0% found this document useful (0 votes)
31 views4 pages

DFM Guidelines for Mechanical Design

Design For manufacturing ppt contains all the the Basic concepts and theoretical guidelines with example

Uploaded by

Abhay Vaishnav
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
31 views4 pages

DFM Guidelines for Mechanical Design

Design For manufacturing ppt contains all the the Basic concepts and theoretical guidelines with example

Uploaded by

Abhay Vaishnav
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Shri Yogindra Sagar Institute Technology, Ratlam (M.

P)

Mechnical Engineering Dept.


Topic :- Design for Manufacturing (DFM)
Subject : Product Design
Sem / Year : VI/ III
By : Prof. Abhay kumar vaishnav

Design for Manufacturing – Guidelines


Design for Manufacturing (DFM) and design for assembly (DFA) are the
integration of product design and process planning into one common activity. The
goal is to design a product that is easily and economically manufactured. The
importance of designing for manufacturing is underlined by the fact that about
70% of manufacturing costs of a product (cost of materials, processing, and
assembly) are determined by design decisions, with production decisions (such as
process planning or machine tool selection) responsible for only 20%.
The heart of any design for manufacturing system is a group of design principles or
guidelines that are structured to help the designer reduce the cost and difficulty of
manufacturing an item. The following is a listing of these rules:-

1. Reduce the total number of parts. The reduction of the number of parts in a
product is probably the best opportunity for reducing manufacturing costs. Less
parts implies less purchases, inventory, handling, processing time, development
time, equipment, engineering time, assembly difficulty, service inspection, testing,
etc. In general, it reduces the level of intensity of all activities related to the
product during its entire life. A part that does not need to have relative motion with
respect to other parts, does not have to be made of a different material, or that
would make the assembly or service of other parts extremely difficult or
impossible, is an excellent target for elimination. Some approaches to part-count
reduction are based on the use of one-piece structures and selection of
manufacturing processes such as injection molding, extrusion, precision castings,
and powder metallurgy, among others.
2. Develop a modular design. The use of modules in product design simplifies
manufacturing activities such as inspection, testing, assembly, purchasing,
redesign, maintenance, service, and so on. One reason is that modules add
versatility to product update in the redesign process, help run tests before the final
assembly is put together, and allow the use of standard components to minimize
product variations.
However, the connection can be a limiting factor when applying this rule.

3. Use of standard components. Standard components are less expensive than


custom-made items. The high availability of these components reduces product
lead times. Also, their reliability factors are well ascertained. Furthermore, the use
of standard components refers to the production pressure to the supplier, relieving
in part the manufacture’s concern of meeting production schedules.

4. Design parts to be multi-functional. Multi-functional parts reduce the total


number of parts in a design, thus, obtaining the benefits given in rule 1. Some
examples are a part to act as both an electric conductor and as a structural member,
or as a heat dissipating element and as a structural member. Also, there can be
elements that besides their principal function have guiding, aligning, or self-
fixturing features to facilitate assembly, and/or reflective surfaces to facilitate
inspection, etc.

5. Design parts for multi-use. In a manufacturing firm, different products can


share parts that have been designed for multi-use. These parts can have the same or
different functions when used in different products. In order to do this, it is
necessary to identify the parts that are suitable for multi-use. For example, all the
parts used in the firm (purchased or made) can be sorted into two groups: the first
containing all the parts that are used commonly in all products. Then, part families
are created by defining categories of similar parts in each group. The goal is to
minimize the number of categories, the variations within the categories, and the
number of design features within each variation. The result is a set of standard part
families from which multi-use parts are created. After organizing all the parts into
part families, the manufacturing processes are standardized for each part family.
The production of a specific part belonging to a given part family would follow the
manufacturing routing that has been setup for its family, skipping the operations
that are not required for it. Furthermore, in design changes to existing products and
especially in new product designs, the standard multi-use components should be
used.

6. Design for ease of fabrication. Select the optimum combination between the
material and fabrication process to minimize the overall manufacturing cost. In
general, final operations such as painting, polishing, finish machining, etc. should
be avoided. Excessive tolerance, surface-finish requirement, and so on are
commonly found problems that result in higher than necessary production cost.

7. Avoid separate fasteners. The use of fasteners increases the cost of


manufacturing a part due to the handling and feeding operations that have to be
performed. Besides the high cost of the equipment required for them, these
operations are not 100% successful, so they contribute to reducing the overall
manufacturing efficiency. In general, fasteners should be avoided and replaced, for
example, by using tabs or snap fits. If fasteners have to be used, then some guides
should be followed for selecting them.
Minimize the number, size, and variation used; also, utilize standard components
whenever possible. Avoid screws that are too long, or too short, separate washers,
tapped holes, and round heads and flatheads (not good for vacuum pickup). Self-
tapping and chamfered screws are preferred because they improve placement
success. Screws with vertical side heads should be selected vacuum pickup.

8. Minimize assembly directions. All parts should be assembled from one


direction. If possible, the best way to add parts is from above, in a vertical
direction, parallel to the gravitational direction (downward). In this way, the effects
of gravity help the assembly process, contrary to having to compensate for its
effect when other directions are chosen.
9. Maximize compliance. Errors can occur during insertion operations due to
variations in part dimensions or on the accuracy of the positioning device used.
This faulty behavior can cause damage to the part and/or to the equipment. For this
reason, it is necessary to include compliance in the part design and in the assembly
process. Examples of part built-in compliance features include tapers or chamfers
and moderate radius sizes to facilitate insertion, and nonfunctional external
elements to help detect hidden features. For the assembly process, selection of a
rigid base part, tactile sensing capabilities, and vision systems are example of
compliance. A simple solution is to use high-quality parts with designed-in-
compliance, a rigid-base part, and selective compliance in the assembly tool.

10. Minimize handling. Handling consists of positioning, orienting, and fixing a


part or component. To facilitate orientation, symmetrical parts should be used
when ever possible. If it is not possible, then the asymmetry must be exaggerated
to avoid failures. Use external guiding features to help the orientation of a part.
The subsequent operations should be designed so that the orientation of the part is
maintained. Also, magazines, tube feeders, part strips, and so on, should be used to
keep this orientation between operations. Avoid using flexible parts - use slave
circuit boards instead. If cables have to be used, then include a dummy connector
to plug the cable (robotic assembly) so that it can be located easily. When
designing the product, try to minimize the flow of material waste, parts, and so on,
in the manufacturing operation; also, take packaging into account, select
appropriate and safe packaging for the product.

Common questions

Powered by AI

Designing parts to be multi-functional impacts the manufacturing process positively by reducing the total number of parts, which lowers costs and simplifies the assembly process . Multi-functional parts serve multiple purposes, such as acting as both an electric conductor and structural support, further consolidating functionality and reducing complexity in manufacturing . This reduction in complexity not only leads to cost savings but also eases assembly and enhances the robustness of the manufactured product .

Using standard components reduces lead times because these components are readily available, eliminating delays associated with acquiring custom-made items . Moreover, the reliability of standard components is often well-established, which enhances production efficiency and product dependability while shifting part of the production pressure from the manufacturer to the supplier .

To minimize handling in manufacturing, strategies such as designing symmetrical parts for easy orientation, using external guiding features, and maintaining consistency through systems like magazines, tube feeders, and part strips are critical . Avoiding flexible parts, using slave circuit boards, and proper packaging considerations also ensure efficient handling. These strategies contribute to manufacturing efficiency by reducing time, errors, and the overall complexity associated with handling parts throughout production .

Reducing the total number of parts in a product is critical for lowering manufacturing costs because each component in a product involves significant cost and resource allocation. Fewer parts mean less need for purchasing and inventory management, reduced handling and processing time, shortened development and equipment usage time, decreased engineering and assembly efforts, and simplified service inspections and testing . Easing the intensity of all these activities across the product lifecycle directly impacts the cost-effectiveness and efficiency of manufacturing .

When avoiding separate fasteners in product design, it is advisable to opt for alternatives like tabs or snap fits instead of traditional fasteners . If fasteners must be used, efforts should be made to minimize their number, size, and variation, and to utilize standard components whenever possible . Avoiding separate fasteners is crucial because fasteners increase manufacturing costs due to additional handling and feeding operations and decrease overall manufacturing efficiency .

Designing parts for multi-use involves creating components that can serve different functions across a variety of products. This requires identifying parts that are suitable for multiple functions and categorizing them into part families . Standardizing these components minimizes design variation, simplifies manufacturing processes, and allows efficient use of manufacturing resources by following predefined manufacturing routings for part families . This approach enables adaptability and reduces costs associated with over-customization in the manufacturing process .

Modular design enhances manufacturing efficiency by simplifying activities such as inspection, testing, assembly, purchasing, redesign, and maintenance . Modules add versatility to product updates during redesign processes, enable running tests prior to final assembly, and facilitate the use of standard components, thus reducing product variation . This systematic approach aids in maintaining consistency while enhancing the robustness of the manufacturing process, ultimately leading to efficiency .

Minimizing assembly directions is recommended to streamline the assembly process and utilize the effects of gravity to assist in parts placement. The preferred assembly direction is from above, in a vertical direction parallel to gravitational pull, as this simplifies assembly and helps avoid the complexities introduced by needing to counteract gravitational effects in other directions .

Avoiding excessive tolerance and surface finish requirements is critical because these requirements significantly increase production costs without proportionate benefits . The need for precise finishing operations, such as painting or polishing, involves additional labor, time, and financial resources. By selecting optimal material-process combinations and minimizing unnecessary specifications, manufacturers can streamline production, reduce waste, and lower costs associated with overengineering . This approach ensures a cost-effective manufacturing process while maintaining product functionality and quality .

Maximizing compliance in the assembly process involves designing parts with inherent flexibility, such as incorporating tapers or chamfers and moderate radii to facilitate insertion . Compliance also includes selecting a rigid base part and using technologies like tactile sensing and vision systems to accurately position and assemble components. This helps accommodate dimensional variations and positional inaccuracies during assembly, reducing the risk of damage and increasing efficiency .

You might also like