Objective Vs.
Subjective Performance Evaluations
Objective Vs. Subjective Performance Evaluations
The Key Elements of Measuring Performance
How to Write an Accounting Staff Progress Report
Top-Down Performance Appraisal Method
What Is a Subjective Performance Evaluation?
Team Member Performance Evaluation Techniques
Management experts have debated for decades the most useful way to assess employee
performance. In today's businesses, employers tend to rely on a mix of subjective and objective
measures as part of a larger performance measurement process. Each measurement method has
its strengths and weaknesses.
Objective Measurement Metrics
An objective measurement typically defies interpretation: Either an employee was late five times
or she wasn't, or he met his widgets-per-hour target or he didn't. For that reason, some employers
use purely objective measures for employees who have repetitive or entry-level jobs –
performance is a function of doing (or not doing) some specific action, or in meeting per-product
or per-service productivity totals.
Subjective Measurement Metrics
Some jobs cannot be easily measured. Data analysts, attorneys and dolphin trainers each perform
a job that is difficult to distill into a few discrete metrics. Therefore, employers will determine
categories of measurement – for example, customer service or teamwork or professionalism.
Supervisors typically offer a numeric score that represents the employee's perceived performance
in that category, but the question of whether a specific rating is "correct" is primarily a matter of
interpretation.
Strengths and Weaknesses
Objective measures work best in situations where each employee can be assessed directly and
each employee's performance can be meaningfully compared to another employee. For example,
it is inappropriate to give part-time and full-time employees the same total-parts-per-month
score. However, objective measures fail when supervisors distill complex processes into a single
score that may not have much meaning in the real world. For example, attorneys should not be
measured on the quantity of legal briefs they file each month.
Subjective measures are very good at allowing a supervisor to exercise judgment about an
employee's performance in complicated systems. However, if the employer/employee
relationship is sour, employees may see a negative rating as either punitive or unfair.
Hybrid Evaluation Systems
Some employers employ a hybrid evaluation system. Some measures are objective, and some are
subjective. A supervisor might give a score for her perception of an employee's overall
professionalism but provide objective scores for the number of unplanned absences or customer
complaints. Or, a boss might assess 50 percent of an employee's performance based on objective
measures and 50 percent on "commitments" or "standards" or some other subjective measure of
quality.