0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views2 pages

Comparing Logit & Probit Coefficients

This document discusses comparing coefficients across logit and probit regression models. It presents results from regressing a binary outcome variable on single and multiple predictor variables. Standardized coefficients are reported to allow for comparison of effects across variables with different scales. Decomposition methods are also demonstrated for assessing direct and indirect effects in models with multiple predictor variables.

Uploaded by

陈文源
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views2 pages

Comparing Logit & Probit Coefficients

This document discusses comparing coefficients across logit and probit regression models. It presents results from regressing a binary outcome variable on single and multiple predictor variables. Standardized coefficients are reported to allow for comparison of effects across variables with different scales. Decomposition methods are also demonstrated for assessing direct and indirect effects in models with multiple predictor variables.

Uploaded by

陈文源
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Comparing Logit and Probit Coefficients between Models

Richard Williams, Notre Dame Sociology, rwilliam@[Link]


[Link]
August 2012 Annual Meetings of the American Sociological Association
Last revised March 24, 2019

I. Comparing coefficients across models


V ( y*) = V (α + xβ ) + V (ε y* ) = V (α + xβ ) + π 2 / 3 = V (α + xβ ) + 3.29

. quietly logit ybinary x1


. listcoef, std

logit (N=500): Unstandardized and Standardized Estimates

Observed SD: .50035659


Latent SD: 2.3395663

Odds of: 1 vs 0

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ybinary | b z P>|z| bStdX bStdY bStdXY SDofX
-------------+-----------------------------------------------------------------
x1 | 0.73887 10.127 0.000 1.4777 0.3158 0.6316 2.0000
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

. quietly logit ybinary x2


. listcoef, std

logit (N=500): Unstandardized and Standardized Estimates

Observed SD: .50035659


Latent SD: 2.3321875

Odds of: 1 vs 0

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ybinary | b z P>|z| bStdX bStdY bStdXY SDofX
-------------+-----------------------------------------------------------------
x2 | 0.48868 10.134 0.000 1.4660 0.2095 0.6286 3.0000
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

. quietly logit ybinary x1 x2


. listcoef, std

logit (N=500): Unstandardized and Standardized Estimates

Observed SD: .50035659


Latent SD: 5.3368197

Odds of: 1 vs 0

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ybinary | b z P>|z| bStdX bStdY bStdXY SDofX
-------------+-----------------------------------------------------------------
x1 | 1.78923 9.815 0.000 3.5785 0.3353 0.6705 2.0000
x2 | 1.17314 9.714 0.000 3.5194 0.2198 0.6595 3.0000
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comparing Logit & Probit Coefficients…Richard Williams, ASA 2012 Page 1


. corr, means

(obs=500)

Variable | Mean Std. Dev. Min Max


-------------+----------------------------------------------------
y | 5.51e-07 3.000001 -8.508021 7.981196
ybinary | .488 .5003566 0 1
x1 | -2.19e-08 2 -6.32646 6.401608
x2 | 3.57e-08 3 -10.56658 9.646875

| y ybinary x1 x2
-------------+------------------------------------
y | 1.0000
ybinary | 0.7923 1.0000
x1 | 0.6667 0.5248 1.0000
x2 | 0.6667 0.5225 0.0000 1.0000

. webuse nhanes2f, clear


. khb logit diabetes black || weight

Decomposition using the KHB-Method

Model-Type: logit Number of obs = 10335


Variables of Interest: black Pseudo R2 = 0.02
Z-variable(s): weight
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
diabetes | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
black |
Reduced | .6038012 .1236714 4.88 0.000 .3614098 .8461926
Full | .5387425 .1241889 4.34 0.000 .2953368 .7821483
Diff | .0650587 .0132239 4.92 0.000 .0391403 .0909771
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

. khb logit jobenjoy race || gpa ses sex educjob educimportant luckimportant sbprevent

Decomposition using the KHB-Method

Model-Type: logit Number of obs = 6731


Variables of Interest: race Pseudo R2 = 0.08
Z-variable(s): gpa ses sex educjob educimportant luckimportant sbprevent

jobenjoy Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval]

race
Reduced -.5727334 .10607 -5.40 0.000 -.7806269 -.3648399
Full -.4833004 .1095584 -4.41 0.000 -.6980309 -.26857
Diff -.089433 .0349898 -2.56 0.011 -.1580117 -.0208542

Comparing Logit & Probit Coefficients…Richard Williams, ASA 2012 Page 2

You might also like