0% found this document useful (0 votes)
27 views9 pages

Viscosity Measurement of Gasoline Experiment

This document describes an experiment to determine the viscosity of fluids at various temperatures using a viscometer. The experiment measured the viscosity of water and gasoline at temperatures ranging from 14 to 42 degrees Celsius. The results were recorded in a table showing that viscosity decreases with increasing temperature for both fluids. A graph of kinematic viscosity versus temperature for gasoline showed viscosity declining steadily as temperature rose. The aim was to study how temperature affects fluid viscosity using a viscometer.

Uploaded by

Kaify Abubakr
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
27 views9 pages

Viscosity Measurement of Gasoline Experiment

This document describes an experiment to determine the viscosity of fluids at various temperatures using a viscometer. The experiment measured the viscosity of water and gasoline at temperatures ranging from 14 to 42 degrees Celsius. The results were recorded in a table showing that viscosity decreases with increasing temperature for both fluids. A graph of kinematic viscosity versus temperature for gasoline showed viscosity declining steadily as temperature rose. The aim was to study how temperature affects fluid viscosity using a viscometer.

Uploaded by

Kaify Abubakr
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Soran University

Faculty of Engineering

Department of Petroleum Engineering

Petroleum Properties

Title: Viscosity of fluids

Experiment No.: 02

Name: Kaify Abubakr

Group: C2

Date: 3 Mar 2019

Supervisor (s): Mr. Foad Yousefi

Mr. Buya Sabri

Ms. Mariam Wanli


Table of Contents
1. Aim .............................................................................................................................. 1

2. Theory ......................................................................................................................... 1

3. Apparatus .................................................................................................................... 2

4. Procedure ..................................................................................................................... 3

5. Calculation .................................................................................................................. 3

6. Results and Discussion ................................................................................................ 4

7. Conclusion................................................................................................................... 5

8. References ................................................................................................................... 6

List of Figures
Figure (1): stand ................................................................................................................... 2
Figure (2): pipette ................................................................................................................ 2
Figure (3): pipette bulb ........................................................................................................ 2
Figure (4): viscometer .......................................................................................................... 2
Figure (5): thermometer ....................................................................................................... 2
Figure (6): heater.................................................................................................................. 2
Figure (7): graph kinematic viscosity vs temperature.......................................................... 5

List of Tables
Table (1): Results ................................................................................................................. 4

i
1. Aim
To determine the viscosity of the fluid at various temperature by using a viscometer.

2. Theory
Viscosity is a fundamental characteristic property of all liquids. When a liquid flow, it has
an internal resistance to flow. Viscosity is a measure of this resistance to flow or shear.
Viscosity can also be termed as a drag force and is a measure of the frictional properties of the
fluid. Viscosity is a function of temperature and pressure. Although the viscosities of both
liquids and gases change with temperature and pressure, they affect the viscosity in a different
manner (Viswanath, et al., 2007).

The factors effect on the viscosity:

1. Effect of Temperature: the temperature of the liquid fluid increases its viscosity
decreases. In gases its opposite, the viscosity of the gases fluids increases as the
temperature of the gas increases.
2. Pressure: when increase the pressure on liquids, the viscosity increases because increase
the attraction force between the molecules of liquid.

The kinematic viscosity is the ratio of the dynamic viscosity and the density of a fluid. The
SI unit of the kinematic viscosity is m2/s. Other units are: 1 St (Stoke) = 1 cm2/s = 10−4 m2/s.
1 cSt (centistoke) = 1 mm2/s = 10−6m2/s. Water at 20 °C has a kinematic viscosity of about 1
cSt (ToolBox, 2003).

µ
𝑣=
ρ

Where: µ= dynamitic viscosity (N s/m²)

ρ =density (kg/m³)

v = kinematic viscosity (m²/s)

Dynamic viscosity is the force needed by a fluid to overcome its own internal molecular
friction so that the fluid will flow. In other words, dynamic viscosity is defined as the tangential
force per unit area needed to move the fluid in one horizontal plane with respect to other plane
with a unit velocity while the fluid's molecules maintain a unit distance apart (Viswanath, et
al., 2007).

1
Ostwald viscometer is a commonly used viscometer, which consists of a U-shaped glass
tube held vertically. For more accurate measurements it is held in a controlled temperature
bath. It is also known as a glass capillary viscometer. A liquid is allowed to flow through its
capillary tube between two etched marks and the time of flow of the liquid is measured using
a stopwatch (McKenna, 2003).

3. Apparatus
Martials:

• Water
• Gasoline

Equipment:

• Beaker
• Stand (see Figure (1))
• Pipette (see Figure (2))
• Pipette bulb (see Figure (3))
• Viscometer (see Figure (4))
• Thermometer (see Figure (5))
• Heater (see Figure (6))

Figure (1): stand Figure (2): pipette Figure (3): pipette bulb

Figure (4): viscometer Figure (5): thermometer Figure (6): heater


2
4. Procedure
1. Fill the beaker with water.
2. Put the beaker containing water on the heater and heat it to 20 C.
3. Pour the water into the viscometer to a marked line just below the second reservoir.
4. Pull the water to the marked line just above the second reservoir by suction.
5. Allow the water to return to a marked line just below the second reservoir by the
force of gravity.
6. Measure the time that the water had taken passing between two marked lines (the
lines above and below the second reservoir) by using a stopwatch.
7. Fill the beaker with gasoline.
8. Repeat steps above for temperatures 20, 26, 32 and 42 C.

5. Calculation
𝑣 1 𝑚𝑚2
𝑡 = 32.7𝑠 , 𝑐= = = 0.0306
𝑡 32.7 𝑠
𝑔 𝑔
𝑇 = 14 𝐶, 𝑡 = 85.12 𝑠, 𝜌ℎ𝑦𝑑𝑟𝑜 = 0.8280 , 𝜌𝑝𝑦𝑐𝑛𝑜 = 0.8220
𝑐𝑚3 𝑐𝑚3

𝑣 = 𝑐. 𝑡 = 0.0306 ∗ 85.12 = 2.65 𝑚𝑚2/𝑠 = 0.0265 𝑐𝑚2/𝑠

𝜇ℎ𝑦𝑑𝑟𝑜 = 𝜌. 𝑣 = 0.8280 ∗ 0.0265 = 0.0215 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒

𝜇𝑝𝑦𝑐𝑛𝑜 = 𝜌. 𝑣 = 0.8220 ∗ 0.0265 = 0.0213 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

𝑔 𝑔
𝑇 = 20 𝐶, 𝑡 = 86.31 𝑠, 𝜌ℎ𝑦𝑑𝑟𝑜 = 0.822 , 𝜌𝑝𝑦𝑐𝑛𝑜 = 0.8176
𝑐𝑚3 𝑐𝑚3

𝑣 = 𝑐. 𝑡 = 0.0306 ∗ 86.31 = 2.64 𝑚𝑚2/𝑠 = 0.0264 𝑐𝑚2/𝑠

𝜇ℎ𝑦𝑑𝑟𝑜 = 𝜌. 𝑣 = 0.8225 ∗ 0.0264 = 0.0217 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒

𝜇𝑝𝑦𝑐𝑛𝑜 = 𝜌. 𝑣 = 0.8176 ∗ 0.0264 = 0.02158 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

𝑔 𝑔
𝑇 = 26 𝐶, 𝑡 = 88.67 𝑠, 𝜌ℎ𝑦𝑑𝑟𝑜 = 0.8180 , 𝜌𝑝𝑦𝑐𝑛𝑜 = 0.8119
𝑐𝑚3 𝑐𝑚3

𝑣 = 𝑐. 𝑡 = 0.0306 ∗ 88.67 = 2.713 𝑚𝑚2/𝑠 = 0.02713 𝑐𝑚2/𝑠

3
𝜇ℎ𝑦𝑑𝑟𝑜 = 𝜌. 𝑣 = 0.8180 ∗ 0.02713 = 0.0222 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒

𝜇𝑝𝑦𝑐𝑛𝑜 = 𝜌. 𝑣 = 0.8119 ∗ 0.02713 = 0.0220 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

𝑔 𝑔
𝑇 = 32 𝐶, 𝑡 = 107.85 𝑠, 𝜌ℎ𝑦𝑑𝑟𝑜 = 0.815 , 𝜌𝑝𝑦𝑐𝑛𝑜 = 0.8095
𝑐𝑚3 𝑐𝑚3

𝑣 = 𝑐. 𝑡 = 0.0306 ∗ 107.85 = 3.3 𝑚𝑚2/𝑠 = 0.033 𝑐𝑚2/𝑠

𝜇ℎ𝑦𝑑𝑟𝑜 = 𝜌. 𝑣 = 0.815 ∗ 0.033 = 0.0269 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒

𝜇𝑝𝑦𝑐𝑛𝑜 = 𝜌. 𝑣 = 0.8095 ∗ 0.033 = 0.0267 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

𝑔 𝑔
𝑇 = 42 𝐶, 𝑡 = 85.7 𝑠, 𝜌ℎ𝑦𝑑𝑟𝑜 = 0.809 , 𝜌𝑝𝑦𝑐𝑛𝑜 = 0.805
𝑐𝑚3 𝑐𝑚3

𝑣 = 𝑐. 𝑡 = 0.0306 ∗ 85.7 = 2.622 𝑚𝑚2/𝑠 = 0.0262 𝑐𝑚2/𝑠

𝜇ℎ𝑦𝑑𝑟𝑜 = 𝜌. 𝑣 = 0.809 ∗ .0262 = 0.021 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒

𝜇𝑝𝑦𝑐𝑛𝑜 = 𝜌. 𝑣 = 0.805 ∗ 0.0262 = 0.020 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒

6. Results and Discussion

Table (1): Results

Temperature (C) v (cm2/s) 𝜇ℎ𝑦𝑑𝑟𝑜 (𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒) 𝜇𝑝𝑦𝑐𝑛𝑜 (𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒)

14 0.0265 0.0215 0.0213

20 0.0264 0.0217 0.02158

26 0.02713 0.0222 0.0220

32 0.0330 0.0269 0.0267

42 0.0262 0.021 0.020

4
Viscosity of gasoline
0.03

0.025
kinematic viscosity (poise)

0.02

0.015
μ_hydro
μ_pycno
0.01

0.005

0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Temperature (C)

Figure (7): graph kinematic viscosity vs temperature


In this lab experiment, viscosities of gasoline were measured at several different
temperatures. The results were not acceptable. However, there will always be some errors. One
of the problems that are worth to be mentioned was that the gasoline was cooled down due to
the repetition of the test several times. Another reason that was arisen during performing the
experiment was that the air in the Oswalt viscometer could not be emptied. This led to errors
in the results. During recording the time from the stopwatch, errors occurred because more than
one person has done the job, and it became a source of error. during the tests releasing the
gasoline may have not been constant. As explained in the theory section temperature and
viscosity are inversely proportional but, in the tests, it seems that they are directly proportional,
meaning the provided data is not perfect.

7. Conclusion
The experiment was run to measure the viscosity of the gasoline at various temperatures.
the results were found not to be acceptable due to the errors happened during the experiment.
unfortunately, the hypothesis for calculating the viscosity using viscometer was not confirmed.

5
8. References
• McKenna, B. a. K. D., 2003. Texture in Food: Semi-Solid Foods. s.l.:Woodhead
Publishing.

• ToolBox, E., 2003. Absolute, Dynamic and Kinematic Viscosity. [Online]


Available at: [Link]
viscosity-d_412.html
[Accessed 3 Mar 2019].

• Viswanath, D. S. et al., 2007. Viscosity of Liquids. s.l.:Springer.

6
7

Common questions

Powered by AI

The experimental procedure involves precisely heating the water to a controlled temperature and using a stopwatch to measure the time it takes for the liquid to flow through the viscometer, which is essential for determining viscosity . However, potential sources of error include fluctuations in the liquid's temperature due to repeated tests, incomplete removal of air from the viscometer, and inconsistencies in releasing the liquid, all of which can lead to incorrect viscosity readings . Handling errors when using the stopwatch can further compromise the results .

Kinematic viscosity is defined as the ratio of the dynamic viscosity to the density of the fluid. It is calculated using the formula \( v = \frac{\mu}{\rho} \), where \( \mu \) is the dynamic viscosity and \( \rho \) is the density . In this experiment, measurements are taken by timing how long it takes for a fluid to pass between two marks in a viscometer, and the kinematic viscosity is computed from these times and densities .

Viscosity errors can significantly impact petroleum engineering by affecting fluid dynamics in extraction and refinement processes, leading to inefficient operation or equipment damage . To minimize these errors, accurate temperature control during measurement, and precise equipment calibration are essential . Implementing automated data collection and analysis can further reduce human error, while regular training for technicians ensures consistent procedural execution. Additionally, incorporating redundancy in measurements through multiple approaches or checks can verify findings and enhance reliability .

The density of the fluid is directly multiplied by the kinematic viscosity to obtain the dynamic viscosity, as demonstrated by the formula \( \mu = \rho \times v \). Comparing \( \mu_{hydro} \) and \( \mu_{pycno} \) values reflects the differences arising from employing varying densities for calculations. These differences can indicate variations in fluid behavior under different conditions or the impact of experimental inconsistencies on density measurements .

The theoretical expectation is that viscosity decreases with increasing temperature for liquids, given the inverse relationship between temperature and viscosity . However, the experimental data showed inconsistencies, with measurements not perfectly aligning with this relationship. Specifically, the results indicated both an inverse and a paradoxical direct relationship at times, suggesting experimental errors such as the cooling of the gasoline or inadequate air removal from the viscometer affected the findings .

The theoretical component provides a foundational understanding of how temperature and pressure influence viscosity, which guides practical applications such as predicting fluid behavior in pipelines and machinery under varying conditions . It enables experimenters to anticipate how fluids might behave in real-world scenarios, influencing engineering decisions related to fluid transport and processing systems . The disconnect between theory and experiment observed here helps refine methodologies and enhance reliability in industrial practices .

In the theory section, it is stated that the viscosity of liquids decreases with an increase in temperature because the molecular attractions decrease, allowing easier flow . In contrast, the viscosity of gases increases with temperature due to more vigorous molecular movements resulting in higher internal friction . Regarding pressure, an increase in pressure for liquids results in higher viscosity due to stronger molecular attractions . These differences stem from the varying intermolecular forces and densities between liquids and gases.

Unacceptable viscosity results may stem from repeated testing causing the gasoline to cool, as well as errors due to incomplete air removal from the viscometer and inconsistencies in stopwatch handling by multiple individuals . These could be mitigated by ensuring precise temperature control for each test and improving the consistency of fluid release and timing measures—effects that could be reduced by automating some aspects of the procedure or ensuring consistent operation by a single, trained experimenter .

Kinematic viscosity is crucial because it accounts for the flow characteristics of a fluid without the influence of its weight, providing clarity on the fluid's internal resistance relative to its density . It differs from dynamic viscosity, which directly measures a fluid's resistance to flow under an applied force, emphasizing the effect of molecular friction . Kinematic measurements are instrumental in calculations that involve real-world applications where fluid density is a factor, such as in fluid transport systems .

The Oswalt viscometer is significant for its precision in measuring the flow time of liquids, which is crucial for determining viscosity. It operates by allowing a liquid to flow through a capillary tube between two etched marks, and the time of flow is measured using a stopwatch . The controlled temperature bath surrounding the glass tube is essential for minimizing temperature variations during the measurement, ensuring more accurate results .

You might also like