0% found this document useful (0 votes)
256 views6 pages

Valuation of Forward Commitments

Troubadour, a derivatives trader, identifies arbitrage opportunities in various derivatives markets. He holds positions in futures, forwards, and swaps and analyzes them to determine profit or loss. Johnson, a risk manager, also uses swaps and forwards to hedge risks for her bank. She prices various interest rate swaps, a currency swap, and equity swap to value existing positions and considers entering new forward rate agreement positions.

Uploaded by

Alvian
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
256 views6 pages

Valuation of Forward Commitments

Troubadour, a derivatives trader, identifies arbitrage opportunities in various derivatives markets. He holds positions in futures, forwards, and swaps and analyzes them to determine profit or loss. Johnson, a risk manager, also uses swaps and forwards to hedge risks for her bank. She prices various interest rate swaps, a currency swap, and equity swap to value existing positions and considers entering new forward rate agreement positions.

Uploaded by

Alvian
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
  • Pricing and Valuation of Forward Commitments
  • Forward Contracts and Currency Valuation
  • Value Factors and Rates
  • Spot Rates and Equity Options
  • Fixed Rate Swap Calculations

Pricing and Valuation of Forward Commitments

Literature
Chapter 2: Pricing and Valuation of Forward Commitments, p. 111-176
PIRIE, Wendy L. Derivatives. Hoboken: Wiley, 2017. CFA institute investment series. ISBN 978-1-119-
38181-5.
Chapters 5, 6, p. 107-154
HULL, John. Options, futures, and other derivatives. Ninth edition. Harlow: Pearson, 2018. ISBN
978-1-292-21289-0. Learning Outcomes

Learning Outcomes
• describe and compare how equity, interest rate, fixed-income, and currency forward and futures contracts
are priced and valued;
• calculate and interpret the no-arbitrage value of equity, interest rate, fixed-income, and cur- rency
forward and futures contracts;
• describe and compare how interest rate, currency, and equity swaps are priced and valued;
• calculate and interpret the no-arbitrage value of interest rate, currency, and equity swaps.

Problems
The following information relates to Questions 1-7
Donald Troubadour is a derivatives trader for Southern Shores Investments. The firm seeks arbitrage
opportunities in the forward and futures markets using the carry arbitrage model.
Troubadour identifies an arbitrage opportunity relating to a fixed-income futures contract and its underlying
bond. Current data on the futures contract and underlying bond are presented in Exhibit 1. The current
annual compounded risk-free rate is 0.30%.

Exhibit 1 - Current Data for Futures and Underlying Bond

Futures Contract Underlying Bond


Quoted futures price 125.00 Quoted bond price 112.00
Conversion factor 0.90 Accrued interest since last 0.08
coupon payment
Time remaining to contract Three months Accrued interest at futures 0.20
expiration contract expiration
Accrued interest over life of 0.00
futures contract

Troubadour next gathers information on three existing positions.

Position 1 (Nikkei 225 Futures Contract):


Troubadour holds a long position in a Nikkei 225 futures contract that has a remain- ing maturity of three
[Link] continuously compounded dividend yield on the Nikkei 225 Stock Index is 1.1%, and the current
stock index level is 16,080. The continuously compounded annual interest rate is 0.2996%.

Position 2 (Euro/JPY Forward Contract):

1
One month ago, Troubadour purchased euro/yen forward contracts with three months to expiration at a
quoted price of 100.20 (quoted as a percentage of par). The contract notional amount is U100,000,000. The
current forward price is 100.05.

Position 3 (JPY/USD Currency Forward Contract):


Troubadour holds a short position in a yen/US dollar forward contract with a notional value of $1,000,000.
At contract initiation, the forward rate was U112.10 per $1. The forward contract expires in three months.
The current spot exchange rate is U112.00 per $1, and the annually compounded risk-free rates are -0.20%
for the yen and 0.30% for the US dollar. The current quoted price of the forward contract is equal to the
no-arbitrage price.
Troubadour next considers an equity forward contract for Texas Steel, Inc. (TSI). Information regarding TSI
common shares and a TSI equity forward contract is presented in Exhibit 2.

Exhibit 2 - Selected Information for TSI

Selected Information for TSI


- TSI has historically paid dividends every six months.
- The price per share of TSI’s common shares is $250.
- The forward price per share for a nine-month TSI equity forward contract is $250.562289.
- Assume annual compounding.

Troubadour takes a short position in the TSI equity forward contract. His supervisor asks, “Under which
scenario would our position experience a loss?”
Three months after contract initiation, Troubadour gathers information on TSI and the risk-free rate, which
is presented in Exhibit 3.

Exhibit 3 - Selected Data on TSI and the Risk-Free Rate

Selected Data on TSI and the Risk-Free Rate


- The price per share of TSI’s common shares is $245.
- The risk-free rate is 0.325% (quoted on an annual compounding basis).
- TSI recently announced its regular semiannual dividend of $1.50 per share that will be paid exactly
three months before contract expiration.
- The market price of the TSI equity forward contract is equal to the no-arbitrage forward price.

1. Based on Exhibit 2 and assuming annual compounding, the arbitrage profit on the bond futures contract
is closest to:
• A. 0.4158.
• B. 0.5356.
• C. 0.6195.
2. The current no-arbitrage futures price of the Nikkei 225 futures contract (Position 1) is closest to:
• A. 15,951.81.
• B. 16,047.86.
• C. 16,112.21.
3. The value of Position 2 is closest to:
• A. -U149,925.
• B. -U150,000.

2
• C. -U150,075.
4. The value of Position 3 is closest to:
• A. -U40,020.
• B. U139,913.
• C. U239,963.
5. Based on Exhibit 2, Troubadour should find that an arbitrage opportunity relating to TSI shares is
• A. not available.
• B. available based on carry arbitrage.
• C. available based on reverse carry arbitrage.
6. The most appropriate response to Troubadour’s supervisor’s question regarding the TSI forward contract
is:
• A. a decrease in TSI’s share price, all else equal.
• B. an increase in the risk-free rate, all else equal
• C. a decrease in the market price of the forward contract, all else equal.
7. Based on Exhibits 2 and 3, and assuming annual compounding, the per share value of Troubadour’s
short position in the TSI forward contract three months after contract initiation is closest to:
• A. $1.6549.
• B. $5.1561.
• C. $6.6549.

3
The following information relates to Questions 8–16
Sonal Johnson is a risk manager for a bank. She manages the bank’s risks using a combination of swaps and
forward rate agreements (FRAs).
Johnson prices a three-year Libor-based interest rate swap with annual resets using the present value factors
presented in Exhibit 1.

Exhibit 1 - Present Value Factors

Maturity (years) Present Value Factors


1 0.990099
2 0.977876
3 0.965136

Johnson also uses the present value factors in Exhibit 1 to value an interest rate swap that the bank entered
into one year ago as the receive-floating party. Selected data for the swap are presented in Exhibit 2. Johnson
notes that the current equilibrium two-year fixed swap rate is 1.00%.

Exhibit 2 - Selected Data on Fixed for Floating Interest Rate Swap

Data
Swap notional amount $50,000,000
Original swap term Three years, with annual resets
Fixed swap rate (since initiation) 3.00%

One of the bank’s investments is exposed to movements in the Japanese yen, and Johnson desires to hedge
the currency exposure. She prices a one-year fixed-for-fixed currency swap involving yen and US dollars, with
a quarterly reset. Johnson uses the interest rate data presented in Exhibit 3 to price the currency swap.

Exhibit 3 - Selected Japanese and US Interest Rate Data

Days to Maturity Yen Spot Interest Rates US Dollar Spot Interest Rates
90 0.05% 0.20%
180 0.10% 0.40%
270 0.15% 0.55%
360 0.25% 0.70%

Johnson next reviews an equity swap with an annual reset that the bank entered into six months ago as the
receive-fixed, pay-equity party. Selected data regarding the equity swap, which is linked to an equity index,
are presented in Exhibit 4. At the time of initiation, the underlying equity index was trading at 100.00.

Exhibit 4 - Selected Data on Equity Swap

Data on Equity Swap


Swap notional amount $20,000,000
Original swap term Five years, with annual resets
Fixed swap rate 2.00%

4
The equity index is currently trading at 103.00, and relevant US spot rates, along with their associated
present value factors, are presented in Exhibit 5.

Exhibit 5 - Selected US Spot Rates and Present Value Factors

Maturity (years) Spot Rate Present Value Factors


0.5 0.40% 0.998004
1.5 1.00% 0.985222
2.5 1.20% 0.970874
3.5 2.00% 0.934579
4.5 2.60% 0.895255

Johnson reviews a 6 × 9 FRA that the bank entered into 90 days ago as the pay-fixed/ receive-floating party.
Selected data for the FRA are presented in Exhibit 6, and current Libor data are presented in Exhibit 7.
Based on her interest rate forecast, Johnson also considers whether the bank should enter into new positions
in 1 × 4 and 2 × 5 FRAs.

Exhibit 6 - 6 x 9 FRA Data

Data
FRA term 6x9
FRA rate 0.70%
FRA notional amount US$20,000,000
FRA settlement terms Advanced set, advanced settle

Exhibit 7 - Current Libor

Current Libor
30-day Libor 0.75%
60-day Libor 0.82%
90-day Libor 0.90%
120-day Libor 0.92%
150-day Libor 0.94%
180-day Libor 0.95%
210-day Libor 0.97%
270-day Libor 1.00%

Three months later, the 6 x 9 FRA in Exhibit 6 reaches expiration, at which time the three-month US dollar
Libor is 1.10% and the six-month US dollar Libor is 1.20%. Johnson determines that the appropriate discount
rate for the FRA settlement cash flows is 1.10%.
8. Based on Exhibit 1, Johnson should price the three-year Libor-based interest rate swap at a fixed rate
closest to:
• A. 0.34%.
• B. 1.16%.
• C. 1.19%.
9. From the bank’s perspective, using data from Exhibit 1, the current value of the swap described in
Exhibit 2 is closest to:

5
• A. –$2,951,963.
• B. –$1,967,975.
• C. –$1,943,000.
10. Based on Exhibit 3, Johnson should determine that the annualized equilibrium fixed swap rate for
Japanese yen is closest to:
• A. 0.0624%.
• B. 0.1375%.
• C. 0.2496%.
11. From the bank’s perspective, using data from Exhibits 4 and 5, the fair value of the equity swap is
closest to:
• A. –$1,139,425.
• B. –$781,323.
• C. –$181,323.
12. Based on Exhibit 5, the current value of the equity swap described in Exhibit 4 would be zero if the
equity index was currently trading the closest to:
• A. 97.30.
• B. 99.09.
• C. 100.00.
13. From the bank’s perspective, based on Exhibits 6 and 7, the value of the 6 x 9 FRA 90 days after
inception is closest to:
• A. $14,817.
• B. $19,647.
• C. $29,635.
14. Based on Exhibit 7, the no-arbitrage fixed rate on a new 1 × 4 FRA is closest to:
• A. 0.65%.
• B. 0.73%.
• C. 0.98%.
15. Based on Exhibit 7, the fixed rate on a new 2 x 5 FRA is closest to:
• A. 0.61%.
• B. 1.02%.
• C. 1.71%.
16. Based on Exhibit 6 and the three-month US dollar Libor at expiration, the payment amount that the
bank will receive to settle the 6 x 9 FRA is closest to:
• A. $19,945.
• B. $24,925.
• C. $39,781.

Common questions

Powered by AI

Present value factors are used to discount future cash flows to their present value and are essential in valuing interest rate swaps. In a swap valuation, the present value factors applied to the fixed and floating rate cash flows determine the current value of the swap. The difference between the sum of discounted fixed and floating cash flows indicates whether the swap has a positive or negative value for the participating parties .

Dividend announcements affect equity forward contract valuation by altering the expected cash flows from the underlying asset. A higher-than-expected dividend may lower the forward price, as future cash flows to the forward holder are now considered higher due to reinvested dividends. The valuation model must integrate these cash flows to accurately reflect the present value in the forward price calculation .

The no-arbitrage futures price of an equity index can be determined using the formula F = S e^(r-d)T, where S is the current index level, r is the continuously compounded risk-free interest rate, d is the continuously compounded dividend yield, and T is the time to expiration. This formula accounts for the cost of carry and the expected dividend yield .

A currency swap with periodic resets is typically priced using the present value of expected future cash flows derived from the prevailing interest rates of the involved currencies. Key interest rates such as the spot rates and the forward rates for each currency at various maturities are considered. The swap rate is influenced by the difference between these rates, ensuring that the present value of cash flows from both currencies are equivalent initially .

For the receiving party in an interest rate swap, a decline in the fixed swap rate increases the present value of receiving fixed payments due to the lower future cash flows compared to the original terms. Conversely, an increase in the fixed swap rate would decrease the present value of receiving fixed payments, as future payments would be more valuable relative to the market rate .

A short position in an equity forward contract would result in a loss if there is a decrease in the share price, all else being equal. This is because the forward holder is obligated to buy at the forward price, which will be higher than the market price if the share price drops, thus resulting in a loss .

The selection of different discount factors or interest rate environments significantly affects swap pricing. Using lower discount rates increases the present value of future fixed cash flows, thereby increasing the swap's value for the receiving party when future payments are fixed. Conversely, a steeper yield curve or higher rates result in higher discount factors, reducing present values and consequently, the swap's attractiveness. It is critical to apply consistent discounting reflective of prevailing market conditions to avoid mispricing .

An arbitrage opportunity might arise if there is a discrepancy between the forward exchange rate implied by interest rate parity and the actual forward rate quoted in the market. For example, if the forward rate is lower than expected based on interest rate differentials between two currencies, an arbitrageur could borrow in the currency with a higher interest rate, convert to the other currency, invest at the lower rate, and simultaneously enter into a forward contract to convert back at maturity for a guaranteed profit .

Accrued interest must be considered in bond futures arbitrage analysis because it affects the total consideration of the bond's value and thus the futures pricing. Arbitrageurs need to ensure that the quoted futures price aligns with the underlying bond price adjusted for accrued interest, as it influences the cash flows and potential profits from an arbitrage strategy. Ignoring accrued interest could lead to a misjudgment of true arbitrability .

The no-arbitrage value of equity forward contracts is determined by comparing the forward price to the spot price adjusted for carrying costs, typically using the formula F = S(1 + r - d)^T, where S is the spot price, r is the risk-free rate, d is the dividend yield, and T is the time to maturity. Factors influencing the valuation include the current stock price, the risk-free rate, the dividend yield, and the time to expiration .

Pricing and Valuation of Forward Commitments
Literature
Chapter 2: Pricing and Valuation of Forward Commitments, p. 111-176
P
One month ago, Troubadour purchased euro/yen forward contracts with three months to expiration at a
quoted price of 100.20 (q
• C. -¥150,075.
4. The value of Position 3 is closest to:
• A. -¥40,020.
• B. ¥139,913.
• C. ¥239,963.
5. Based on Exhibit 2,
The following information relates to Questions 8–16
Sonal Johnson is a risk manager for a bank. She manages the bank’s risks
The equity index is currently trading at 103.00, and relevant US spot rates, along with their associated
present value factor
• A. –$2,951,963.
• B. –$1,967,975.
• C. –$1,943,000.
10. Based on Exhibit 3, Johnson should determine that the annualized eq

You might also like