Insomnia Treatment: Self-Help vs. Relaxation
Insomnia Treatment: Self-Help vs. Relaxation
net/publication/286004425
CITATIONS READS
10 1,375
4 authors, including:
10 PUBLICATIONS 48 CITATIONS
Iuliu Haţieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy
41 PUBLICATIONS 375 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE
2 PUBLICATIONS 10 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Viorel Lupu on 27 April 2016.
Abstract
Insomnia is one of the most prevalent psychological disorders worldwide.
Some of the deficiencies of the current treatments of insomnia are: side
effects in the case of sleeping pills and high costs in the case of
psychotherapeutic treatment. Some suggest that self-help treatments could
be a viable alternative, with certain advantages such as low cost, and wide
accessibility to a large number of people. In our study we used a modified
Latin square experimental design for single subject research to verify the
effect of multi-component treatment efficiency in primary insomnia.
Another goal of our study was to compare the effects of the three treatment
techniques (progressive muscle relaxation, sleep hygiene, binaural beats)
included in the multi-component intervention package. Our results reflect
the efficiency of the multi-component treatment. Significant differences
were found only between muscle relaxation and binaural beat. Based on
effects size measures we can say that muscle relaxation and sleep hygiene
have a very similar effect. The effect of binaural beat treatment is lower
than that of the other two types of intervention.
affects well-being and the quality of life (Espie, 1991) and is often associated
with affective disorders, such as irritability and dysphoria (Morin, 2003). The
impredictibility and incontrolability of the sleeping pattern can lead to feelings of
helplessness and to the onset of depressive and anxiety disorders (Morin, 2003;
Neckelmann, 2007). Longitudinal studies conducted by Ford & Kamerow (1989)
showed that persistent untreated insomnia can be a risk factor in the development
of the major depressive disorder.
The global expenses for the treatment of insomnia and its consequences rise
to several billion dollars. For example, in the United States, the cost of insomnia
treatments in 2004 rose to over 2.1 billion dollars, and it is estimated to reach 3.2
billion dollars in 2009 (Gershell, 2006). A cost harder to quantify is due to the
decrease of daytime performance of people affected by insomnia, due to the
reduction of the cognitive and motor performances (Mendelson, Garnett, Gillin &
Weingartner, 1984), as well as to the high rates of work absence (Johnson &
Spinveber, 1983).
Theoretical models in the literature generally attribute insomnia to certain
activating factors that interfere with the sleeping pattern. These factors can be
organized along two dimensions: a. physiological, emotional and cognitive
activation; b. the general level of activation of the person and the person’s
tendency to respond with activation to aversive life events. These models only
consider certain factors in isolation, such as psychological, emotional and
cognitive hyperactivity, level of arousal, excitability and habituation to stimuli,
and the role of the activating events.
According to the integrative model of insomnia recently proposed by Lundh
and Broman (2000), an essential component in the development and maintenance
of insomnia is the physiological and cognitive arousal before sleep. The
physiological processes of sleep interference are those that influence a person’s
sleeping pattern, independently of the way the person interprets the sleeping
pattern and of daytime events (traumatic or stressful events, emotional conflicts,
depression, worries). Psychological insomnia processes influence the way the
person interprets sleep fluctuations, difficulties and daytime events (personal
standards, beliefs and attitudes). The validity of the model was checked by a
series of studies that investigated: the relationship between rumination, mood and
sleep quality (Thomsen, 2003), the efficacy of meta-cognitive observations
during insomnia (Lundh, 2002), the impact of acceptance and mindfulness
therapies in the treatment of insomnia (Lundh, 2005).
At present, the most frequently recommended treatment for occasional
insomnias is medication, but not for chronic insomnia (Jacobs, 2004). This is due
to the side-effects of medication and to the decrease in its efficacy after long
periods of treatment. One of the effects of sleeping pills is the modification of
sleep structure (Morin, 2003). Benzodiazepines improve sleep continuity and, at
the same time, they increase the length of the first two stages of sleep, and
decrease the length of the third and fourth stages (Morin, 2003). This sleeping
pattern is also observed in the elderly and is perceived as superficial and non-
resting (Morin, 2003). Frequently, high medication levels produces a toxic state
associated with psycho-motor and cognitive delay (Grad, 1995; Roehrs, Merlotti,
Zorick, & Roth, 1994). Side-effects are also noticed in the case of more recent
drugs (Aragona, 2000), and, consequently, their use is not recommended for a
period longer than four weeks (Holm & Goa, 2000).
Beginning with the 1980s, research on sleep disorders, insomnia in particular,
was oriented towards the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral interventions.
Cognitive behavior therapy includes various combinations of cognitive and
behavioral interventions. The cognitive component is aimed at changing the
patients’ beliefs and attitudes regarding insomnia. The behavioral component
usually includes relaxation training (Morgenthaler et al., 2006). Relaxation
training involves methods which focus on reducing physiological arousal (e.g.,
progressive muscle relaxation, autogenic training) or intrusive thoughts that occur
around bedtime and that interfere with sleep (Lick & Heffler, 1977).
The superiority of cognitive-behavioral interventions as opposed to
medication was proven in several studies (Morin & Schwartz, 1994). A recent
study comparing cognitive-behavioral therapy with Zopiclone (Sivertsen, Omvik,
Pallesen et al., 2006), highlights the superiority of the psychological interventions
over medication. Thus, cognitive-behavioral therapy improved three of the four
investigated parameters, while medication (i.e., Zopiclone) did not lead to
significant changes compared to the placebo group.
Meta-analyses show that these interventions generally produce significant and
long lasting sleep improvements in insomniacs (Morin, Culbert, & Schwartz,
1994; Murtagh & Greenwood, 1995). The Data confirm a significant modification
in the following parameters: sleep latency, and time awake after sleep onset, as a
consequence of this type of intervention.
In their review, Morgenthaler et al. (2006) summarize several studies that
have shown the effectiveness of relaxation methods, even when not combined
with cognitive interventions (Edinger et al., 2001; Lichstein et al., 2001; Means et
al., 2000). These results are also confirmed by a study conducted by Lichstein &
Johnson (1993) that reports a reduction in the dose of medication required by the
relaxation group. Relaxation also proved efficient in improving the sleeping
pattern usually found in the elderly (Riedel & Lichstein, 2001; Rybarczyk et al.,
2002).
Validation studies of cognitive-behavioral interventions are scored with a
high coefficient on the Sackett scale (Sackett, 1993), making this form of
intervention the standard recommendation (Morgenthaler et al., 2006). But even
though the psychological treatment is quite efficient, it is limited in terms of
accessibility. Thus, surveys show that 85% of the individuals affected by
insomnia remain untreated, due to the lack of information or due to financial
reasons (Sivertsen, Omvik, Pallesen et al., 2006). In order to facilitate the access
Methods
Participants
Participants were recruited from the records of a general practitioner’s
office and by advertisements posted on the psychology students’ groups of the
Department of Psychology at the Babes-Bolyai University in Cluj-Napoca. The
selection was comprised of two consecutive phases. In the first phase the
participants who presented evidence: a) of another sleep disorder, other than
insomnia; b) that the sleep disorder was determined by physiological problems,
which interfered with sleep; c) of frequent use of sleeping medication; d) of
working on shifts, were excluded from the study.
In the second phase participants that remained in the study were evaluated
for their match related to the inclusion criteria: a) aged between 18 and 60; b)
sleep onset insomnia or sleep maintaining insomnia (sleep onset latency or time
spent awake after sleep onset greater than 30 minutes per night for a minimum of
3 nights per week); c) insomnia lasting for at least 1 month; d) discontent
regarding the effects of insomnia during the day (e.g., fatigue, mood disorders,
functional impairments). These criteria are a combination of the diagnostic
criteria described by The International Classification of Sleep Disorders (ICSD)
(American Sleep Disorders Association, 1990) and by the Diagnostic and
Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM IV) for primary insomnia.
After applying the exclusion criteria, three women, aged 22 (Participant
1), 24 (Participant 2) and 30 (Participant 3) were included in the study.
Experimental design
A modified latin square experimental design for single subject research
was used. As it can be seen Table 1, the design involves a baseline recording
stage (S1), 3 intervention stages (S2, S3 and S4) and a final stage of recording the
persistence of the effect over time. (S5). The three participants were randomly
assigned to each treatment sequence (see Table 1).
The design contains one random effect variable (Participant) and two
fixed effect variables (Stage and Treatment). The carryover effect was not taken
into account because the design is not a replicated Latin square. This effect will
be estimated indirectly from the Stage x Treatment interaction. The dependent
variable of the study was sleep onset time.
Procedure
The data collection procedure run over a period of 50 days, divided into
five 10-day stages. In the first 10 days of the experiment (baseline stage) and the
last 10 days (follow-up) each participant monitored their sleep pattern, recording
the relevant parameters in the sleep. In stages 2-4 (treatment phases) each subject
received the treatment procedure corresponding to that stage (see Table 1), and
recorded their sleep pattern in the sleep diary. In each phase, the therapeutic
intervention was supervised by a certified psychological counselor.
In the sleep hygiene condition subjects were instructed, during a one hour
session, how to apply, on a day-to-day basis, the principles of stimulus control,
fostering a healthy lifestyle, favorable to satisfactory sleep, as well as how to use
sleep restriction. At the end of the session they were given the sleep hygiene
brochure as a reminder for all the principles discussed.
In the progressive muscle relaxation condition, subjects were listening to
an audio tape containing a relaxation session. The length of a relaxation session
was based on the standards of an abbreviated progressive muscle relaxation
session (30 minutes) (Bernstein, 2007). Before the intervention stage there was a
learning session in which the participants learned how to apply the relaxation
technique, supervised by the same psychological counselor.
In the binaural beats condition the subjects were listening to an audio tape
containing binaural beat music. The length of the binaural beats music was
matched to the length of the muscle relaxation session. Subjects were instructed to
listen the tapes each day while lying in bed before sleep. Before the intervention
stage there was an informative session regarding the underlying mechanism of
binaural beats and the proper methodology of using the tape.
In order to get an accurate idea of how the intervention was going,
subjects were interviewed regarding their difficulties with the treatment procedure
of the corresponding stage every three days. The minor difficulties that appeared
during the implementation of the treatment were solved by short correction
periods, which did not exceed the standard limits of the interventions.
Results
Data processing involved three phases. In the first phase we checked the
resemblance of our data with the assumptions that would allow us to perform
linear statistical models (Morley & Adams, 1989). In the second phase we
verified if the therapeutic intervention as a whole had an effect, by statistically
comparing the baseline, treatment and follow-up phase. Finally, in the third phase
we used a GLM model for a latin square design to estimate the relative efficiency
of each treatment procedure (Kutner, Nachtscheim, Neter, & Li, 2005).
Following Morley and Adams (1989) we applied to each baseline data
set: the Turning Point Test (Bradley, 1968) to evaluate if the baseline data only
reflect random fluctuations of performance, with no regularity or specific
tendency; and the Record Test (Foster & Stewart, 1954), which verifies if there is
a tendency or a change in baseline variance. Results are shown in Table 2.
Tabel 2. The results of the Turning Point Test and the Record Test for each participant’s
baseline scores
column indicates that neither of the computed p value drops below the critical
value p=.05, meaning that baselines data reflect random fluctuations only
(Kratochwill & Levin, 1992). This conclusion is confirmed by the other statistics
in the table: the z value calculated for each d test and the probability associated
with each s tests. All values are statistically insignificant, meaning that there are
no signs of tendency or variance fluctuations in the baseline.
To confirm these patterns we computed an autocorrelation coefficient
using tag-1 in order to detect the presence of a tendency in the data (Franklin,
Allison, & Gorman (1997). Correlation values range between 0.01 – 0.21, all of
them being statistically insignificant. These results re-confirm that baseline data
were not affected by any source of systematic variation.
Consequently, we proceeded to the next phase concerning the effect of
treatment phase (2-4) as a whole. In order to get an answer to the first question of
the study, regarding the effects of the multi-component treatment, we used a 3x3
ANOVA, with two independent variables – the Subject variable, with three levels
(participant 1, participant 2, participant 3) and the Treatment variable, with three
levels (baseline, treatment and follow-up). Results are shown Table 3.
Table 3. Mean sleep onset (in minutes) in baseline and follow-up phase
The calculated value of the Mauchly test for the within subject variable
(Treatment) was W = 0.85; the approximated value is χ²=4.76 (df=2, p=0.13),
satisfying the assumption of sphericity. The statistical analysis indicates an effect
of the treatment, F(2,52) = 27.09 (p=0.001, η² = 0.51), and its magnitude reflects a
high effect size (Cohen, 1982). No significant effect of the subject variable was
observed, F<1, meaning that all subjects improved their sleep onset time in the
same amount. This conclusion is also confirmed by the insignificant value of the
interaction between treatment x subject, F(2,52) = 0.73 (p = 0.57, η² = 0.05).
The results of the Sidak post-hoc are presented in Table 4. All statistical
comparisons were significant. This means that the mean sleep onset time
progressively decreases from m=33.55 (sd=14.06) at Baseline, to m=22.04
(sd=9.09) during Treatment and to m=15.52 (sd=5.72) at Follow-up.
Table 4. Sidak post-hoc pair wise comparison for the main stages of the study
Participant/Stage S2 S3 S4
Participant 1 8.5 16.5 20
SH MR BB
Participant 2 3 16.5 17
BB SH MR
Participant 3 13.3 -9.7 15.3
MR BB SH
S2-S4 – intervention stages, SH – sleep hygiene, MR – muscle relaxation and BB -
binaural beats
Table 6. Sidak post-hoc pair wise comparison for the treatment types
Mean
Treatment Treatment Sig.
Difference
Sleep Hygiene Muscular Relaxation -2.16 .95
Binaural Beats 9.00 .15
Muscular Relaxation Sleep Hygiene 2.16 .95
Binaural Beats 11.16 .04
Binaural Beats Sleep Hygiene -9.00 .15
Muscular Relaxation -11.16 .04
Discussion
The main objective of this study was twofold: to compare the effect of
two types of self-help treatment (i.e., sleep hygiene, binaural beats) with the effect
of progressive muscle relaxation in the treatment of primary insomnia; we were
also interested in the relative efficacy of two self-help methods (i.e., sleep
hygiene, binaural beats).
The research design was a modified latin square experimental design for
single subject research. This design allows valid inferences regarding treatment,
and has a high practical value in clinical research (Kutner, Nachtsheim, Neter, &
Li, 2005).
The significant main effect of treatment and the significant differences
between baseline, treatment phase and follow-up indicate that treatment improves
sleep onset time for all the participants. These results support the already-proven
effect of multi-component interventions in primary insomnia (Morgenthaler et al.,
2006). The post-hoc differences between follow-up and treatment phase indicate
that, during the intervention, all subjects gained some abilities that improved their
sleep onset time over the treatment phase. This feature is common to all
therapeutic interventions and, moreover, it is a desirable outcome (Beck, 1995).
To prove that this global effect could not be explained by the high effect
size of only one intervention (e.g., progressive muscle relaxation combined with
insignificant effect of hygiene and binaural beats), we compared each treatment
type with the baseline scores. Our results show statistically significant effects for
each treatment type.
In which muscle relaxation and sleep hygiene are concerned, our results
are in line with the conclusions of other empirical studies (Engle-Friedman,
Bootzin, Hazlewood, & Tsao, 1992; Guilleminault, Clerk, Black, Labanowski,
Pelayo, & Claman, 1995). The main component of these two techniques is based
primarily on behavior modification. The target of progressive muscle relaxation is
to reduce arousal before falling asleep, which is an important component of the
integrative model of insomnia (Lundh & Broman, 1999).
The second procedure has a behavioural component which consists in
stimulus control, sleep restriction and adopting a healthy lifestyle favourable to a
good night sleep. Lifestyle change is focused on avoiding high arousal prior to
sleep (e.g., limiting physical exercise after 6 P.M., limiting caffeine and alcohol
intake in the afternoon, etc.). Based on stimulus control and sleep restriction, the
individual can develop a healthy sleep-related cognitive schema. For example,
through sleep restriction the patient will associate staying in bed only with sleep
and not with other activities such as eating, watching TV, etc. (Bower, Black, &
Turner, 1979; Miclea, 2003). The convergence of these two mechanism results in
an improvement of sleep quality which was demonstrated in the present and in
many other studies (Harvey, 2001; Stepanski, 2003).
The empirical data regarding the utility of binaural beats in treating
primary insomnia in particular, and other types of disorders is nearly missing,
notwithstanding the fact that the underling physiological mechanism of this
phenomenon is relatively well-known (Newman, 1993, 1997; Oster, 1973; Smith,
1975, 1978). According to the theoretical model of the binaural beats (Lane,
Kasian, Owens, & Marsh, 1998) the statistically significant difference between
baseline and binaural beats condition could be explained by neural-level
phenomena which take place in the presence of these particular beats (for a detail
description see Newman, 1997).
Regarding the statistical significant effect of binaural beats, there is a
possible confounded variable which might affect our conclusion. During the
binaural treatment, each subject listened to an audio tape playing music and
background binaural beats. It is possible that the significant reducing in sleep
onset time is explained by the effect of the relaxation music itself, not by the
presence of the binaural beats. This explanation would contradict the findings
reported by Padmanabhan et al. (2005) in a study comparing the effect of binaural
beats music, control, and placebo (i.e., same music without binaural beats) in
treating of preoperative anxiety. They found significant differences between the
experimental group and both control and placebo group.
Regarding the relative effect of the three treatment types, progressive
muscle relaxation, sleep hygiene and binaural beats, our results indicate that there
is a significant difference only between muscle relaxation and binaural beats. We
did not find any significant differences between muscle relaxation and sleep
hygiene, binaural beats and sleep hygiene. This lack of difference could be
explained by the moderate effect size reported in most studies using progressive
muscle relaxation and low to moderate effect size of self-help treatment. To verify
this, we computed the effect size of our post hoc comparisons and found an effect
size of d=0.23 for the difference between muscle relaxation and sleep hygiene and
an effect size of d=0.96 between sleep hygiene and binaural beats. According to
Cohen’s norms, the first calculated effect size is low, and we can say that the
effect of the two interventions is nearly similar.
In which the difference between hygiene and binaural beats is concerned, a
beta type error is more probable. Probably this effect size would have been
observed by an increase in statistical power (i.e., increasing the number of
evaluations in each stage) or, by using a replicated Latin square design instead of
simple one, which allows a more precise evaluation of the carryover effect
(Kutner, Nachtsheim, Neter, & Li, 2005).
Summarizing our findings, we can say that the cognitive behavioral
intervention and the self-help treatment have both proved to be efficient related to
baseline. The effect of the cognitive behavioral intervention is very similar to the
effect of hygiene and it is very probable that the effect of binaural beat is
somewhat reduced compared to the other two. Based on the above mentioned
empirical evidence, we believe that self-help treatment strategies could offer a
viable alternative in the treatment of primary insomnia for individuals who do not
have the possibility or chose not to enter cognitive behavioral treatment.
REFERENCES
Alperson, J., & Biglan, A. (1979). Self-administered treatment of sleep onset insomnia
and the importance of age. Behavior Therapy, 10, 347–356.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental
disorders: DSM-IV-TR. Washington, DC: APA
Atwater, F. H. (2001). Binaural beats and the regulation of arousal levels. Proceedings of
the IANS 11th Forum on New Arts and Science. Fort Collins, CO: International
Association on New Science.
Beck, J. (1995). Cognitive therapy: Basics and beyond. New York: Guilford Press.
Bernstein, D., Carlson, C., & Schmidt, J. (2007) Progressive Relaxation, Abbreviated
methods. In P. Lehrer (Ed.), Principles and practice of stress management (pp. 88-
125). New York: Guilford Press.
Bower, G. H., Black, J. B., & Turner, T. J. (1979). Scripts in memory for text. Cognitive
Psychology, 11, 177-220.
Bradley, J. V. (1968). Distribution free Statistical Tests. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice
Hall.
Cheung, Y., Molassiotis, A., & Chang, A. (2002). The effect of progressive muscle
relaxation training on anxiety and quality of life after stoma surgery in colorectal
cancer patients. Psycho-Oncology, 12(3), 254 – 266.
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
Edinger, J. D., Wohlgemuth, W. K., Radtke, R. A., Marsh, G. R., & Quillian, R. E.
(2001). Cognitive behavioral therapy for treatment of chronic primary insomnia: A
randomized, controlled trial. Journal of American Medical Association, 285, 1856-
1864.
Engle-Friedman, M., Bootzin, R. R., Hazlewood, L., & Tsao, C. (1992). An evaluation of
behavioral treatments for insomnia in the older adult. Journal of Clinical
Psychology, 48, 77-90.
Lundh, L., & Hindmarsh, H. (2002) Can meta-Cognitive observation be used in the
treatment of insomnia? A pilot study of a cognitive-emotional self-observation
task. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 30(2), 233-236.
Lundh, L. G. (2005). The Role of Acceptance and Mindfulness in the Treatment of
Insomnia. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 19(1), 29-39.
Means, M. K., Lichestein, L. K., Epperson, M. T., & Johnson, C. T. (2000). Relaxation
therapy for insomnia: nighttime and day time effects. Behaviour Research and
Therapy, 38, 665-678.
Mendelson, W. B., Garnett, D., Gillin, J. C., & Weingartner, H. (1984). The experience of
insomniaand daytime and nighttime functioning. Psychiatric Research, 12, 235-
250.
Miclea, M. (2003). Psihologie Cognitivă. Modele teoretico-experimentale. Editura
Polirom. Iaşi.
Morawetz, D. (1989). Behavioral self-help treatment for insomnia: A controlled
evaluation. Behavior Therapy, 20, 365-379.
Morgenthaler, T., Kramer, M., Alessi, C., Friedman, L., Boehlecke, B., Brown, T.,
Coleman, J., Kapur, V., Lee-Chiong, T., Owens, J., Pancer, J., & Swick, T. (2006).
Practice Parameters for the Psychological and Behavioral Treatment of Insomnia:
An Update. An American Academy of Sleep Medicine Report. Sleep, 29(11),
1415-1419.
Morin, C. M., & Schwartz, S. M. (1994). Nonpharmacological interventions for insomnia:
a meta-analysis of treatment efficacy. American Journal of Psychiatry, 151, 1172-
1180.
Morin, C. M., Hauri, P. J., Espie, C. A., Spielman, A. J., Buysse, D. J., Bootzin, R. R.
(1999). Nonpharmacologic Treatment of Chronic Insomnia. Sleep, 22(8), 1134-
1156.
Morin, C. M. (2003). Insomnia: A Clinical Guide to assessment and treatment. New
York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Morley, S., & Adams, M. (1989). Some simple statistical tests for exploring single-case
time- series data. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 1-28.
Neckelmann, D., Mykletun, A., & Dahl, A. (2007). Chronic Insomnia as a Risk Factor for
Developing Anxiety and Depression. Sleep, 30(7), 873-880.
Newman, J., & Baars, B. J. (1993). A neural attentional model for access to
consciousness: A Global Workspace perspective. Concepts in Neuroscience, 4(2),
255-290.
Newman, J. (1997). Putting the puzzle together. Part I: Toward a general theory of the
neural correlates of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 4(1), 47-66.
Oosterhuis, A., & Klip, E. (1993). Behavior therapy without therapists: Treating the
complaint of insomnia. International Journal of Health Sciences, 4, 27–32.
Oster, G. (1973). Auditory Beats in the Brain. Scientific American, 229, 94-102.
Pallesen, S., Nordhus, I. H., Kvale, G., Nielsen, G. H., Havik, O. E., Johnsen, B. H., &
Skotskift, S. (2003). Behavioral treatment of insomnia in older adults: an open
clinical trial comparing two interventions. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41,
31–48.
Riedel, B. W., Lichstein, K. L., & Dwyer, W. O. (1995). Sleep compression and sleep
education for older insomniacs: Self-help versus therapist guidance. Psychology
and Aging, 10, 54–63.
Roehrs, T., Merlotti, L., Zorick, F., & Roth, T. (1994). Sedative, memory, and
performance effects of hypnotics. Psychopharmacology, 116(2), 130-134.
Rybarczyk, B., Lopez, M., Benson, R., Alsten, C., & Stepanski, E. (2002). Efficacy of
two behavioral treatment programs for comorbid geriatric insomnia. Psychology
and Aging, 17, 288-298.
Sackett, D. (1993). Rules of evidence and clinical recommendation. Canadian Journal of
Cardiology, 9, 487-489.
Saxby, E., & Peniston, E. G. (1995). Alpha-theta brainwave neurofeedback training: An
effective training for male and female alcoholics with depressive symptoms.
Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51(5), 685-693.
Sherman, R., Gall, N., & Gormly, J. (1979). Treatment of phantom limb pain with
muscular relaxation training to disrupt the pain-anxiety-tension cycle. Pain, 6, 47-
55.
Sivertsen, B., Omvik, S., Pallesen, S., Bjorvatn, B., Havik, O., Kvale, G., Nielsen, G., &
Nordhus, I., (2006). Cognitive Behavioral Therapy vs. Zopiclone for Treatment of
Chronic Primary Insomnia in Older Adults – A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Journal of American Medical Association, 295(24), 2851-2858.
Smith, J. C., Marsh, J. T., & Brown, W. S. (1975). Far-field recorded frequency-following
responses: Evidence for the locus of brainstem sources. Electroencephalography
and Clinical Neurophysiology, 39, 465-472.
Smith, J. C., Marsh, J. T., Greenberg, S., & Brown, W. S. (1978). Human auditory
frecuency-following responses to a missing fundamental. Science, 201, 639-641.
Smith, M., Perlis, M., Park, A., Smith, M., Pennington, J., Giles, D., & Buysse, J. (2002).
Comparative Meta-Analysis of Pharmacotherapy and Behavior Therapy for
Persistent Insomnia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 5-11.
Stinson, K., Tang, N., & Harvey, A. (2006). Barriers to Treatment Seeking in Primary
Insomnia in the United Kingdom: A Cross-Sectional Perspective. Sleep, 29(12),
1643-1648.
Straten, A., & Cuijpers, P. (2009). Self-help therapy for insomnia: A meta-analysis. Sleep
Medicine Reviews, 13, 61-71.
Stepanski, E. J., & Wyatt, J. K. (2003). Use of sleep hygiene in the treatment of insomnia.
Sleep Medicine Reviews, 7, 215–225.
Ström, L., Pettersson, R., & Andersson, G. (2004). Internet-Based Treatment for
Insomnia: A Controlled Evaluation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical
Psychology, 72(1), 113-120.
Swann, R., Bosanko, S., Cohen, R., Midgley, R., & Seed, K. M. (1982). The Brain - A
User’s Manual. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.
Thomsen, K., Mehlsen, Y., Christensen, S., & Zachariae, R. (2003). Rumination—
relationship with negative mood and sleep quality. Personality and Individual
Differences, 34(7), 1293-1301.
Thorndike, F., Saylor, D., Bailey, E., Gonder-Frederick, L., Morin, C., & Ritterband, L.
(2008). Development and Perceived Utility and Impact of an Internet Intervention
for Insomnia. E-Journal of Applied Psychology, 4(2), 32-42.