Scribd
Upload
6 views1 page

Disagreement in Mortgage Rate Predictions

Evelyn Mastakis wrote a research report predicting interest rates over the next six months as required by her firm. While some members of the firm's investment committee agreed with her conclusions, most disagreed and significantly changed the report to indicate rates would increase more than Mastakis predicted. Mastakis should not ask to have her name removed from the report disseminated, as the committee is entitled to issue a report with different conclusions if reasonably supported by evidence reviewed.

Uploaded by

srinu Vasu
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
6 views1 page

Disagreement in Mortgage Rate Predictions

Evelyn Mastakis wrote a research report predicting interest rates over the next six months as required by her firm. While some members of the firm's investment committee agreed with her conclusions, most disagreed and significantly changed the report to indicate rates would increase more than Mastakis predicted. Mastakis should not ask to have her name removed from the report disseminated, as the committee is entitled to issue a report with different conclusions if reasonably supported by evidence reviewed.

Uploaded by

srinu Vasu
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Example 5 (Group Research Opinions):

Evelyn Mastakis is a junior analyst who has been asked by her firm to write a research
report predicting the expected interest rate for residential mortgages over the next
six months. Mastakis submits her report to the fixed-income
investment committee
of her firm for review, as required by firm procedures. Although some committee
members support Mastakis’s conclusion, the majority of the committee disagrees with
her conclusion, and the report is significantly changed to indicate that interest rates
are likely to increase more than originally predicted by Mastakis. Should Mastakis
ask that her name be taken off the report when it is disseminated?
Comment: The results of research are not always clear, and different people
may have different opinions based on the same factual evidence. In this case,
the committee may have valid reasons for issuing a report that differs from
the analyst’s original research. The firm can issue a report that is different
from the original report of an analyst as long as there is a reasonable and
adequate basis for its conclusions.

You might also like