0% found this document useful (0 votes)
90 views10 pages

Chemical Engineering Assessment Cover Sheet

This document contains information about a chemical engineering school's assessment policies. It includes a cover sheet for assignments with spaces for student and course details. It discusses keeping copies of submitted work and the serious consequences of plagiarism or collusion, such as failing courses or expulsion. Students must sign to acknowledge they understand these policies and consent to submitted work being checked for plagiarism electronically.

Uploaded by

Leo Nguyễn
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
90 views10 pages

Chemical Engineering Assessment Cover Sheet

This document contains information about a chemical engineering school's assessment policies. It includes a cover sheet for assignments with spaces for student and course details. It discusses keeping copies of submitted work and the serious consequences of plagiarism or collusion, such as failing courses or expulsion. Students must sign to acknowledge they understand these policies and consent to submitted work being checked for plagiarism electronically.

Uploaded by

Leo Nguyễn
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

SCHOOL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING

ASSESSMENT COVER SHEET

Student Name: Quoc Anh Nguyen


Student ID: 1697736
Course (eg Materials I)
Calender No. (eg Chem Eng 1003)
Assessment Title (eg pollution today) Assignment 5
Lecturer/Tutor
OFFICE USE ONLY
Date Received

KEEP A COPY:

Please be sure to make a copy of your work. If you have submitted assessment work electronically
make sure you have a backup copy.

PLAGIARISM AND COLLUSION:

Plagiarism: Using another person’s ideas, designs, word or works without appropriate
acknowledgement.

Collusion: Another person assisting in the production of an assessment submission without the
express requirement, or consent or knowledge of the assessor.

CONSEQUENCES OF PLAGIARISM AND COLLUSION:

Penalties associated with plagiarism and collusion are design to impose sanctions on offenders that
reflect the seriousness of the University’s commitment to academic integrity. Penalties may include:
the requirement to revise and resubmit assessment work, receiving a result of zero for the
assessment work, failing the course, expulsion and/or receiving a financial penalty.

I declare that all material in this assessment is my own work except where there is clear acknowledgement
and reference to the work of others. I have read the University Policy Statement on Plagiarism, Collusion and
Related Forms on Cheating ([Link] I give permission for my
assessment work to be reproduced and submitted to other academic staff for the purposes of assessment
and to be copied, submitted and retained in a form suitable for electronic checking of plagiarism.

Signed: Date: 1/06/2020


Question 1.

a.
Item Relative Purchase Purchase Scale up Installed Scaled Updated
capacity cost($) year factor cost scale
factor cost($) cost($)
Compressor 120 900000 2013 0.7 2.5 79216 908596
5
Condenser 80 270000 2010 0.5 3.7 30186 391399
9
Accumulato 100 200000 2014 0.6 4 20000 222667
r 0
Economiser 75 80000 2011 0.6 4 95072 118485
Suction 150 80000 2015 0.6 4 62724 68464
drum

Updated Installed
Installed
Item Quantity scale cost factor
cost ($)
cost($) ($)
Compressor 1 908596 2.5 2271490
Condenser 1 391399 3.7 1448175
Accumulator 1 222667 4 890667
Economiser 1 118485 4 473942
Suction drum 2 68464 4 547709
Direct cost 5631983
Indirect cost 1407996
Direct plus Indirect cost 7039978
Contingency 1055997
Total capital cost 8095975

Example

 Compressor

Scaled cost:
0.7
100
scaled cost of compressor=900000 x
120 ( ) =792165($)

Updated scale cost:

835
updated scale cost ( 2020 ) =792165 x =908596( $)
728
Installed cost:

installed cost=1 x 908596 x 2.5=2271490($)


Indirect cost:

indirect cost=0.25 xdirect cost=0.25 x 5631983=1407996($)


Direct plus Indirect cost
direct plus indirect cost=1407996+5631983=7039978($)
Contingency:
constigency =15 %x direct plusindirect cost=7039978 x 15 %=1055997 ($)

Total capital cost:

total capital cost =constigency +direct plus indirect cost=1055997+7039978=8095975($)


b. The capital cost estimated here is study estimate, as the estimate contains equipment costs
and installation factors.
c. The typical accuracy of Order of magnitude estimate (OOM) is about ±20 to ±30%.
d. The study estimate typically has 0.1 to 0.2 % cost to produce.
e. Assume the maintenance cost = 4% of the fixed capital investment:
maintenance cost=4 %x ¿ capital investment =direct plus indirect costx 5 %=7039978 x 5 %=352000(
Question 2.

Mass balance around the tur deaerator:

The deaerator uses 3 tonnes of LP steam per 100 tonnes of boiler feedwater

¿> ṁ steam¿ deaerator ¿ =3/100


ṁ boiler feedwater

ṁcondensate
100−3 97
ṁboiler feedwater= =
100 100
100 t
ṁboiler feedwater = x 291=300 ( )
97 d
t
ṁ steam¿ deaerator ¿=ṁ boiler feedwater −ṁ condensate =300−291=9( )
d
t
ṁ HP steam =291+9=300( )
d
The incremental steam consumption for the TA is 0.16 t/d per net KW generated, thus the power
generated can be calculated as:

300 kWh
powergenerated= =1875 ( kW )=45000( )
0.16 d
-300 t/d

-291 t/d
-300t/d -291 t/d

-9 t/d

-300 t/d
-300 t/d

Incremental saving

 300t/d steam @ 25$/t= 300x25=7500($)


 Total incremental saving=7500($)

Incremental cost

 Purchase power 45000 kWh @ 0.19$/kWh= 8550 ($)


 Additional raw material 2.4t/d @ 800$/t= 1920($)
 Total incremental cost 10470($)

Decision

as the Total incremental cost > Total incremental saving => do not to proceed with proposal.

The decision is clear cut as the difference between the Total incremental cost and the Total
incremental saving is larger than 10% of the Total incremental cost.

 If the turbo-alternator was operating at full capacity and 100 t/d of HP steam was being let-
down and desuperheated to satisfy the LP steam demand

ṁ HP steam¿ desuperheter ¿=100 ( dt )=¿ ṁ LP steam =


100
0.8
t
=125 ( )
d
t
¿> ṁ HP steam ¿ TA ¿=300−125=175 ( )
d
t
¿> ṁ HP steam =100+175=275( )
d
The power generated can be calculated as:
175
powergenerated=ṁ HP steam ¿ TA ¿ = =1094 ( kW ) =26250(kWh)
0.16 0.16

-275 t/d -100 t/d

-125 t/d
-175 t/d

-291 t/d
-175 t/d -300 t/d -291 t/d

-9 t/d

-300 t/d

Incremental saving

 275 t/d steam @ 25$/t= 275x25= 6875($)


 Total incremental saving=6875($)

Incremental cost

 Purchase power 26250 kWh @ 0.19$/kWh= 4987.5 ($)


 Additional raw material 2.4t/d @ 800$/t=1920 ($)
 Total incremental cost 6907.5($)

Decision: as the Total incremental cost > Total incremental saving => do not to proceed with
proposal.

The decision is not clear cut as the difference between the total incremental cost and the total
incremental saving is larger than 10% of the Total incremental cost.

Question 3.

 The annual maintenance cost is 5% of the capital cost

maintenance cost=0.05 x 6000000=300000( $)


 Operating supplies and expenses for the replacement TA are $250,000 per annum
 The average power requirement over a 365-day year is 10 MW for processing LP steam=>
the power cost for processing LP steam= 10 x 1000 x 0.08 x 24 x 365=700800($ )
The replacement TA generates 125 kWh of net AC power per tonne of HP steam, thus maximum
7 x 1000 t
steam capacity of TA= =1344 ( )
125/24 d

¿ 4 ṁcondensate
ṁsteam¿ deaerator = =¿ =96 /100
ṁboiler feedwater 100 ṁboiler feedwater
t
ṁcondensate =1680( )
d
ṁ condensate x 100 100 t
ṁboiler feedwater = =1680 x =1750( )
96 96 d
t
ṁ steam¿ deaerator ¿=1750−1680=70( )
d
ṁ HP steam : ṁ LP steam produced by desuperheter :ṁ boiler feedwater ¿ desuperheater ¿=1:1.25 :0.25

 Case 1 if everything go through the desuperheater


t
ṁ LP steam produced by desuperheter =1750( )
d
1750 t
ṁ HP steam = =1400( )
1.25 d
1750
ṁboiler feedwater ¿ desuperheater ¿= =350 ($)
5

-1400t/d
-350 t/d -1750t/d

-70t/d

-1680t/d

-1750t/d
Incremental HP steam cost=1400 t/d steam @ 20$/t= 1400x20=28000($/d)

Installed cost $ 6,000,000


Maintenance $ 300,000
Other expenses $ 250,000
Incremental HP steam
cost $ 12,182,240
Power cost for LP $ 7,008,000
Power cost for AC $ -
Pretax operating cost $ 25,740,240
 Case 1 the AC function at maximum capacity go through the desuperheater

t
ṁ HP steam¿ TA ¿=1344 ( )
d
-325t/d
-1669t/d

-1344t/d

-406t/d

-1344t/d

-1750t/d -70t/d

-1680t/d

-1750t/d

t
ṁ LP steam produced by desuperheter =1750−1344=406 ( )
d
406 t
ṁ HP steam = =325( )
1.25 d
ṁHP steam =325+1344=1669($)
Incremental HP steam cost=1669 t/d steam @ 20$/t= 1669x20=33376($/d)
Power cost for AC=7000x24x0.08x365= 4905600
Installed cost $ 6,000,000
Maintenance $ 300,000
Other expenses $ 250,000
Incremental HP steam $ 12,182,240
cost
Power cost for LP $ 7,008,000
Power cost for AC $ 4,905,600
Pretax operating cost $ 30,645,840

Question 4.

Given

Loan value LV= 30000$

Loan tenure n=5 years

Interest rate i=5%

Let the equivalent interest rate be i equv

Let monthly repayment be R

 Ignorance of any loan fees and charges

Loan interest:

loan interest =LVxnxi=30000 x 5 x 0.05=7500 ( $ )


Total repayment:

total repayment=loan value+ loan interest=30000+ 7500=37500( $)


Annual repayment:

37500 $
anual repayment= =7500( )
5 year
Monthly repayment:
7500 $
R= =625 ( )
12 year
5 year=60 month

Use the mortgage calculation method:

R [ 1−( 1+i )−n ] 625 [ 1−( 1+ i )−60 ]


i= =¿ i=
LV 30000
Using trial and error methods 2 with the value of “I” initial trial twice the simple interest rate period=
2x0.05/12=0.00833

The exact solution i=0.00763

The equivalent annual rate:

i equv =( 1+i )12 −1=( 1+0.00763 )12−1=0.0955=9.55 %

Thus, the equilibrium interest rate per annum is 9.55%

Question 5.

Given

Rate of interest per annum i=6.5%

Growth rate g= 5%

Number of year n=10 years

Let X be the first year investment.

Future value FV=250000$

Future value of growing annuity of payment at 5%:


X
FV = [ ( 1+i )n−( 1+ g )n ]
(i−g)
X
¿>250000=
0.065−0.05
[ ( 1+ 0.065 )10−( 1+0.05 )10 ]
X
¿>250000= [ 1.06510−1.0510 ]
0.01 5
X
¿>250000= [ 1.06510−1.0510 ]
0.01 5
250000
¿>250000=Xx 16.55=¿ X= =15106( $)
16.55
Thus, the investment value in first year is 151056$

 First year
Interest=0
Total investment1=first year investment=15106 ($)
 Second year
Interest:
Interest 2= Xxi=15106 x 0.065=982($ )
Second year investment:
second year investment =first year investmentx 0.05=15106 x 0.05=15861($)
Total investment in second year:
total investment 2=total investment 1+ second year investment + Interest 2=15106 +15861+ 982=31950(
 Third year
Interest:
Interest 3=total investment 2 xi=31950 x 0.065=2077( $)
Third year investment:
second year investment =second year investmentx 0.05=15861 x 0.05=16655($)
Total investment in third year:
total investment 3=total investment 2+ third year investment + Interest 3=16655+2077+ 31950=50681($
………………………………

 Last year
Interest:
Interest 10=total investment 9 xi=212737 x 0.065=13828($)
Tenth year investment:
tenth year investment=nighth year investmentx 0.05=22319 x 0.05=23435($)
Total investment in tenth year:
total investment 10=total investment 9+ tenth year investment + Interest 10=212737+23435+13828=2500

Year Annual Interest Investment


investment total
0 15106 15106
1 15861 982 31950
2 16655 2077 50681
3 17487 3294 71462
4 18362 4645 94469
5 19280 6140 119889
6 20244 7793 147926
7 21256 9615 178797
8 22319 11622 212737
9 23435 13828 250000

You might also like