Generator Maintenance Inspection Test Programmes
Generator Maintenance Inspection Test Programmes
GENERATOR MAINTENANCE,
INSPECTION AND TEST PROGRAMMES
Working Group
A1.07
August 2009
WG A1.07
Generator Maintenance,
Inspection and Test Programmes
Members Contributors
Copyright©2009
“Ownership of a CIGRE publication, whether in paper form or on electronic support only infers
right of use for personal purposes. Are prohibited, except if explicitly agreed by CIGRE, total or
partial reproduction of the publication for use other than personal and transfer/selling to a third
party. Hence circulation on any intranet or other company network is forbidden”.
Disclaimer notice
“CIGRE gives no warranty or assurance about the contents of this publication, nor does it accept
any responsibility, as to the accuracy or exhaustiveness of the information. All implied warranties
and conditions are excluded to the maximum extent permitted by law”.
,6%1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................3
1.1. Methodology ................................................................................................................................3
1.2. Access for Generator Maintenance.............................................................................................3
1.3. Generator Component Maintenance ................................................................................... ……5
1.4. Generator In-Service Diagnostic Testing ....................................................................................5
1.5. Generator Maintenance Practices...............................................................................................6
1.6. Conclusions .................................................................................................................................6
2. RESPONSES. ......................................................................................................................................7
2.1. Users. ..........................................................................................................................................7
2.2. Manufacturers. ............................................................................................................................7
3. GENERATOR MAINTENANCE OUTAGE SCHEDULING PRACTICES. ..........................................8
3.1. Shutdown Maintenance Access ..................................................................................................8
3.2. Shutdown Scheduling..................................................................................................................8
3.3. Outage Duration ..........................................................................................................................9
3.4. Generator Rotor Removal ...........................................................................................................9
3.5. Other Comments .......................................................................................................................10
4. PLANNED MAINTENANCE TASKS FOR GENERATOR COMPONENTS. ....................................11
4.1. Stator winding – slot content. ....................................................................................................12
4.2. Stator winding – end windings ..................................................................................................13
4.3. Stator winding - terminal box .....................................................................................................13
4.4. Bushings ....................................................................................................................................13
4.5. Core & frame .............................................................................................................................14
4.6. Stator cooling water system ......................................................................................................14
4.7. Stator water treatment ...............................................................................................................15
4.8. Rotor ..........................................................................................................................................15
4.9. Hydrogen cooling system ..........................................................................................................15
4.10. Hydrogen seals .........................................................................................................................16
4.11. Bearings ....................................................................................................................................16
4.12. Seal oil system ..........................................................................................................................16
4.13. Slip rings & brush gear (or diodes)............................................................................................17
4.14. Instrumentation..........................................................................................................................17
4.15. Neutral point grounding system ................................................................................................17
4.16. Generator electrical protection system......................................................................................17
4.17. Excitation system ......................................................................................................................18
5. GENERATOR IN-SERVICE DIAGNOSTIC TESTING ......................................................................19
5.1. Stator winding – slot content .....................................................................................................19
5.2. Stator winding – end windings ..................................................................................................19
5.3. Rotor ..........................................................................................................................................20
5.4. Core & frame .............................................................................................................................20
5.5. Hydrogen cooling system ..........................................................................................................20
5.6. Stator water treatment ...............................................................................................................20
5.7. Bearings ....................................................................................................................................21
5.8. Slip rings & brush gear (or diodes)............................................................................................21
6. GENERATOR MAINTENANCE PRACTICES ..................................................................................22
6.1. Scenario 1: ................................................................................................................................22
6.2. Scenario 2: ................................................................................................................................23
6.3. Scenario 3: ................................................................................................................................23
6.4. Additional Comments: ...............................................................................................................24
7. CONCLUSION ...................................................................................................................................24
8. APPENDIX 1 - Appendix to Chapter 4 ............................................................................................25
9. APPENDIX 2 - Appendix to Chapter 5 ............................................................................................56
10. APPENDIX 3 - Appendix to Chapter 6 ............................................................................................67
2
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The maintenance, inspection and testing of large hydrogen & water cooled turbo-generators remains one
of the most significant costs of asset ownership for electricity generation companies worldwide.
Competitive reforms in electricity marketing structures and ownership have imposed significant cost
pressures in many countries that have resulted in decisions to reduce maintenance and inspection
frequency and accept greater operating risk, albeit through managed risk assessment and mitigation
programs. There is both factual and anecdotal evidence that in some instances the risk envelope is being
stretched quite significantly compared to previous practice.
The objective of this study was to survey actual and recommended practice, and in so doing identify the
reasons and justification for differences. In addition, innovative and/or best practice maintenance
procedures and strategies were explored.
The information obtained may help all countries maintain or increase generator reliability, by providing
data that can be used to support review of maintenance practices, and providing information on improved
techniques.
The study covered four main topics:
1. Planned maintenance access – generating unit outage scheduling factors.
2. Planned maintenance tasks for generator components.
3. Generator in-service diagnostic testing.
4. Generator maintenance practices.
1.1. Methodology
The study used the survey methodology whereby members of Study Committee A1 were asked to obtain
responses from a cross-section of users (utilities) and manufacturers in their own countries. The
responses have been correlated and analysed to produce this report. The survey was limited to turbo-
generators with ratings > 250MVA.
The responses were segregated into users and manufacturers. These categories are reported separately
in chapter appendices, but combined in analysis of the relevant maintenance practices. There is no
reference to the origin of highlighted responses in the text, although the tables of responses in the
chapter appendices at the end of the report are presented under the name of the country of origin.
The survey obtained responses on utility practice from 11 countries, 4 of which also included responses
either from a manufacturer, or on behalf of their manufacturers. The responses cover a total of 423 utility
generators from 250MVA to over 800MVA, as well as manufacturers with combined annual production of
72 units in the same capacity range annually.
The results are presented in the Technical Brochure, including appendices with the response detail.
3
8
0
≤ 9 days 10 - 16 days 17 - 30 days 31 - 50 days >50 days
In regard to practice in removing generator rotors for inspection, once again there was no consistency in
the durations reported between such events. Fig 2 shows that the most common period however is 8
years.
4
Responses
0
2 4 6 8 9 10 12
No. of Years
In general, a common response in regard to issues affecting access to generators for maintenance, was
that the timing and periodicity of such maintenance is determined by other factors, typically maintenance
4
requirements on turbines, boilers and nuclear reactors (including re-fuelling) around which the generator
maintenance program must fit.
As per the previous section, there was a significant disparity in responses, so for many or most items, it
was not possible to identify a preferred maintenance interval and accordingly the working group decided
to include the full set of responses for the benefit of readers of the Technical Brochure. However some
general remarks were possible:
There was no general preference for either time based or service hour scheduling for maintenance
tasks.
The dominant source of interval recommendation was manufacturers, followed by company
standards.
There was a trend towards accepting the recommendation from the nominated source without
change.
The dominant reason from users for changing the recommendation was prior maintenance
experience.
One manufacturer stated an acceptable reason for changing their recommendation was through risk
assessment; another market driven needs, while others did not nominate an acceptable reason.
The Technical Brochure includes a brief summary of the responses received for each item.
5
Available diagnostic tests that were less commonly used included:
Stator end windings vibration monitors.
Stator core/frame vibration monitoring. This was nominated as being used generally only if a
vibration condition was occurring and known. Audio detection of stator core lamination vibration was
also not commonly applied.
Hydrogen make up rate monitoring.
Brush gear on-line condition monitoring, and diode breakdown detection, even though the latter was
generally recommended by manufacturers.
The information provided on reasons for using in-service diagnostics was patchy – the most common
reason being that it was company usual practice. All but two of the countries who responded said they
did not use any form of expert system to diagnose monitored variables and generate alarms or other
actions.
1.6. Conclusions
The survey has provided a basis for comparison by utility engineers of maintenance practices across a
range of countries. The responses included with the Technical Brochure provide a library of maintenance
task recommendations and actual practices that could be considered by generator owners if new or
modified practices are being contemplated.
The most significant conclusion is that there is a considerable diversity in approach and practice in use
internationally. It has proven unrealistic to anticipate that a study such as this can identify best or
preferred practice in any particular area of generator maintenance.
6
2. RESPONSES.
The response details including number and rating of generators included is summarised in the following
tables – countries reported in alphabetical order:
2.1. Users.
The following table summarises the responses received from users (utilities). The response is taken to be
typical of country practice unless otherwise indicated. In this report, all separate responses have been
analysed and reported
In the case of Italy, two separate responses were received that related to base load and mid-load units.
For Australia, there were 3 separate responses received that were sufficiently different to not sensibly
enable combination to a unified response. For both countries, the responses are reported separately.
2.2. Manufacturers.
The following table summarises the responses received from manufacturers. Note that the generator
size range relates to the number of units in the size range manufactured annually. USA-2 is a response
from a consultant with significant experience in manufacturing.
7
3. GENERATOR MAINTENANCE OUTAGE SCHEDULING PRACTICES.
The questionnaire explored the practices amongst utilities associated with maintenance outage
scheduling for generators. The initial assumption was that planned unit shutdowns follow a pattern that
includes regular minor outages, interspersed with less frequent major outages, with the following
characteristics:
“Minor” outage – limited duration; repair of known defects; plant surveys and inspections;
preventive maintenance.
“Major” outage – extended duration; major plant item(s) dismantle for inspect / repair / replace;
repair of known defects; plant surveys and inspections; preventive maintenance.
Respondents were requested to confirm or otherwise their adherence to a pattern of this nature, and to
answer some questions on the basis and frequency of scheduling, and typical outage durations.
3.1. Shutdown Maintenance Access
13 of 14 respondents confirmed that they followed a shutdown pattern as described above. The
exception was a utility with significant nuclear generation where shutdowns were dependent on reactor
refuelling requirements.
The reasons for major and minor shutdowns were generally associated with maintenance access for
boilers/reactors and/or turbines. 5 utilities advised they may schedule a major outage for generator
maintenance primarily, with two advising similarly for minor outages.
3.2. Shutdown Scheduling
The contributing determinants of planned shutdown schedules could be time (calendar based) periods;
service hours; plant cycles; or another factor or combination. The total response is included in the
following table:
Minor outage 8 2 8
Major outage 8 4 9
It is clear that time period scheduling is more dominant than service hours. Other factors affecting
scheduling that were nominated included:
- Plant condition (includes boiler, turbine and generator)
- Regulated inspection periods
- Reactor refuelling
- Market drivers
- Financial drivers
The period of time advised between calendar scheduled major outages was quite variable, ranging from
two to ten years. For service hour scheduled majors, the range was from 40K hours to >55K hours.
There was significant variation in the number of scheduled minor outages between majors, with some
respondents maintaining an evenly programmed major/minor/major schedule, whilst others had more
than one minor between consecutive major outages. A summary of reported patterns is included in the
following table:
8
Outage Pattern Number of Comments
Respondents
Major – Minor @ 1 yrs – Major @ 2 yrs 2
Minor outage 1 6 3
Major outage 3 7 4
9
8 5
9 1
10 2
12 1
No firm program 1
10
4. PLANNED MAINTENANCE TASKS FOR GENERATOR COMPONENTS.
Information was sought on the recommended and actual frequencies of maintenance for a range of
generator components and systems, and maintenance tasks including long period diagnostic tests.
This was broken down into 3 major and 6 minor categories, with multiple choice responses
recommended as follows:
Recommended maintenance intervals – including:
the basis of the recommendation:
- elapsed time;
- service hours;
- operation (speed) cycles;
- a combination of these; or
- on condition.
the period between recommended maintenance tasks; and
the source of the recommendation:
- manufacturer;
- government;
- company standard;
- national standard;
- international standard; or
- other source.
Actual service intervals:
the type of outage in which maintenance inspections are done:
- minor outage;
- major outage – rotor in;
- major outage – rotor out;
- major outage – either of the above;
- no outage required; or
- task not done.
the actual period between maintenance tasks.
The basis of the decision if the actual interval adopted is different to that recommended:
- not applicable (recommendation being followed);
- risk assessment;
- prior maintenance experience;
- maintenance cost saving;
- market needs – maximise availability; or
- other.
There were 17 generator components addressed in the question, and a number of potential maintenance
tasks per component identified. In general, there was a significant disparity in responses – and for this
reason the full responses received have been included in appendices linked to this chapter, for
11
reference. In the appendices, blank cells either indicate no response or a response that was considered
to be inconsistent with the question.
Note that as an aid to understanding the USA utility response, the respondent provided the following
explanation:
We did not respond for ‘Recommended maintenance intervals’. For ‘Actual period’ we took the
liberty of using CB (condition based) in several situations. For every task, ‘Actual/recommended
change decision basis’ could be nominated as ‘risk assessment’; ‘prior maintenance experience’;
‘maintenance cost saving’; or ‘market needs – maximise availability’ or a combination of these.
Basically, the "calendar" does not dictate maintenance.
Where possible, dominant practices are summarised in this report under each listed task. Attention is
also drawn to any exceptions that may be of interest.
Some general observations can be made:
There was no general preference overall for planning of periodic maintenance tasks between
time based scheduling and service hour scheduling – some countries preferred one, some
the other. The inclusion of operational cycles in the scheduling was present in some
applications, but was not widespread.
Manufacturer recommendation was a dominant factor in the source of planned maintenance
scheduling. However company standard was significant also. There was a lesser reliance on
national standards. International standards and government requirements were also present
in a limited number of specific areas.
There was a trend towards accepting the recommendation from the nominated source for
maintenance task scheduling. The main reason for changing this was prior maintenance
experience, while cost savings and market needs also featured to a small extent. Risk
assessment was nominated by utilities on a small number of specific tasks.
Manufacturers, however, advised that the dominant acceptable reasons for altering their
recommended schedules were risk assessment and market needs.
12
4.2. Stator winding – end windings
4.2.1. Test for water leaks, and repair
- Wide range of responses received – known condition of winding or prior experience
is a key determinant.
4.2.2. Test for water leaks – no repair
- As for 4.2.1. Survey did not explore reasons for not repairing leaks if found during
tests.
4.2.3. Inspect end windings, including supports, spacers and phase connection rings
- Commonly done during a major outage.
4.2.4. Inspect/test/repair temperature sensors
- Commonly done during a major outage. In some cases this was nominated as a
minor outage task also.
4.2.5. General inspection for contamination and insulation state; clean as required.
- Commonly done during a major outage. In some cases nominated as a minor outage
task also.
4.2.6. Capacitance mapping
- Variety of responses. Common major outage test – however not done in some
countries, and not recommended by one manufacturer.
4.2.7. Tracer gas leak test
- Commonly recommended as a standard or condition based test. Timing either
follows the recommended interval, or is modified based on prior experience.
Manufacturers all recommend this test but based on condition.
4.2.8. Modal response
- Generally either not a recommended test, or performed if condition dictates.
However it is a routine test for some.
4.4. Bushings
4.4.1. Inspection & clean, external.
- Responses were similar to 4.3.1. The test was not recommended by one
manufacturer.
13
4.4.2. Internal inspection – gas cooled bushings
- Similar to 4.3.1. Not done in one country, and on condition in another. Not
recommended by one manufacturer.
4.4.3. Leakage test - replace gaskets and seals if required.
- Variety of responses received – on condition basis of test was common.
4.4.4. Leakage test - replace bushings if required.
- Some time or hours based maintenance nominated, but mainly on condition.
14
4.6.2. Mechanical maintenance of pumps, valves etc.
- As per 4.6.1.
4.6.3. Pressure test
- Major outage task for some utilities; condition based for others; and not done or
recommended by some utilities and one manufacturer. Some manufacturers
recommend on condition.
4.6.4. Vacuum test
- Generally consistent with 4.6.3.
4.8. Rotor
4.8.1. Remove rotor for inspection - inspect accessible rotor components, including
fan; NDT of rotor bore.
- The task is done or recommended by all respondents in major outages with rotor
removed. Time period ranged from 3-5 years to 15 years. Change from the
recommended period where applicable was prior experience for utilities, and market
needs for manufacturers.
4.8.2. Remove retaining rings – inspect & NDT rings, wedges & slots.
- Responses generally followed 4.8.1, except that a decision based on condition was
nominated in some cases.
4.8.3. Electrical tests: IR; PI; RSO; winding resistance.
- This task is also commonly done at varying frequencies by all utilities – not
recommended by one manufacturer.
4.8.4. Time of flight diffraction
- Rarely done. Not recommended by any manufacturer.
15
4.9.2. Pressure test cooling water piping.
- A task generally done by utilities on a periodic basis, with some exceptions. Not
recommended by one manufacturer.
4.9.3. Calibrate dewpoint instrumentation
- Periodically done by the majority of utility respondents at varying frequency. Not
recommended by one manufacturer.
4.11. Bearings
4.11.1. Inspection including NDT
- A regular maintenance task at mainly major outages. Similarly recommended by
manufacturers. Variation is due to prior maintenance experience or market needs.
4.11.2. IR testing
- Similar to 4.11.1 but more frequent for some.
4.11.3. Shaft earthing system inspect & repair
- A frequent inspection task – annual or at a major outage.
16
4.13. Slip rings & brush gear (or diodes)
4.13.1. Inspection, including brush wear
- Frequent inspection nominated for most – on average with annual frequency.
Performed more often for some – responses include a recommendation of daily
inspection by one manufacturer.
4.13.2. Cleaning, including clean/replace filters
- Recommendation or actual inspection interval ranges from one week to more than
two years
4.13.3. Slipring grinding
- Generally done or recommended on condition. Time based intervals for some
utilities.
4.13.4. IR testing
- A regular task based on time or service hours. Condition based for one utility, and
not recommended by one manufacturer.
4.14. Instrumentation
4.14.1. Calibration & circuit checks
- A regular task – varied frequency. Condition based for two utilities,
17
4.17. Excitation system
4.17.1. AVR characteristic checks
- There were varied time intervals advised – however 3-5 years was common.
4.17.2. AVR limit checks
- Generally the same as 4.17.1.
4.17.3. Demagnetisation checks.
- A task done on time or condition basis – not done or recommended by one
manufacturer and two utilities.
18
5. GENERATOR IN-SERVICE DIAGNOSTIC TESTING
This section of the questionnaire sought information on the usage and frequency of in service diagnostic
tests for eight generator components and systems. One or more tests were nominated for each, and the
respondents were asked to advise information on the usage of the diagnostic test; the mode and
frequency of use; and the reason it was used.
A standard set of responses were listed as follows:
Usage of diagnostic test:
Not used
Used now
Used in the past, (but not now)
Will be used in the near future (but not used now).
Mode and frequency of use.
Continuous use – data stored & reviewed regularly
Continuous use – data monitored and alarmed continuously
Intermittent use – weekly testing
Intermittent use – monthly testing
Intermittent use – 6 monthly testing
Intermittent use – greater than 6 months between tests.
Initiated if specific known condition arises
Reason for use
Manufacturer’s recommendation
Company usual practice
Test equipment supplier recommendation
Response to potential fault in generator
Other reason
For this question also, the responses received are included in an appendix linked to this chapter. The
following summaries highlight any commonality or significant exceptions present in the responses.
19
5.3. Rotor
5.3.1. Rotor shorted turns detection
- Generally used by utilities, but not universally, with intermittent monitoring at typically
6 month intervals. Recommended by manufacturers with one exception.
5.3.2. Shaft torsional oscillation monitoring
- Generally not used with two exceptions – one advising use on known condition only.
One manufacturer similarly advises use on a known condition basis.
20
5.6.4. Copper concentration
- Commonly used most often in continuous mode, but some intermittent monitoring
was reported. Not used in one country, nor recommended in the same country’s
manufacturer response.
5.7. Bearings
5.7.1. Bearing journal vibration – dual probe monitor.
- Universal continuous usage was reported (one exception only). Recommended by
all manufacturers.
5.7.2. Shaft grounding monitoring
- Commonly used, but not universally – a variety of modes and frequency. Not
recommended by one manufacturer.
Utilities were also asked if they have and use an expert system that considers some or all of the tests
performed and synthesises a diagnosis or actions (eg. alarms, or auto-generation of maintenance work
orders). All but two countries – Switzerland and Finland – answered in the negative.
Additional comments made were:
- Some techniques of monitoring systems already used all over the world should be included such
as:
- AGMS - air gap monitoring systems;
- SBV - Stator bar vibration;
- FOA - Fiber optics accelerometers;
- MFM - Magnetic flux measurement;
- Capacitive proximity sensors;
- Digital temperature monitoring systems - stator and rotor.
21
6. GENERATOR MAINTENANCE PRACTICES
The questionnaire sought to identify best practice techniques for major preventive and corrective
maintenance tasks on generators. Three scenarios were postulated for different levels of generator
outage maintenance, and typical maintenance techniques listed under each. Respondents were also
invited to add additional techniques used, and to advise any additional maintenance practices used. The
results are included in the following tables – the number of respondents answering in each category was
counted and entered into the tables. Total numbers may not be consistent as there were some
responses received in which some of the table cells were left blank. Total response number was 15 (the
Swiss response for this question was provided from two utilities).
From the responses, the most consistently used maintenance practices include:
- Application of formal quality control systems.
- Formal confined space entry procedures for access to generator casings.
- Control of internal inspections and inspectors, including training; protective clothing; and tool
control
- Use and control of clean condition enclosures for stator work (rotor in or out) and for work on a
rotor after its removal.
- Documented inspection procedures at critical stages, especially on final box-up of stator casings.
6.1. Scenario 1:
Short shutdown – generator de-gassed to air. Covers removed for internal inspection.
Usage
Always Sometimes Never
Maintenance technique
1. Dry air circulation, or heaters installed 4 3 7
2. Continuous internal air quality monitoring 1 5 7
3. Internal human access for inspection. 11 3 0
4. Formal confined space entry procedures. 10 3 1
5. Formal checks on internal inspectors:
10 3 0
training & certification;
protective clothing; 12 1 0
tool controls. 11 3 0
6. Internal inspection by remote device only
0 7 5
– eg. video.
7. Documented inspection procedure before
9 1 4
box-up
22
6.2. Scenario 2:
Generator de-gassed to air. Covers removed for internal inspection. End-shields fully or partially
removed. Rotor not removed.
Usage
Sometim
Always Never
Maintenance technique es
1. Formal Quality Control system used? 9 5 1
2. Dry air circulation, or heaters installed 4 7 4
3. Clean condition enclosure set up. 10 2 0
a. Security & access controls for
8 3 4
enclosure.
b. Formal checks on workers in
enclosure – Training & 9 3 3
certification; protective clothing.
c. Component tracing & tool control
8 3 4
procedures.
4. Formal confined space procedures for
10 2 3
generator entry.
5. Robot coil capacitance tests 0 5 10
6. Physical coil capacitance tests 1 8 6
7. Robot wedge tightness checks 0 7 7
8. Tracer gas winding leakage tests 3 10 2
9. Documented inspection procedure before
9 2 4
box-up
10. Other – please add below
1
Internal inspection by remote device
6.3. Scenario 3:
Usage
Sometime
Always Never
Maintenance technique s
1. Formal Quality Control system used? 10 3 1
2. Dry air circulation, or heaters installed 4 6 3
3. Clean condition enclosure set up for
10 3 0
stator.
a. Security & access controls for
7 2 4
enclosure.
b. Formal checks on workers in
enclosure – Training & 9 2 3
certification; protective clothing.
c. Component tracing & tool control
8 2 4
procedures.
23
4. Clean condition enclosure set up for rotor. 9 5 1
a. Security & access controls for
8 3 3
enclosure.
b. Formal checks on workers in
enclosure – Training & 8 2 4
certification; protective clothing.
c. Component tracing & tool control
7 1 5
procedures.
5. Documented inspections before rotor re-
10 0 3
installation
6. Documented inspections before box-up. 9 1 3
- The industry must not overlook the significance of a thorough visual inspection by a qualified and
experienced machinery engineer. Money spent on the education and training of an engineer
provides the greatest return on investment that any utility can earn. Relying on OEMs is not always
the most cost effective inspection method.
Switzerland:
- Responsibilities between generator-owner and maintenance supplier have to be clarified and agreed
on by both parties.
- Another item to check for old units is for asbestos fibre concentration in the generator.
7. CONCLUSION
The survey has provided a basis for comparison by utility engineers of maintenance practices across a
range of countries. The responses reported in the appendices provide a library of maintenance task
recommendations and actual practices that could be considered if new or modified practices are being
contemplated.
The aims of the study have largely been met, although the reasons for the differences in approach
highlighted in the various areas of maintenance practice surveyed were not adequately explained by the
data received. The most significant conclusion is that there is a considerable diversity in approach and
practice in use internationally. It has proven unrealistic to anticipate that a study such as this can identify
best or preferred practice in any particular area of generator maintenance.
24
8. APPENDIX 1 – Appendix to Chapter 4
25
Serbia - Italy - Base Italy - Mid
Australia 1 Australia 2 Australia 3 Brazil
Montenegro Load Load
Stator winding – slot content
1. Inspect wedges and repair or
replace
Service hours &
Basis Time Time Time Time Service hours Service hours
operation cycles
Recommended Period 3-5 years 10 years 7- 10 years 5-7 years 60K to 90K hours 60K to 90K hours > 90K hours
Company Company
Source Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer National Standard Manufacturer
standard standard
Outage type Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out
Actual
Period 7-10 years 15 years 7- 10 years 5-7 years 60K to 90K hours 60K to 90K hours > 90K hours
Recommended Period > 10 years 10 years 7- 10 years 20K to 40K hours 40K to 60K hours > 90K hours
Company Company
Source Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer
standard standard
Outage type Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Any Major - rotor out Major - rotor out
Actual
Period > 10 years 15 years 7- 10 years Only if necessary 20K to 40K hours 40K to 60K hours > 90K hours
Recommended Period 3-5 years 4 years 3 - 5 years 5-7 years 60K to 90K hours 60K to 90K hours > 90K hours
Company Company
Source Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer National Standard Manufacturer
standard standard
Major - rotor in or
Outage type Major - rotor out Any Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out
out
Actual
Period 7-10 years 4 years 2 years 5-7 years 60K to 90K hours 60K to 90K hours > 90K hours
Recommended Period 3-5 years 4 years 3 - 5 years 5-7 years 60K to 90K hours 60K to 90K hours > 90K hours
5. HV withstand
Not Service hours &
Basis Condition based Condition Based Time Service hours Service hours
recommended operation cycles
Recommended Period 5-7 years 60K to 90K hours 60K to 90K hours > 90K hours
Company Company
Source Manufacturer National standard National Standard Manufacturer
standard standard
Outage type Task not done Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out
Actual
Period 5-7 years 60K to 90K hours 60K to 90K hours > 90K hours
26
Finland Russia USA Japan France Croatia Switzerland
(Refer note - p9 of
Stator winding – slot content report)
1. Inspect wedges and repair or
replace
Time, service Service hrs or Service hours &
Basis Condition based Time Service hours
hours or cycles Condition based operation cycles
20K - 40K hrs
Recommended Period 5-7 or 7-10 years 3-5 years 3-5 years 40K - 60K hrs 40K to 60K hours
60K - 90K hrs
Mfr or Company Mfr or Company
Source Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer
standard standard
Outage type Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Any
Actual
Period 5-7 or 7-10 years 3-5 years 5-7 years 3-5 years More than 7 years 7-10 years 3-5 years
Recommended Period 5-7 or 7-10 years 3-5 years 3-5 years 40K - 60K hrs 40K to 60K hours 20K to 40K hours
Outage type Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Any
Actual
Period 5-7 or 7-10 years 3-5 years 5-7 years 3-5 years More than 7 years 40K to 60K hours 3-5 years
Recommended Period 3-5 years 3-5 years 40K - 60K hrs 40K to 60K hours 20K to 40K hours
Mfr or Company
Source Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer
standard
Major - rotor in or
Outage type Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Any
out
Actual
Annual or 3-5
Period 5-7 or 7-10 years 3-5 years 5-7 years 3-5 years 7 - 10 years 40K to 60K hours
years
Actual/Recommended Prior mtce Prior mtce
Decision Basis Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
change experience experience
5. HV withstand
Time or Condition Not Service hours &
Basis Time Condition based Time
based recommended operation cycles
20K - 40K hrs
Recommended Period 5-7 or 7-10 years 3-5 years 7-10 years
40K - 60K hrs
Company Mfr or Company
Source Manufacturer Manufacturer
standard standard
Major - rotor in or Major - rotor in or
Outage type Major - rotor out Task not done Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out
out out
Actual
3 - 5 years, or
Period 5-7 or 7-10 years 3-5 years Condition based 7 - 10 years 7-10 years
7 - 10 years
Actual/Recommended Maintenance cost
Decision Basis Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
change saving
27
Serbia - Italy - Base Italy - Mid
Australia 1 Australia 2 Australia 3 Brazil
Montenegro Load Load
Stator winding – end windings
1. Test for water leaks, and repair
Not Service hours &
Basis Time Time Time Service hours Condition based
recommended operation cycles
Recommended Period 3-5 years 2 years 2 years 60K to 90K hours 40K to 60K hours < 10K hours
Recommended Period 3-5 years 2 years 2 years 60K to 90K hours 40K to 60K hours > 90K hours
Company Company
Source Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer
standard standard
Major - rotor in or
Outage type Major - rotor in Any Minor Major - rotor out Minor Major - rotor in
out
Actual
Period 7-10 years 4 years 2 years Annual 60K to 90K hours 40K to 60K hours > 90K hours
Recommended Period 3-5 years 4 years 2 years 5-7 years 60K to 90K hours 40K to 60K hours > 90K hours
Recommended Period 3-5 years 4 years 2 years 5-7 years 60K to 90K hours 60K to 90K hours < 10K hours
Recommended Period 3-5 years 4 years 2 years 5-7 years 60K to 90K hours 40K to 60K hours < 10K hours
28
Serbia - Italy - Base Italy - Mid
Stator winding – end windings Australia 1 Australia 2 Australia 3 Brazil
Montenegro Load Load
6. Capacitance mapping
Not
Basis Time Time Service hours
recommended
Outage type Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Task not done Major - rotor in
Actual
Period 7-10 years 15 years > 90K hours
Company
Source Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer
standard
Major - rotor in or
Outage type Major - rotor out Any Minor Major - rotor in
out
Actual
Period 7-10 years 15 years Only if necessary < 10K hours
8. Modal response
Not Not
Basis Time Service hours
recommended recommended
Major - rotor in or
Outage type Major - rotor out Task not done Task not done Minor
out
Actual
Period 7-10 years Only if necessary > 90K hours
29
Finland Russia USA Japan France Croatia Switzerland
Recommended Period 3-5 years Two years 10K - 20K hrs 40K to 60K hours 20K to 40K hours
Mfr or Company
Source Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer
standard
Major - rotor in or Major - rotor in or Major - rotor in or Major - rotor in or
Outage type Major - rotor out Task not done
out out out out
Actual
Period 3-5 years Condition based Two years 40K to 60K hours Annual
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Market needs
change
Recommended Period 2 - 5 years 10K - 20K hrs 40K to 60K hours 20K to 40K hours
Manufacturer &
Source Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer
Company std
Major - rotor in or Not
Outage type Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Task not done
out recommended
Actual
Period Annual 7 - 10 years 40K to 60K hours Annual
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Risk assessment Not applicable Not applicable Market needs
change
3. Inspect end windings, including
supports, spacers and phase
Time, service Service hours &
Basis Time Time Service hours Service hours
hours or cycles operation cycles
Recommended Period 3 - 7 years 3-5 years Two years 10K - 20K hrs 20K to 40K hours 20K to 40K hours
Recommended Period 2 - 5 years 3-5 years Two years 40K - 60K hrs 40K to 60K hours 20K to 40K hours
Company
Source Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer
standard
Major - rotor in or
Outage type Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Minor Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Any
out
Actual
Annual or 3-5
Period 2 - 5 years 3-5 years 5-7 years Two years 7 - 10 years 40K to 60K hours
years
Actual/Recommended Prior mtce
Decision Basis Not applicable Not applicable Market needs
change experience
30
Stator winding – end windings Finland Russia USA Japan France Croatia Switzerland
6. Capacitance mapping
Time or Condition Not Service hrs or Service hours &
Basis Time Service hours
based recommended Condition based operation cycles
10K - 20K hrs or
Recommended Period 7-10 years 3-5 years 20K to 40K hours 40K to 60K hours
40K - 60K hrs
Company
Source Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer
standard
Not
Outage type Major - rotor out Task not done Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor in
recommended
Actual
Period 7-10 years Condition based 3-5 years 20K to 40K hours
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Risk assessment
change
Recommended Period Two years 3-5 years 40K - 60K hrs 20K to 40K hours 20K to 40K hours
8. Modal response
Time, service Not
Basis Service hours Condition based
hours or cycles recommended
Recommended Period 5-7 or 7-10 years 40K - 60K hrs 20K to 40K hours
Company
Source Manufacturer
standard
Outage type Major - rotor out Task not done Major - rotor out
Actual
Period 7-10 years Condition based 7 - 10 years
31
Serbia - Italy - Base Italy - Mid
Australia 1 Australia 2 Australia 3 Brazil
Montenegro Load Load
Stator winding - terminal box.
1. General inspection and clean;
including support insulators, flexibles
Service hours &
Basis Time Time Time Time Service hours Condition based
operation cycles
Recommended Period 3-5 years 4 years 2 years 5-7 years 20K to 40K hours 20K to 40K hours 20K to 40K hours
Recommended Period > 10 years 3 - 5 years 5-7 years 20K to 40K hours 20K to 40K hours 20K to 40K hours
Outage type Task not done Major - rotor out Major - rotor in
Actual
Period 5-7 years 40K to 60K hours
32
Finland Russia USA Japan France Croatia Switzerland
Recommended Period Annual 3-5 years Two years 10K - 20K hrs 40K to 60K hours 20K to 40K hours
Company
Source Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer
standard
Major - rotor in or Major - rotor in or Major - rotor in or
Outage type Minor Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Any
out out out
Actual
Annual or 3-5
Period Annual 3-5 years 5-7 years Two years 3-5 or 7-10 years 40K to 60K hours
years
Actual/Recommended Prior mtce
Decision Basis Not applicable Not applicable Market needs
change experience
2. Disconnect flexibles; inspect;
replace as required; reconnect.
Time, service Service hrs or
Basis Time Time Service hours Condition based
hours or cycles Condition based
Recommended Period 5-7 or 7-10 years 3-5 years 7-10 years 10K - 20K hrs 20K to 40K hours 20K to 40K hours
Company Company
Source Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer
standard standard
Major - rotor in or Major - rotor in or
Outage type Major - rotor out Major - rotor in Major - rotor in
out out
Actual
Period 5-7 or 7-10 years 3-5 years Condition based 7-10 years 3 - 5 years 20K to 40K hours
33
Serbia - Italy - Base Italy - Mid
Australia 1 Australia 2 Australia 3 Brazil
Montenegro Load Load
Bushings.
1. Inspection & clean, external.
Not Service hours &
Basis Time Time Time Service hours Service hours
recommended operation cycles
Recommended Period Annual 4 years 7- 10 years 20K to 40K hours 20K to 40K hours 20K to 40K hours
Recommended Period > 10 years 4 years 7- 10 years 20K to 40K hours 20K to 40K hours 20K to 40K hours
Company
Source Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer
standard
No outage Major - rotor in or
Outage type Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor in
required out
Actual
Period Two years 20 7- 10 years 5-7 years 40K to 60K hours
Company
Source Manufacturer Manufacturer
standard
Major - rotor in or Major - rotor in or
Outage type Task not done Major - rotor out Minor
out out
Actual
Period > 10 years 7- 10 years Only if necessary > 90K hours
34
Finland Russia USA Japan France Croatia Switzerland
Bushings.
1. Inspection & clean, external.
Service hours &
Basis Time Time Time Service hours Time
operation cycles
Recommended Period Annual 3-5 years Two years 10K - 20K hrs 3-5 years 20K to 40K hours
Recommended Period 5-7 or 7-10 years 3-5 years 3-5 years 3-5 years 20K to 40K hours
Mfr or Company
Source Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer
standard
Major - rotor in or Major - rotor in or
Outage type Major - rotor out Major - rotor in
out out
Actual
Period 5-7 or 7-10 years 3-5 years Condition based 3-5 years 3-5 years 3-5 years
Recommended Period > 7 years 3-5 years Two years > 90K hours 5-7 years 40K to 60K hours
Mfr or Company
Source Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer
standard
Major - rotor in or Major - rotor in or Major - rotor in or
Outage type Major - rotor out Any
out out out
Actual
Annual or 3-5
Period > 7 years 3-5 years Condition based Two years 5-7 years
years
Actual/Recommended Prior mtce
Decision Basis Not applicable Market needs
change experience
4. Leakage test - replace bushings
if required.
Service hours &
Basis Time Time Condition based Condition based Time
operation cycles
Recommended Period > 7 years 3-5 years 5-7 years 40K to 60K hours
Mfr or Company
Source Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer
standard
Major - rotor in or Major - rotor in or
Outage type Major - rotor out Major - rotor out
out out
Actual
Period > 7 years 3-5 years Condition based 5-7 years Annual
35
Serbia - Italy - Base Italy - Mid
Australia 1 Australia 2 Australia 3 Brazil
Montenegro Load Load
Core & frame
1. Visual inspection & clean.
Service hours & Not
Basis Time Time Time Time Service hours
operation cycles recommended
Recommended Period 3-5 years 4 years 7- 10 years 5-7 years 60K to 90K hours 60K to 90K hours
Source Manufacturer
Outage type Major - rotor out Task not done Major - rotor out Minor
Actual
Period > 10 years 7- 10 years Only if necessary
Recommended Period Daily 3 - 5 years Annual 20K to 40K hours 20K to 40K hours
Company Company
Source Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer
standard standard
Major - rotor in or
Outage type Minor Minor Minor
out
Actual
Period Daily 3 - 5 years Annual 20K to 40K hours 20K to 40K hours
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
change
4. Check longitudinal core
tightening screws.
Service hours & Not
Basis Time Time Time Time Service hours
operation cycles recommended
Recommended Period 3-5 years 4 years 7- 10 years 5-7 years 60K to 90K hours 60K to 90K hours
Recommended Period 3-5 years 4 years 7- 10 years Annual 20K to 40K hours 20K to 40K hours
Company Company
Source Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer
standard standard
Outage type Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Minor Minor Minor
Actual
Period 7-10 years 15 years 7- 10 years Annual 20K to 40K hours 20K to 40K hours
36
Serbia - Italy - Base Italy - Mid
Core & frame Australia 1 Australia 2 Australia 3 Brazil
Montenegro Load Load
6. Inspect end shields.
Not
Basis Time Time Time
recommended
Mfr or National
Source Manufacturer Manufacturer
standard
Major - rotor in or
Outage type Major - rotor out Task not done Major - rotor out
out
Actual
Period 7-10 years 3 - 5 years 5-7 years
7. El-Cid test
Not Service hours & Not
Basis Time Condition based Condition Based Service hours
recommended operation cycles recommended
Recommended Period 3-5 years 60K to 90K hours 60K to 90K hours
Company Company
Source Other
standard standard
Outage type Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out
Actual
Period > 10 years 5-7 years 60K to 90K hours 60K to 90K hours
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Not applicable On condition On condition
change
37
Finland Russia USA Japan France Croatia Switzerland
Recommended Period 5-7 years 3-5 years 3-5 years 40K - 60K hrs 5-7 years 20K to 40K hours
Manufacturer &
Source Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer
Company std
Major - rotor in or
Outage type Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Any
out
Actual
Annual or 3-5
Period 5-7 or 7-10 years 3-5 years 5-7 years 3-5 years 7 - 10 years 5-7 years
years
Actual/Recommended Prior mtce Prior mtce
Decision Basis Not applicable Not applicable
change experience experience
Outage type Major - rotor out Task not done Major - rotor out
Actual
Period Condition based 5-7 years 3-5 years
Recommended Period Annual Annual Two years Annual 20K to 40K hours
Manufacturer &
Source Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer
Company std
Major - rotor in or Major - rotor in or
Outage type Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Task not done
out out
Actual
Period 2 - 5 years 3-5 years 7-10 years 3-5 years 5-7 years
Recommended Period 5-7 or 7-10 years 3-5 years 40K - 60K hrs 5-7 years 20K to 40K hours
Manufacturer &
Source Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer
Company std
Major - rotor in or Major - rotor in or
Outage type Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Any
out out
Actual
Period 5-7 or 7-10 years Condition based 3-5 years 5-7 years Annual
38
Core & frame Finland Russia USA Japan France Croatia Switzerland
Recommended Period 5-7 or 7-10 years 3-5 years 3-5 years 40K - 60K hrs 5-7 years 40K to 60K hours
Company
Source Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer
standard
Major - rotor in or Major - rotor in or
Outage type Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out
out out
Actual
Period 5-7 or 7-10 years 3-5 years 5-7 years 3-5 years 7 - 10 years 5-7 years 3-5 or 7-10 years
7. El-Cid test
Time, service Not Service hours &
Basis Time Service hours Service hours
hours or cycles recommended operation cycles
Recommended Period 5-7 or 7-10 years 3-5 years 40K - 60K hrs 40K to 60K hours 20K to 40K hours
Company
Source Other Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer
standard
Outage type Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Task not done Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Any
Actual
Period 7-10 years 3-5 years Condition based 7 - 10 years 40K to 60K hours 3-5 years
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Market needs
change
Outage type Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Task not done
Actual
Period > 10 years 3-5 years Condition based
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Not applicable Not applicable Risk assessment
change
39
Serbia - Italy - Base Italy - Mid
Australia 1 Australia 2 Australia 3 Brazil
Montenegro Load Load
Stator cooling water system
1. Inspect heat exchangers
Service hours & Not
Basis Time Time Time Time Service hours
operation cycles recommended
Recommended Period 3-5 years 4 years 7- 10 years Annual 60K to 90K hours 60K to 90K hours
Company Company
Source Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer
standard standard
Major - rotor in or
Outage type Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Minor Major - rotor out Major - rotor out
out
Actual
Period 7-10 years 4 years 3 - 5 years Annual 60K to 90K hours 60K to 90K hours
Recommended Period Annual 4 years 7- 10 years Annual 60K to 90K hours 60K to 90K hours
Company Company
Source Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer
standard standard
Major - rotor in or
Outage type Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Minor Major - rotor out Major - rotor out
out
Actual
Period 4 years 7- 10 years Annual 60K to 90K hours 60K to 90K hours
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
change
3. Pressure test
Not Service hours & Not
Basis Time Time Time Service hours
recommended operation cycles recommended
Recommended Period 3-5 years 3 - 5 years Annual 60K to 90K hours 60K to 90K hours
Company Company
Source Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer
standard standard
Major - rotor in or Major - rotor in or
Outage type Task not done Minor Major - rotor out Major - rotor out
out out
Actual
Period 3-5 years 3 - 5 years Annual 60K to 90K hours 60K to 90K hours
4. Vacuum test
Not Not Service hours & Not
Basis Condition based Time Service hours
recommended recommended operation cycles recommended
Company Company
Source Manufacturer
standard standard
Major - rotor in or
Outage type Task not done Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out
out
Actual
Period 7-10 years 7- 10 years 60K to 90K hours 60K to 90K hours
40
Finland Russia USA Japan France Croatia Switzerland
Recommended Period Annual 1 - 2 years 3-5 years > 90K hours 3-5 years 20K to 40K hours
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Not applicable Not applicable Market needs
change
2. Mechanical maintenance of
pumps, valves etc.
Service hours &
Basis Time Time Time Service hours Time
operation cycles
Recommended Period Annual 3-5 years 3-5 years 40K - 60K hrs Annual 20K to 40K hours
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Not applicable Not applicable Market needs
change
3. Pressure test
Service hours &
Basis Time Time Time Condition based Service hours
operation cycles
Recommended Period 3 - 10 years 3-5 years 3-5 years 40K to 60K hours 40K to 60K hours
4. Vacuum test
Basis Time Time Time Service hours Service hours Condition based
Recommended Period 3 - 10 years 1 - 2 years 3-5 years 10K - 20K hrs 40K to 60K hours 20K to 40K hours
Company
Source Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer
standard
Major - rotor in or Major - rotor in or
Outage type Major - rotor out Major - rotor out
out out
Actual
Period 5-7 or 7-10 years 1 - 2 years Condition based 3-5 years 40K to 60K hours
41
Serbia - Italy - Base Italy - Mid
Australia 1 Australia 2 Australia 3 Brazil
Montenegro Load Load
Stator water treatment
1. Replace resin
Technical Not
Basis Time Condition Based Time Time
diagnostic recommended
Company Company
Source Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer
standard standard
No outage No outage No outage
Outage type
required required required
Actual
Period As required Annual Annual
Recommended Period 2 years Annual 60K to 90K hours 60K to 90K hours
Company Company
Source Manufacturer Manufacturer
standard standard
Not
Outage type Minor Major - rotor out Major - rotor out
recommended
Actual
Period Annual 60K to 90K hours 60K to 90K hours
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
change
3. Calibrate conductivity
instruments.
Not Service hours & Not
Basis Time Time Time Service hours
recommended operation cycles recommended
Recommended Period Annual 5-7 years 60K to 90K hours 60K to 90K hours
Company Company
Source Manufacturer Manufacturer
standard standard
Major - rotor in or No outage Major - rotor in or Major - rotor in or
Outage type Major - rotor out Major - rotor out
out required out out
Actual
Period 3-5 years 4 years 2 years 5-7 years 60K to 90K hours 60K to 90K hours
42
Finland Russia USA Japan France Croatia Switzerland
Recommended Period Annual 3-5 years Two years 40K - 60K hrs Annual 20K to 40K hours
Manufacturer &
Source Other Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer
Company std
Major - rotor in or Major - rotor in or Major - rotor in or No outage
Outage type Minor Any
out out out required
Actual
Period Annual 3-5 years Two years Annual Annual
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Not applicable Not applicable Market needs
change
3. Calibrate conductivity
instruments.
Service hours &
Basis Time Time Time Service hours Time
operation cycles
Recommended Period 1 - 2 years 3-5 years Annual 40K - 60K hrs Annual 20K to 40K hours
Company
Source Other Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer
standard
Major - rotor in or Major - rotor in or Major - rotor in or No outage No outage
Outage type Manufacturer Any
out out out required required
Actual
Period 1 - 2 years 3-5 years Annual 3 - 5 years Annual Annual
43
Serbia - Italy - Base Italy - Mid
Australia 1 Australia 2 Australia 3 Brazil
Montenegro Load Load
Rotor
1. Remove rotor for inspection -
inspect accessible rotor components,
including fan; NDT of rotor bore.
Service hours &
Basis Time Time Time Time Service hours Service hours
operation cycles
Recommended Period 3-5 years 10 years 7- 10 years 5-7 years 60K to 90K hours 60K to 90K hours > 90K hours
Company Company
Source Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer
standard standard
Outage type Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out
Actual
Period 7-10 years 15 years 7- 10 years 5-7 years 60K to 90K hours 20K to 40K hours > 90K hours
Recommended Period 3-5 years 10 years 7- 10 years >7 years > 90K hours
Outage type Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out
Actual
Period > 10 years 25 years 7 - 10 years >7 years > 90K hours
Recommended Period 3-5 years 10 years 3 - 5 years 5-7 years 20K to 40K hours 20K to 40K hours > 90K hours
Major - rotor in or
Outage type Major - rotor out Major - rotor out
out
Actual
Period 7-10 years 15 years 5-7 years
44
Finland Russia USA Japan France Croatia Switzerland
Rotor
1. Remove rotor for inspection -
inspect accessible rotor components,
including fan; NDT of rotor bore.
Time, service Service hours &
Basis Time Time Service hours Service hours
hours or cycles operation cycles
Recommended Period 5-7 or 7-10 years 3-5 years 3-5 years 40K - 60K hrs 40K to 60K hours 40K to 60K hours
Outage type Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out
Actual
2-5 years OR
Period 5-7 or 7-10 years 3-5 years 5-7 years 3-5 years 7 - 10 years 40K to 60K hours
7-10 years
Actual/Recommended Prior mtce Prior mtce
Decision Basis Not applicable Not applicable
change experience experience
Recommended Period 5-7 or 7-10 years 3-5 or >10 yrs >10 yrs 40K - 60K hrs 40K to 60K hours 60K to 90K hours
Outage type Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor out
Actual
Period 5-7 or >10 years 3-5 or >10 yrs Condition based >10 yrs 40K to 60K hours >7 years
No outage
Outage type Major - rotor out
required
Actual
Period Condition based 7-10 years Two years
45
Serbia - Italy - Base Italy - Mid
Australia 1 Australia 2 Australia 3 Brazil
Montenegro Load Load
Hydrogen cooling system
1. Remove, inspect & repair
hydrogen coolers.
Service hours &
Basis Time Time Time Time Service hours Condition based
operation cycles
Recommended Period 3-5 years 4 years 3 - 5 years Annual 60K to 90K hours 60K to 90K hours > 90K hours
Recommended Period 3-5 years 3 - 5 years Annual 60K to 90K hours 60K to 90K hours < 10K hours
Recommended Period Two years 3 - 5 years Annual 60K to 90K hours 60K to 90K hours < 10K hours
Hydrogen seals
1. Inspect, including NDT
Service hours &
Basis Time Time Time Time Service hours Service hours
operation cycles
Recommended Period 3-5 years 4 years 3 - 5 years Annual 20K to 40K hours 20K to 40K hours < 10K hours
2. IR testing
Service hours &
Basis Time Time Time Time Service hours Service hours
operation cycles
Recommended Period 3-5 years 4 years 3 - 5 years Annual 20K to 40K hours 20K to 40K hours < 10K hours
46
Finland Russia USA Japan France Croatia Switzerland
Recommended Period 5-7 years 3-5 years 3-5 years 40K to 60K hours 40K to 60K hours
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Not applicable Not applicable Market needs
change
3. Calibrate dewpoint
instrumentation
Not Service hours &
Basis Time Time Service hours
recommended operation cycles
Recommended Period 2 - 5 years 3-5 years 40K - 60K hrs 20K to 40K hours
Company
Source Other Manufacturer Manufacturer
standard
No outage Major - rotor in or
Outage type Task not done Major - rotor out Any
required out
Actual
Period 3-5 years 3-5 years Condition based 7 - 10 years Annual
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Not applicable Market needs
change
Hydrogen seals
1. Inspect, including NDT
Time, service Service hours &
Basis Time Time Service hours Service hours
hours or cycles operation cycles
Recommended Period 3 - 7 years 2 or 3-5 years 3-5 years 40K - 60K hrs 20K to 40K hours 40K to 60K hours
2. IR testing
Service hours &
Basis Time Time Time Service hours Time
operation cycles
Recommended Period Annual 2 or 3-5 years Two years 10K - 20K hrs Annual 40K to 60K hours
47
Serbia - Italy - Base Italy - Mid
Australia 1 Australia 2 Australia 3 Brazil
Montenegro Load Load
Bearings
1. Inspection including NDT
Service hours &
Basis Time Time Time Time Service hours Service hours
operation cycles
Recommended Period 3-5 years 4 years 3 - 5 years Annual 20K to 40K hours 20K to 40K hours 20K to 40K hours
2. IR testing
Service hours &
Basis Time Time Time Time Service hours Service hours
operation cycles
Recommended Period Two years 4 years 3 - 5 years Annual 20K to 40K hours 20K to 40K hours < 10K hours
Recommended Period Two years Weekly < 10K hours 20K to 40K hours 20K to 40K hours < 10K hours
Recommended Period Two years 4 years 2 years Annual 60K to 90K hours 60K to 90K hours < 10K hours
48
Finland Russia USA Japan France Croatia Switzerland
Bearings
1. Inspection including NDT
Time, service Time & operation Service hours &
Basis Time Service hours Service hours
hours or cycles cycles operation cycles
Recommended Period 2 - 5 years 3-5 years 3-5 years 40K - 60K hrs 20K to 40K hours 20K to 40K hours
Manufacturer &
Source Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer
Company std
Major - rotor in or Major - rotor in or Major - rotor in or
Outage type Major - rotor out Major - rotor out Major - rotor in Any
out out out
Actual
Period 2 - 5 years 3-5 years 5-7 years 3-5 years 7 - 10 years 20K to 40K hours 3-5 years
2. IR testing
Time & operation Service hours &
Basis Time Time Service hours Time
cycles operation cycles
Recommended Period Annual 3-5 years Two years 10K - 20K hrs Annual 20K to 40K hours
Recommended Period Annual Two years 10K - 20K hrs Annual 20K to 40K hours
Recommended Period 2 - 5 years 2 or 3-5 years 3-5 years 10K - 20K hrs Annual 20K to 40K hours
49
Serbia - Italy - Base Italy - Mid
Australia 1 Australia 2 Australia 3 Brazil
Montenegro Load Load
Slip rings & brush gear (or
diodes)
1. Inspection, including brush
wear
Service hours &
Basis Time Time Time Time Service hours Service hours
operation cycles
Recommended Period Annual Weekly < 10K hours Annual 20K to 40K hours 20K to 40K hours < 10K hours
Recommended Period Two years Weekly 2 years Annual 20K to 40K hours 20K to 40K hours < 10K hours
3. Slipring grinding
Recommended Period > 10 years 2 years 5-7 years < 10K hours
Company
Source Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer
standard
Major - rotor in or Major - rotor in or Major - rotor in or
Outage type Any Minor
out out out
Actual
Period > 10 years 20 years 2 years Only if necessary < 10K hours
4. IR testing
Service hours &
Basis Time Time Time Time Service hours Service hours
operation cycles
Recommended Period 3-5 years 4 years 2 years Annual 20K to 40K hours 20K to 40K hours < 10K hours
Instrumentation
1. Calibration & circuit checks
Service hours &
Basis Time Time Time Service hours
operation cycles
Recommended Period Two years 4 years 3 - 5 years Annual 60K to 90K hours 60K to 90K hours
Company Company
Source Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer
standard standard
Major - rotor in or Major - rotor in or Major - rotor in or
Outage type Minor Major - rotor out Major - rotor out
out out out
Actual
Period 3-5 years 4 years 3 - 5 years Annual 60K to 90K hours 60K to 90K hours
50
Finland Russia USA Japan France Croatia Switzerland
Slip rings & brush gear (or
diodes)
1. Inspection, including brush
wear
Time, service Time & operation Service hours &
Basis Time Service hours Service hours
hours or cycles cycles operation cycles
Recommended Period Annual Annual Two years 10K - 20K hrs 20K to 40K hours 20K to 40K hours
Recommended Period Annual Annual Two years 10K - 20K hrs Annual 20K to 40K hours
3. Slipring grinding
Service hrs or
Basis Condition based Time Condition based Service hours Condition based
Condition based
Recommended Period 2 or 3-5 years 40K - 60K hrs 20K to 40K hours 20K to 40K hours
4. IR testing
Time or Condition Service hours &
Basis Time Time Service hours Time
based operation cycles
Recommended Period Annual Annual Two years 10K - 20K hrs Annual 20K to 40K hours
Company Company
Source Other Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer
standard standard
Major - rotor in or No outage
Outage type Minor Minor Any Major - rotor out
out required
Actual
Annual or 7-10
Period Annual Annual Condition based Two years 2 years Annual
years
Actual/Recommended Maintenance cost
Decision Basis Not applicable Not applicable
change saving
Instrumentation
1. Calibration & circuit checks
Service hours &
Basis Time Condition based Time Service hours Time
operation cycles
Recommended Period 3-5 years Two years 40K - 60K hrs Annual 20K to 40K hours
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Not applicable Not applicable Market needs
change
51
Serbia - Italy - Base Italy - Mid
Australia 1 Australia 2 Australia 3 Brazil
Montenegro Load Load
Recommended Period Two years 3 - 5 years Annual 20K to 40K hours 20K to 40K hours 20K to 40K hours
Recommended Period Two years 3 - 5 years Annual 20K to 40K hours 20K to 40K hours 20K to 40K hours
Recommended Period 3-5 years Annual 3-5 years 3-5 years > 90K hours
Company Company
Source Manufacturer Government Manufacturer Manufacturer
standard standard
Major - rotor in or No outage No outage Major - rotor in or
Outage type Minor
out required required out
Actual
Period 3-5 years Annual 3-5 years 3-5 years > 90K hours
Recommended Period 3-5 years Annual 3-5 years 3-5 years > 90K hours
Company Company
Source Manufacturer Government Manufacturer Manufacturer
standard standard
Major - rotor in or No outage No outage Major - rotor in or
Outage type Minor
out required required out
Actual
Period 3-5 years Annual 3-5 years 3-5 years > 90K hours
3. Demagnetisation checks
Recommended Period Annual 3-5 years 3-5 years > 90K hours
Company Company
Source Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer
standard standard
No outage No outage Major - rotor in or
Outage type Major - rotor out Minor
required required out
Actual
Period 7- 10 years Annual 3-5 years 3-5 years > 90K hours
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable
change
52
Finland Russia USA Japan France Croatia Switzerland
Recommended Period 3-5 years 3-5 years 40K - 60K hrs Annual 40K to 60K hours
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Not applicable Not applicable Market needs
change
2. Resistance or impedance
measurement
Not Service hours &
Basis Time Time Time Time
recommended operation cycles
Recommended Period 2 - 5 years 3-5 years Two years Annual 40K to 60K hours
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Market needs
change
Recommended Period 3-5 years 3-5 years Two years > 90K hours Annual 20K to 40K hours
Recommended Period 3-5 years 3-5 years Two years > 90K hours 5-7 years 20K to 40K hours
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Not applicable Other Not applicable Market needs
change
3. Demagnetisation checks
Not
Basis Time Time Condition based Time Time
recommended
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Not applicable Other Not applicable Not applicable
change
53
Serbia - Italy - Base Italy - Mid
Australia 1 Australia 2 Australia 3 Brazil
Montenegro Load Load
Generator electrical protection
system
1. Protection trip checks
Recommended Period 3-5 years 3 - 5 years Annual 3-5 years 3-5 years 20K to 40K hours
2. Relay injection
Recommended Period 3-5 years 3 - 5 years Annual 3-5 years 3-5 years 20K to 40K hours
3. Circuit checks
Recommended Period 3 - 5 years Annual 3-5 years 3-5 years 20K to 40K hours
4. CT IR and continuity
Not Not
Basis Condition Based Time Time
recommended recommended
Company
Source Manufacturer
standard
54
Finland Russia USA Japan France Croatia Switzerland
Recommended Period 3-5 years 7-10 years Two years > 90K hours Annual 20K to 40K hours
2. Relay injection
Time & operation Service hours &
Basis Time Time Service hours Time
cycles operation cycles
Recommended Period 3-5 years > 90K hours Two years > 90K hours Annual 20K to 40K hours
3. Circuit checks
Service hours &
Basis Time Time Time Service hours Time
operation cycles
Recommended Period 3-5 years 7-10 years Two years > 90K hours Annual 20K to 40K hours
4. CT IR and continuity
Service hours &
Basis Time Time Time Service hours Time
operation cycles
Recommended Period 3-5 years 7-10 years Two years > 90K hours Annual 20K to 40K hours
55
9. APPENDIX 2 - Appendix to Chapter 5
56
Japan Italy USA 1 USA 2 France
Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Market needs
change
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Market needs Other
change
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Risk assessment
change
5. HV withstand
Not Service hours &
Basis Time Condition based Condition based
recommended operation cycles
Recommended
Period 40K to 60K hours 3-5 years
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Other
change
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Market needs
change
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Risk assessment
change
3. Inspect end windings, including
supports, spacers and phase
connection rings
Service hours &
Basis Time Time Time Service hours
operation cycles
Recommended
Period 3-5 years 40K to 60K hours 3-5 years 5-7 years 10K to 20K hours
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Market needs Risk assessment
change
57
Japan Italy USA 1 USA 2 France
Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer
4. Inspect/test/repair temperature
sensors
Not Service hours & Service hours or
Basis Condition based Condition based
recommended operation cycles Condition based
Recommended
Not
Period 40K to 60K hours 3-5 years 40K to 60K hours
recommended
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis
change
5. General inspection for
contamination and insulation state;
Service hours & Service hours or
Basis Time Time Time
operation cycles Condition based
Recommended
Period 3-5 years 40K to 60K hours 3-5 years 3-5 years 40K to 60K hours
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Market needs
change
6. Capacitance mapping
Not Service hours or
Basis Time Condition based Time
recommended Condition based
Recommended
10K to 20K hrs
Period 3-5 years 5-7 years
40K to 60K hrs
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Risk assessment
change
Basis Condition based Condition based Condition based Condition based Service hours
Recommended
Period 40K to 60K hours
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis
change
8. Modal response
Not Service hours &
Basis Condition based Condition based Service hours
recommended operation cycles
Recommended
Not
Period 5-7 years 40K to 60K hours
recommended
Actual/Recommended Maintenance cost
Decision Basis
change saving
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Market needs Other
change
58
Japan Italy USA 1 USA 2 France
Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer
Bushings.
1. Inspection & clean, external.
Not Service hours &
Basis Time Condition based Service hours
recommended operation cycles
Recommended
Period 20K to 40K hours 3-5 years 10K to 20K hours
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Risk assessment
change
2. Internal inspection – gas cooled
bushings
Service hours & Not
Basis Time Condition based Condition based
operation cycles recommended
Recommended
Period Two years 20K to 40K hours
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Market needs Risk assessment
change
3. Leakage test - replace gaskets
and seals if required.
Basis Time Condition based Condition based Condition based Service hours
Recommended
Period 7-10 years > 90K hours
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Market needs Risk assessment
change
4. Leakage test - replace bushings
if required.
Not
Basis Condition based Condition based Condition based Condition based
recommended
Recommended
Period
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Risk assessment
change
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Market needs
change
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Risk assessment rare
change
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis
change
59
Japan Italy USA 1 USA 2 France
Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer
4. Check longitudinal core
tightening screws.
Not Service hours & Not
Basis Time Time
recommended operation cycles recommended
Recommended
Period 40K to 60K hours 3-5 years 5-7 years
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis
change
5. Check gas flow control rings,
baffles etc.
Service hours &
Basis Time Time Time Service hours
operation cycles
Recommended
Period 3-5 years 20K to 40K hours 5-7 years 5-7 years 40K to 60K hours
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Market needs
change
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis
change
7. El-Cid test
Not Service hours & Condition based Condition based
Basis Service hours
recommended operation cycles or Time or Time
Recommended
Period 40K to 60K hours 5-7 years 7-10 years 40K to 60K hours
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis
change
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Risk assessment
change
60
Japan Italy USA 1 USA 2 France
Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Market needs
change
2. Mechanical maintenance of
pumps, valves etc.
Service hours &
Basis Time Time Time Service hours
operation cycles
Recommended
Period Two years 40K to 60K hours 3-5 years 3-5 years 40K to 60K hours
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Market needs
change
3. Pressure test
Not Service hours &
Basis Condition based Condition based Condition based
recommended operation cycles
Recommended
Period 40K to 60K hours
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis
change
4. Vacuum test
Not Service hours &
Basis Condition based Condition based Service hours
recommended operation cycles
Recommended
Period 40K to 60K hours 10K to 20K hours
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis
change
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Market needs
change
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Market needs
change
3. Calibrate conductivity
instruments.
Service hours &
Basis Time Time Service hours
operation cycles
Recommended
Period Two years 40K to 60K hours 3-5 years 40K to 60K hours
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Market needs
change
61
Japan Italy USA 1 USA 2 France
Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer
Rotor
1. Remove rotor for inspection -
inspect accessible rotor components,
including fan; NDT of rotor bore.
Service hours &
Basis Time Time Time Service hours
operation cycles
Recommended
Period 3-5 years 40K to 60K hours T4/T5 5-7 years 40K to 60K hours
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Market needs Market needs
change
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Market needs Other
change
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis
change
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis
change
62
Japan Italy USA 1 USA 2 France
Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Market needs Risk assessment
change
2. Pressure test cooling water
piping.
Service hours & Not
Basis Time Condition based Condition based
operation cycles recommended
Recommended
Not Not
Period > 10 years 40K to 60K hours
recommended recommended
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Market needs
change
3. Calibrate dewpoint
instrumentation
Not Service hours &
Basis Time Service hours
recommended operation cycles
Recommended
Period 40K to 60K hours 3-5 years 40K to 60K hours
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis
change
Hydrogen seals
1. Inspect, including NDT
Service hours & Condition based
Basis Time Time Service hours
operation cycles or Time
Recommended
Period Two years 20K to 40K hours 3-5 years 5-7 years 40K to 60K hours
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Market needs
change
2. IR testing
Service hours &
Basis Time Time Condition based Service hours
operation cycles
Recommended
Period 3 or 6 mths 20K to 40K hours 3-5 years 10K to 20K hours
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis
change
63
Japan Italy USA 1 USA 2 France
Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer
Bearings
1. Inspection including NDT
Service hours & Condition based Condition based
Basis Time Service hours
operation cycles or Time or Time
Recommended
Period Two years 20K to 40K hours 3-5 years 3-5 years 40K to 60K hours
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Market needs
change
2. IR testing
Service hours & Condition based
Basis Time Condition based Service hours
operation cycles or Time
Recommended
Period 3 or 6 mths 20K to 40K hours 3-5 years 10K to 20K hours
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis
change
3. Shaft earthing system inspect &
repair
Service hours & Condition based Condition based
Basis Time Service hours
operation cycles or Time or Time
Recommended
Period Annual 20K to 40K hours 3-5 years 3-5 years 10K to 20K hours
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Market needs
change
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Market needs
change
64
Japan Italy USA 1 USA 2 France
Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis
change
3. Slipring grinding
Service hours or
Basis Condition based Condition based Condition based
Condition based
Recommended
Period 40K to 60K hours
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Other
change
4. IR testing
Not Service hours &
Basis Time Service hours
recommended operation cycles
Recommended
Period 20K to 40K hours 10K to 20K hours
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis
change
Instrumentation
1. Calibration & circuit checks
Service hours &
Basis Time Service hours
operation cycles
Recommended
Period 3 or 12 months 40K to 60K hours 40K to 60K hours
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis
change
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis
change
2. Resistance or impedance
measurement
Not Service hours & Not
Basis
recommended operation cycles recommended
Recommended
Period 20K to 40K hours
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis
change
65
Japan Italy USA 1 USA 2 France
Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer Manufacturer
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Market needs
change
2. Relay injection
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Market needs
change
3. Circuit checks
Service hours &
Basis Time Service hours
operation cycles
Recommended
Period Two years 20K to 40K hours > 90K hours
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Market needs
change
4. CT IR and continuity
Service hours &
Basis Time Service hours
operation cycles
Recommended
Period Two years 40K to 60K hours > 90K hours
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis Market needs
change
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis
change
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis
change
3. Demagnetisation checks
Not Service hours &
Basis Condition based Condition based
recommended operation cycles
Recommended
Period 20K to 40K hours
Actual/Recommended
Decision Basis
change
66
10. APPENDIX 3 - Appendix to Chapter 6
67
UTILITIES
Serbia -
Australia 1 Australia 2 Australia 3 Italy - Base Load Italy - Mid Load Brazil
Montenegro
Stator winding – slot
content
1. Partial discharge
monitoring – various
types
Usage - Used now Used now Used now Future use Used now Used now Not used
Usage - Not used Not used Not used Used now Not used Not used Future use
Company usual
Reason for use -
practice
Rotor
Usage - Used now Used now Used now Used now Used now Used now Future use
Continuous use -
Intermittent - > 6 Intermittent - 6 On known Intermittent - > 6 Intermittent - > 6 Intermittent - > 6
Mode & frequency - regular data
mths month condition mths mths mths
review
Potential fault Potential fault Company usual Company usual Company usual Company usual
Reason for use - Other reason
response response practice practice practice practice
2. Shaft torsional
oscillation monitoring
Usage - Not used Not used Not used Not used Not used Not used Not used
68
Finland Russia USA Japan France Croatia Switzerland
Usage - Used now Used now Not used Not used Not used Used now Used now
Usage - Used now Used now Not used Not used Used now Used now Used now
Continuous OR
On known Intermittent - > 6
Mode & frequency - Intermittent - > 6 Continuous Various
condition mths
mths
Company usual Potential fault Mfrs Mfrs rec or
Reason for use - Any or all reasons
practice response recommendation Company practice
Rotor
Usage - Future use Not used Used now Not used Future use Used now Used now
2. Shaft torsional
oscillation monitoring
Usage - Past use Used now Not used Not used Not used Used now
Company usual
Reason for use - Other reason Other reason
practice
69
Serbia -
Australia 1 Australia 2 Australia 3 Italy - Base Load Italy - Mid Load Brazil
Montenegro
1. Stator core/frame
vibration monitoring
Usage - Not used Not used Not used Used now Used now Used now Future use
Company usual
Reason for use - Other reason Other reason Other reason
practice
2. Stator core
lamination vibration –
audio detector
Usage - Not used Not used Not used Used now Used now Used now Not used
Hydrogen cooling
system
1. Dew point
monitoring
Usage - Used now Used now Used now Not used Used now Used now Not used
2. Hydrogen make up
rate monitoring
Usage - Used now Used now Used now Used now Not used Not used Used now
3. Hydrogen purity
analysis
Usage - Used now Used now Used now Used now Used now Used now Used now
Continuous use -
Continuous use & On known Continuous use & Continuous use & Continuous use & Intermittent - 6
Mode & frequency - regular data
monitoring condition monitoring monitoring monitoring month
review
Potential fault Potential fault Mfrs Company usual Company usual Company usual
Reason for use - Other reason
response response recommendation practice practice practice
70
Finland Russia USA Japan France Croatia Switzerland
1. Stator core/frame
vibration monitoring
Usage - Not used Used now Not used Future use Not used Not used
Mfrs
Reason for use - Other reason Other reason Other reason
recommendation
2. Stator core
lamination vibration –
audio detector
Usage - Not used Past use Other reason Not used Not used Not used Not used
On known On known
Mode & frequency -
condition condition
Hydrogen cooling
system
1. Dew point
monitoring
Usage - Used now Used now Used now Not used Used now Not used Used now
2. Hydrogen make up
rate monitoring
Usage - Used now Used now Used now Not used Not used Used now
Continuous use & Cont monitored or Continuous use & Cont monitored or
Mode & frequency -
monitoring Int monthly test monitoring Int monthly test
3. Hydrogen purity
analysis
Usage - Used now Used now Used now Used now Used now Used now Used now
Continuous use & Cont monitored or Continuous use & Continuous use & Continuous use & Continuous use - Continuous use &
Mode & frequency -
monitoring Int weekly test monitoring monitoring monitoring regular data review monitoring
Mfrs rec or Mfrs rec or Company usual Potential fault Mfrs Mfrs Mfrs
Reason for use -
Company practice Company practice practice response recommendation recommendation recommendation
71
Serbia -
Australia 1 Australia 2 Australia 3 Italy - Base Load Italy - Mid Load Brazil
Montenegro
Stator water
treatment
1. Stator cooling
water conductivity
Usage - Used now Used now Used now Used now Used now Used now
Usage - Used now Used now Used now Used now Used now Used now
Usage - Used now Used now Used now Used now Used now Used now
Usage - Used now Used now Used now Not used Used now Used now Used now
Continuous use -
Intermittent - 6 Intermittent - Intermittent - Intermittent - > 6
Mode & frequency - regular data
month monthly monthly mths
review
Potential fault Potential fault Company usual Company usual
Reason for use - Other reason
response response practice practice
Bearings
1. Bearing journal
vibration – dual probe
monitor.
Usage - Used now Used now Used now Used now Used now Used now Used now
Continuous use -
Continuous use & Continuous use & Continuous use & Continuous use & Continuous use & Intermittent - > 6
Mode & frequency - regular data
monitoring monitoring monitoring monitoring monitoring mths
review
Potential fault Potential fault Mfrs Company usual Company usual
Reason for use - Other reason Other reason
response response recommendation practice practice
2. Shaft grounding
monitoring
Usage - Used now Used now Used now Not used Used now Used now Used now
Continuous use -
Intermittent - 6 Intermittent - Intermittent - Intermittent - > 6
Mode & frequency - regular data *
month monthly monthly mths
review
Potential fault Potential fault Company usual Company usual
Reason for use - Other reason Other reason
response response practice practice
72
Finland Russia USA Japan France Croatia Switzerland
Stator water
treatment
1. Stator cooling
water conductivity
Usage - Used now Used now Used now Used now Used now Used now Used now
Continuous use & Continuous use & Continuous use & Continuous use & Continuous use -
Mode & frequency - Continuous Continuous
monitoring monitoring monitoring monitoring regular data review
Mfrs rec or Mfrs rec or Company usual Potential fault Mfrs rec or Mfrs Mfrs
Reason for use -
Company practice Company practice practice response potential fault recommendation recommendation
2. Hydrogen leakage
into stator water
Usage - Used now Used now Used now Not used Used now Not used Used now
Usage - Used now Used now Used now Not used Used now Not used Used by some
Usage - Used now Used now Used now Not used Used now Used now Used now
Continuous use & On known Intermittent - Intermittent - Continuous use - Continuous use &
Mode & frequency -
monitoring condition weekly testing weekly or monthly regular data review monitoring
Bearings
1. Bearing journal
vibration – dual probe
monitor.
Usage - Used now Used now Used now Used now Used now Used now Used now
Continuous use & Continuous use & Continuous use & Continuous use & Continuous use & Continuous use - Continuous use &
Mode & frequency -
monitoring monitoring monitoring monitoring monitoring regular data review monitoring
Company usual Mfrs rec or Company usual Potential fault Mfrs Mfrs
Reason for use - Various
practice Company practice practice response recommendation recommendation
2. Shaft grounding
monitoring
Usage - Used now Used now Used now Used now Not used Used now Used now
Continuous use & On known Intermittent - Continuous use & Continuous use - Continuous use &
Mode & frequency -
monitoring condition weekly testing monitoring regular data review monitoring
73
Serbia -
Australia 1 Australia 2 Australia 3 Italy - Base Load Italy - Mid Load Brazil
Montenegro
Usage - Used now Not used Not used Not used Not used Not used Future use
2. Diode breakdown
detection
Usage - Not used Not used Not used Not used Not used Not used Not used
Usage - Past use Used now Not used Not used Not used Used now Not used
2. Diode breakdown
detection
Usage - Used now - Not used Used now Used now Used by some
Continuous use & Continuous use & Continuous use & Continuous use -
Mode & frequency - -
monitoring monitoring monitoring regular data review
74
MANUFACTURER RESPONSES
Usage - Future use Used now Used now Used now Used now
Intermittent - > 6 Cont stored or Continuous use & Cont stored or Cont stored or
Mode & frequency -
mths Inter > 6 mths monitoring Inter > 6 mths Inter > 6 mths
Usage - Past use Future use Used now Used now infrequently
Rotor
Usage - Past use Used now Used now Used now Used now
Continuous use -
On known Intermittent - > 6 Cont monitored or Continuous use &
Mode & frequency - regular data
condition mths Int monthly test monitoring
review
Mfrs Mfrs rec or Company usual Mfrs
Reason for use - Other reason
recommendation potential fault practice recommendation
Usage - Past use Not used Not used Used now Very rarely
Continuous use -
On known
Mode & frequency - regular data CM when used
condition
review
Potential fault Response to
Reason for use - Other reason
response system
75
M - Japan M - Italy M - France USA - 1 USA - 2
Usage - Not used Not used Future use Used now Very rare
Continuous use -
On known
Mode & frequency - regular data CM when used
condition
review
Company usual Company usual
Reason for use - Other reason
practice practice
Usage - Not used Not used Not used Not used Not used
Usage - Not used Used now Used now Used now Used now
Continuous use & Intermittent - Continuous use & Continuous use &
Mode & frequency -
monitoring weekly testing monitoring monitoring
Usage - Past use Not used Not used Used now Used now
Usage - Used now Used now Used now Used now Used now
Continuous use & Continuous use & Continuous use & Continuous use & Continuous use &
Mode & frequency -
monitoring monitoring monitoring monitoring monitoring
76
M - Japan M - Italy M - France USA - 1 USA - 2
Usage - Used now Used now Used now Used now Used now
Usage - Past use Used now Used now Used now Sometimes
3. Oxygen concentration
Usage - Not used Used now Used now Used now Rarely
4. Copper concentration
Usage - Not used Used now Used now Used now Used now
Continuous use & Continuous use & Continuous use & Continuous use &
Mode & frequency -
monitoring monitoring monitoring monitoring
Bearings
Usage - Used now Used now Used now Used now Used now
Continuous use & Continuous use & Continuous use & Continuous use & Continuous use &
Mode & frequency -
monitoring monitoring monitoring monitoring monitoring
Usage - Not used Used now Used now Used now Used now
77
M - Japan M - Italy M - France USA - 1 USA - 2
Usage - Past use Not used Not used Used now Y-occasionally
Usage - Used now Not used Used now Used now Used now
Continuous use & Continuous use & Continuous use & Continuous use &
Mode & frequency -
monitoring monitoring monitoring monitoring
78
ISBN: 978- 2- 85873- 073-5









