WORKFLOW MANAGEMENT AND JOB ROTATION
A Thesis
Presented to
The faculty of UM Panabo College
Panabo City
In Partial Fulfillment
Of the Requirement for the Course
HR Research
(Psychology 32)
Arianne Grace Albelda
Shella Mae B. Arguelles
Jorylyn Cabutaje
Diego Ginolos
Kimberly C. Marzado
orylyn B. Cabutaje
September 2019
Chapter 1
THE PROBLEM AND ITS SETTING
Background of the Study
In us, Efficiency in lean production systems is largely determined by
the speed of recovery from process interruptions. Without buffer stock, and
with a balanced line, the production rate will be constant except when a
problem is detected, at which point the whole line will stop. This motivates
exploration of problem solving as a key design feature of lean systems. One
response to the need for improving operator problem solving skills has been
the use of job rotation schemes. The increasing efficiency of operators faced
with repeating tasks is widely accepted and has been characterized by the
well-known learning curve (Allwood and Lee, 2004).
Statement of the Problem
This study aims to determine if there is a relationship between workflow
management and job rotation.
Specifically, the researcher aimed to sought answers to the following
questions:
1. What is the level of workflow management?
2. What is the level of job rotation?
3. Is there a significant relationship between workflow management and
job rotation?
2
Hypothesis
The null hypothesis was tested at 0.05 level of significance, which
states that there is no significant relationship workflow management.
Theoretical and Conceptual Framework
This is anchored from the theory of Yoon and Jung (2013) states that
the effect of job rotation could be hard to identify because it required a long-
period close observation. Laboratory studies covered only simple aspects of
tasks or movements. Optimization approach studies showed the systematic
approach to establish the job rotation scheme though many limitation and
assumptions were adopted. This study collected and classified the previous
studies on job rotation and presented the different approaches across various
research areas.
Independent Variable Dependent Variable
Job Rotation
Workflow Management
Figure 1. Conceptual Paradigm Showing the Variables of the Study.
3
Supported by the study of Mohsan, Musarrat Nawaz & Sarfraz Khan,
(2012) agreeing on job rotation in organizations is following by different beliefs
and reliable data forming the principles of decision-making. By correctly
planning for relocation, organizations can solve human resource problems,
lead employees' to have positive perception of their job and organization, and
at the same time reduce improper organizational behaviors (such as leaving,
absence, and working poor). It is, thus, clear that job rotation is not only an
ideal but an undeniable necessity. The importance of job rotation is relatively
known to all companies around the world. It is a good approach for
organizations to develop employees, managers and executives.
As shown conceptual paradigm of the study figure 1, the independent
variable is workflow management.
The dependent variable is job rotation.
Significance of the Study
The significance of this study is considered to be important to the
following:
Manager. This will assist them in making effective way on how to work
together as a team, productive, innovative on how to achieve the company
goals.
Employees. This will help them to understand their real value of
responsibilities and duties and also help them to understand what fulfillment
they needed most that drive them to do more.
4
Future Researcher. This study would help researcher to be aware and
knowledgeable to the processes involved in the round rag making industry, to
be a better analyst and it can help as a future reference for more studies in
the future.
Definition of Terms
The following terms which are operationally and universally defined for
easy understanding of the readers.
Workflow Management.
Job Rotation.
5
Chapter 2
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
Readings from the different sources here in Philippines and abroad are
summarized in accordance with the topics and hereby presented to provide a
better background insights.
Workflow Management
Workflow management is commonly defined as a ratio between the
output volume and the volume of inputs. In other words, it measures how
efficiently production inputs, such as labor and capital, are being used in an
economy to produce a given level of output. Workflow is considered a key
source of economic growth and competitiveness and, as such, is basic
statistical information for many international comparisons and country
performance assessments (Krugman, 1994).
Describes the importance of project planning and definition of
operational procedures for both administrative and technical staff when
implementing workflow, along with human factors such as perceived loss of
flexibility and interpersonal give-and-take, fear of ensuing job losses, the need
to relearn electronic versions of forms and resistance to an automated
process developed by a remote corporate authority. It blend one part of
management, one part coalition builder, one part business analyst, one part
project manager and one part systems integrator is required to successfully
implement workflow (Kobielus, 1997).
6
Divides workflow implementation into technical and non-technical
factors. The technical factors he identifies as important are planning,
documentation, training, and systems testing. Non-technical factors are group
working and group behavior, change management, choice of prototyping
options and systems development methods. There are five problems likely to
occur: forgetting that people are involved, using Rapid Application
Development (RAD) techniques inappropriately, having inadequate computer
resources, poor project management and lack of top management support
(Chaffey, 1998).
Workflow management is the coordination of tasks that make up the
work and organization does. By ‘workflow’ we mean a sequence of tasks that
are part of some larger task, and is sometimes synonymous with ‘business
processes. The purpose of a workflow is to achieve some result, and the
purpose of workflow management is to achieve better results according to
some set of goals (Hilton, 2018)
A workflow, sometimes used as a synonym for “a business process,”
comprises a series of tasks or activities through which work is routed.
Workflow management systems area class of software that supports business
processes by taking on their information logistics, they ensure that the right
information reaches the right person at the right time. The information logistics
of business processes can be captured by a work flow or process modeling
language. Different work flow management systems may be implemented
supporting the use of different language (VanHee, 2002).
7
There are other benefits in deploying workflow applications. By having
explicit representations of these resource and control flow dependencies, it
can be claimed that changing workflows is easier and hence a business that
has automated its processes by means of a workflow management system
maybe more responsive to changes in its environment , such as changing
legislation or evolving market conditions. As workflow management systems
log events that pertain to business processes (the fact that a certain resource
has completed certain task at a certain point in time), process logs may be
used to demonstrate that a business complies with best practices or with
existing legislation (Vander, 2004).
Workflow Management has defined what the components of a workflow
environment are and what interfaces these components should have to
support interaction with other and with external components. In a workflow
management environment, there is typically a component that supports the
specification of workflows and another that supports the execution of these
workflows. There are also, components that can deal with external
applications or other work flow engines or that provide support for
administration and monitoring (Fischer, 2005).
Workflow management is the coordination of tasks that make up the
work and organization does. By ‘workflow’ we mean a sequence of tasks that
are part of some larger task, and is sometimes synonymous with ‘business
processes. The purpose of a workflow is to achieve some result, and the
purpose of workflow management is to achieve better results according to
some set of goals. Workflow management is principally a management
discipline, focused on the structure of work within some the network, and thus
8
can be controlled and managed by incorporating the domain business
application into the execution process of the network (Hilton, 2018).
Job Rotation
Therefore, job rotation is a method of job design which allows the
employees to learn the job skills from various departments and eliminates the
employees fatigue caused by the same kind of job assignments by changing
such assignments (Richard Thackray, 1981).
States that organizations use job rotation to alleviate the physical and
mental stresses endured by employees when working the same position, year
after year. By allowing employees to rotate to other positions, the risk factors
for some types of musculoskeletal disorders may be reduced. Job Rotation is
also believed to have the ability to decrease the amount of boredom and
monotony experienced by employees who work the same position for
extended periods of time (Rothwell, 1994).
States that, job rotation at the senior management levels is frequently
referred to as management rotation, is tightly linked with succession planning
developing a pool of people capable of stepping into an existing job. Here the
goal is to provide learning experiences which facilitate changes in thinking
and perspective equivalent to the "horizon" of the level of the succession
planning (Hunng, 1999).
Job rotation is a training method followed by the organization to
develop the employees in various departments were they can gain diversified
learning of job skills for a specific period of time and job rotation is a practical
9
approach to enrich and expand the job assignments of the employees
(Kraimer, 2001).
Job rotation comes in many forms and is useful in many situations. Job
rotation is the systematic movement of employee from one job to another.
How this movement is accomplished depends on the purpose that you wish to
achieve and how dramatic a move you are willing to take (Malinski, 2002)
Job rotation staff is moved between different jobs and it is most of the
time within the organization between different jobs or tasks. It is a form of
training where a member of staff leaves the job and another unemployed
person takes his job and his debates about job rotation takes job rotation
outside the scope of organization rather than inside the organization as
unemployed people are brought into the organization (Bennett, 2003).
In job rotation, staffs are moved between different jobs over a period of
time and this movement is planned to achieve different purposes. It is an
organized movement of staff from one job to another and he also adds that an
individual does not have to leave a job to get a more satisfying job. This can
be achieved in the same job by using job rotation, enrichment and
restructuring. It is a model of training through which already employed staffs
leave their jobs to go on further training and unemployed people are brought
into their places for work, hold the view that in job rotation, individuals are
moved between jobs of similar nature. Write that the movement of staff in jobs
is at the same level in the organization as they are not promoted in the job
where they are rotated (Parker, 2003)
10
Job rotation can be defined as the performance by an employee of a
new assignment on a temporary basis for an agreed period of time. Job
rotation is position-oriented, with management determining the need for a
specific job to be done. An employee selected for job rotation will normally
possess the requisite skills and be paid for work-out-of-class if the assignment
is in a higher salary range than that corresponding to the employee’s usual
classification (Collard, 2004)
Job rotation is described as the process of switching a person from job
to job, which increases an employee’s capability and value to an organization.
Job rotation can be defined as the performance by an employee of a new
assignment on a temporary basis for an agreed period of time. Job rotation is
position-oriented, with management determining the need for a specific job to
be done (Edward, 2005)
Job Rotation is where an individual is moved through a schedule of
assignments designed to give that individual a breadth of exposure to the
entire operation. The term of job rotation can also mean the scheduled
exchange of persons in offices, especially in public offices. It can be used in a
variety of ways to meet the development and training needs of companies and
employees, without a break in production. It is an alternative to job
specialization. It is a way to reduce employee boredom and it also facilitates
more of an understanding about the organization. Job rotation is moving from
one job to another. Job can be rotated that are very similar or drastically
different for example, a person in charge of accounts receivable could change
with a person who is in charge of accounts payable. An employee could work
11
as a marketer for a year and then work as a selling agent for a year (John,
2005).
Position rotation is the process of moving an employee laterally to
different departments, positions, or geographic locations for the purpose of
professional development of the employees by exposing them to new
knowledge, skills, and perspectives. Position rotation can be further broken
down into within-function rotation, and cross-functional rotation. Within-
function rotation is where an employee rotates between jobs within the same
level of responsibility and in the same functional or operational areas.
Conversely, cross-functional rotation, on the other hand, usually involves a
sequence of positions, often with increasing levels of job responsibilities
(Marshall, 2006).
It involves an employee changing positions within the same
organization and eventually returning to the original position. The term JR can
refer to different types of rotations. Task rotation usually takes place in jobs
that involve a high degree of physical demands on the body or a high degree
of repetitive tasks that can become extremely tedious. Employees are
periodically removed from these physically demanding or mentally stressful
tasks to a less demanding task for a certain period of time to give them a
break (Mourdoukoutas, 2009).
Further, job rotation can be characterized as the execution by a worker
of another task on a transitory reason for a concurred timeframe. Job rotation
is position-situated, with administration deciding the requirement for a
particular employment to be done. A representative chose for job rotation will
12
ordinarily have the imperative abilities and be paid for work-out-of-class if the
task is in a higher pay extend than that relating to the representative usual
classification (Alquraan, 2011).
Moreover, job rotation may have the impact of diminishing a workforce
due to the broadly educating included; an organization should not have to
contract extra staff to cover positions and should probably closure current
workers now not thought of necessary. One other issue looked by
associations is the probability of having to pay sparks to workers for interest
with the action turn execution which can incite wage lopsidedness (Adjei,
2012).
Job rotations have existed as a means of developing individual
knowledge and skills since the industrial revolution, and in today's dynamic
global workplace, they afford organizations an opportunity to manage
changing psychological work contracts and employee desires for self‐
managed careers. Through the systematic mining of psychology, business,
management, and educational databases, this literature review provides a
summary of job rotation practices, individual and organizational benefits, likely
costs associated with job rotations, and implications for practitioners. Findings
indicate that while employees seek learning and marketability over job
security and stability, organizations strive to maintain continuity and internal
growth and development of their workforce (Casad, 2012).
Job rotation is a great tool to enhance staff motivation, commitment
and participation in the work, which is also important in an effective and
integrated performance of organization. Job rotation is accepted as an
13
effective way to develop skills and motivation of the employees. Job rotation is
a job design process that is widely used in many organizations at different
levels of the organizational hierarchy. Job rotation is the result of effort and
determination and implementation of human structure with technological
processes. Job rotation is an important process in human resource capital
development policies, which potentially plays a role in improving job
satisfaction and enhances the capabilities of employees (Wageeh, 2014).
In the same manner, job rotation is a bit of preparing experienced in a
connection including the two supervisor and non-administrators. It happens
when an operator is moved from one occupation, division, or errand to
another in the wake of burning through sometime in an express occupation,
undertaking, task, or office with a point of perspective of connecting with the
workers to stay more aptitudes, gifts and information. As they say, job rotation
is impacted by coordination and is wanted to expand ones position, learning,
fitness, and contact (Oparanma, 2015).
Job rotation can be characterized as working at various undertakings
or in various positions for set timeframes. Job rotation can be likewise
considered as a substitute device for work planning, that enable
representatives to think about various occupations abilities from various
divisions, it additionally eliminated workers exhaustion caused because of
exhausting employment assignments, these new difficulties inspire workers
again which additionally increment workers spirit to enhance yield. The
difficulties looked by the representatives in the new assignments can urge
them to pick up energy and enhance their assurance in the workplace
(Jocom, 2017).
14
Job rotation is an awesome instrument to upgrade staff inspiration,
duty and interest in the work, which is additionally vital in a viable and
incorporated execution of association. Job rotation is acknowledged as a
compelling method to create abilities and inspiration of the representatives.
Job rotation is a vocation configuration process that is broadly utilized as a
part of numerous associations at various levels of the authoritative order. Job
rotation is the consequence of exertion and assurance and usage of human
structure with innovative procedures. Job rotation is an imperative procedure
in human asset capital improvement strategies, which conceivably assumes a
part in enhancing work fulfillment and upgrade that capacities of
representatives (Ali-Mohammadi, 2017).
15
Chapter 3
METHOD
This chapter contains the discussion of research method,
which includes the research design, research subject, research
instruments, data gathering processes, and statistical treatment of
data interpretation.
Research Design
The non-experimental correlational method was employed in
this study. As stated by Medel (2014), this method described the
characteristics of a population involved the description, recording,
analysis, and interpretation of the present nature, composition or
processes of phenomena. It is descriptive because the study focused
on the current situation with the objective of finding new truth that may
have different forms and new generalization.
Research Subject
The researchers used random sampling technique in
identifying the respondents. The respondents of the study were the
selected employees of Panabo Multi-Purpose cooperative in Panabo
City. Out of the approximately 90 workers, only fifty (50) respondents
considered in the study.
16
Research Instrument
The instrument used is a constructed questionnaire for
employee
engagement and an adopted research questionnaire for employee job
performance. Section one of the instrument pertains to the level of
commitment, loyalty and trust and section two pertains to the job
performance of the business. The respondents were required to check
single selected choice on the range 5 to 1 for section one and two,
respectively.
To determine the level of workflow management, the following
rating skills was used:
Scales Descriptive Equivalent Interpretation
4.21 – 5.0 Very High It means that
workflow
management is
always
practiced
3.41 – 4.20 High It means that
workflow
management is
practiced
2.61 – 3.40 Moderate It means that
workflow
management is
often practiced
1.81 – 2.60 Low It means that
workflow
management is
sometimes
practiced
1.00 – 1.80 Very low It means that
17
workflow
management is
not practiced
To determine the level of job rotation, the following rating skills
was used:
Scales Descriptive Equivalent Interpretation
4.21 – 5.00 Very High This means that
Job Rotation
is very satisfactory.
3.41 – 4.20 High This means that
Job Rotation
is satisfactory.
2.61 – 3.40 Moderate This means that
Job Rotation
is fair.
1.81 – 2.60 Low This means that
Job Rotation
is less satisfactory.
1.00 – 1.80 Very low This means that
Job Rotation
is not satisfactory.
Data Gathering Procedures
The researchers used the following steps in the gathering data.
Initial Interview. The researchers asked for the names of the
manager of Panabo Multi-purpose Cooperative to address the letter
asking permission to conduct a study.
18
Permission to Conduct the Study. Letter of permission to
conduct the survey question was sent to the human resource manager
of Panabo Multi-purpose Cooperative.
Construction and Validation of Questionnaire. The
questionnaire for employee engagement was constructed by the
researchers while the questionnaire for job performance is adopted
from University of the Fraser Valley and was validated by the expert.
The revision was made until the questionnaire was polished and ready
for administration to the respondents.
Administration of the Questionnaire. The research
questionnaires were personally administered to the respondents.
Collection of the Questionnaire and Scoring of Data. The
responses were collected, tallied, and statistically processed and be
interpreted by the statistician.
Statistician Treatment of the Data
The data gathered were classified, analyzed, and interpreted by
using the following appropriate statistician tools:
Mean. This was used to determine the level of engagement and
job performance among selected employees of Panabo Multi-purpose
Cooperative in Panabo City.
Pearson-r. This was used to determine the relationship between
engagement and job performance among selected employees of
Panabo Multi-purpose Cooperative in Panabo City.
REFERENCES
Adjie, (2012). Case study of Workflow implementation success
Factors Retrieved on September, 2018 from
[Link]
/link/574bcc8708ae5bf2e63f3f74/download
Alquraan, (2011). What is the meaning of workflow management.
Retrieved on July, 2017 from
[Link]
[Link]/post/-is/&ved=2ahUKEwiZiu39-sPkAhUI-
2EKHUTeCwEQFjAbegQIAhAB&usg=AOvVaw3cJy32wBP-
mW4MX2P0Fod6&cshid=1568039865311
Alquraan, (2015). Accounting for the influence of overall justice on job
Performance. March 17, 2017 from
[Link]
influence-of-overall-justice-on-job-performance(7f7301f1-a640-
4608-af81-541e7cf94938).html
Bennett, (2003). A qualitative study of organization workflow.
retrieved on September 18, 2016 from
[Link]
[Link]
Casad, (2012). Job rotation and major
types.
retrieved on August 2018 from [Link]
[Link]/system/files/resources/files/[Link]
Chaffey, (1998). The individual and group loyalty scales (IGLS)
construction and
preliminary validation. Retrieved on September 11, 2013 from
[Link]
Collard. (2004). Employee performance and job rotation.
Retrieved on November, 2018 from
[Link]
performance-job-performance/
Edward, (2005). The effects of job
Characteristics and working conditions on job rotation. Retrieved
on October, 2018 from
[Link]
107000418
Fischer, (2005). Factors on employee loyalty in hoang Phuc Company.
Retrieved on October, 2018 from
[Link]
[Link]?sequence=1
Hilton, (2018). Impacts of job analysis on organizational
Performance. Retrieved on September 2018 from
[Link]
01865
Hunng, (1999). Comparisons of competing models between
attitudinal loyalty and behavioral loyalty. Retrieved on
September, 2018 from
[Link]
Jocom, (2017). Identifying factors that influences job
performance among employees in oil palm plantation. Retrieved
on December 9, 2017 from
[Link]
[Link]
John, (2005). The relationship between job satisfaction and job
rotation among employees in trade winds group of companies.
retrieved on February 14, 2017 from
[Link]
f
Kobielus, (1997). Job rotation and customer satisfaction.
retrieved on August, 2018 from [Link]
[Link]/system/files/resources/files/[Link]
Kraimer, (2001). Most external of engagement.
retrieved on August, 2018 from
[Link]
supv-brown-bag/[Link]
Krugman, (1994). Social exchange in a Swedish
work Environment. Retrieved on December 23, 2012 from
[Link]
/[Link]
Malinski (2002). Job insecurity and its consequences.
retrieved on May 22, 2016 from [Link]
[Link]/smash/get/diva2:453238/[Link]&sa=U&ei=
sixoU7qfBcGfyATF_oDACg&ved=0CCAQFjAB&usg=AFQjCNH
oH6XdGdWdp024_n9kO7gPxL6How
Marshall (2006). The relationship between workflow and
sustained productivity in agricultural businesses. Retrieved on
November 21, 2015 from
[Link]
[Link]
Mohammadi, (2017). Employment relations comment.
retrieved on November 2012 from
[Link]
[Link]
Mourdoukoutas, (2019). High commitment performance management:
the roles of justice and trust. Retrieved on October, 2018 from
[Link]
Oparanma, (2015). Best practice on how to be a productive
employee.
[Link]
_engagement'_does_it_exist_and_if_so_how_does_it_relate_to
_performance_other_constructs_and_individual_differences
Richard Thackray, (1981). Meaning of engagement of employee.
retrieved on May 13, 2006 from
[Link]
[Link]
Rothwell, (1994). The impact of job rotation on the
success of commercial organizations. Retrieved on November,
2018 From
[Link]
[Link]
Vanhee, (2002). Factors of Job rotation and Job
satisfaction.
retrieved on October, 2018 from
[Link]
_Engagement_Satisfaction_and_Business-Unit-
Level_Outcomes_A_Meta-Analysis_Prepared_by
Vander, (2004). Outcomes of workflow to the company.
retrieved on September, 2018 from
[Link]
_Engagement_Satisfaction_and_Business-Unit-
Level_Outcomes_A_Meta-Analysis
Wageeh, (2014). Relationship of job rotation and work performance.
retrieved on September, 2018 from
[Link]
[Link]