The Impact of Part Time Work towards Academic Performance to the students in
Lapasan National High School and Senior High School
Chapter 1
Introduction
The researchers would like to investigate if working while studying really
affects a student's academic performance. If work is related to their studies this
would definitely be beneficial to students, however how will work affect working
students if it is not study-related?
“Most of the studies have been pretty clear and consistent in saying that
working full-time is not good at all. Working part-time can be beneficial,
particularly if it’s on campus,” (Dr. Gary Pike, 2017)
Just as what (Caldwell, 2019) stated, “When a student gets a job, they will
have less time to devote to their academic studies. Less study time usually means
a decrease in test scores and overall grades. Students get jobs for many reasons,
including wanting to buy what they want or to earn money for their school
needs.”
For some students, especially those in traditionally underserved
populations, taking a job is not a matter of choice, but a necessity. They need to
work to save for their financial needs in school or even to supplement family
income. Counselors should help students who have a real need to work improve
time-management skills and seek employment that helps their educational
goals.
According to (Brody, 2018), “As a working student, work-life balance is
also important, while there are amazing things to be said about working while
studying, student work must be managed well.” Additionally, we should only
take on work that we know we can handle. What it meant by that is that we need
to be realistic about working hours: we cannot work 30 hours as a full-time
student. Experts agree that students who work more than 15 to 20 hours per
week often experience decreased school success, which can lead to dropping out
entirely. Working long hours can also limit opportunities to build friendships
and explore interests that enhance intellectual and emotional development, we
need to be able to balance our work, home, social, and most importantly, student
life.
Poverty is the #1 enemy of education on every level. Poor students not only
receive the worst education, but they fall victim to lifestyle and health issues that
hinder their ability to learn. (Gunnane, 2019)
Here's a review at how poverty impacts education and, why do students
are craving to find part-time jobs.
With little financial education and low-earnings, poor families might have
to send their kids to school without breakfast or lunch and perhaps not eating
enough can reduce the brain's capacity to learn, and poor students quickly end
up falling behind their classmates.
“Poor parents are unable to give their kids the same level of attention and
thus their children learn a much more limited vocabulary.” (Dixon,2017)
Moreover, poor children have often not been asked to find solutions to problems
or received advice on how to handle difficult situations before entering school.
As a result, poor children had heard 32 million fewer words than other students
starting school.
Poverty can create a series of emergencies that trigger stress hormones.
These hormones have a dampening effect on brain development, which can
result in an inability to pay attention, regulate emotions, or develop proper
memory function.
Many poor children are not taught about the variety of career opportunities
within and outside of their communities. Growing up poor, they leave school with
a general focus on “making money” instead of trying to excel at a career. It's not
a matter of lack of motivation; it's a question of lack of information. “Schools can
educate children about careers and what it takes to succeed on the job, helping
poor students aim higher.” (Davis, 2016)
The bottom line here is, Poverty not only affects education at the
institutional level, but it also affects learners on a personal level. Opportunities
can seem limited for poor students, and the children’s ability and willingness to
take advantage of existing opportunities may be limited.
Theoretical Framework
In this section, we briefly introduce the main theories found in multiple
disciplines, providing support for a relationship between working students and
their academic performances. These theories helps explain on how do working
while studying really affects the academic performance of the students. In the
following paragraphs, we consecutively present the leading theories that
advocate both of these views.
This study is anchored by Human Capital Theory , According to
(Becker,2014) “Student employment can be a complement to education due to
the additional skills and knowledge obtained while working.” There are several
reasons why student work may lead to such an increase in human capital. First,
student employment enables the recovery of new general and transferable skills
such as work values, communication skills, and a sense of time management.
Second, combining study and work may offer students the opportunity to apply
in practice what they have learned in school. (Joe Bandy, 2018) Third, student
employment may increase future-orientedness and thereby motivate students to
work harder in school in order to achieve a certain career goal.
On the other hand, building on the Theory of the Allocation of Time, the
Zero-Sum Theory suggests that student employment and education are
substitutes. It is argued that student employment strongly hold down students’
use of time: time spent working out ton activities that enhance academic
performance, for example: studying, doing homework and attending classes. As
the reduced time spent on the latter activities subsequently worsens academic
performance.
However, spending one hour more on student work does not necessarily
translate into spending one hour less on study activities. This theory suggests
that the worse academic performance of working students is related to their
primary orientation being toward work rather than toward school.
Another theory that supports a negative association between student work
and educational success is the Primary Orientation Theory. In other words, it
reflects a separation from school that existed before the decision to work was
made, rather than a negative effect due to student employment itself. Therefore,
instead of providing an explanation for a casual, negative effect of student work,
this theory reveals a potential selection problem that one wants to control for in
empirical analysis. Indeed, hypothesize that when pre-existing differences
between working and non-working students, such as their primary orientation,
are properly controlled for, the difference in academic performance between
these two groups disappears.
Based on the aforementioned theories, there are several reasons why
student employment is expected to be less of a substitute for education for
students in tertiary education. First, as students in tertiary education have more
flexibility in their schedules, the assumption that working crowds out time spent
on activities that nurture academic performance the “Zero-Sum Theory” may be
less valid for them. Indeed, their classes are usually not required, and they often
have flexibility in planning their academic workload by choosing between
different courses. Second, a selection effect with respect to students’ primary
orientation may be less of an issue for students in tertiary education, since only
more school-oriented students will choose to begin this form of alternative
education. More work-oriented students will not enter this type of education, but
rather pursue labour market opportunities. Third, most students in tertiary
education have already combined study and work in secondary education, so
they should be more skilled at mixing these two activities.
Conceptual Framework
The researchers has conceptual framework to guide them in their study.
The conceptual framework helps the researcher to develop awareness about the
situation review of the topic. Conceptual framework also helps the readers to
directly understand the relationship of the dependent and independent variable.
The independent variable contains the profile of the respondents in terms
of age which represent the age of the part-time worker students, sex which
represents wether the part-time worker student is a male or female, and lastly is
family income which is very important to our research, so that we would know
the reason on why the student take part-time jobs. The dependent variable
contains the Academic Performance which represents the grade and the
performance of the students Interest of the working students in their studying,
Tardiness which represents the behavior of the student in the school. and lastly
is Time Management which represents on how the part-time worker students
manage their time in studying, doing assignments, projects, and working.
Dependent Variable Independent Variable
Profile of the respondents in Factors that affects the
terms of: working students in terms of:
Age Academic
Performance
Sex
Tardiness
Family Income
Interest in Studying
Time Management
Figure 1: Schematic Model of the Conceptual Framework
Statement of the Problem
The purpose of this study is to determine how working students affects
their academic performance. This study is seeking an investigation, whether
working while studying has a relationship with the student's academic
performance among senior high school students in Lapasan National High
School. Specifically, it seeks the following questions to be answered:
1. What is the profile of the working students in terms of?
1.1. Age
1.2. Sex
1.3. Family Income
2. What are the factors that affects working students in terms of?
2.1. Academic Performance
2.2. Tardiness
2.3. Interest in Studying
2.4. Time Balancing
Significance of the Study
The researchers believe that this study is very useful and crucial to the
students, teachers, parents and future researchers. This study will determine
the affection of working students in the school performance. Especially, this
study is significant to:
● Students. This study will help the students to know the effects of having
a part-time job in their academic performance.
● Teachers. This study helps the teachers to know or to learn the triggering
the part-time working students are facing.
● Parents. This study helps the parents to know how to manage the time in
working and studying of their child.
● Future Researchers. This study helps the future researchers to have an
idea or to have advance knowledge about the topic.
Scope and Limitation of the Study
This research aimed to find out the impact of working while studying
among the selected students of Lapasan Senior High School which is located in
the municipality of Cagayan De Oro City. In region X of Northern Mindanao for
the SY: 2019-2020. This research is further bounded to the survey if there is a
positive or negative impact of working while studying to their academic
performance.
This research has 60 respondents from the students of Senior High School
which are the Grades 11 and 12, with the age of 16 and up. The respondents
can help the researcher to find out the impact of working while studying to their
academic performance, if whether having a part-time job while studying have a
negative or positive effect in the students.
Definition of Terms
For the purpose of this study, some technical terms used are operationally
defined for clarity and better understanding. The terms are the following:
● Part-Time. This term refers to the student’s that works for only part of
each day.
● Academic Performance. This terms refers to the behavior of the student
in school.
● Poverty. This term refers to the situation of the student that makes them
crave to find a job.
● Time Balancing. This term refers to the part-time students that balances
their time in studying and working.
● Age. This term refers to the age of the respondents.
● Sex. This term refers to the biological sex of the respondents.
● Family Income. This term refers to what the family of the student get
while working.