0% found this document useful (0 votes)
23 views5 pages

Understanding Gyroscopic Motion Dynamics

This document is a Diwali assignment report submitted by student Dhruvesh Asnani for their Calculus course. The report discusses the non-intuitive behavior of gyroscopes and how they resist falling down due to precession. It provides equations showing how the gyroscope's angular velocity results in a reactive torque that balances the torque from gravity, preventing it from falling as one might intuitively expect. The report includes 3 sections that introduce the topic, demonstrate the counterintuitive behavior, and explain how nature deals with it through precession and reactive torque.

Uploaded by

Dhruvesh Asnani
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
23 views5 pages

Understanding Gyroscopic Motion Dynamics

This document is a Diwali assignment report submitted by student Dhruvesh Asnani for their Calculus course. The report discusses the non-intuitive behavior of gyroscopes and how they resist falling down due to precession. It provides equations showing how the gyroscope's angular velocity results in a reactive torque that balances the torque from gravity, preventing it from falling as one might intuitively expect. The report includes 3 sections that introduce the topic, demonstrate the counterintuitive behavior, and explain how nature deals with it through precession and reactive torque.

Uploaded by

Dhruvesh Asnani
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

DIWALI ASSIGNMENT

Professor:Manish K Gupta
Course: SC107
CALCULUS
Fall 2016
DA-IICT

Made By:

Dhruvesh Asnani
ID: 201601423

November 18,2016

1
Gyroscope

1 Introduction
In our daily life we come across rigid bodies that rotate about an axis changing its direc-
tion. Eg: A spinning top,a turning bicycle wheel,a gyroscope,earth’s precession,etc. These
motions can be very difficult and complex to analyse. Often they are very non-intuitive...

2 How non-intuitive it is!


See the figure below.

This is model gyroscope which consists of a flywheel mounted in a suspension frame


that allows the flywheels axle to point in any direction. One end of the axle is supported
on a pylon at distance l from the center of mass of the gyroscope.
Suppose that flywheel is not spinning. The figure above shows the FBD of the sys-
tem.
Net force on the system is zero.

~net = ~0
F (1)
This is because:
~N ormal = −F
F ~gravity (2)
~gravity
But there is net torque on the system due to F
τgravity = mgl (3)
So flywheel will fall down..That’s Intuitive..
But what will happen if we spin the flywheel with some angular velocity and arrange
it in a position as in the above figure..
It will not fall!!

Very NON-INTUITIVE!!

2
3 How beautifully NATURE deals with it!!
Suppose the angular velocity of the flywheel is ω
~ s.

In this case, the center of mass of flywheel rotates about the vertical axis passing
through the contact point S of the axle with the pylon with angular velocity ω ~ p . This
velocity is called precessional angular velocity.

Here, ω
~ s is along x − axis and ω
~ p is along z − [Link] FBD of the system is as follows:

Gyroscopic Approximation:
Here we shall assume that ω ~ p and ω
~ s << ω ~ s and ω
~ p are nearly constant. These two
assumptions are collectively known as gyroscopic approximations.

~net = ~0.
Here also, F
This is because:

~N ormal = −F
F ~gravity (4)
FHor = mlω2 (5)
The direction of torque due to gravity is inside the plane of paper.
The spin angular momentum of the flywheel is:

~Lspin = Icm ω
~s (6)

3
Note:
Equation (6) is only valid in the gyroscopic approximation. If this approximation
is not made, ~Lspin would also have a component in the jˆ direction since the flywheel is
rotating about its vertical axis as the center of mass rotates in a circle about the vertical
axis. This component of the spin angular momentum would be

0
(~Lspin )y = Icm ω
~p
0 is the moment of inertia of the flywheel with respect to an axis parallel to the z−
where Icm
axis passing through the center of mass of the flywheel. In the gyroscopic approximation,
the ratio of the magnitudes

|(~Lspin )y | ωp
≈ << 1
|(~Lspin )x | ωs

and so (~Lspin )y need not be considered. In any event, (~Lspin )y = Icm


0 ω is constant in time.
p
Thus in the gyroscopic approximation the only change to the angular momentum
about S is the change in direction of the spin angular momentum about the axis passing
through the center of mass perpendicular to the wheel.

Due to τ~gravity , the direction of ~Lspin and hence ω


~ s changes.

From the figure,


∆ωs = ωs ∆θ (7)

(∵ We have assumed ωs to be constant)

Hence,
∆ωs ∆θ
= ωs (8)
∆t ∆t

Taking lim on both sides,


∆t→0
dωs dθ
= ωs (9)
dt dt

4
α = ωs ωp (10)
Due to this angular acceleration α
~ , the system exerts an active gyroscopic torque
given by

τactive = Icm ωs ωp (11)


The direction of τ~active is determined by right hand thumb rule.

τ~active = Icm (ω ~ s)
~p × ω (12)
But, if we observe from the frame of reference of the system, then the system expe-
riences a reactive gyroscopic torque in the direction opposite to that of active gyroscopic
torque having same magnitude as that of active gyroscopic torque.

τ~reactive = −~
τactive (13)
τ~reactive = Icm (ω ~ p)
~s × ω (14)
This τ~reactive balances τ~gravity and the flywheel does not fall.
i.e.

Icm ωs ωp = mgl (15)


mgl
ωp = (16)
Icm ωs

4 References
1. [Link]/8.01t/www/materials/modules/[Link]

2. [Link]

3. [Link]

You might also like