0% found this document useful (0 votes)
106 views6 pages

Understanding Map Projection Distortions

This document discusses map projections and the types of distortion that can occur when converting spherical geographic coordinates to a planar coordinate system. It describes: 1) The main types of projections are planar, conic, and cylindrical, defined by the shape of the projection surface and its relationship to the reference globe. 2) Distortions in shape, area, distance, and direction occur depending on the projection used. Certain projections aim to minimize distortion of one property at the expense of others. 3) Key concepts are points of contact between the projection surface and globe, which define lines of no scale distortion, and how distortion increases with distance from these lines.

Uploaded by

ArenPrajapati
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
106 views6 pages

Understanding Map Projection Distortions

This document discusses map projections and the types of distortion that can occur when converting spherical geographic coordinates to a planar coordinate system. It describes: 1) The main types of projections are planar, conic, and cylindrical, defined by the shape of the projection surface and its relationship to the reference globe. 2) Distortions in shape, area, distance, and direction occur depending on the projection used. Certain projections aim to minimize distortion of one property at the expense of others. 3) Key concepts are points of contact between the projection surface and globe, which define lines of no scale distortion, and how distortion increases with distance from these lines.

Uploaded by

ArenPrajapati
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

GIS02

MAP PROJECTIONS
Last day we look at the different types of co-ordinate system which could be used to specify the location of features
in 2- and 3-dimensional space. Today we will look at how geographic co-ordinates (i.e. latitude and longitude) can
be converted to a planar co-ordinate system using map projections.

In practice map projections use mathematical formulae to convert from one co-ordinate system to another. This can
be expressed in general terms as:
x=f( , )
y=g( , )
where f and g are the functions for a particular projection. For example, the formulae for the Mercator projection are:
x=
y = ln tan ( /2 + /4)
Most projections can be envisaged as analogous to shining a light through a scaled-down model of the Earth, known
as the reference globe (or generating globe), onto a surface, referred to as a developable surface, which can be
'rolled out' into a flat plane. Different types of projection can be defined depending upon the source of the light (e.g.
the centre of the Earth, or a point infinitely far away) and the location and shape of the projection surface (e.g. cone,
cylinder or plane). The projected lines of latitude and longitude form a graticule. These lines are not necessarily
equally spaced, may converge and may be curved, depending upon the projection. A rectangular co-ordinate system,
known as a grid, is often superimposed for the purpose of providing grid references, etc.

TYPES OF DISTORTION

Projecting from a curved surface onto a plane necessarily involves distortions. Different types of projection result in
different types of distortion. If you are using a GIS to make measurements from the map (e.g. of distance or area), it
may be important to know what sort of projection you are using so as to gauge the extent of the distortion in the
properties you are measuring. It is also important to know what projections are being used if you are trying to
overlay data from different sources - if the sources use different projections then the features will be displaced
relative to one another. Four properties are generally identified as important:
Shape
Area
Distance
Direction

-1-
GIS02

Different projections can be selected to ensure the accuracy of the map with regard to one or sometimes more of
these properties, but each projection necessarily results in distortions with regard to some of the other properties.

The scale of a map may be thought of as having two components: one identifies the extent to which the reference
globe is scaled down relative to the Earth; the other measures the extent to which features on the curved reference
globe are distorted when projected onto a planar surface. The first of these, referred to as the principal scale (or
sometimes simply as the map scale, e.g. 1:50,000), is the representative fraction for the reference globe, calculated
by dividing the Earth's radius by the radius of the reference globe. The second, referred to as the scale factor, is
calculated by the dividing the distance between features on the planar surface (i.e. map) by the distance between
these features on the reference globe. A scale factor of 1.0 would indicate no distortion.1 When the reference globe is
projected onto a planar surface, the scale factor will tend to vary between different parts of the map – i.e. some parts
of the map will have a scale factor of 1.0, whereas other parts will have scale factors larger or smaller than this.

Analysis of the scale factor helps to understand the nature of the four properties more precisely. We will refer to the
scale factor in the east-west direction (i.e. along the parallels) as sx and the scale factor in the north-south direction
(i.e. along the meridians) as sy.

1. Shape. Projections which preserve the correct shape for local areas (e.g. Lambert Conformal Conic, Mercator)
are referred to as conformal (or orthomorphic). To preserve shape, the projected map should preserve the
angles between lines on the reference globe. The parallels and meridians must therefore remain at 90 degrees to
one another. For example, the Mercator projection represents both the lines of latitude and of longitude as
straight parallel lines intersecting at right angles. Given that the meridians on a globe converge towards the poles,
the distance between them along the lines of latitude in a Mercator projection must obviously be stretched (i.e. sx
must get larger) as you move towards the poles if the meridians are to remain parallel. However, to retain the
correct shape, the distance between the parallels must also be stretched by the same amount. For example, if you
increase the width of a square by, say, 10 per cent, then you will also need to increase its height by 10 per cent
otherwise it will no longer remain square. The lines of latitude are therefore spaced further and further apart as
you move towards the poles as sy increases.

In any conformal map, at any given point sx = sy. However, the lines of latitude do not necessarily need to be
straight nor do the lines of longitude need to be parallel. For example, the lines of latitude in the Lambert
Conformal Conic are curved but parallel, whilst the lines of longitude are straight but converge.

It should be noted that conformal projections only preserve shape for small areas. No map projection can
preserve shape for larger areas. For example, a conformal map of Ireland might show both Dublin Bay and Cork
Harbour as the correct shape, but they will have different scale factors. The overall shape of Ireland will therefore
be distorted.

2. Area. Projections which correctly represent the area of features (e.g. Albers Equal Area Conic; Equal Area
Cylindrical) are referred to as equal area (or equivalent). To preserve areas, equal area projections must
compensate for an increase in the scale factor in one direction by a corresponding decrease in the other cardinal
direction (i.e. sx. sy = 1.0). This preserves the measures of area. However, to preserve areas we must distort
shape. Shape and area cannot both be preserved at the same time.

3. Distance. Projections which attempt to minimise distortions in measures of distance (e.g. Equidistant Azimuthal,
Sinusoidal) are referred to as Equidistant. There are two ways in which this can be done. One is to maintain a
scale factor of 1.0 along one or possibly two lines of latitude (called standard parallels). Distance measures will
be correct along these lines, but inaccuracies arise along all other lines. The other approach is to maintain a scale
factor of 1.0 in all directions from one or sometimes two points. Distances measured from these points will be
correct, but errors will be introduced if distances are measured from any other point. Both approaches provide
only partial solutions, although the extent of the errors may be insignificant for most purposes (i.e. about 0.1%).
No projection can measure distance correctly throughout the entire map. For example, the Sinusoidal projection
provides accurate measures along the Equator and all meridians, but distances in all other directions are distorted.

4. Direction. Azimuthal projections (see below e.g. Lambert Equal Area Azimuthal, Equidistant Azimuthal)
preserve direction on maps (e.g. for navigation purposes). However, they are only accurate for one or two

1
The scale factor of features on the reference globe may be thought of as 1.0. The scale factor of features on the
planar surface therefore measures the extent by which these features are stretched or compressed.

-2-
GIS02

selected points. Directions starting from all other points will be incorrect. Although not azimuthal, the Mercator
projection also shows the correct compass bearing between any two points, although the line connecting them on
a Mercator will rarely follow the shortest (i.e. great circle) route – the shortest route will generally appear on a
Mercator map as a curved line.

Some map projections, referred to as Compromise projections (e.g. Robinson), attempt to strike a balance between
objectives without necessarily being perfect with regard to any of them.

An important step in any projection is to identify one or more points of contact - i.e. places where the projection
surface touches (points of tangency) or intersects (points of secancy) the surface of the reference globe. Tangential
projections are more common. Planar projections (see below) are tangential at one point only. Conic and cylindrical
projections are tangential along a line. If the projection surface intersects the reference globe, rather than merely
touching it, then the points of intersection may form a circle (planar projection) or two lines (conic or cylindrical).
These projections involve secant rather than tangential calculations. The location of the points of contact are
important because they define the point or line of no distortion (i.e. true scale, where the scale factor is 1.0), often
referred to as the standard line (usually a standard parallel or a standard meridian, but occasionally another
line). Distortion generally increases with distance from the point or line of contact.

PROJECTION TYPES

The three main types of projection are conic, cylindrical and planar.

Conic Projections

The simplest conic projection is tangential to the globe along a line of latitude (known as the standard parallel).
The lines of latitude and longitude are projected onto the cone, and the cone is then metaphorically cut along any
meridian. The opposite meridian becomes the central meridian in the map. The other meridians converge towards a
point, and the lines of latitude appear as concentric circular arcs.

Distortion increases north and south of the standard parallel, so the top of the cone (corresponding to polar areas) is
usually cut off.

Secant conic projections use two lines of contact (i.e. the projection surface intersects the globe along two lines of
latitude – i.e. two standard parallels). The cone may also sit on the globe 'crookedly' to form an oblique conic
projection (i.e. the line of contact does not lie along a line of latitude, but intersects it at an angle).

-3-
GIS02

The lines of latitude are arc shaped, whilst the meridians are straight but radiate from a common point
(corresponding to the tip of the cone). The spacing between the parallels (i.e. lines of latitude) can be adjusted
(analogous to moving the light source closer or further away). Equidistant Conic projections, which may be either
tangential or secant, have evenly spaced parallels, which means the projection is equidistant in a north-south
direction (i.e. the meridians), but it is neither conformal nor equal-area. The Lambert Conformal Conic projection
is a secant projection designed to preserve shape. It is characterised by an increasing distance between parallels
beyond the standard parallels as you move towards the top or bottom of the map. The scale factor is less than 1.0
between the standard parallels, and more than 1.0 outside the standard parallels. The Lambert Conformal Conic is
particularly useful in mid-latitude areas with a large east-west extent. The Albers Equal-Area Conic projection is
also suited to mid-latitude areas with a large east-west extent. It is also a secant projection, but the objective in this
case is to accurately represent areas. Shape is only distorted slightly between the central parallels, but the distortion
increases towards the top and bottom of the map. The parallels between the standard parallels are more widely
spaced than those at the top or bottom.

Cylindrical Projections
Cylindrical projections may either have one line of tangency or two of secancy. The projection may be normal
(using lines of latitude as the lines of contact - e.g. Mercator), transverse (using meridians - e.g. Transverse
Mercator) or oblique (using any other great circle line).

The Mercator projection is probably the best known projection of all. It produces a graticule with 90 degree angles.
The meridians are equally spaced, whilst the spacing of the parallels (i.e. lines of latitude) increases towards the
poles. The Mercator projection preserves direction, but results in massive distortions of some of the other properties
(especially area in the polar regions).

The Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) is also very widely used. The world is divided into 60 zones with
central meridians at 6 degree intervals. The zones start at 180 degrees West, and the zone numbers rise as you travel
east. Ireland is in zone 29 and Britain is in zone 30. Each zone between 84° N and 80° S is divided into 20 rows of 8
degrees each, except for the most northerly one which is 12 degrees (i.e. a total of 60x20=120 ‘regions’). Two lines
of secancy run parallel to and approximately 180 km on either side of the central meridian. The scale factor along
these lines is 1.0, but is 0.9996 along the central meridian and 1.0004 on either edge of the zone. The UTM is a
conformal projection (i.e. small features have the correct shape, and the scale is the same in all directions). Lines of
latitude and longitude both appear curved in the projection, except for the central meridian and the equator. The co-
ordinates are expressed in metres. The origin is the intersection of the central meridian and the equator, but to ensure
all values are positive the origin is given a false easting of 500,000. In the southern hemisphere the origin is given a
false northing of 10,000,000, but no adjustment is necessary in the northern hemisphere. One of the distinguishing
characteristics of the UTM is that the x co-ordinates have 6 digits, but the y co-ordinates have 7 digits. Because each
zone is in effect a different projection, maps do not fit together across zone boundaries.

Planar Projections
Planar projections, sometimes referred to as azimuthal or zenithal projections, project map data onto a flat surface
which normally touches the globe at a single point. The point of contact defines the aspect of the projection. The
aspect can be polar (using either the north or south pole), equatorial (using a point somewhere on the Equator) or

-4-
GIS02

oblique (using any other point). Planar projections provide accurate representations of direction from their focus
(i.e. point of contact), where the graticular angles are correctly represented as 90 degrees, but not from any other
point. Areal and conformal distortion increases with increasing distance from the focus, so planar projections are
best suited for displaying circular regions.

Polar projections have a dartboard arrangement of concentric lines of latitude and radiating meridians.

The spacing between the lines of latitude depends upon the location of the hypothetical light source. Gnomonic
projections view the surface data from the centre of the Earth, stereographic projections view the data from the
point on the Earth's surface directly opposite the point of contact, and orthographic projections view the data from a
point at infinite distance (analogous to a very distant planet).

Other Projections
There are various other projections which do not fit into any of the above categories. Modified projections use
various mathematical devices to modify one of the standard projections to reduce distortion (e.g. Space Oblique
Mercator). Pseudo projections are totally artificial. The Sinusoidal projection is a pseudocylindrical projection
which preserves area, but distorts shape away from the central meridian and the equator. To minimise these
distortions the map is split into several discontinuous segments, each with its own central meridian. The parallels are
straight, but the meridians are sinusoidal curves. The Robinson projection is also a pseudocylindrical projection
which does not accurately preserve any properties, but it results in only minimal distortions in both shape and area in
the central parts of the map.

-5-
GIS02

NATIONAL GRIDS

The UTM is conformal (i.e. preserves local shape) and is suitable for medium scale mapping in most areas,
especially where the north-south extent exceeds the east-west extent, but it is not sufficiently accurate for some large
scale uses (e.g. accurate surveying). Many national mapping agencies have therefore adopted a co-ordinate system
which is particularly suited to their own local conditions (e.g. shape, latitude, etc.). For example, a Transverse
Mercator would not be suitable for Canada, because of its large east-west extent, therefore Canada uses a Lambert
Conformal Conical projection which is especially suitable for mid to high latitudes.

In the US, each state adopted its own projection and co-ordinate system in the 1930s, referred to as State Plane Co-
ordinates (SPC). Some of the larger states are further subdivided into zones for greater accuracy. Texas, for
example, is divided into five ‘horizontal’ zones, each of which use a Lambert Conformal Conical projection. Hawaii
is also divided into 5 zones, but they are ‘vertical’ and are based on a Transverse Mercator projection. The SPCs had
to be revised following the adoption of the North American Datum in 1983 (NAD83).
The ‘traditional’ British and Irish national grids use Transverse Mercator projections, but with a different central
meridian and a different spheroid. The Irish Grid was based on a modified Airy spheroid, whereas the British grid
used an unmodified Airy spheroid. Ordnance Survey Ireland defined a new co-ordinate system in 2001, referred to as
ITM (Irish Transverse Mercator), to be more compatible with GPS. This is based on the GRS80 spheroid, but it uses
the same origin as the Irish Grid. As the co-ordinates would have been similar, but not identical, the false origin in
ITM was shifted further into the Atlantic to avoid possible confusion – i.e. a co-ordinate for any point on the
landmass is unique to one grid or the other.

OSI will also supply data using a UTM (zone 29) co-ordinate system for customers who may need to operate at an
international level. This has a different origin, different false origin and different scale factor to ITM.
Reference System Irish Grid ITM (Irish Transverse UTM (Universal
Mercator) Transverse Mercator)
Projection : Transverse Mercator Transverse Mercator Transverse Mercator
Spheroid : Airy (Modified 1849) GRS80 GRS80
Semi-major Axis : 6,377,341.89 m 6,378,137.00 m 6,378,137.00 m
Semi-Minor Axis : 6,356,036.143 m 6,356,752.3141 m 6,356,752.3141 m
Central Meridian : -8 degrees -8 degrees -9 degrees
Reference Latitude : 53.5 degrees 53.5 degrees +0 degrees
Scale Factor (i.e. error 1.000035 2 0.999820 0.999600
at central meridian) :
False Easting : 200,000 m 600,000 m 500,000 m
False Northing : 250,000 m 750,000 m 0

2
This was revised following new triangulation in 1975.

-6-

Common questions

Powered by AI

Projections inherently introduce distortions when converting a globe to a flat map, each addressing distortions differently. Conformal projections (e.g., Mercator) preserve shape locally by keeping angles intact, crucial where sx = sy, making them ideal for navigation but distorting size and area, especially near the poles. Equal-area projections (e.g., Albers Equal Area) maintain area proportions by balancing distortions between sx and sy, necessitating shape distortions. Equidistant projections focus on preserving distance accuracy along specific lines or from a point, introducing distortions elsewhere. Azimuthal projections preserve direction accurately from one or two points, misrepresenting directions from others. Compromise projections like Robinson attempt to balance distortions in all properties without perfecting any, thereby providing a more visually appealing global perspective .

Understanding map projection types is crucial for selecting suitable projections for specific tasks, as each projection type optimizes certain properties and introduces specific distortions. Conformal projections, such as Mercator, enable precise navigation by preserving local shapes but distort area, making them apt for sea charts. Equal-area projections like Albers Equal Area Conic maintain area fidelity, ideal for thematic maps assessing spatial distribution (e.g., demographics). Equidistant projections are helpful for distance computation, while azimuthal projections preserve direction, key for navigational and azimuthal plot uses. Selecting based on properties like regional size, shape, and the need for maintaining true distance, area, and direction helps mitigate distortion impact, facilitating accurate maps for various applications .

The Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) system divides the world into 60 zones, each 6 degrees wide in longitude, to provide a system of conformal projections. Each zone has a central meridian with specific lines of secancy where scale distortion is minimized, featuring a scale factor of 1.0. The UTM is a conformal projection, preserving shape locally and is expressed in meters, promoting consistency in measurements across borders and scales. Zones start at 180 degrees west; as a result, maps may not align perfectly across these boundaries, introducing complexity when integrating data from multiple zones. UTM’s design supports accurate regional mapping, crucial for large-scale applications like military and infrastructural mapping .

The scale factor quantifies the distortion between features on a map and the reference globe. Variations in scale factor heavily influence map accuracy since they dictate how faithfully distances and areas are depicted. A scale factor of 1.0 represents no distortion, a crucial understanding for interpreting map accuracy. Non-uniform scale factors across a map indicate distortion patterns, affecting tasks like distance measurement or overlaying multiple data sets. Conformal maps have the same scale factor in all directions at specific points, improving local accuracy, whereas equal area maps manipulate scale factor between directions to preserve area, distorting shapes. Evaluating scale factor across map zones assists in predicting and correcting potential inaccuracies for precise geographic analyses .

Map projections involve mathematical formulae to convert geographic coordinates (latitude and longitude) into planar coordinate systems. This conversion can be expressed using functions: x = f(φ,λ) and y = g(φ,λ). These functions vary according to the type of projection, such as the Mercator projection, where x = λ and y = ln tan (φ/2 + π/4). Different projections convert the curved surface of the Earth into a flat plane, introducing distortions in shape, area, distance, or direction. While conformal projections like Mercator preserve shapes locally by maintaining equal scale factors (sx = sy), equal-area projections preserve area by adjusting scale factors such that sx * sy = 1.0, thereby distorting shape. Understanding the mathematical basis of projections is essential for assessing and mitigating distortions when using GIS for measurements and data overlays .

The Lambert Conformal Conic projection is particularly useful for mid-latitude areas with a large east-west extent. It is a conformal projection, preserving shape locally by keeping angles between meridians and parallels at 90 degrees. This projection is suitable for regions such as the United States and Europe, aligning well with their geographic extent. The projection is typically used for aeronautical charts and other applications where maintaining true shapes is important. However, this results in increased distortion towards the extremities of the map. Its use is strategic where maintaining fidelity of shape and minimizing distortion in an area along east-west lines is critical .

National coordinate systems like the State Plane Coordinate System (SPC) provide high local accuracy, tailored to regional conditions such as shape and latitude, but create discontinuities when integrating with international data systems like UTM. For example, SPCs are ideal for local accuracy in areas like state boundaries in the US, using projections like Lambert Conformal Conic or Transverse Mercator, optimized for east-west or north-south extents, respectively. However, transitioning data to a global scale incurs projection changes that can affect seamless data integration across zones due to different origins and scale factors. This complicates international data sharing, necessitating complex conversions or using unified systems like UTM, which though less locally precise, streamline global dataset integration .

Azimuthal projections, also known as planar or zenithal projections, represent the globe onto a flat surface that touches it typically at a single point, ensuring directional accuracy from that point (focus) only. Polar, equatorial, or oblique aspects determine the projection’s focus. These projections preserve true directions from the point of contact by ensuring that angles between meridians and parallels are represented as 90 degrees. Directional accuracy diminishes with distance from the focus, introducing areal and conformal distortions. This makes azimuthal projections suitable for areas like circular regions where accurate directions from a central point are critical, such as polar maps or radio broadcast maps .

A "false origin" alters coordinate systems, extending the coordinate plane into positive values to avoid negative coordinates, simplifying calculations and enhancing interpretability across systems. For example, the UTM assigns a false easting of 500,000 meters to ensure coordinates are positive in any zone. In the ITM (Irish Transverse Mercator), a false northing extends values 750,000 meters, with a false easting of 600,000 meters, avoiding overlaps with the previous Irish Grid system. This concept is vital in major mapping schemes, ensuring that each point retains unique coordinates relative to its grid, thereby supporting efficient international integration and avoiding confusion in overlapping zones or projections .

Modified projections use mathematical alterations of standard projections to reduce distortion in desired properties. For example, the Space Oblique Mercator modifies the Mercator to minimize distortion for satellites tracking projects. Pseudo projections, meanwhile, such as the Sinusoidal projection, safeguard certain properties like area by segmenting the globe into meridian-based segments with sinusoidal curves, although shape is distorted. These projections aim to provide better visual appeal or accuracy over broader regions compared to standard projections by tailoring projection characteristics to meet specific requirements or enhance spatial representation .

You might also like