Confidential Report
Computerized Polygraph Examination:
Hee Young Noh
Conducted April 22, 2016
[Link] (818) 8836969
April 22, 2016
three pages
Polygraph Examination conducted on April 22, 2016
Interested Parties:
Pursuant to a request, I conducted a computerized Psychophysiological
Detection of Deception Test (a computerized polygraph examination) with
this examinee, in regards to a 2014 incident involving 1832 Arlington
Avenue in Los Angeles. He presented California C6462186 as identification.
During a paralinguistic pretest interview, the examinee and I thoroughly
discussed the relevant issues (listed below as questions). All terms and
words to be used in the relevant questions were understood by the examinee
and then defined by the examinee to my satisfaction.
At the conclusion of the pretest interview, an acquaintance test was
conducted. This test was used to prove to both the examinee and to myself
that the examinee was suitable for a polygraph examination. Adequate
recordings of the examinee’s physiology were obtained during this portion
of the examination, so the testing continued.
A comparisonquestion test was then conducted using methods developed
and validated by the U.S. government’s polygraph institute and approved by
three national polygraph organizations. A computerized polygraph
instrument was used to record the cardio/pulse responses, upper and lower
respiration, and electrodermal skin conductance tracings. The instrument
was functionalitychecked for factory operation for the day of this
examination; all functions were satisfactory. Multiple charts were collected.
page 2 of 3
POLYGRAPH
The examinee was asked the following requested prewritten relevant
questions on each chart (shown with the examinee’s given answers):
1) On January 26 2014 did you get assaulted by Mr Johnson in
front of white guy Charle’s house?
(Examinee’s answer: YES)
2) Has any LAPD interviewed you regarding your 911 call of
serious chest pain due to assault by Mr Johnson?
(Examinee’s answer: NO)
3) Has LAFD Captain Knighten investigated your complaint only
to end up calling your public defender to dismiss your case?
(Examinee’s answer: YES)
4) Have you ever touched the face of the accusing paramedic to
cause any wound as shown as criminal evidence?
(Examinee’s answer: NO)
page 3 of 3
POLYGRAPH
EVALUATION / OPINION:
After carefully reviewing and analyzing the polygraph charts, it is the
opinion of the examiner that there was no deception indicated during this
polygraph examination.
These results indicate that the examinee was likely telling the
truth when answering the questions above in that he believes his
answers to be truthful and was not being purposefully deceptive.
If I may be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
John Grogan, Senior Polygraph Examiner
(818) 8836969
Visit [Link]
COPE #260422
28 years experience; if for a filed court matter, a current CV can be issued.