Running head: CROSS-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION 1
Cross-cultural communication
Cruz, Gabriela
Behavior/Ethic/Leadership I-CBE |
CROSS-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION 2
Introduction
Globalization in the modern world has opened new markets for multinational companies.
Companies such as Samsung operate in over 100 countries in the world. The organization sells
electronic products such as phones, televisions, fridges, and microwaves. However, the company
faces communication barriers as it operates in different regions of the world. Samsung has since
struggled to establish intercultural communication across all the branches.
Intercultural communication in the Samsung company
Samsung operates in many parts of the globe selling electronic appliances. The
organization based in South Korea competes with many other companies such as Apple Inc and
Sony from Japan. Samsung has struggled to resolve communication problems that arise in
foreign branches where expatriates interact with residents. The management has spent a lot of
resources trying to resolve employee differences and publicity crises that result from
miscommunication (Rani, Zuber, Yusoof, Zamziba & Toriry, 2016). The problem seems to cost
Samsung a lot of money and derails its efforts to expand its market base.
Analysis of the problem
Intercultural communication problems occur in culturally diverse workplaces. Hofstede
(2009) showed that individuals from different countries hold different perspectives and customs.
Hofstede called the differences as cultural dimensions that shape the practices and behavior of a
group of people. For example, Hofstede showed that people from high power distance culture
appreciate autocratic leadership styles compared to workers from lower power distance
environments. Hofstede also demonstrated that national cultures affect how individuals interact
with each other in social places. The customs and beliefs show the appropriate verbal and non-
CROSS-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION 3
verbal cues in the society, and therefore the styles used in one country may offend people from
another region of the world. Hofstede explained that the prevailing customs affect the
communication responses of people from various nations. Therefore, intercultural
communication problems arise because of clashing customs and beliefs.
The use of South Korean policies and culture may establish communication problems in
Samsung branches around the world. The people contain alternative ways of communicating
with each other in parts like the Middle East. For example, the employees from Saudi Arabia
would be offended to see Samsung expatriates hugging female employees as a form of greeting
(Kabasakal & Dastmalchian, 2001). Therefore, the imposition of the Samsung culture on other
people creates intercultural communication problems.
The concept of out-group and in-group may also show the communication problems
associated with cultural diversity. The school of thought explains that individuals may feel that
they do not identify with some groups of people. They may, therefore, use prejudice and other
poor attitudes towards the employees. For example, Samsung expatriates may consider other
nationals inferiors, and that promotes disrespect to the local cultures. They may use dirty jokes
and mimic the languages offensively. The feelings of superiority may distort the behavior of the
managers and other foreign workers, and that creates tension in the organizational setting.
(Killen & Coplan, 2011). Therefore, group mentality affects communication efforts in culturally
diverse workplaces.
Solution
The company should establish diversity training programs to promote intercultural
communication. According to Bezrukova, Jehn, and Spell (2012), such policies will enable the
CROSS-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION 4
organization to educate the managers and other employees on the importance of attaining
cultural tolerance. The program will highlight the impact of cultural diversity in the organization.
It may help to show some of the workers to drop their prejudices as they will note the
contributions that members from different backgrounds present to the company. The training
session will equip the staff members with a fundamental understanding of the local language and
cultures to limit communication blunders. For instance, it will show some of the common
greetings and ways of approaching people. It may indicate some of the discouraged social cues
such as touching women and sitting while talking to people (Herring, 2009). The diversity
training program will help to equip the employees with social capital in foreign countries.
The solution acts as the best option because it aims to change the attitudes of the workers.
Many cases of prejudice and intercultural communication conflicts occur because of stereotypes
and other adverse reactions. The approach will enable the employees to appreciate the need for
developing workplace diversity and intercultural communication. Other solutions like the
establishment of restrictive policies may not help to prevent the problem because they may not
bind the conduct of expatriates outside the workplace. Such people may show prejudice to
neighbors and other locals in a manner that may affect the reputation of the company. Besides,
the diversity training programs may cost the company a few resources (Jones, King, Nelson,
Geller & Bowes‐Sperry, 2013). They may only rely on a single expert in each branch around the
world.
Conclusion
Intercultural communication problems arise in culturally diverse workplaces. Many
multinationals such as Samsung that operate in different countries face communication barriers
CROSS-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION 5
that slow business progress. The cultural differences of individuals in an organization may affect
verbal and non-verbal communication processes as shown by Hofstede’s cultural dimensions.
The development of stereotypes and other prejudicial attitudes hinder the establishment of
unified workforces in multinational branches in the world. Therefore, Samsung can establish a
diversity training program that encourages the workers to develop cultural tolerance and cross-
cultural engagement.
CROSS-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION 6
References
Bezrukova, K., Jehn, K. A., & Spell, C. S. (2012). Reviewing diversity training: Where we have
been and where we should go. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(2),
207-227.
Herring, C. (2009). Does diversity pay?: Race, gender, and the business case for
diversity. American Sociological Review, 74(2), 208-224.
Hofstede, G. (2009). Geert Hofstede cultural dimensions.
Kabasakal, H., & Dastmalchian, A. (2001). Introduction to the special issue on leadership and
culture in the Middle East.
Killen, M., & Coplan, R. J. (Eds.). (2011). Social development in childhood and adolescence: A
contemporary reader. John Wiley & Sons.
Jones, K. P., King, E. B., Nelson, J., Geller, D. S., & Bowes‐Sperry, L. (2013). Beyond the
business case: An ethical perspective of diversity training. Human Resource
Management, 52(1), 55-74.
Rani, H. M. N. S., Zuber, F., Yusoof, M., Zamziba, M., & Toriry, S. (2016). Managing Cross-
Cultural Environment in Samsung Company: Strategy in Global Business. International
Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 6(11), 605-613.