1. B.

Sunita v/s State of Talengana 2018 Dishonour of Cheque, Cheque

issued in favour of advocate.
Claim fee based on the percentage
of the subject matter of the
litigation cannot be basis of a
complaint under section 138 of
national instruments act. It is
professional misconduct by the
advocate. Mare issuance of
cheque by climate may know to
debar him from contesting
liability if liability is disputed.
2. Mr. Ranbir Diwan v/s Rashmi Khanna etc. Husband executed a will in favour
2018 of his wife of his self acquired
property by giving a life interest.
Such life in trust my the enlarged
no refund into an absolute and
trust in the suit house and
remainder by contrast i.e. the
restricted estate till the death of
wife under section 14 (2) of the
act.
3. [Link] v/s Annasamy Pandian 2017 Suit withdrawal should be with
O.2 rule 2 permission to file fresh and court
should satisfied itself that there is
formal defect for allowing any
party to file fresh suit.
4. Arjun Gopal v/s Union of India 2017 Prevention of harmful crop
burning and environment safety.
5. [Youth Bar Association of India [Link] of The Supreme Court directed that the
India] copies of the FIRs, unless the offence
is sensitive in nature, like sexual
offences, offences pertaining to
insurgency, terrorism and of that
category, offences under POCSO Act
and such other offences.
6. Shreya Singhal vs. Union of India]... citizens also had a good year with
Supreme Court striking down Section
66A of Information Technology which
was viewed as ‘draconian’ by many.
The Apex court bench comprising of
Justices J. Chelameswar and R.F.
Nariman held that Section 66A
arbitraril...

7. SC advocate on record v/s Union of India NJAC held illegal

8. State of MP v/s Madan Lal No Compromise in Rape Case
9. ABC v/s State Unwed mother can adopt child
10. Manohar Singh v/s State Court must award compensation to
victim while convicting to accused
11. Vikram Singh v/s Union of India Section 364-A not un-constitutional
12. Union of India v/s Shriharan States can't grant remission
13. Rajbala v/s State Minimum qualification for panchayat
election upheld
14. Sharaya Vidharathi v/s Ashok Vidhayarathi Women can be manager of family
15. Privartan Kendra v/s Union of INdia Put acid attach victim in disability list
16. Common cause v/s UOI No politicial photo in government ads
17. State of MP v/s Anoop Singh Age determination of rape victim
 clarified
18. S.R. Sukumar v/s [Link] Raghuram Amendment in complaint can be done

19. Devidas v/s State of Maharashtra Obscene language can not be tolerated
against historical respected
personality.
20. Satya Pal singh v/s State of M.P. Father of victim has right to appeal
21. Ram Singh v/s UOI Jat Reservation un-constitutional
22. Krishnamoorthi vv/s Shivakumar concealment of pending criminal case
for election illegal
23. Riju Parsad Sarma v/s State of Assam Judiciary is not state and writ against it
for judicial decision not maintainable
24. Parkash vs Phoolwati Law giving equal right to daughters
prospective
25. Subramaniam Swami v/s UOI Criminal defamation law not un-
constitutional
26. Muthuramalingal v/s state Life imprisonments will run
concurrently and remission given for
one can't be considered for other
27. Hiras P Harsora v/s kusim narottamdas DV Act relief possible against minor,
women
28. Narrendra v/s [Link] Forcing husband to live saperate from
his parents amounts to cruelty
29. Voluntary health association v/s state of Punjab Female Foeticide
30. Swaraj Abhian vs UOI Guidelines for draught or disaster
management
31. State of Tamilnadu v/s [Link] No liquor wend within 500 meter of
National Highway
32. Krishna Kumar Singh v/s State of Bihar re-Promulgation of ordinance is not
fair and president or governor are not
immune from judicial review
33. Suresh K. Vadhwa v/s State of M.P There must clause of forfeiture in
2018(1) CCC 284SC. contract and in absence of the same no
right to forfeiture of amount.
Also with public auction
34. Tehseen S. Poonawala v/s UOI Lynching
35. Government of Delhi v/s UOI Powers of Governer or Delhi
Government
36. Kalpana Mehta v/s Union of India Article 105 of constitution of India
37. 2018(7) scale 427 Inhuman conditions of prisnors
38. Lok Prahari v/s State of UP Regarding residences of [Link]
39. Tularam v/s State of MP Death without premeditation and in
Surain Singh v/s State of Punjab suddan fight
40. Alakh Alok Shrivstwa v/s UOI Speedy Trial of POSCO cases
41. Shivaji Yallapa Patil vs sri Ranjeet Appasahib Section 20 and 53A of Specific Relief
Patil Act
42. Sucha Singh Sodhi v/s Baldev Raj Walia Relief of Permanent Injunction and
Specific Relief are not same and are
not bared by order 2 rule 2 CPC
43. Shafeen Jahan v/s Ashokan K.M. Any major has right to live as his
choice. This case is related to a girl
who marry with other cast boy.
44. Asian resurfacing of road agency v/s CBI Framing of Charge is not purely
interlocutory order.
45. Mohinder Singh v/s Paramjeet Singh SEction 14 limitation act
46. Shakti Vahini v/s UOI Against Khap Panchayats
47. Dr. Subash Kashinath v/s State of Maharashtra SC and ST judgments
48. Common cause vs UOI passive euthanasia
49. state of UP v/s Mahipal 313 Cr.P.C
50. Dinesh Kumar Kalidas Patel v/s State of Gujrat 201 IPC
51. Dannama v/s Amar Coparcenary of girls
52. Shafi Mohd. v/s State of Himachal Videography of crime scene inspire
 confidence
53. Chand Devi Daga v/s Manju K Humatani Complaint is not to be rejected in case
of death of complainant.
54. Rajesh Sharma v/s State of UP 498-A should be investigated by
designated IO only
55. Shakti Vahini v/s UOI Honor Killing
56. Ganpati v/s State of Tamilnadu Interest is not in similar and related. A
related witness is not necessary to be
interested to depose against accused.
57. Kedar Nath Kohli v/s Baldev Singh No one can transfer the title better then
he have.
58. Indepandant though v/s UOI Intercourse with wife under aged of 18
is rape
59. Navtez Singh Zohar v/s UOI 377 un-constitutional in consensual
cases
60. Amrutbhai Shambhubhai Patel v/s Sumanbhai Magistrate has no power to direct
Kantibhai Patel, police to further investigate matter
except upon the application by
Atul Rao v/s State of Karnataka investigation agency.
61. Rajkishor Purohit v/s State of MP Common intention is state of mind and
can be seen from circumstances and
there is hardly any direct evidence
62. Jaswinder Kaur v/s Gurmeet Singh Readyness and willingness has to be
seen from the contaxt of entire
document

63. Uttam Nandram Somwanshi v/s State of Unsoundness of mind, accused acted
Maharashtra in planned manner. he can't be said to
be of unsoundmind at the time of
commission of crime.
64. Anurag Mittal v/s Shally Mishra Section 15 of HMA, person can marry
again when one has shown intention to
not to pursue the appeal.
65. Mohan Lal v/s State of Punjab Informant can't be Investigation officer
66. Social Action Forum for Manav Adhikar and Another Vs. 498-A abolition of committee, against
Union of India Ministry of Law and Justice and Others 14-
9-2018
rajesh sharma judgement
67. Prithvi Raj Chouhan v/s Union of India SC and ST Act amendment upheld and
it was declared that the police can
arrest without preliminary inquiry.
68. Mukesh Kumar v/s State of Uttrakhand It is within domain of state to allow
reservation in promotion.
69. Krishnaveni v/s Pankaj 2020 Marriage contracted after divorce but
during pendency of appeal which was
filed after period of limitation is not
void marriage.
70. Sushila Aggarwal v/s State (NCT Delhi) Anticipatory bail can't be for limited
period.
71. Uttam Chand v/s Nathu Ram Pleas of adverse possession can be
taken only if the person taking plea
admit ownership of owner.
72. Shilpa Mittal v/s State of NCT Juvenile Justice Act provide cases tried
as heinous offence which provide
sentence not less than 7 years and the
offences which provide sentence upto
or more than 7 years but does not
provide minimum 7 years can be kept
in category of serious offences.
73. Anokhi Lal v/s State of MP The court must provide sufficiently
senior counsel to accused in cases
where death or life imprisonment is
sentence provided i.e. must be having
10 years practice.
74. Munish Kakkar vs Nidhi Kakkar Breakdown theory for divorce.
75. [Link] @ Duleep v/s State of Kerala Article 21 - Article 21 -
Fundamental rights - Considering
that this is a peculiar case of intra-
conflict of fundamental rights
flowing from Article 21, that is
right to a fair trial of the accused
and right to privacy of the victim, it
is imperative to adopt an approach
which would balance both the
rights.
76. Kaushaliya v/s Jodha Ram The properties which are not
subject matter of suit can be subject
matter of compromise deed in
mediation and the parties are bound
by it.
77. Vinughai Haribhai Malvia vs State of Gujrat Power of court u/s 173 (8), 156(3)
Cr.P.C.