0% found this document useful (0 votes)
95 views8 pages

Overview of Social Science Fields

Social science is the branch of science devoted to studying human societies and social interactions. It encompasses fields like anthropology, economics, political science, psychology, and sociology. Social scientists use both quantitative and qualitative methods to understand social phenomena, with some using experimental or observational techniques like natural scientists while others use interpretation or critique. The social sciences developed in the 18th-19th centuries alongside advances in natural philosophy to systematically study topics like demographics, social institutions, and human behavior. Today social science continues to grow more interdisciplinary and uses diverse methods to examine issues relating to individuals and societies.

Uploaded by

Miyang
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
95 views8 pages

Overview of Social Science Fields

Social science is the branch of science devoted to studying human societies and social interactions. It encompasses fields like anthropology, economics, political science, psychology, and sociology. Social scientists use both quantitative and qualitative methods to understand social phenomena, with some using experimental or observational techniques like natural scientists while others use interpretation or critique. The social sciences developed in the 18th-19th centuries alongside advances in natural philosophy to systematically study topics like demographics, social institutions, and human behavior. Today social science continues to grow more interdisciplinary and uses diverse methods to examine issues relating to individuals and societies.

Uploaded by

Miyang
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Social science

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Jump to navigationJump to search
For the integrated field of study intended to promote civic competence, see Social
studies. For the social-political-economic theory first pioneered by Karl Marx,
see Scientific socialism.
"Social Sciences" redirects here. For other uses, see Social Sciences (disambiguation).

Archaeology is one of the social sciences.

Part of a series on

Science
Overview
[show]

Branches
[hide]
 Formal
 Natural 
o Physical
o Life
 Social
 Applied 
o Engineering
o Medical
 Interdisciplinary

 Society
[show]

 Outline
 Portal
 Category

 v
 t
 e

Part of a series on

Research

List of academic fields[show]

Research design[show]

Philosophy[show]

Research strategy[show]

Methodology[show]

Methods[show]

Philosophy portal

 v
 t
 e

Social science is the branch of science devoted to the study of societies and


the relationships among individuals within those societies. The term was formerly used
to refer to the field of sociology, the original "science of society", established in the 19th
century. In addition to sociology, it now encompasses a wide array of academic
disciplines, including anthropology, archaeology, economics, human
geography, linguistics, management science, media studies, political
science, psychology, and social history. (For a more detailed list of sub-disciplines
within the social sciences see: Outline of social science.)
Positivist social scientists use methods resembling those of the natural sciences as
tools for understanding society, and so define science in its stricter modern
sense. Interpretivist social scientists, by contrast, may use social critique or symbolic
interpretation rather than constructing empirically falsifiable theories, and thus treat
science in its broader sense. In modern academic practice, researchers are
often eclectic, using multiple methodologies (for instance, by combining
both quantitative and qualitative research). The term "social research" has also acquired
a degree of autonomy as practitioners from various disciplines share the same aims and
methods.

Contents

 1History
 2Branches
o 2.1Anthropology
o 2.2Communication studies
o 2.3Economics
o 2.4Education
o 2.5Geography
o 2.6History
o 2.7Law
o 2.8Linguistics
o 2.9Political science
o 2.10Psychology
o 2.11Sociology
 3Additional fields of study
 4Methodology
o 4.1Social research
o 4.2Theory
 5Education and degrees
 6Low priority of social science
 7See also
o 7.1General
o 7.2Methods
o 7.3Areas
o 7.4History
o 7.5Lists
o 7.6People
o 7.7Other
 8Notes
 9References
 10Bibliography
o 10.120th and 21st centuries sources
o 10.219th century sources
o 10.3General sources
o 10.4Academic resources
o 10.5Opponents and critics
 11External links

History[edit]
Early censuses and surveys provided demographic data.

Main article: History of the social sciences


The history of the social sciences begins in the Age of Enlightenment after 1650,[1] which
saw a revolution within natural philosophy, changing the basic framework by which
individuals understood what was "scientific". Social sciences came forth from the moral
philosophy of the time and were influenced by the Age of Revolutions, such as
the Industrial Revolution and the French Revolution.[2] The social sciences developed
from the sciences (experimental and applied), or the systematic knowledge-bases or
prescriptive practices, relating to the social improvement of a group of interacting
entities.[3][4]
The beginnings of the social sciences in the 18th century are reflected in the grand
encyclopedia of Diderot, with articles from Jean-Jacques Rousseau and other pioneers.
The growth of the social sciences is also reflected in other specialized encyclopedias.
The modern period saw "social science" first used as a distinct conceptual field. [5] Social
science was influenced by positivism,[2] focusing on knowledge based on actual positive
sense experience and avoiding the negative; metaphysical speculation was
avoided. Auguste Comte used the term "science sociale" to describe the field, taken
from the ideas of Charles Fourier; Comte also referred to the field as social physics.[2][6]
Following this period, five paths of development sprang forth in the social sciences,
influenced by Comte in other fields.[2] One route that was taken was the rise of social
research. Large statistical surveys were undertaken in various parts of the United States
and Europe. Another route undertaken was initiated by Émile Durkheim, studying "social
facts", and Vilfredo Pareto, opening metatheoretical ideas and individual theories. A
third means developed, arising from the methodological dichotomy present, in
which social phenomena were identified with and understood; this was championed by
figures such as Max Weber. The fourth route taken, based in economics, was
developed and furthered economic knowledge as a hard science. The last path was
the correlation of knowledge and social values;
the antipositivism and verstehen sociology of Max Weber firmly demanded this
distinction. In this route, theory (description) and prescription were non-overlapping
formal discussions of a subject.
The foundation of social sciences in the West implies conditioned relationships between
progressive and traditional spheres of knowledge. In some contexts, such as the Italian
one, sociology slowly affirms itself and experiences the difficulty of affirming a strategic
knowledge beyond philosophy and theology (Cfr. Guglielmo Rinzivillo, La scienza e
l'oggetto. Autocritica del sapere strategico, Milan, Franco Angeli editor, 2010, p. 51 e
sg. ISBN 978-88-568-2487-2).
Around the start of the 20th century, Enlightenment philosophy was challenged in
various quarters. After the use of classical theories since the end of the scientific
revolution, various fields substituted mathematics studies for experimental studies and
examining equations to build a theoretical structure. The development of social science
subfields became very quantitative in methodology. The interdisciplinary and cross-
disciplinary nature of scientific inquiry into human behaviour, social and environmental
factors affecting it, made many of the natural sciences interested in some aspects of
social science methodology.[7] Examples of boundary blurring include emerging
disciplines like social research
of medicine, sociobiology, neuropsychology, bioeconomics and
the history and sociology of science. Increasingly, quantitative research and qualitative
methods are being integrated in the study of human action and its implications and
consequences. In the first half of the 20th century, statistics became a free-standing
discipline of applied mathematics. Statistical methods were used confidently.
In the contemporary period, Karl Popper and Talcott Parsons influenced the furtherance
of the social sciences.[2] Researchers continue to search for a unified consensus on what
methodology might have the power and refinement to connect a proposed "grand
theory" with the various midrange theories that, with considerable success, continue to
provide usable frameworks for massive, growing data banks; for more, see consilience.
The social sciences will for the foreseeable future be composed of different zones in the
research of, and sometime distinct in approach toward, the field. [2]
The term "social science" may refer either to the specific sciences of society established
by thinkers such as Comte, Durkheim, Marx, and Weber, or more generally to all
disciplines outside of "noble science" and arts. By the late 19th century, the academic
social sciences were constituted of five fields: jurisprudence and amendment of
the law, education, health, economy and trade, and art.[3]
Around the start of the 21st century, the expanding domain of economics in the social
sciences has been described as economic imperialism.[8]

Branches[edit]
For a topical guide to this subject, see Outline of social science §  Branches of social
science.

Social science areas

The following are problem areas and


discipline branches within the social
sciences.[2]

 Anthropology
 Area studies
 Business studies
 Civics
 Communication studies
 Criminology
 Demography
 Development studies
 Economics
 Education
 Environmental studies
 Folkloristics
 Gender studies
 Geography
 History
 Industrial relations
 Information science
 Law
 Library science
 Linguistics
 Media studies
 Political science
 Psychology
 Public administration
 Sociology
 Social work
 Sustainable development

The social science disciplines are branches of knowledge taught and researched at the
college or university level. Social science disciplines are defined and recognized by
the academic journals in which research is published, and the learned social science
societies and academic departments or faculties to which their practitioners belong.
Social science fields of study usually have several sub-disciplines or branches, and the
distinguishing lines between these are often both arbitrary and ambiguous.
Anthropology[edit]
Main articles: Anthropology and Outline of anthropology
Anthropology is the holistic "science of man", a science of the totality of human
existence. The discipline deals with the integration of different aspects of the social
sciences, humanities, and human biology. In the twentieth century, academic disciplines
have often been institutionally divided into three broad domains. The natural
sciences seek to derive general laws through reproducible and verifiable experiments.
The humanities generally study local traditions, through their history, literature, music,
and arts, with an emphasis on understanding particular individuals, events, or eras.
The social sciences have generally attempted to develop scientific methods to
understand social phenomena in a generalizable way, though usually with methods
distinct from those of the natural sciences.
The anthropological social sciences often develop nuanced descriptions rather than the
general laws derived in physics or chemistry, or they may explain individual cases
through more general principles, as in many fields of psychology. Anthropology (like
some fields of history) does not easily fit into one of these categories, and different
branches of anthropology draw on one or more of these domains. [9] Within the United
States, anthropology is divided into four sub-fields: archaeology, physical or biological
anthropology, anthropological linguistics, and cultural anthropology. It is an area that is
offered at most undergraduate institutions. The word anthropos (ἄνθρωπος) in Ancient
Greek means "human being" or "person". Eric Wolf described sociocultural
anthropology as "the most scientific of the humanities, and the most humanistic of the
sciences".
The goal of anthropology is to provide a holistic account of humans and human nature.
This means that, though anthropologists generally specialize in only one sub-field, they
always keep in mind the biological, linguistic, historic and cultural aspects of any
problem. Since anthropology arose as a science in Western societies that were complex
and industrial, a major trend within anthropology has been a methodological drive to
study peoples in societies with more simple social organization, sometimes called
"primitive" in anthropological literature, but without any connotation of "inferior". [10] Today,
anthropologists use terms such as "less complex" societies or refer to specific modes
of subsistence or production, such as "pastoralist" or "forager" or "horticulturalist" to
refer to humans living in non-industrial, non-Western cultures, such people or folk
(ethnos) remaining of great interest within anthropology.
The quest for holism leads most anthropologists to study a people in detail, using
biogenetic, archaeological, and linguistic data alongside direct observation of
contemporary customs.[11] In the 1990s and 2000s, calls for clarification of what
constitutes a culture, of how an observer knows where his or her own culture ends and
another begins, and other crucial topics in writing anthropology were heard. It is
possible to view all human cultures as part of one large, evolving global culture. These
dynamic relationships, between what can be observed on the ground, as opposed to
what can be observed by compiling many local observations remain fundamental in any
kind of anthropology, whether cultural, biological, linguistic or archaeological. [12]
Communication studies[edit]
Main articles: Communication studies and History of communication studies
Communication studies deals with processes of human communication, commonly
defined as the sharing of symbols to create meaning. The discipline encompasses a
range of topics, from face-to-face conversation to mass media outlets such as television
broadcasting. Communication studies also examines how messages are interpreted
through the political, cultural, economic, and social dimensions of their contexts.
Communication is institutionalized under many different names at different universities,
including "communication", "communication studies", "speech communication",
"rhetorical studies", "communication science", "media studies", "communication arts",
"mass communication", "media ecology", and "communication and media science".
Communication studies integrates aspects of both social sciences and the humanities.
As a social science, the discipline often overlaps with sociology, psychology,
anthropology, biology, political science, economics, and public policy, among others.
From a humanities perspective, communication is concerned with rhetoric and
persuasion (traditional graduate programs in communication studies trace their history
to the rhetoricians of Ancient Greece). The field applies to outside disciplines as well,
including engineering, architecture, mathematics, and information science.

Common questions

Powered by AI

Statistical methods play critical roles in contemporary social sciences by providing the tools for data collection, analysis, and interpretation. They allow researchers to apply quantitative analysis to examine relationships between social phenomena, test hypotheses, and validate findings. The use of statistics has enabled social sciences to attain a level of rigor and predictability akin to natural sciences. Techniques such as regression analysis, factor analysis, and survey sampling are extensively used to draw insights from vast datasets, making research findings more reliable and generalizable .

Positivist social scientists employ methodologies similar to natural sciences, relying on empirical and quantifiable observations to establish knowledge and develop theories that can be tested and falsified. In contrast, interpretivist social scientists use methods like social critique and symbolic interpretation, which are more qualitative. They focus on understanding meanings and human experiences in context, treating science in a broader sense that encompasses more subjective and relativistic approaches .

The Age of Enlightenment influenced the development of social sciences by fostering a shift in understanding scientific knowledge, leading to the emergence of social sciences from the moral philosophy of the time. This period initiated a revolution within natural philosophy which contributed to the development of methodologies that social sciences eventually adopted. It also laid the groundwork for the Age of Revolutions, such as the Industrial and French Revolutions, which further influenced the social sciences' development. Social sciences developed in this context as systematic knowledge bases for social improvement, embodying the Enlightenment ideals of reason and empirical evidence .

Economic imperialism has influenced the social sciences by increasingly applying economic principles and methodological approaches to other disciplines. This expanded domain has encouraged the use of quantitative analysis, cost-benefit studies, and econometric methods across various fields such as sociology, political science, and anthropology. While this has enabled a more analytical and data-driven approach to social science research, it has also sparked debates about the dominance of economic logic over other forms of social inquiry and the potential reduction of complex social phenomena to mere economic transactions .

The integration of natural science methodologies into social sciences is driven by the growing need for rigorous, quantitative analysis to address complex social phenomena that require interdisciplinary understanding. As human behavior and societal issues often involve biological, environmental, and technological factors, adopting scientific methods such as empirical data collection, experimentation, and statistical analysis offers more precise insights and enhances the validity of social science research. This cross-disciplinary approach also reflects efforts to bridge gaps between understanding human and natural systems, leading to disciplines like sociobiology, neuropsychology, and bioeconomics that blur traditional boundaries .

The integration of quantitative and qualitative methods, also known as methodological eclecticism, has significantly influenced social sciences by enhancing the depth and breadth of research. This mixed-methods approach allows for a more comprehensive understanding of social phenomena by combining numerical data with in-depth qualitative insights. It helps in triangulating findings, providing richer data analysis, and increasing the validity of research outcomes. The combination addresses the limitations of relying solely on either quantitative or qualitative data, facilitating the exploration of complex social issues from multiple perspectives and allowing for more robust conclusions .

Anthropology serves as a bridge between social sciences and humanities by integrating methods and insights from both domains to achieve a comprehensive understanding of human cultures. While it shares the goal of scientific generalization with social sciences, anthropology often focuses on in-depth, nuanced descriptions typical of humanities. It considers both the biological aspects, akin to natural sciences, and the cultural, historical, and linguistic aspects emphasized in humanities. This holistic approach enables anthropology to examine human existence in a totality that includes diverse human experiences and cultural interpretations, thus connecting the empirical focus of the social sciences with the interpretive focus of the humanities .

Anthropology's holistic approach offers a unique perspective by considering all aspects of human societies, such as biological, cultural, historical, and linguistic dimensions, for a comprehensive analysis. Unlike more focused disciplines, anthropology examines human experiences in their entirety, seeking to understand the interconnectedness of various factors influencing human behavior. By integrating different subfields like archaeology, cultural anthropology, and linguistic anthropology, it provides a multi-faceted understanding that enriches insights into both specific and general aspects of human societies .

The blending of sociology with economics fosters an interdisciplinary approach by integrating sociological insights into economic models and vice versa. This cross-pollination enhances the understanding of economic behaviors within societal contexts, such as how social norms influence market dynamics or how economic policies impact social structures. It also allows for the exploration of economic phenomena with a broader lens that includes social factors like class, culture, and institutions, which traditional economic models might overlook. This interdisciplinary synergy enriches both fields, facilitating the development of more comprehensive theories and applications .

Auguste Comte influenced social sciences to develop along five paths: 1) the rise of large-scale social research using statistical surveys in the U.S. and Europe, 2) the study of 'social facts' initiated by Émile Durkheim, 3) the methodological dichotomy focusing on interpretative understanding of social phenomena championed by Max Weber, 4) the hard science approach in economics that furthered economic knowledge and methodology, and 5) the correlation of knowledge and social values through antipositivism that emphasized a distinction between theory and prescription. These routes reflect the diverse methodologies and frameworks now present within various social science disciplines .

You might also like