0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views5 pages

Embracing Failure for Business Success

This document evaluates Kodak's failure to adapt to digital photography technology. Kodak was unwilling to change from film to digital, fearing disruption. This caused it to miss opportunities to lead in digital imaging. The document argues that companies should create a culture where employees can freely experiment and learn from failures without fear. Embracing failure and new ideas, rather than punishing mistakes, allows for innovation and growth. Kodak could have maintained success had it encouraged digital technology experimentation among employees earlier.

Uploaded by

api-469147336
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views5 pages

Embracing Failure for Business Success

This document evaluates Kodak's failure to adapt to digital photography technology. Kodak was unwilling to change from film to digital, fearing disruption. This caused it to miss opportunities to lead in digital imaging. The document argues that companies should create a culture where employees can freely experiment and learn from failures without fear. Embracing failure and new ideas, rather than punishing mistakes, allows for innovation and growth. Kodak could have maintained success had it encouraged digital technology experimentation among employees earlier.

Uploaded by

api-469147336
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Running head: EVALUATION OF A CASE STUDY 1

Evaluation of a Case Study

Cruz, Gabriela

Behavior/Ethic/LeadrshipII-CBE
2

Evaluation of a problematic issue in leadership

Business entities are established with the aim of attaining a specific objective. Profit

maximization is one of the critical business objectives. The desire of every investor is to make a

reasonable return on capital investment on a continuous basis. Many business entities have

reportedly witnessed failure in one form or the other. Failure is considered to be a key factor that

propels individuals towards the path of success. The social conditioning has made failure to a big

and scary phenomenon. Failure is inevitable and is prerequisite for success. The most successful

businesses and personalities succeeded due to failure. The key to success is the ability to learn

from failure. Every success has an associated story of failure (Raspin, 2011). Stephen King’s

novel was rejected more than thirty times before it got published. Bill Gate’s first attempt at

starting a company flopped. Successful individuals are failures who refused to quit. They learn

from their failures and use them to achieve success. Kodak is one of the multinational company

that significantly declined due to the failure to create an environment where its innovators and

employees can freely develop and experiment with new ideas with no fear.

Most entrepreneurs consider business failure as something they wished never happened

since it is a negative and depressing event that has no value. A failed business causes stress in

various aspect in the life of a person such as financial, personal and professional. It is indeed

devastating for something one has sacrificed a lot of time and energy fall apart. Facing and

coping with failure is a big struggle. No one would like to put themselves through failure due to

the misery and darkness associated with it. The flipside of a failed business entity is that it is a

path towards success. It provides insights that are critical in finding success in the future. An

attempt to accomplish a dream is worthy irrespective of the outcome (Casuto, 2016). Many

people fear taking risks and to go after their dreams. Recent failure is a small stumbling block in
3

attaining defined goals if individuals are passionate enough about their pursuits. Failing arms one

with an invaluable wealth of real-world experience. Real world experience cannot be learned

unless tried.

The company was unwilling to change its efficient ability to making and selling the film

in developing digital technologies. The company lost the opportunity that could have been

critical in maintaining its leading position in digital image processing. The fear of disruptive

innovation denied Kodak the opportunity of being the market leader in digital photography. Lack

of agility in the organizational culture made its employees fear to fail and could not freely

experiment with disruptive technology to gain insight from it. Favourable destiny and fate can be

influenced by trying something and not failing to try. Other companies that embraced the

technology perfected the art and overtook Kodak (Lucas & Goh, 2009). The case study of

Kodak is an eye-opener that offers many insights into embracing digital technology with no fear

of anything. The company could have maintained its success by moving into digital technology

fast enough. The rapid and continuous technological advancement should encourage an attitude

of preparedness. A company cannot be future-proof by holding on to its status quo. It needs to

encourage its employees to try new things with the aim of appealing to the changing taste of

customers.

A critical review of the proposed solution

Creating a culture of innovation entails learning to celebrate failure. Innovation can be

fostered by changing the way people see failure. Kodak should create an environment where

employees are free to try new things without fear. Most employees fail to innovate due to lack of

passion in what they do and the fear of failing to meet the objectives set by their companies.

Great innovations were created out of numerous failed trials. Failure, mishaps, and mistakes
4

facilitate learning and growth in individuals. Penalizing mistakes and focusing on risk-aversion

makes employees to shy away from trying new things. The most successful companies in the

world are defined by three essential aspects that include encouraging failure, embracing

divergent thinking, and giving room for employees to learn from their mistakes.

Making mistakes make the brain expand as it compiles information about

experiences throughout the learning scenario. It retains new neural pathways as it takes new

information. The brain becomes mature by making mistakes resulting in efficient synapse and

altered neurons. Failures can make employees become smarter.

The fear of failure is human nature. Individuals often feel scared when they go outside

their comfort zone. When the self-esteem and identity of entrepreneurs are wrapped in their

work, they are easily upset when all is not well. Learning to use failure as a stepping stone to the

next milestone is critical for success. Loder (2015) asserts that a number of strategies have

proven to be effective in overcoming the fear of failure. They include reframing goals,

visualizing obstacles, uncovering the story, asking three personal questions, surrendering and

feeling the fear (Loder, 2015). Edmondson (2014) posit that learning from failure is

incontrovertible wisdom that is extraordinarily rare in most organizations. Organizations often

fail to learn from failure due to a lack of commitment to learning (Edmondson, 2014). Kodak can

only improve their future performance by encouraging their employees to learn from their

failures failure.
5

References

Casuto, S. (2016, July 27). Why Failure Is The Key To Workplace Culture Success. Retrieved

from [Link]

workplace-culture-success/#3c9acc4648f4

Edmondson, A. C. (2014, August 01). Strategies for Learning from Failure. Retrieved from

[Link]

Loder, V. (2015, May 06). How To Conquer The Fear Of Failure - 5 Proven Strategies. Retrieved

from [Link]

fear-of-failure-5-proven-strategies/#51731fdb1b78

Lucas Jr, H. C., & Goh, J. M. (2009). Disruptive technology: How Kodak missed the digital

photography revolution. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 18(1), 46-55.

Raspin, P. (2011). Failing to learn? How organizations can learn from failure. Strategic Direction,

27(1), 4-6.

You might also like