Scribd
Upload
12 views2 pages

Delta Function Representations in Physics

The document discusses different representations of the delta function. The principal value representation states that when considered as a distribution, the limit as epsilon approaches 0 of 1/(x ± iepsilon) equals the principal value of 1/x plus or minus ipi times the delta function. The integral representation defines the delta function as 1/(2pi) integrated from negative infinity to positive infinity of e^ikx. This leads to another representation of the delta function as the limit as tau approaches 0 of 1/(tau + ik) plus 1/(tau - ik) divided by 2pi.

Uploaded by

chris224
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
12 views2 pages

Delta Function Representations in Physics

The document discusses different representations of the delta function. The principal value representation states that when considered as a distribution, the limit as epsilon approaches 0 of 1/(x ± iepsilon) equals the principal value of 1/x plus or minus ipi times the delta function. The integral representation defines the delta function as 1/(2pi) integrated from negative infinity to positive infinity of e^ikx. This leads to another representation of the delta function as the limit as tau approaches 0 of 1/(tau + ik) plus 1/(tau - ik) divided by 2pi.

Uploaded by

chris224
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Some Delta Function Representations

W. A. Horowitz
November 16, 2010

1 Delta Functions
1.1 Principal Value Representation
The Sokhotsky-Weierstrauss Theorem states that, when considered as a distri-
bution,
1 1
lim+ = PV ∓ i π δ(x). (1)
→0 x ± i x
To see this consider
1 x 
f (x) ≡ lim = lim ∓i 2 . (2)
→0+ x ± i →0+ x2 + 2 x + 2
For x 6= 0, f (x) = 1/x. For x = 0, f (x) = ∓ i ∞. So it already looks like the
form of Eq. (1); we really need only check the normalization. If we integrate
f (x) we get, for a < 0 < b,
Z b Z b  
1 b a
dx f (x) = P V dx ∓ i lim+ tan−1 − tan−1 (3)
a a x →0  
Z b
1
= PV dx ∓ i π, (4)
a x

where the Cauchy principal value is defined as the exclusion of a singular value
from a region of integration; e.g. for a < 0 < b
Z b Z − Z b
1 1 1
PV dx ≡ lim+ dx + dx . (5)
a x →0 a x  x

To be specific as to the application of Eq. (1), for a smooth function g(x)


and a < 0 < b
Z b Z b
1 1
lim+ dx g(x) = PV g(x) ∓ i π g(0). (6)
→0 a x ± i a x

1
1.2 Integral Representation
To get the normalization correct for the integral representation of a delta func-
tion note that:
Z ∞
dxeikx f (x) = f˜(k)
−∞
Z ∞
1
f (x) = dke−ikx f˜(k). (7)
2π −∞

Therefore taking f (x) = δ(x), f˜(k) = 1 and, we have that


Z ∞
1
δ(k) = dxeikx . (8)
2π −∞

We also get, for free, another form of the delta function:


Z 0 Z ∞ 
1 i(k−iτ )x i(k+iτ )x
δ(k) = lim+ dxe + dxe
τ →0 2π −∞ 0
 
1 1 1
= lim+ −
τ →0 2π i(k − iτ ) i(k + iτ )
 
1 1 1
= lim+ +
τ →0 2π τ + ik τ − ik
1 τ
= lim+ . (9)
τ →0 π τ 2 + k 2

You might also like