Saes A 113 PDF
Saes A 113 PDF
Contents
1 Scope..................................................…........... 2
2 Conflicts and Deviations......................…........... 2
3 References............................................…......... 2
4 Geotechnical Investigation Project Phases…… 7
5 Site-Specific Geotechnical Information
Requirements............................................….8
6 Geotechnical Investigation Scope of Work….... 9
7 Quality Control Requirements……………….... 11
8 Execution of Geotechnical Investigations……. 12
9 Engineering Assessment Requirements….…. 18
10 Engineering Report Requirements………….... 25
Appendix A – Required Geotechnical Services…… 32
1 Scope
2.1 Any conflicts between this document and other applicable Mandatory Saudi
Aramco Engineering Requirements (MSAERs) shall be addressed to the EK&RD
Coordinator.
2.2 Any deviation from the requirements herein shall follow internal company
procedure SAEP-302.
3 References
The selection of material and equipment, and the design, construction, maintenance, and
repair of equipment and facilities covered by this standard shall comply with the latest
edition of the references listed below unless otherwise noted.
ASTM D3080 Standard Test Method for Direct Shear Test of Soils
under Consolidated Drained Conditions
ASTM D3385 Standard Test Method for Infiltration Rate of Soils in
Field Using Double-Ring Infiltrometer
ASTM D3689M Standard Test Methods for Deep Foundations under
Static Axial Tensile Load
ASTM D3966M Standard Test Methods for Deep Foundations under
Lateral Load
ASTM D4220 Standard Practices for Preserving and Transporting
Soil Samples
ASTM D4253 Test Methods for Maximum Index Density and Unit
Weight of Soils Using a Vibratory Table
ASTM D4254 Standard Test Methods for Minimum Index Density
and Unit Weight of Soils and Calculation of Relative
Density
ASTM D4318 Standard Test Method for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit,
and Plasticity Index of Soils
ASTM D4428 Standard Test Method for Crosshole Seismic Testing
ASTM D4543 Standard Practices for Preparing Rock Core
Specimens and Determining Dimensional and Shape
Tolerances
ASTM D4633 Standard Test Method for Energy Measurement for
Dynamic Penetrometers
ASTM D4719 Standard Test Method for Prebored Pressuremeter
Testing in Soils
ASTM D4945 Standard Test Method for High-Strain Dynamic
Testing of Piles
ASTM D5079 Standard Practices for Preserving and Transporting
Rock Core Samples
ASTM D5334 Standard Test Method for Determination of Thermal
Conductivity of Soil and Soft Rock by Thermal Needle
Probe Procedure
ASTM D5434 Guide for Field Logging of Subsurface Explorations
of Soil and Rock
ASTM D5731 Standard Test Method for Determination of the Point
Load Strength Index of Rock
British Standards
BS 4550 Methods of Testing Cement
BS EN 1744-1 Tests for Chemical Properties of Aggregates -
Part 1: Chemical Analysis
4.1 A typical project lifecycle includes the site selection, planning, design,
construction and operational phases. Geotechnical investigations may be required
for some or all of these stages. Geotechnical investigations are thus broadly
classified as follows:
4.1.1 Reconnaissance (site selection) geotechnical investigation related to site
selection at planning-level and preliminary facility layout, typically consisting
of a site-specific desk study, geologic hazard assessment (e.g. presence of
sabkha, rock, underground cavities), remote sensing data assessment and
probable supplemented limited field investigation tests.
4.1.2 Preliminary geotechnical investigation consisting of widely spaced
geotechnical/geophysical tests corresponding to approximate positioning and
preliminary designs of the proposed constructions.
4.1.3 Detailed geotechnical investigation relates to structure-specific exploratory
holes (within finalized plot plans) or dense grid of exploratory holes (within
not yet finalized plot plans) including boreholes, cone penetration tests, trial
pits, geophysical tests, etc., as well as corresponding laboratory testing.
4.1.4 Monitoring or verification investigation during and after the project
execution for ensuring that actual performance or design parameters are
corresponding to the design tolerances and performance estimates; or to verify
soil conditions, groundwater or other geologic aspects.
Preliminary Geotechnical
A, B, C FEL 2 - Study G2 of FEL2
Investigation Report
Detailed Geotechnical Investigation
A, B, C, C1 FEL3 - Project Proposal (PPA) 30% PPA of FEL3
Report
* It shall be noted that the Report completion deadline is for final report completion and acceptance after review
cycles and not for initial report submission.
Source – Saudi Aramco Front End Loading (FEL) Manual (1 June 2014)
4.3 Small projects may only require a single detailed structure-specific geotechnical
investigation, while project types A, B and C would require multiple geotechnical
investigations.
4.4 The results of previous geotechnical investigations shall be made available and
incorporated into the planning for subsequent investigations. All corresponding
information shall be included in the subsequent staged geotechnical investigation
analysis and report.
5.1 Site-specific geotechnical investigations are required for all new onshore
structures, foundations, major roads, pipelines, etc. unless exempt by paragraph
5.2.
5.2 Geotechnical investigations are not required when all of the conditions below
have been met:
5.2.1 The footprint of the structure is less than 4 m x 4 m (i.e., guard houses,
smoking shelters, etc.).
5.2.2 The net applied bearing pressure on the footing does not exceed 100 kPa
(2,000 psf).
5.2.6 Unusual soil conditions, such as sabkha or expansive clay, are not
present.
5.4 Procedure set out in SAEP-61 shall be followed for requesting existing soil data
or for using existing soil data for existing or new projects.
5.5 In cases where cavities within rock formations are encountered or are expected,
e.g., karst regions, additional exploration by geophysical means may be required.
A risk assessment study for potential underground cavities is required for all Type
A and B projects or grass-root plants in the areas of predominately limestone
geology.
6.1 The geotechnical investigation Scope of Work (SOW) is the responsibility of the
Main Contractor to ensure all required field and lab testing are included in the
SOW. The geotechnical investigation SOW shall be prepared and checked by the
Main Contractor. The approval of the geotechnical investigation SOW shall be
done only by one of the following:
6.2 The geotechnical investigation SOW shall be prepared using the SOW template
provided by CSD. For thrust boring, simplified template shall be used.
6.3 Quality assurance checks (author, checker, and approver) shall be reflected on the
cover page of the SOW template including all signatures.
6.5.2 Site description, including topographic maps, aerial photos, existing and
previous construction on the site, and any previous geotechnical
investigations conducted at the site.
6.5.5 The objectives of the laboratory test program (specific number and type
of laboratory tests need not be specified).
File Number is issued to the project only upon receipt of the endorsement
letter and form SA-9866. Procedure set out in SAEP-61 shall be followed
for obtaining Geotechnical File Number.
7.1.3 The geotechnical contractor shall not initiate any field work before
obtaining the Geotechnical File Number. The Geotechnical File Number
shall be stated in all reports and correspondence with regards to this
project.
7.3.1 Peer Review: All engineering calculations and the draft final
geotechnical investigation report must be peer-reviewed internally by the
geotechnical contractor prior to submittal to Saudi Aramco for review.
Procedure set out in SAEP-61 shall be followed for report submissions.
All soil and rock samples shall be retained for a minimum 2 months after approval
of the geotechnical investigation report. The samples must be kept according to
ASTM D4220 and ASTM D5079.
The geotechnical contractor shall examine the site and become familiar
with all existing conditions and evaluate the conditions with respect to
performance of the work and to the design/construction of the proposed
facilities.
Saudi Aramco: Company General Use
Page 13 of 39
Document Responsibility: Geotechnical Standards Committee SAES-A-113
Issue Date: 13 December 2018
Next Planned Update: 13 December 2021 Onshore Geotechnical Engineering Requirements
UTM coordinates and Mean Sea Level (MSL) elevations must be provided
for all field tests. MSL elevations and UTM coordinates must be shown
on the field test log. If local coordinates and elevations are available, a
table shall be included in the report showing both local and UTM/MSL
data for each boring location.
Mean Sea Level (MSL) is the “Saudi Aramco Vertical Datum of 1978”
(SAVD 1978) based on the Benchmark “Monument B” located at the
Dhahran Airport, having a preliminary elevation of 24.640 meters as
established by the Saudi Arabian Government in 1978.
Note: SAVD 1978 approximates MSL at the Arabian Sea. SAVD 1978
elevations minus 0.79 meters equals the Jeddah 1969 datum (Ministry
of Petroleum and Mineral Resources, Aerial Survey Department).
Location and depths of all field tests shall be provided as specified in the
geotechnical investigation SOW. Layout/density/depth of field tests
within the various geotechnical staged investigations in relation to
different facilities / structures and geologic / seismic conditions shall be
as per international standards.
The location and depth of cross-hole seismic tests shall be specified in the
geotechnical investigation Scope of Work. The exact location should be
determined by the Contractor's field geologist based on field conditions
(underground utilities may exist in the area and the test must be located so
as not to be affected by utilities).
Unless otherwise specified in the Scope of Work, the pits should extend to
a depth of 1 m and be logged. Density testing per ASTM D1556 or ASTM
D6938 should be performed on the undisturbed soils at depths of 0.0, 0.3,
0.6, and every 0.3 m thereafter, and bulk samples representative of the soil
layer(s) taken for Compaction testing and California Bearing Ratio (CBR)
testing as per ASTM D1557 and ASTM D1883 respectively.
Thermal resistivity testing shall be carried out as per ASTM D5334 and
where applicable to cover the range of soil types encountered.
8.3.4 Laboratory CBR tests should use the “three-point” method along with
field soil density results to estimate the in-situ CBR and the CBR at the
recommended compaction density.
Water-soluble sulfate and chloride tests are required where concrete will
be in contact with the soil.
The friction angle for cohesive soils shall be obtained from drained
direct shear or triaxial shear tests.
(𝑞𝑐 − 𝜎0 )
𝑐𝑢 (𝑘𝑃𝑎) =
𝑁𝑘
where average Nk can be taken as 15 (Nk range can be 11-19 for normally
consolidated clays) and 25 for over consolidated clays.
In the absence of laboratory test data, soil stiffness (E) may be estimated
from N60 using below correlations.
Normally consolidated sands 𝐸 = 1000 𝑁60
Silts, sandy silts or clayey silts 𝐸 = 330 𝑁60 + 1800
Gravelly sands 𝐸 = 1300 𝑁60 + 7200
It shall be noted that the above average empirical data are from numerous
publications.
Notes:
9.2.1 Net Allowable Bearing Capacity (NABC) shall be determined based on the
lower of bearing failure and settlement limit criteria. Typically, total
settlement for shallow spread and strip footings shall be limited to 25 mm,
and for mat foundations limited to 50 mm.
Note: The equations below are applicable to idealized conditions, where use
of these equations is not justified, a more refined analysis or special
considerations should be considered by the Geotechnical Contractor.
𝑁𝑞 = 𝑡𝑎𝑛2 [45 + ] 𝑒 tan
2
𝑁 = 2 [𝑁𝑞 + 1] tan
𝐵
𝑠𝑞 = [1 + tan ]
𝐿
𝐵
𝑠 = [1 − 0.4 ]
𝐿
Depth factors shall not be used for the evaluation of shallow foundations.
̅̅̅̅̅
𝑁60 𝐵 + 0.3 2 𝑆𝑒
𝑞𝐴(𝑛𝑒𝑡) = [ ] 𝐹𝑑 [ ]
0.08 𝐵 25
Where:
𝐷
𝐹𝑑 = 1 + 0.33 ( )
𝐵
̅̅̅̅̅
𝑁60 = is the average N60 within the stress influence depth
𝑆𝑒 = is the allowable settlement which can be taken as 50 mm.
Time period for the settlement calculations, when not specified in the
project, shall be taken as 25 years. An appropriately shorter duration can
be used for foundations of non-critical or temporary structures.
The geotechnical investigation report shall state the design ground water level to
be considered in bearing capacity evaluation for each of the areas of investigation.
Design ground water levels shall take into consideration ground water
measurements from boreholes, the location of the site, potential future change in
ground water level and proximity to shoreline. Design water level shall be based
on the following guidelines:
Case 1 : When ground water level is above Df, i.e., Dw ≤ Df, Design Water
level (DwD) shall be taken as 0 m. Areas nearshore should use this design case
and dewatering would be required for such foundation construction.
Note: If there is a potential for the ground water level to reach the surface during
the lifetime of the foundation, then the design ground water level shall be
considered as surface level.
Case 2 : When ground water level is below base of the foundation but within
1.5Bf from base of the foundation, i.e., Df < Dw ≤ (Df + 1.5B), Design Water
level (DwD) shall be taken as Df.
Case 3 : When the ground water is below 1.5Bf from base of the foundation,
then the design can be as dry conditions.
9.4.1 The minimum boreholes density and depth that shall be conducted for all tank
foundations are as follow:
Preliminary Investigation
Detailed Investigation
9.4.2 For tank foundations, the following shall be provided in the geotechnical
report:
Tank dimensions
Tank foundation settlements at center and edge under the design load
and hydrotest load
9.4.3 The depth of soil influence for tank settlement calculations shall be made up
to 1.5 times tank diameter. The design of the tank foundation shall be in
accordance with API STD 650 “Annex B (informative) Recommendations for
Design and Construction of Foundations for Aboveground Oil Storage
Tanks.”
9.4.4 Tank designer specifications or API STD 650 shall be followed for
Hydrostatic Testing Requirements.
9.5.2 All liquefaction assessments shall define the following inputs; Moment
Magnitude of the earthquake, Peak Ground Acceleration at bed-rock, Site
class, Peak Ground Acceleration at site (adjusted for site class effects),
Ground water level assumed in the assessment and any further assumptions
used in the evaluation.
The analysis and assessment of at least 3 different pile design and installation
options shall be provided in the geotechnical report (e.g. bored and cast-in-
place, continuous flight auger (CFA), driven displacement, driven…etc.)
9.6.4 Frequencies
The final geotechnical report shall address all items in the Scope of Work
including the checklist of “Required Geotechnical Services” (see Appendix A).
Copy of the approved SOW shall be attached to the Geotechnical Report when
submitted to CSD. The signature of the approver of the SOW and report shall
appear on the cover page of both documents. The qualification of Main
Contractor’s geotechnical engineer shall be attached to the report submittal.
The geotechnical report shall, as a minimum, clearly address the following items:
1. Evidence of internal peer-review of the report by use of “CSD Geotechnical
Report Checklist” as per SAEP-61. Completed “CSD Geotechnical Report
Checklist” shall be provided with the report.
2. Executive summary providing clear recommendations of soil properties,
allowable bearing capacity, design ground water table, concrete exposure and
cement type, soil improvement requirements, etc.
3. Confirmation that the performed geotechnical investigation was in line with
the approved geotechnical investigation Scope of Work or highlight any
variations.
4. If applicable, a summary of findings from any preliminary geotechnical
reports that were undertaken at the same site.
5. A summary table with soil parameters for design.
6. A summary table and a plot plan showing all field tests.
7. A summary table with all laboratory tests results.
8. Soil properties, factors of safety and assumptions used shall be provided for
all geotechnical engineering calculations.
Saudi Aramco: Company General Use
Page 26 of 39
Document Responsibility: Geotechnical Standards Committee SAES-A-113
Issue Date: 13 December 2018
Next Planned Update: 13 December 2021 Onshore Geotechnical Engineering Requirements
9. All boring logs must be prepared in Saudi Aramco Boring Log format.
10. All PCPT plots shall clearly show soil classification.
11. All the units of measurements shown in the report should be in SI system.
12. If applicable, trial pit pictures shall be provided in an appendix.
13. A summary a table of all field tests with UTM (referenced to the International
1924 Ellipsoid, Ain (Ayn) Al Abd 1970 Datum (as per
SAES-A-100) and elevation (MSL defined as Saudi Aramco Vertical Datum
of 1978” (SAVD 1978) data.
14. The borehole log shall include the identification of the drilling rig used and
the SPT hammer efficiency of the rig.
10.3.2 Main contractor shall review and approve any geotechnical report prior to
submission to Saudi Aramco Consulting Services Department.
10.3.3 For thrust boring, factual geotechnical report shall be prepared based on the
field and lab geotechnical testing. The report shall include: (1) soil design
parameters, and (2) soil classification for excavation as per Saudi Aramco
Safety Management Guide (Guide No. 06-002-2008, Excavations and
Shoring). The report shall be reviewed and approved by the Main Contractor.
Electronic copy of the factual geotechnical report shall be submitted to CSD
for record only.
10.3.4 An excel spreadsheet containing details of all field test UTM coordinates and
MSL, achieved depth of borings, water level and all other field data shall be
submitted with the geotechnical report.
10.3.5 All data which is collected during the investigation are to be transferred in
electronic format. The format of the digital data files shall comply with the
Association of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Specialists (AGS)
publication Electronic Transfer of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Data
Edition 4.0, known as AGS4. Both the paper and digital versions of the data
must be generated from the same source software.
10.4.1 One electronic copy of the entire final report, including appendices with all
field and laboratory test results, using text-searchable Adobe Acrobat format
shall be provided to main contractor for submission to Saudi Aramco.
Revision Summary
19 June 2012 Revised the "Next Planned Update". Reaffirmed the contents of the document, and reissued
with editorial revisions to update references and be consistent with the new SAEP-383.
16 March 2016 Editorial revision to change referenced to Saudi Aramco Sanitary Code (SASC) with Saudi
Aramco Environmental Health Code (SAEHC-S-02).
27 March 2017 Major revision. Summary of major changes are summarized below:
o Bearing capacity equations are included in line with international standards and SPT
hammer efficiency has been made mandatory. These are major improvements which
will lead to accurate and correct bearing capacity for all projects resulting in millions of
dollars in cost savings. The improvement will also result in avoiding unnecessary soil
improvements in projects.
o Pile testing requirements have been added to be in line with international standards. This
benefits cost and time to project execution.
o Geotechnical Investigation Project Phases have been included to align with the FEL
(Front End Loading Manual) to submission of geotechnical related document as at when
due to improve timing and project review schedule.
o Some technical additions, e.g., design ground water levels and settlement calculations
etc., and additions to many Sections of the document to improve quality.
13 December 2018 Major revision. Summary of major changes are summarized below:
o Analysis and assessment of at least 3 different pile design and installation options to be
provided in the geotechnical report to achieve economical and time schedule benefits.
o The minimum boreholes density and depth that shall be conducted for all tank
foundations has been included within the standard revision leading to accurate and
correct settlement evaluations to avoid mitigation measures.
o The geotechnical investigation Scope of Work review and acceptance has been
transferred to be the responsibility of the Main Contractor ensuring that all required field
and lab testing are included within the Scope of Work.
o Some additions (e.g. as-built survey of all field test locations to be undertaken by the
Geotechnical Contractor, new best practice providing guidelines for exploratory holes
density & depth) have been included to improve document quality.
9.4.2 Sections 9.4.1, 9.4.2, and 9.4.3 has been changed to 9.4.2,
25 Modification 9.4.3, and 9.4.4
9.4.3
Saudi Aramco: Company General Use
Page 31 of 39
Document Responsibility: Geotechnical Standards Committee SAES-A-113
Issue Date: 13 December 2018
Next Planned Update: 13 December 2021 Onshore Geotechnical Engineering Requirements
9.4.4
26 9.6 Modification Pile Design and Testing Requirements
Design Requirement
The analysis and assessment of at least 3 different pile design
27 9.6.1 New and installation options shall be provided in the geotechnical
report (e.g. bored and cast-in-place, continuous flight auger
(CFA), driven displacement, driven etc.)
9.6.2 Sections 9.6.1, 9.6.2, 9.6.3, 9.6.4, and 9.6.5 has been
9.6.3 changed to 9.6.2, 9.6.3, 9.6.4, 9.6.5, and 9.6.6
28 9.6.4 Modification
9.6.5
9.6.6
The final geotechnical report shall address all items in the
Scope of Work including the checklist of “Required
Geotechnical Services” (Appendix A). Copy of the approved
SOW shall be attached to the Geotechnical Report when
29 10.2 Modification submitted to CSD. The signature of the approver of the SOW
and report shall appear on the cover page of both documents.
The qualification of Main Contractor’s geotechnical engineer
shall be attached to the report submittal
10.3.4 Sections 10.3.3 and 10.3.4 has been changed to 10.3.4 and
33 Modification 10.3.5
10.3.5
Appendix A As-built survey of all field test location(s)
34 New
4.6
The geotechnical contractor report shall include appropriate information and recommendations
from this list.
1 Introduction
1.1 Description of proposed construction, including final grade elevations
1.2 Purpose and scope of investigation
1.3 Abstract of findings and recommendations
2 Site Conditions
2.1 Site local geology, general description
2.2 Potential geologic hazards
2.3 Site surface description
2.4 Site topography (referenced to MSL-mean sea level), general description
2.5 Description of above-ground obstructions
3 Subsurface Conditions
3.1 Stratigraphy
3.2 Subsurface material properties, general description
3.3 Groundwater elevations (referenced to MSL-mean sea level) and expected variations
3.4 Description of underground obstructions encountered or otherwise identified
4 Field Investigation
4.1 Summary of operations
4.2 Description of sampling procedures
4.3 Description of field tests
4.4 Logs of borings, soundings, pits, wells, etc., in accordance with ASTM D5434 and
containing:
4.4.1 Complete descriptions and thicknesses of all strata, including near-surface
materials such as paving, base course, topsoil, fill, etc.
4.4.2 Locations referenced to UTM coordinate as per SAES-A-100
4.4.3 Ground surface elevations referenced to MSL (mean sea level)
4.4.4 Standard penetration test values in blows per six-inch increment
4.4.5 Results of all field tests
4.5 Percolation test results as per SAEHC-S-02
4.6 As-built survey of all field test location(s)
4.7 Location plan, containing as a minimum
4.7.1 Scale plan with locations of borings, soundings, pits, wells, etc.
Saudi Aramco: Company General Use
Page 33 of 39
Document Responsibility: Geotechnical Standards Committee SAES-A-113
Issue Date: 13 December 2018
Next Planned Update: 13 December 2021 Onshore Geotechnical Engineering Requirements
7 Absorption
7.1 Suitability of site for use as an absorption field per SAEHC-S-02
7.2 Recommended alternatives if site is unsuitable
8 General Foundation Recommendations
8.1 Foundation recommendations to be based on:
8.1.1 Construction at existing grade
8.1.2 Site modified to final grade different than existing grade
8.1.3 Improved ground
8.2 Type(s) of foundation recommended
8.3 Basis for selecting recommended foundation type(s)
8.4 Recommendations for foundation type(s) selected
8.5 Recommendations for deep foundations regardless of foundation type selected
8.6 Recommendations for shallow foundations regardless of foundation type selected
8.7 Soil strength parameters used in determining design capacities
8.8 Ground Improvement recommendations
9 Shallow Foundation Recommendations in accordance with SAES-Q-005 and SAES-Q-007
9.1 Spread footings: Depth below grade, size and shape restrictions
9.2 Mat foundations: Depth below grade, modulus of subgrade reaction (in kN/m³)
9.3 Tank foundations: Recommendations and restrictions, excavation and backfill, ring wall
or mat considerations, extended water tests
9.4 Vibratory equipment foundations: dynamic shear modulus, Poisson's ratio, other
considerations
9.4.1 Based on correlations from published literature
9.4.2 Based on in-situ testing
9.5 Ultimate and allowable net soil bearing capacity (in kPa)
9.5.1 As a function of the shape and size of foundation, depth of embedment, and
soil strength
9.5.2 Any increase in net allowable bearing capacity for hydrotest loads, and short
term loads such as wind and earthquake
9.5.3 Ultimate net soil bearing capacity for blast loading conditions (SAES-M-009)
9.6 Foundation settlement (in mm)
9.6.1 As a function of loading, shape, depth and size of foundations, and
compressibility of sub-soils
9.6.2 Immediate settlement during construction
9.6.3 Long term settlement
9.6.4 Time rate of settlement
Saudi Aramco: Company General Use
Page 35 of 39
Document Responsibility: Geotechnical Standards Committee SAES-A-113
Issue Date: 13 December 2018
Next Planned Update: 13 December 2021 Onshore Geotechnical Engineering Requirements
13 Seismic Analysis
13.1 Seismicity based on SAES-A-112
13.2 Confirmation of or proposed alternatives to Site Class given in SAES-A-112
13.3 Liquefaction potential of soils
13.4 Site-specific seismic risk study
14 Earthwork
14.1 Definition of select fill as per SAES-A-114
14.2 Suitability of on-site material for select and non-select fill
14.3 Special preparations or other requirements for use of on-site material
14.4 Availability of imported fill
14.5 Subgrade preparation
14.6 Recommended compaction criteria and moisture content control in accordance with
SAES-A-114 and SAES-Q-006
14.7 Potential compaction difficulties and recommended solutions
14.8 Final fill surface/wind erosion protection measures
15 Excavation Considerations
15.1 Allowable excavation slope inclinations, temporary and permanent in accordance with
SAES-A-114 and Saudi Aramco Safety Management Guide Number 06-002-2008
15.2 Groundwater Control
15.2.1 Recommended dewatering method
19 Other Considerations
19.1 Swelling potential of soils, including depth of zone of soil moisture content fluctuation
and associated recommendations
19.2 Erosion protection of slopes
19.3 Collapsible or dispersive soils
19.4 Effects of proposed construction on existing facilities or adjacent property
19.5 Geologic or other potential hazards
20 Foundation Protection
20.1 Concrete requirements per SAES-Q-001, Table 2
20.2 Coatings or other protective measures, if required









