UNIVERSITY
OF
SAN
CARLOS
SCHOOL
OF
LAW
AND
GOVERNANCE
College
of
Law
RELEVANT
LAWS
AND
JURISPRUDENCE
(Transportation
Laws)
Module
3
Obligations
of
the
parties
1. Obligations
of
Common
Carrier
Basic
obligations
Ø Compania
Maritima
v.
Insurance
Co.
of
North
America,
12
SCRA
213
(1964)
Ø Servando
v.
Phil.
Steam
Navigation
Co.,
117
SCRA
832
(1982)
Ø Maerskline
v.
CA,
222
SCRA
108
(1993)
Ø Macam
v.
CA,
313
SCRA
77
(1999)
Ø Delsan
Transport
Lines,
Inc.
v.
American
Home
Assurance
Corp.,
G.R.
No.
149019,
August
15,
2006
Ø Westwind
Shipping
Corporation
v.
UCPB
General
Insurance
Co.,
Inc.,
et
al.,
G.R.
No.
200289,
November
25,
2013
Ø Nedlloyd
Lijnen
B.V.
Rotterdam
v.
Glow
Laks
Enterprises,
Ltd.,
G.R.
No.
156330,
November
19,
2014
2.
Duty
to
Exercise
Extraordinary
Diligence
Rationale
Ø Kapalaran
Bus
Lines
v.
Coronado,
et
al.,
176
SCRA
792
(reiterated
in
Cacho
v.
Manahan,
G.R.
No.
203081,
January
17,
2018)
How
duty
is
complied
Ø Juntilla
v.
Fontanar,
136
SCRA
624
Ø Eastern
Shipping
Lines
v.
IAC,
150
SCRA
463
Ø Republic
of
the
Philippines
v.
Lorenzo
Shipping
Corp.,
G.R.
No.
153563,
February
07,
2005
Ø Victory
Liner
v.
Race,
G.R.
No.
164820,
March
28,
2007
Ø Victory
Liner,
Inc.
v.
Race,
G.R.
No.
164820,
December
8,
2008
To
whom
duty
is
owed
Ø PAL
v.
CA,
106
SCRA
391
Ø Cangco
v.
Manila
Railroad
Co.,
38
Phil.
768
Imbued
with
public
interest
Ø Solidbank
Corp.
v.
Sps.
Tan,
G.R.
No.
167346,
April
2,
2007
In
carriage
by
sea
Seaworthiness
Warranty
Ø Caltex
Philippines
v.
Sulpicio
Lines,
315
SCRA
709
Sufficient
evidence
Ø Delsan
Transport
v.
CA,
G.R.
No.
127897,
Nov.
15,
2001
Ø National
Steel
Corp
v.
CA,
283
SCRA
45
Ø Loadstar
Shipping
v.
CA,
315
SCRA
339
Proper
Manning
Ø Coastwise
Lighterage
v.
CA,
245
SCRA
796
Ø Manila
Steamship
v.
Abdulhaman,
100
Phil.
32
Proper
loading
1
Ø Negros
Navigation
v.
CA,
281
SCRA
534
(applying
Mecenas
v.
CA)
Proper
Storage
Ø Phil.
Home
Assurance
Corp.
v.
CA,
257
SCRA
468
Ø Phil.
American
Gen.
Insurance
v.
CA,
273
SCRA
260
Ø Belgian
Overseas
v.
Phil.
First
Insurance,
383
SCRA
23
Competence
of
captain
and
crew
Ø Valenzuela
Hardwood
and
Industrial
Supply
v.
CA,
G.R.
No.
102316,
June
30,
1997
In
carriage
by
land
Duty
to
Inspect
Ø Nocum
v.
Laguna
Tayabas
Bus
Company,
No.
L-‐23733,
Oct.
31,
1969
Skill
and
Expertise
of
Driver;
Condition
of
Vehicle;
Proof
of
lack
of
prudence
Ø Baritua,
et
al.
v.
Nimfa
Divina
Mercader
in
her
capacity
and
as
guardian
of
Darwin,
Giovanni,
Rodel
and
Dennis,
all
surnamed
Mercader,
et
al.,
G.R.
No.
136048,
January
23,
2001
Ø Sanico,
et
al.
v.
Colipano,
G.R.
No.
209969,
Sept.
27,
2017
Proof
of
Extraordinary
Diligence
Ø Mariano,
Jr.
v.
Callejas,
et
al.,
G.R.
No.
166640,
July
31,
2009
In
carriage
by
sea
Precautionary
Measures;
Knowledgeable
of
nature
of
cargo
Ø Tabacalera
Insurance
Co.,
et
al.
v.
North
Front
Shipping
Services,
Inc.,
et
al.,
G.R.
No.
119197,
May
16,
1997
Knowing
and
following
the
required
precaution
Ø Sulpicio
Lines,
Inc.
v.
First
Lepanto-‐Taisho
Insurance
Corp.,
G.R.
No.
140349,
June
29,
2005
No
proof
of
repairs
Ø Vector
Shipping
Corp.,
et
al.
v.
Macasa,
et
al.,
G.R.
No.
160219,
July
21,
2008
Use
of
all
reasonable
means
Ø Aboitiz
Shipping
Corp.
v.
Insurance
Co.
of
North
America,
G.R.
No.
168402,
August
6,
2008
Prompt
notification
Ø Nedlloyd
Lijnen
B.V.
Rotterdam,
et
al.
v.
Glow
Laks
Enterprises,
Ltd.,
G.R.
No.
156330,
November
19,
2014
In
carriage
by
air
Inspection
Ø Saludo,
et
al.
v.
CA,
et
al.,
G.R.
No.
95536,
March
23,
1992
Reasonableness
of
weight
standards
Ø Yrasuegui
v.
Philippine
Airlines,
Inc.,
G.R.
No.
168081,
Oct.
17,
2008
3.
Baggages
(checked-‐in
and
hand
carried)
4. Obligations
of
Shipper
and
Passenger
(Articles
1741,
1761
and
1762,
NCC)
Ø Manay,
Jr.,
et
al.
v.
Cebu
Air,
Inc.,
G.R.
No.
210621,
April
4,
2016
-o-