements, restoration incase of ‘emergency, arrangement of mock tials on roaches et shouldbe called by CBE from the executing agency and checked | (ote: Since the work generaly volves Iniistage operations, @ general method Statement needs to be developed by the fxecuing agency which canbe further developed to mare detsiled ard speciic method statement. These statenents will invarably requre diagrammatic 25 well 35 descrptve notes covering the erection Eequence fr esch span and highfghting the stress requied at all stages, certited by the independent checking authority tke prod! conguttat& IT. GBE should insist. for imethed statement on the above lines before ‘proving. the launching scheme. A. risk assessment analysis is required to be done by the executing agency ard all measures ‘eds tobe taken to ensire safe launching. Oo 30" | Caunahing scheme eb nae te : ct and verified by CBE anc “ ces oa ayaa cen FP nut a mame identified in the risk assessn 7 ames ment has Bee © scenester geod i ly procedures and instructions, & acerca Sperone. ‘ing adjacent to the. g comucice, Mamtssson0oo, Scanned by CamScanner{- (W)WathodTo ensure al necessary test and examination cereals. (%)* Operational. and" mairtenence ‘manual) and any other relevant documents (vi) Ghetng and contrmaton of ihe Storgiond sty Gunga att ncn (Prison, of poy taeda Conte pas (js) Meare. f0 obser for any unsafe tondton te) Gengoney plans and prosedes 2 © Berle in cae. of omegency Stuatogssessedin ik assssmnt (i) Mota repre beaten ter Decent ang iy ateratsterant wh source . (0? Make of eqamont wit at corates Raacensititd an are fonder troke and pve sence The ciel Raterat ee vslang” eoubret Cole wee, les, eames» sul. whch : 37 ROBRFORUGGT| alerts Tesgnh ol abaRaU ord Bale) [sipertuce have’ een checod and Grspetross | center? (CBE show! sal Design boas vn now DSO | es elton pra checked by If So Baaled boos coincavon he sou * fensure (het all relevant loadings have been Tekon into consideration and the instructions [given in eevanced Corecion Sip No.4 Brage Rules daled 2862017 have been complied, specialy pare [Link] to [Link] OBE should also chick and satisfy that the bearing capacity considerad in design of foundation has been correctly assessed as 3 spulated procedure, 32 | ROBIRFORUBH |Winether method for inspection and Relay. ‘maintenance including bearings has been laid |__| eridgestFoas_| down during launching and during service? 35" Fabrication work | (). Whether fabrication work i being Bone of Rainy steal at ROSO approved workshop or oiders bridges Ratwray workshop? i @) Whether the work is being carried out i under ROSO supervision and as per if RDSO standard procedure? ‘Scanned by CamScannerGE Sis Tose] — Wer abiton wei eB oe \ bridges ‘at -RDSO approved workshop | or| Raiway workshop or the workshop approved by CBE/CE(Con)? (@) Wether the fabrication work is being carried out with submerged Arc welding or superior welding has been ensured? Welding technique may be mentioned. {c) Whether fabrication drawings have been prepared and approved by competent authori? (e) Whether spices and joins are as per the appraved fabrication drawings? (6) Whether HSFG bolts with DTI washers ‘2s per approved designs have been used? (9 Whether stee! has been procured from approved source? (g) Whether WPS and WPOR. has been approved by competent authority? 35 | Uauneing Whether the svengih and slabiity of girders Scheme have been checked for stresses during and ater erection al every stage? 36 | Launching Whether provision for 100% reserve Scheme ‘machinery tocls and plants has been made to Cater fr failure during the launching? | 37 [Laonching Whether requited medical team has been Scheme ‘ensured at sie to caler any emergency for working personnel? Whether af Safety, Health and Environment protection plen has been submitted and fequired measures have been ensured? 35 Launching Tiether the launching scheme hes detaled « ‘Scheme descriptive note about sequence of operation, requirement of speed restiction, traffic and power blocks etc? Whether the scheme requires road/rall traffic diversion plan during construction of ROSMFO? If 20, whether the eame has béen prepared and examined and bears the approval of competent authority? : ‘Scanned by CamScanner° 4 un 38 | Launching Wi shor Thefe Way Ipeonsiency In the Scheme GAD Maurcnng’ storia, mods operas @1¢? | (CBE to examine that In case of any change of scheme al later stage, suitable ‘amendment has been Issued to GAD or any other relevant approved drawing) — Whelier Ino crane working aTangement indiates the fcatlon of placement of Grane, members to bo tackled, Eoom length ‘and working radlus? 40" | Caunahing Scheme Whether the load chart of crane proposed be used, the welght of members 10 be ties fee, and specie complance of Railway 803! insiuctions regarding crane werking neat track has been ensured? a Poaaneniag Trrcaub ne launching work proposed fo Be Scheme done i stages, whether the arrangement for SSeuring of girders during al itermodlate ‘Stuges hos ‘boen clearly indicted? The Scare tor tinal work viz. foing bearing. fomoval of temporary works as required et . shall also pe indicated, 2 | Taunetng ‘Whether manufacturer's guarantee certiicste Scheme of indwidual component tke bearings has boen ensured wherever relevant? I 35 Launeting Whether the QAP fo: fabrication aid erection Scheme Of girders and after erection of girders for Check on camber ete, has been submitted ‘and vested? 7a aang indicate tear of he ‘allway officials with scheme ‘name and designation responsible ‘or quality ‘control and inspection of citical components viz. welding, bearing etc. 5] cauneting Whether launching scheme Is as per the ‘Scheme ROSO standard launching scheme wherever applicable? 3 Leating | Wher RESO ues ag ber Tolowed Scheme for fabrication of gitders? For non-RDSO ‘spans, whether accepted guidelires have been followed for fabrication work (reference + aR maybe en)? aunching ‘or steel gfders, _whath i scheme i 3 ier fabrication drawings have been approved by competent ‘authortly forall connections splices ele’? ‘Scanned by CamScannercom Teaming shome Rravay BisgeerOBs 5] Taaneting rcheme Tcaonehing scheme [ROBRUBRFOT Far Botad connadions, whather FG wate wih DTI wasnara of reputed maka have hear fused? Whathat ROSO gunaines for MSO. bots hava bern fotowed? Tor repincemant of any component Iboansg ac, during aarvica cequres special fqupment tho spec! jects, then whether [avainoty of the ear with tke mainienace ‘agency hns beon ensured? _ Weiner any previous 6% Undertaking a simiar work af oer places invaliable o known? (CBE shou'd ask a bot ftom the evecuive ceparirent wath details 33 | whol problems wore encountered and Nov thay vn be tacled in the eresent work The ‘some shoud be submitted win COES comments ‘Wether the apace racurement for tau and Tabicaion keeping the train postion ha | been sssessed propery? a | caanering scheme Whetver Teennal Note of counterpart of ‘recuing department has been submitted lang axamined at CBE's love!? s Tawching fotome ‘inather elabity of slopes for exeavalion bas been examined for all excavations including | under arebeving gos? a ‘Scanned by CamScanner