0% found this document useful (0 votes)
40 views1 page

Defining the Group Problem-Solving Process

1. The document outlines the steps of group problem solving: defining the problem, analyzing it, establishing criteria for solutions, generating potential solutions, selecting the best solution, and implementing it. 2. Key aspects of defining the problem include determining the situation, difficulty, causes, importance, and clarifying any unclear terms. The problem should then be framed as an open-ended question. 3. Analyzing the problem involves locating facts about its effects, severity, and causes to uncover a workable solution. Establishing criteria ensures solutions do not cause more problems than they solve.

Uploaded by

Shrutika ranjan
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
40 views1 page

Defining the Group Problem-Solving Process

1. The document outlines the steps of group problem solving: defining the problem, analyzing it, establishing criteria for solutions, generating potential solutions, selecting the best solution, and implementing it. 2. Key aspects of defining the problem include determining the situation, difficulty, causes, importance, and clarifying any unclear terms. The problem should then be framed as an open-ended question. 3. Analyzing the problem involves locating facts about its effects, severity, and causes to uncover a workable solution. Establishing criteria ensures solutions do not cause more problems than they solve.

Uploaded by

Shrutika ranjan
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

GROUP PROBLEM SOLVING 4.

GENERATING POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS TO THE PROBLEM

1. DEFINE THE PROBLEM Having determined the criteria, the group can now propose solutions to the problem.
When problem solving, many groups observe a common practice. They “think in Rather than accepting the first one proposed, the members should try to think of many ways to solve the
reverse.” Before identifying the problem or knowing the facts about the problem, they propose solutions. If problem. To create a list of possible solutions, the group might use brainstorming, a technique designed
luck is with them, a satisfactory solution might result, but these short cuts usually do to bring forth many ideas. Three rules govern its use: (1) ideas are to be expressed freely; as an idea
not work. The problem reappears and continues to plague the group. A more sensible approach comes to mind, it is to be expressed without evaluation by anyone; (2) all ideas, wild or otherwise, are
to problem solving is to begin by determining what the problem is. Usually a group undertakes problem welcome; (3) as many ideas as possible are voiced; quantity is the goal. When the group runs out of
solving because of a felt difficulty. The members perceive a perplexing situation and ideas, it evaluates those resulting from the brainstorming.
realize it has to be dealt with. What group members ordinarily perceive are the effects of the situation, the
signs or symptoms of a possible problem, not the problem itself. They have to 5. SELECT THE BEST SOLUTION
ferret out the problem before they can treat it satisfactorily. To identify a problem, answers to questions In this step the group chooses the solution that seems to meet the criteria better than any
like the following are helpful: other. As a means of accomplishing this end, these questions are helpful:
A. What is the situation in which the problem is occurring?
A. What is the exact nature of each solution?
B. What in general is the difficulty?
B. How would it correct the problem?
C. How did the difficulty arise?
C. How well would it remedy the problem?
D. What is its importance?
D. How well does it satisfy the criteria?
E. What are the meanings of any terms that require clarification?
E. Would a combination of solutions be best?
By obtaining the answers to these questions, a group can more ably determine what the problem really is.
Once you have defined the problem you need to frame the problem as a question.
Determining which of the proposed solutions is best is a decision-making process. A decision implies
Questions should be:
that agreement to do something prevails among the group members, and the something that is agreed to
1. open to alternative answers; not yes/no (closed) questions
is a choice among different alternatives. Decisions can be made in many ways. Here six common
2. clearly written; and avoid vague terms.
methods:
3. unbiased; it cannot imply that a certain decision has to be reached.
4. concise; not to wordy
1. Group consensus - all members come to an agreement.
5. a question of policy; it asks what action should be taken.
2. Majority vote - decision of the majority is accepted.
-”What should be MCC’s policy towards high impact aerobics?”
3. Minority process - committee, board of directors makes decision for all.
-”How can we promote low impact aerobics at MCC?”
4. Averaging individual opinions - members mail or phone in their opinions; majority wins.
-”What can be done about the shortage of low impact aerobics classes at MCC?”
5. Expert decision - authority on subject makes decision and group accepts it.
2. ANALYZE THE PROBLEM 6. Decision by authority - after group discusses, leader decides.
After the group has agreed on what the problem is, then next step is to analyze it, particularly its
causes and effects. In doing this the group must try to avoid letting opinions take priority over facts. The 6. IMPLEMENT THE SOLUTION!
question “What are the facts?” must be foremost in the members’ minds. Answers to these questions are The finale step involves deciding how to put the solution into effect. This step has much
helpful in locating the facts: value. First, in deciding how to execute a solution, the group may uncover possible weaknesses.
A. What effects indicate that a problem exists? What often sounds like a good decision might prove to be inoperable. The members find this out
B. How serious are the effects? when they try to institute a plan of action. If the solution is unworkable, it can be abandoned in favor
C. What is causing the problem? of one that is more likely to work. You don’t have to solve any problems as a group or actually implement
D. Are the causes inherent in the problem situation? your solutions, however, you could and that would bring your group Extra Credit.
E. Have previous attempts been made to solve the problem?
Most problems have multiple causes that we should identify, so we can uncover a workable solution. EXTRA CREDIT
Your group may go beyond just talking about a solution. It can do something to carry out the
3. ESTABLISH CRITERIA FOR SOLUTIONS solution. The adages “Talk is cheap,” “Actions speak louder than words,” and “put your money where
After your group has analyzed the problem, you must now establish criteria to guide you your mouth is” apply here. This is where the extra credit for our group work is available. How
in your quest for solutions. These solutions, preferably, will solve the problem, and will not cause other exactly can you implement your plan?
problems to develop and make conditions worse than they are already. For example in the case of a If you take this project a step further and actually implement your plan you will receive extra
stomach ache, the doctor discovers that the patient has a kidney infection. One solution credit, not to mention the deed you do for yourselves and others. An example may be a letter sent to the
is to take out the kidney, but that solution might cause more serious problems than the patient has person or persons that can begin to implement your solution(s). Another example may be a petition to
at present. A less drastic solution may be more appropriate, perhaps a program of medication. get the ball rolling towards your solution. The intent here is to see your project through. You have done,
To ensure that a group’s solution does not cause more serious problems than already exist, the and will do some good work on this project, why let it die in a speech instructors files. Let your ideas
proper procedure is to FIRST develop a set of criteria or conditions that an acceptable solution must meet. live, and do some good for others that are affected by the issue(s)/problem(s), topic area your group has
One criterion obviously is that the solution must correct the cause of the problem. Other general criteria chosen. You be the judge as to how the information, you have gathered and the solution(s) you have
worth considering are: come up with, can best be implemented. As always, you can ask me for my opinions, ideas, and help,
as to what your group can do to see your solution(s) to fruition.
A. Is the proposed solution workable? F. Is the proposed solution just?
B. Is it economical? G. Is it moral?
C. Is it the best possible way to solve the problem? H. Will it get the job done efficiently?
D. Will it produce more benefits than disadvantages? I. Is it clear?
E. Are the benefits significant? J. Will it be harmful in any way?

Common questions

Powered by AI

Groups can use several methods to decide on the best solution: group consensus, majority vote, minority process, averaging individual opinions, expert decision, and decision by authority. Group consensus fosters full agreement but can be time-consuming. Majority vote is efficient and democratic but may overlook minority perspectives. Minority process allows for quick decisions but might not reflect the group's overall view. Averaging opinions is straightforward but may lead to compromise solutions. Expert decision leverages deep knowledge but may cause dependency on a single viewpoint. Decision by authority is fast and centralized but risks alienating members with differing opinions .

Evaluating past solutions can inform the current problem-solving process by providing insights into what strategies have previously succeeded or failed and why. This historical perspective allows the group to refine their approaches, avoid past mistakes, and leverage effective strategies. Understanding the context and reasoning of previous solutions can guide the establishment of more robust criteria and the development of solutions that are better tailored to the current problem's specifics .

A group can effectively analyze a problem by focusing on factual information and asking specific questions such as: What effects indicate that a problem exists? How serious are these effects? What is causing them? Are the causes inherent in the situation? Have previous solutions been attempted, and what were the outcomes? Dedicating effort to uncovering multiple causes helps the group determine the most comprehensive approach to solving the issue .

Establishing criteria before generating potential solutions is important as it ensures that any proposed solutions meet essential requirements and do not exacerbate the problem. These criteria guide the group to evaluate the viability, cost-effectiveness, justice, morality, and efficiency of a solution, ensuring it truly addresses the core of the problem without creating additional issues. By adhering to these criteria, the group can systematically and objectively assess potential solutions, leading to a more effective decision-making process .

Brainstorming facilitates the generation of potential solutions by encouraging free expression and creativity, which can spark innovative ideas. For effectiveness, groups should follow guidelines such as: expressing ideas freely without evaluation, welcoming all ideas regardless of how wild, and aiming for quantity over quality initially. These rules help foster an environment where all members feel comfortable contributing, thereby maximizing creative input .

Implementing a practical solution rather than just discussing potential solutions ensures tangible progress and impact; it turns theoretical ideas into actionable results. This action-based approach can reveal unforeseen challenges and help refine the initial solution. Additionally, it boosts motivation and accountability in the group, as members see their contributions leading to real-world outcomes, thereby fostering a sense of achievement and purpose .

A concise problem question is specific, clear, and focuses on actionable insights, while a vague question is broad, abstract, and leaves room for multiple interpretations. This distinction matters because specific questions lead to targeted discussions and precise solutions, whereas vague questions can result in confusion, misaligned efforts, and ineffective decision-making. Clear questions ensure that the group tackles the core issue directly, enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of the problem-solving process .

The initial steps a group should take include defining the problem and analyzing it. This begins with identifying the problem based on observed difficulties or symptoms, instead of jumping directly to solutions. Understanding the situation, the nature of the difficulty, its origin, and its importance is crucial. Properly defining the problem involves asking clear, unbiased, and actionable questions. These steps are critical for problem-solving as they lay the groundwork for identifying the real issues rather than treating symptoms, which ensures that the solutions developed are effective and do not lead to recurring problems .

A clear understanding of problem terms and definitions is crucial because it eliminates ambiguities and ensures that all group members have a shared understanding of the problem's scope and nuances. This clarity prevents miscommunications and misalignments in the group’s approaches to solving the problem, enabling more focused and effective discussions and solutions .

If a solution proves to be inoperable during implementation, the group can reassess and identify weaknesses encountered during execution. This reflection allows them to modify or abandon the current solution in favor of one with a higher likelihood of success. The process might include returning to the established criteria, generating new ideas, or choosing a different method of solution selection. By doing this, the group can iteratively refine their approach, learning from practical experiences .

You might also like