0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views4 pages

HEC Manuscript Evaluation Form

This document is a manuscript evaluation form used by the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan to evaluate books proposed for their Monograph and Textbook Writing Scheme. The 12-question form addresses topics such as whether the book's title and contents match, the quality and presentation of scientific material, suitability for students, and clarity of ideas. Evaluators are asked to rank various aspects on scales and provide explanations. They recommend whether the commission should fund publication, revision, or reject the project.

Uploaded by

Ahmad Zaheer
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views4 pages

HEC Manuscript Evaluation Form

This document is a manuscript evaluation form used by the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan to evaluate books proposed for their Monograph and Textbook Writing Scheme. The 12-question form addresses topics such as whether the book's title and contents match, the quality and presentation of scientific material, suitability for students, and clarity of ideas. Evaluators are asked to rank various aspects on scales and provide explanations. They recommend whether the commission should fund publication, revision, or reject the project.

Uploaded by

Ahmad Zaheer
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

HIGHER EDUCATION COMMISSION

Islamabad – Pakistan
‘Monograph & Textbook Writing Scheme’
[Link]
(Manuscript Evaluation Form)

Title of Book: _____________________________________________________

Category: ________________________________________________________

Discipline: ________________________________________________________

Level of Book: _____________________________________________________

1- Does the title of the book reflect its contents? Yes No

If “No”, what title would you recommend?

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

2- Does the proposed table of contents provide sufficient topical coverage of


the subject matter of the book?

Yes No

If “No”, what topic (s) should the author (s) add, delete or revise to improve the
book’s contents? Please elaborate.

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...

3- a) Is there any singularity in the way the material is presented in this book?

Yes No

b) Is any material in this book new (not available in other books on the
same subject)?

Yes No

4- Are the scientific materials, notation, terminology, and methods presented in


this proposed book appropriate and do you recommend the manuscript draft for
publication?

Yes No
If “No”, what are your recommendations?

…………………………………………………………………………………………………..................

………………………………………………………………………………………………….....................

5- How would you rank the academic quality of this book as compared to other
books on the market?

Excellent Very Good Fair Poor

Would you please explain the basis of your ranking of the academic quality of this
book?

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

6- To give views regarding suitability for postgraduate/graduate students of


your discipline, the relevance of contents of the manuscript to the revised
updated curriculum.

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

7- How would you rank the clarity with which the author expresses his ideas in
the proposed book?

Excellent Very Good Fair Poor

Would you please explain the basis of your ranking?

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………....

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

8- How would you rank the quality and scope the overall presentation?

Excellent Very Good Fair Poor

Would you please explain the basis of your ranking of the quality of presentation?

………………………………………………............................................................................

………………………………………………………………………………………………..…………………
………………………………………………..…………………………………………………………………

..…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

9- If this proposed book were completed according to your proposed changes and
improvements, would you recommend is as a

a) Textbook
b) Monograph
c) Worthwhile book to have on your shelf?
a b c

10- Should HEC fund this project on this Weightage Score?

Please tick the relevant box

A- Book Proposal considered RECOMMENDED for Publication

B- Book Proposal considered RECOMMENDED for Revision & its

Re-submission to the experts for final review

C- Book Proposal considered NOT RECOMMENDED

A- If recommended, gives a brief justification:

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

B- If referred back give guidelines for revision:

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

C- If not recommended gives reasons:

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

11- Could you summarize the overall impression of your evaluation of this
project?

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

………………………………………………………………………………………………………....…………

………………………………………………………....…………………………………………………………

12- Please add any other comments you feel are relevant to your evaluation
(Please attach additional sheet/s, if required).

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

………………………………………………………………………………………………………....…………

………………………………………………………………………………………………………....…………

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

………………………………………………………………………………………………………....…………

………………………………………………………....…………………………………………………………

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

………………………………………………………………………………………………………....…………

………………………………………………………....…………………………………………………………

………………………………………………………....…………………………………………………………

………………………………………………………....…………………………………………………………

……………………………………………………....…………………………………………………………

(Please submit the Book Evaluation Form along with official - covering letter)

You might also like