Scribd
Upload
17 views9 pages

Attribute Gage R&R Study Report

The document is a scoring report from an attribute gage R&R study conducted on November 7, 2005 to evaluate the effectiveness of three operators in inspecting a product. The study found inconsistencies in how the operators judged samples, as they did not always agree within or between each other or with the known population. While some samples saw full agreement, many did not meet the criteria of having all operators and the known population in agreement.

Uploaded by

chteo1976
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
17 views9 pages

Attribute Gage R&R Study Report

The document is a scoring report from an attribute gage R&R study conducted on November 7, 2005 to evaluate the effectiveness of three operators in inspecting a product. The study found inconsistencies in how the operators judged samples, as they did not always agree within or between each other or with the known population. While some samples saw full agreement, many did not meet the criteria of having all operators and the known population in agreement.

Uploaded by

chteo1976
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Report

Attribute Gage R & R Effectiveness


SCORING REPORT
DATE: 11/7/2005
Attribute Legend NAME: Suriati/ Noraisha
1 Accept PRODUCT: Zoe Co-brand Bezel All operators
2 Reject BUSINESS: BTFS agree within and All Operators
between each agree with
Other standard
Known Population Trainer #1 (Rozana, A-shift) Trainer #2 (Julia, B shift) Trainer #3 (Julie, C shift) Y/N Y/N
Sample # Attribute Try #1 Try #2 Try #1 Try #2 Try #1 Try #2 Agree Agree
1 Accept Reject Reject Accept Accept Accept Accept N N
2 Accept Accept Accept Accept Accept Accept Accept Y Y
3 Reject Reject Reject Reject Reject Accept Accept N N
4 Accept Accept Accept Accept Accept Accept Accept Y Y
5 Reject Accept Reject Reject Reject Reject Reject N N
6 Accept Reject Reject Reject Reject Accept Reject N N
7 Accept Accept Accept Accept Accept Accept Accept Y Y
8 Accept Accept Accept Accept Accept Accept Accept Y Y
9 Accept Reject Accept Accept Reject Accept Reject N N
10 Reject Reject Reject Reject Reject Accept Accept N N
11 Reject Reject Accept Reject Reject Reject Accept N N
12 Accept Accept Accept Accept Accept Reject Accept N N
13 Accept Reject Accept Reject Reject Accept Accept N N
14 Accept Accept Accept Accept Accept Accept Reject N N
15 Reject Reject Reject Reject Reject Accept Reject N N
16 Accept Reject Accept Accept Accept Reject Accept N N
17 Accept Accept Accept Accept Accept Accept Accept Y Y
18 Accept Accept Accept Accept Accept Accept Accept Y Y
19 Accept Reject Accept Accept Accept Reject Accept N N
20 Reject Accept Accept Reject Reject Accept Accept N N
21 Accept Accept Accept Accept Accept Reject Reject N N
22 Accept Accept Accept Reject Accept Accept Accept N N
23 Accept Accept Reject Accept Reject Reject Reject N N
24 Accept Reject Reject Reject Reject Reject Reject Y N
25 Reject Accept Reject Accept Reject Reject Reject N N
26 Accept Reject Reject Accept Accept Reject Reject N N
27 Reject Reject Reject Reject Reject Reject Reject Y Y
28 Accept Reject Reject Reject Reject Reject Reject Y N
29 Accept Reject Reject Reject Reject Reject Reject Y N
30 Reject Reject Reject Reject Reject Reject Reject Y Y
31 - - - - - - -
32 - - - - - - -
33 - - - - - - -
34 - - - - - - -
35 - - - - - - -
36 - - - - - - -
37 - - - - - - -
38 - - - - - - -
39 - - - - - - -
40 - - - - - - -
41 - - - - - - -
42 - - - - - - -
43 - - - - - - -
44 - - - - - - -
45 - - - - - - -
46 - - - - - - -
47 - - - - - - -
48 - - - - - - -
49 - - - - - - -
50 - - - - - - -
51 - - - - - - -
52 - - - - - - -
53 - - - - - - -
54 - - - - - - -
55 - - - - - - -
56 - - - - - - -
57 - - - - - - -
58 - - - - - - -
59 - - - - - - -
60 - - - - - - -
61 - - - - - - -
62 - - - - - - -
63 - - - - - - -
64 - - - - - - -
65 - - - - - - -
66 - - - - - - -
67 - - - - - - -
68 - - - - - - -
69 - - - - - - -
70 - - - - - - -
71 - - - - - - -
72 - - - - - - -
73 - - - - - - -
74 - - - - - - -
75 - - - - - - -
76 - - - - - - -
77 - - - - - - -
78 - - - - - - -
79 - - - - - - -
80 - - - - - - -
81 - - - - - - -
82 - - - - - - -
83 - - - - - - -
84 - - - - - - -
85 - - - - - - -
86 - - - - - - -
87 - - - - - - -
88 - - - - - - -
89 - - - - - - -
90 - - - - - - -
91 - - - - - - -
92 - - - - - - -
93 - - - - - - -
94 - - - - - - -
95 - - - - - - -
96 - - - - - - -
97 - - - - - - -
98 - - - - - - -
99 - - - - - - -
100 - - - - - - -

% APPRAISER SCORE(1) -> 73.33% 86.67% 73.33%


% SCORE VS. ATTRIBUTE(2) -> 50.00% 70.00% 43.33%

SCREEN % EFFECTIVE SCORE(3) -> 36.67%


SCREEN % EFFECTIVE SCORE vs. ATTRIBUTE(4) -> 26.67%

Note:
(1) Operator agrees with him/herself on both trials
(2) Operator agrees on both trials with the known standard
(3) All operators agreed within and between themselves
(4) All operators agreed within and between themselves AND agreed with the known standard
(5) Enter Pass/Fail, Good/Bad, Accept/Reject or other labels which indicate status of inspection

Page 1
Statistical Report - Attribute Gage R&R Study
DATE: 11/7/2005
NAME: Suriati/ Noraisha
PRODUCT: Zoe Co-brand Bezel
BUSINESS: BTFS

% Appraiser1 %Score vs Attribute2


Source Trainer #1 (Rozana, Trainer
A-shift)
#2 (Julia,
Trainer
B shift)
#3 (Julie,
Trainer
C shift)
#1 (Rozana,
Trainer
A-shift)
#2 (Julia,
Trainer
B shift)
#3 (Julie, C shift)
Total Inspected 30 30 30 30 30 30
# Matched 22 26 22 15 21 13
False Negative (operator biased toward rejection) 6 5 6
False Positive (operator biased toward acceptance) 1 0 3
Mixed 8 4 8
95% UCL 87.7% 96.2% 87.7% 68.7% 85.3% 62.6%
Calculated Score 73.3% 86.7% 73.3% 50.0% 70.0% 43.3%
95% LCL 54.1% 69.3% 54.1% 31.3% 50.6% 25.5%

Screen % Effective Score3 Screen % Effective Score vs Attribute4


Total Inspected 30 30
# in Agreement 11 8
95% UCL 56.1% 45.9%
Calculated Score 36.7% 26.7%
95% LCL 19.9% 12.3%

% Appraiser % Score vs Appraiser 95% LCL


95% LCL
% Efficiency

% Efficiency

110.0% 110.0%
100.0% 100.0%
90.0% 90.0%
80.0% 80.0%
70.0% 70.0%
60.0% 60.0%
50.0% 50.0%
40.0% 40.0%
30.0% 30.0%
20.0% 20.0%
10.0% 10.0%
0.0% 0.0%
Trainer #1 Trainer #2 Trainer #3 Trainer #1 Trainer #2 Trainer #3
(Rozana, A- (Julia, B shift) (Julie, C shift) (Rozana, A- (Julia, B shift) (Julie, C shift)
shift) shift)

Notes
(1) Operator agrees with him/herself on both trials
(2) Operator agrees on both trials with the known standard
(3) All operators agreed within and between themselves
(4) All operators agreed within & between themselves AND agreed with the known standard
Calculations

Known Population Operator #1 Operator #2 Operator #3


Sample # Attribute Try #1 Try #2 Try #1 Try #2 Try #1
1 1 2 2 1 1 1
2 1 1 1 1 1 1
3 2 2 2 2 2 1
4 1 1 1 1 1 1
5 2 1 2 2 2 2
6 1 2 2 2 2 1
7 1 1 1 1 1 1
8 1 1 1 1 1 1
9 1 2 1 1 2 1
10 2 2 2 2 2 1
11 2 2 1 2 2 2
12 1 1 1 1 1 2
13 1 2 1 2 2 1
14 1 1 1 1 1 1
15 2 2 2 2 2 1
16 1 2 1 1 1 2
17 1 1 1 1 1 1
18 1 1 1 1 1 1
19 1 2 1 1 1 2
20 2 1 1 2 2 1
21 1 1 1 1 1 2
22 1 1 1 2 1 1
23 1 1 2 1 2 2
24 1 2 2 2 2 2
25 2 1 2 1 2 2
26 1 2 2 1 1 2
27 2 2 2 2 2 2
28 1 2 2 2 2 2
29 1 2 2 2 2 2
30 2 2 2 2 2 2
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40

Page 4
Calculations

41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90

Page 5
Calculations

91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
% Appraiser Score 73.33% 86.67%

Page 6
Calculations

Operator #3 Y/N Y/N


Try #2 Agree Agree
1 FALSE FALSE
1 TRUE TRUE
1 FALSE FALSE
1 TRUE TRUE
2 FALSE FALSE
2 FALSE FALSE
1 TRUE TRUE
1 TRUE TRUE
2 FALSE FALSE
1 FALSE FALSE
1 FALSE FALSE
1 FALSE FALSE
1 FALSE FALSE
2 FALSE FALSE
2 FALSE FALSE
1 FALSE FALSE
1 TRUE TRUE
1 TRUE TRUE
1 FALSE FALSE
1 FALSE FALSE
2 FALSE FALSE
1 FALSE FALSE
2 FALSE FALSE
2 TRUE FALSE
2 FALSE FALSE
2 FALSE FALSE
2 TRUE TRUE
2 TRUE FALSE
2 TRUE FALSE
2 TRUE TRUE

Page 7
Calculations

Page 8
Calculations

73.33%

Page 9

You might also like