100% found this document useful (1 vote)
35 views16 pages

Meta Analysis

meta analysis paper

Uploaded by

Sabu Joseph
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
35 views16 pages

Meta Analysis

meta analysis paper

Uploaded by

Sabu Joseph
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Kangaroo Mother Care and Neonatal

Outcomes: A Meta-analysis
Ellen O. Boundy, MS, ScD,a Roya Dastjerdi, MPH, MD,b Donna Spiegelman, ScD,a,b,c Wafaie W.
Fawzi, MBBS, DrPH,a,b,d Stacey A. Missmer, ScD,a,e Ellice Lieberman, MD, DrPH,a,f,g Sandhya
Kajeepeta, SM,a Stephen Wall, MD, SM, MSW,h Grace J. Chan, MD, MPH, PhDb,h,i

CONTEXT: Kangaroo mother care (KMC) is an intervention aimed at improving outcomes abstract
among preterm and low birth weight newborns.
OBJECTIVE: Conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis estimating the association between
KMC and neonatal outcomes.
DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, African Index Medicus (AIM), Latin
American and Caribbean Health Sciences Information System (LILACS), Index Medicus for
the Eastern Mediterranean Region (IMEMR), Index Medicus for the South-East Asian Region
(IMSEAR), and Western Pacific Region Index Medicus (WPRIM).
STUDY SELECTION: We included randomized trials and observational studies through April 2014
examining the relationship between KMC and neonatal outcomes among infants of any birth
weight or gestational age. Studies with <10 participants, lack of a comparison group without
KMC, and those not reporting a quantitative association were excluded.
DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers extracted data on study design, risk of bias, KMC intervention,
neonatal outcomes, relative risk (RR) or mean difference measures.
RESULTS: 1035 studies were screened; 124 met inclusion criteria. Among LBW newborns,
KMC compared to conventional care was associated with 36% lower mortality(RR 0.64;
95% [CI] 0.46, 0.89). KMC decreased risk of neonatal sepsis (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.34, 0.83),
hypothermia (RR 0.22; 95% CI 0.12, 0.41), hypoglycemia (RR 0.12; 95% CI 0.05, 0.32), and
hospital readmission (RR 0.42; 95% CI 0.23, 0.76) and increased exclusive breastfeeding (RR
1.50; 95% CI 1.26, 1.78). Newborns receiving KMC had lower mean respiratory rate and pain
measures, and higher oxygen saturation, temperature, and head circumference growth.
LIMITATIONS: Lack of data on KMC limited the ability to assess dose-response.

CONCLUSIONS: Interventions to scale up KMC implementation are warranted.

NIH

Departments of aEpidemiology, cBiostatistics, and dNutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Departments of bGlobal Health and Population, and fSocial
and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; eDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston,
Massachusetts; gDepartment of Pediatric Newborn Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; hSave the Children, Washington, DC; and iDepartment of Medicine,
Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

Dr Boundy conceptualized and designed the study, conducted the literature review, collected the data, conducted the analyses, created the tables and figures,
and drafted and revised the manuscript; Dr Dastjerdi conducted the literature review, collected and cleaned the data, assisted with table and figure creation,
and critically reviewed the manuscript; Dr Spiegelman contributed to the study design, statistical analyses, and data interpretation and critically reviewed the
manuscript; Drs Fawzi, Missmer, and Lieberman contributed to the study design and data interpretation and critically reviewed the manuscript; Ms Kajeepeta
conducted the literature review, collected the data, assisted with figure creation, and critically reviewed the manuscript;Dr Wall contributed to the conceptualization
and design of the study and data interpretation and critically reviewed the manuscript; Dr Chan conceptualized and designed the study, designed the data collection

To cite: Boundy EO, Dastjerdi R, Spiegelman D, et al. Kangaroo Mother Care and Neonatal Outcomes: A Meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2016;137(1):e20152238

PEDIATRICS Volume 137, number 1, January 2016:e20152238 REVIEW ARTICLE


An estimated 4 million infants die measures and newborn populations, Data Abstraction
each year during their first 4 weeks and they have included only RCTs,
All article abstracts were screened
of life.1 Although important progress with the exception of Lawn et al
by 2 independent reviewers. When
has been made toward Millennium 2010.7 To give a more complete
eligibility for inclusion was unclear
Development Goal 4 to reduce understanding of the potential
from the abstract, the full text was
mortality in children <5 years old, benefits and drawbacks of KMC, this
screened. Two reviewers then
less improvement has been achieved systematic review and meta-analysis
abstracted data from all articles
in the neonatal period.2 Infants aims to provide a comprehensive
meeting the inclusion criteria. At
born before term or at low birth summary of observational studies
each stage, reviewers compared
weight (LBW) are at elevated risk of and RCTs on KMC and neonatal
results to ensure agreement, and
neonatal mortality and morbidity, outcomes.
in cases of disagreement, a third
inhibited growth and development,
party acted as tiebreaker. Data
and chronic disease.1,3,4 Health
METHODS from articles in English, Spanish,
technologies such as incubators can
and Portuguese were abstracted
help improve outcomes in high-risk Search Strategy and Selection by 2 fluent speakers. For articles
infants; however, such equipment Criteria in less common languages, a single
is not widely available in low- and
The literature search for this review native speaker abstracted data. If an
middle-income countries, where
included original reports, direct article was missing key information,
99% of all neonatal deaths occur.1
queries of authors of published we contacted authors by e-mail to
Effective and low-cost alternative
articles, and program reports. We request data.
methods of neonatal care are needed.
identified studies through electronic We collected information on
In 1978, Dr Edgar Rey Sanabria database searches of PubMed, study design, setting, participant
introduced kangaroo mother care Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, characteristics, description of KMC
(KMC) in Bogotá, Colombia as African Index Medicus (AIM), Latin and comparison groups, follow-up
an alternative to incubators for American and Caribbean Health time, outcomes, assessment of bias,
LBW infants.5 The World Health Sciences Information System and measures of association. Relative
Organization defines KMC with 4 (LILACS), Index Medicus for the risks (RRs) or mean difference
components: early, continuous, Eastern Mediterranean Region (MD) effect estimates with 95%
and prolonged skin-to-skin contact (IMEMR), Index Medicus for the confidence intervals (CIs) were
(SSC) between the newborn and South-East Asian Region (IMSEAR), extracted. We collected exposure
mother, exclusive breastfeeding, and Western Pacific Region Index data on KMC components, clinical
early discharge from the health Medicus (WPRIM) by using the terms stabilization criteria for starting KMC,
facility, and close follow-up at “kangaroo mother care,” “kangaroo and duration of SSC promoted and
home.6 KMC is postulated to improve care,” and “skin to skin care” through practiced.
neonatal outcomes by maintaining April 24, 2014. We also conducted
the infant’s temperature and other hand searches of reference lists Study Quality
vital sign parameters through SSC of published systematic reviews. Two independent reviewers
and by providing the benefits of To search the gray literature for assessed the methodological quality
breastfeeding.5 These effects are unpublished studies, we explored of studies in 5 domains: selection
thought to be beneficial for all programmatic reports and requested bias, information bias, detection
newborns but may be especially data from programs implementing bias, attrition bias, and other bias.11
advantageous for preterm infants. KMC. For observational studies, an
In previous meta-analyses, KMC We included studies using any additional domain for confounding
was found to reduce the risk of definition of KMC with at least the was assessed. Each domain was
morbidity and mortality among LBW SSC component and any neonatal categorized as high, low, or unclear
infants.7,8 In randomized controlled outcome. We excluded studies with risk of bias. We then created an
trials (RCTs), SSC alone has also nonhuman subjects, <10 participants, overall assessment of bias for each
been associated with improved nonprimary data collection or study. For RCTs, if both selection and
breastfeeding, cardiorespiratory analysis, lack of a comparison group information bias were low risk, the
stability, and improved responses to without KMC, and those that did not overall risk of bias was considered
procedural pain.9,10 Although these report a quantitative effect measure. low. If either domain was high
reviews have provided important We did not limit our analysis to risk, the overall risk of bias was
evidence on the effectiveness of KMC, studies of newborns with a specific designated as high. For observational
they are limited to specific outcome gestational age or birth weight. studies, if selection bias, information

2 BOUNDY et al
bias, and confounding were all low country-level neonatal mortality studies (61%) had <100 participants.
risk, the overall risk of bias was rate in 2013,32 infant gestational age Fifty-five (44%) were RCTs, 8 (6%)
considered low. If any of those 3 and birth weight, KMC components, were randomized crossover trials,
domains was high risk, the overall KMC initiation criteria, SSC duration, and 61 (49%) were observational or
risk was considered high. Otherwise, and study quality classification. In nonrandomized intervention studies.
the overall risk of bias was metaregression analyses, we report Most studies (n = 113, 94%) were in
considered unclear. the residual I2, indicating the amount middle- or high-income countries and
of remaining heterogeneity in the were conducted in health facilities (n
Statistical Analysis effect estimate after adjustment = 118, 98%).
for a given characteristic. The
We used the random effects Among studies reporting gestational
indicator method was used for
estimator to assess the effect of KMC age, the majority (n = 61, 68%) were
missing covariate information in
compared with conventional care among preterm infants <37 weeks’
metaregressions.33
on each neonatal outcome.12 For gestation; 17 (19%) were among full-
dichotomous outcomes, we report We assessed publication bias by term infants, defined as ≥37 weeks,
summary estimates as RR and 95% visual inspection of funnel plots of and 12 (13%) were among infants
CI. For studies that did not report effect size and SE for asymmetry of all gestational ages. Similarly, 47
an RR, we calculated the RR and and by Begg’s rank correlation and studies (58%) were among LBW
SE from the data if available. For Egger’s linear regression tests.34,35 infants (≤2500 g), an additional 15
continuous outcomes, we report We conducted meta-analyses by (19%) were among very LBW infants
summary estimates as MD and using Stata statistical software (≤1500 g), 9 (11%) were among
95% CI. When different units or (version 13.1), and risk of bias figures non-LBW infants, and 10 (12%) were
scales were used across studies, we were created in RevMan software among infants of all birth weights.
calculated the standardized mean (version 5.3). Forty-three studies (35%) did not
difference (SMD).11 When available, specify infants’ birth weight, and 34
estimates adjusted for confounding (27%) did not specify gestational age,
were used rather than crude. RESULTS but all studies reported either birth
Estimates that were presented only Our search identified 2515 records weight or gestational age, except for
as medians rather than means, only (Fig 1). We then identified 29 1.45
as odds ratios without raw data to additional records related to KMC Most studies (n = 71, 68%) defined
calculate the RR, or those with 0 through crosscheck of reference lists, KMC as SSC only, 14 (13%) defined
cells were excluded from summary communication with an author,36 KMC as SSC plus promotion of
measures.13–28 and programmatic reports. After exclusive breastfeeding, 20 (19%)
We performed sensitivity analyses 1006 duplicates were removed, included an early discharge or
by restricting the analyses to RCTs 1035 records underwent abstract follow-up component, and 19 (15%)
and adjusted RR estimates for screening. Of those, 527 did not meet did not describe the components
dichotomous outcomes and by inclusion criteria. Full-text articles for of their KMC intervention. SSC was
restricting the analyses to RCTs the remaining 508 records were then initiated immediately after birth in
and randomized crossover studies assessed and of those, 384 did not 7 studies (8%), whereas 41 (48%)
for continuous outcomes. To assess meet inclusion criteria. This review had stability criteria to be met before
between-study heterogeneity, and meta-analysis includes 124 SSC initiation, and 27 (31%) had
we report the I2 statistic and the studies that reported an association other non–stability-related initiation
P value for the Q statistic.12,29,30 between KMC and ≥1 neonatal criteria. Eleven studies (14%)
The I2 statistic quantifies the outcome. One hundred eleven looking at pain-related outcomes
amount of variation in the effect (90%) were in English, 7 (6%) in started SSC around the time of an
estimate attributable to between- Portuguese, 4 (3%) in Spanish, and 2 infant procedure. Fifty-two studies
study heterogeneity, reported (2%) in Farsi. We e-mailed 8 authors (66%) promoted <4 hours of SSC per
as a percentage, with a higher I2 to obtain additional information37–44 day, 20 (25%) promoted ≥22 hours
indicating more heterogeneity. We and received a response with data per day, and few studies (n = 7, 9%)
conducted subgroup analyses and from 2.38,39 had a duration between 4 and 21
metaregression for outcomes with hours per day. Thirty-eight studies
Study Characteristics
data from ≥10 studies. We explored (31%) did not specify when SSC
these predetermined subgroups: Of the 124 included studies, 110 was initiated, and 45 studies (36%)
year, study type, sample size, (89%) were published between 2000 did not report the daily duration
location, country-level economy,31 and 2014 (Table 1). Seventy-six of SSC mothers were instructed to

PEDIATRICS Volume 137, number 1, January 2016 3


FIGURE 1
Flow diagram for identification of included studies.

practice. Information on duration Mortality lower mortality in the KMC groups


of SSC actually practiced rather compared with controls (95% CI,
than promoted was only available Compared with conventional care, 0.43 to 0.82; I2 = 0%) (Table 2).
in 16 studies (13%). Details of each KMC was associated with a 23%
included study are presented in lower risk of mortality at each study’s Among LBW newborns <2000 g,
Supplemental Table 16. latest follow-up time (n = 16; 95% CI, KMC decreased mortality at latest
0.60, 0.99; I2 = 67%) (Fig 2). Among follow-up time by 36% (n = 15; 95%
Meta-analysis 11 studies reporting mortality during CI, 0.46 to 0.89; I2 = 72%). In the 2
the first 45 days of life, there was studies of infants of all birth weights,
Summary RR estimates for nonsignificant 21% decrease in KMC did not significantly affect
dichotomous outcomes are reported mortality with KMC (95% CI, 0.57 mortality (RR 1.04; 95% CI, 0.82 to
in Table 2, and MD estimates for to 1.10; I2 = 77%), whereas the 7 1.33; I2 = 0%). Additional subgroup
continuous outcomes are reported in studies reporting mortality at 3, 6, analyses of study characteristics
Table 3. or 12 months of age showed 41% and KMC components for mortality

4 BOUNDY et al
at latest follow-up are presented TABLE 1 Characteristics of Included Studies (n = 124)
in Supplemental Table 4. We did Characteristic Number of Studies, n (%)
not find important differences in Year of publication
the effect of KMC on mortality by 1988–1999 14 (11)
location, country-level economy, or 2000–2009 58 (47)
neonatal mortality rate. Two studies 2010–2014 52 (42)
Sample size
whose KMC intervention included
<50 43 (35)
SSC, exclusive breastfeeding, early 50–<100 33 (27)
discharge, and close follow-up 100–<200 21 (17)
showed a stronger protective ≥200 27 (22)
effect of KMC against mortality (RR Study type
RCT 55 (44)
0.43; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.98) than
Cohort 17 (14)
studies using other KMC definitions. Pre–post 23 (19)
Similarly, when mothers were Intervention trial (nonrandomized) 8 (6)
encouraged to provide SSC plus Randomized crossover 8 (6)
≥1 other component, KMC was Crossover (nonrandomized) 3 (2)
Case–control 2 (2)
protective against mortality (n =
Chart review 5 (4)
9; RR 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.89), Facility evaluation 2 (2)
whereas studies where KMC was Interview or survey 1 (1)
defined as SSC alone did not (n = Region (World Health Organization)
5; RR 0.71; 95% CI, 0.33 to 1.52). Africa 11 (9)
Americas 50 (41)
There was no difference in mortality
Eastern Mediterranean 11 (9)
between studies including promotion Europe 19 (16)
of exclusive breastfeeding in their Southeast Asia 20 (17)
KMC definition compared with those Western Pacific 9 (7)
that did not. Multiple 1 (1)
Country-level economy (World Bank)
Studies instructing mothers to Low income 7 (6)
start SSC after stability criteria was Middle income 65 (54)
High income 48 (40)
met showed a similarly protective Multiple 1 (1)
effect against mortality (n = 9, RR Country-level neonatal mortality ratio, deaths/1000 live births
0.57; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.97) as those <5 52 (43)
that started SSC immediately (n = 5–<15 36 (30)
3, RR 0.51; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.78) 15–<30 29 (24)
≥30 4 (3)
(Supplemental Fig 3). Eleven studies Setting
promoting ≥22 hours of SSC per day Urban 92 (90)
showed a protective effect of KMC Rural 4 (4)
(RR 0.64; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.92) on Mixed 6 (6)
Facility type
mortality, whereas there was no
NICU or step-down unit 51 (42)
association in the 1 study promoting Health facility 67 (55)
4 to 8 hours per day or the 4 studies Community or population based 3 (2)
that did not define SSC duration Gestational age at birth
(Supplemental Fig 4). Preterm, <37 wk 34 (38)
Very preterm, <34 wk 27 (30)
Full-term, ≥35–37 wk 17 (19)
Breastfeeding
All gestational ages 11 (12)
KMC increased the likelihood Comparison: preterm vs full term 1 (1)
Birth wt
of exclusive breastfeeding at LBW, ≤2500 g 47 (58)
hospital discharge or 40 to 41 Very LBW, ≤1500 g 15 (19)
weeks postmenstrual age by 50% Normal birth wt, ≥2500 g 9 (11)
(n = 13; 95% CI, 1.26 to 1.78; I2 = All birth weights 10 (12)
93%) (Supplemental Fig 5). KMC KMC components
SSC only 71 (68)
increased the likelihood of exclusive SSC + EBF 14 (13)
breastfeeding across nearly all SSC + EBF + DC 1 (1)
subgroups of study, infant, and KMC SSC + EBF + DC + FU 4 (4)
characteristics (Supplemental Table

PEDIATRICS Volume 137, number 1, January 2016 5


TABLE 1 Continued saturation 0.9% higher than controls
Characteristic Number of Studies, n (%) (n = 14; 95% CI, 0.35 to 1.45; I2 =
SSC + DC 1 (1) 92%) (Supplemental Figs 8 and 9).
SSC + DC + FU 7 (7) Across subgroup analyses, KMC was
SSC + EBF + FU 7 (7) associated with lower respiratory
SSC initiation time
rate and higher oxygen saturation
Immediately after birth 7 (8)
After stability criteria met 41 (48) (Supplemental Tables 8 and 9).
After other criteria met 27 (31)
For a painful procedure 11 (13) Temperature
SSC duration promoted, h/d Compared with conventional care,
<2 38 (48)
KMC was associated with 78% lower
2–<4 14 (18)
4–<9 6 (8) risk of hypothermia (n = 9; 95% CI,
9–<12 0 0.12 to 0.41; I2 = 71%) and 23%
12–<22 1 (1) lower risk of hyperthermia (n = 3;
≥22 20 (25) 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.01; I2 = 0%) (Table
Number of days of SSC promoted
2). Mean body temperature of infants
1–5 47 (75)
6–<30 9 (14) receiving KMC was 0.24°C higher
≥30 2 (3) than in controls (n = 14; 95% CI, 0.15
Dependent on hospital stay 5 (8) to 0.33; I2 = 82%) (Supplemental Fig
DC, early discharge; EBF, exclusive breastfeeding; FU, follow-up after discharge. 10). This effect was similar across
subgroups of study, infant, and KMC
5). At 1- to 4-month follow-up, KMC Among RCTs, KMC decreased risk characteristics (Supplemental Table 10).
increased the likelihood of exclusive of infection by 49% (n = 9; 95% CI,
Hypoglycemia and Cortisol
breastfeeding by 39% (n = 8; 95% 0.32 to 0.81) (Supplemental Table
CI, 1.11 to 1.74; I2 = 60%) (Table 2). 6). Nine studies that had stability KMC was strongly protective against
KMC did not have a significant impact criteria before initiating SSC showed hypoglycemia in 2 studies of LBW
on the MD in time to breastfeeding a protective effect of KMC against infants (RR 0.12; 95% CI, 0.05 to
initiation (n = 4; SMD −1.07; 95% infection (RR 0.50; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.32; I2 = 0%) (Table 2). Standardized
CI, −2.30 to 0.17; I2 = 97%) (Table 0.77), whereas the 2 studies that had mean cortisol levels were not
3). Several studies looked at other other non–stability-related criteria significantly different between KMC
feeding outcomes that were too before initiation did not (RR 1.00; and control groups (n = 3; SMD
heterogeneous to combine into a 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.45). −0.44; 95% CI, −0.94 to 0.06; I2 =
summary estimate.62–64,72,77,96,118,119 54%) (Table 3).
Heart Rate
Infection Hospital Stay
KMC did not have a significant effect
Risk of infection during study on mean heart rate (n = 15; MD 0.41 KMC decreased the likelihood of
follow-up was not statistically beats per minute; 95% CI, −2.25 to hospital readmission by 58% in 2
different between KMC and control 1.42; I2 = 46%) (Supplemental Fig 7). studies (95% CI, 0.23 to 0.76; I2 =
groups (n = 12; RR 0.67; 95% CI, 0.43 No statistical or clinically significant 0%) (Table 2). Length of hospital stay
to 1.05; I2 = 60%) (Table 2). When differences were noted in subgroup did not differ significantly between
data were stratified by infection analysis of study, infant, or KMC KMC and control groups (n = 12; MD
type, however, KMC was associated characteristics (Supplemental Table −0.68 days; 95% CI, −2.11 to 0.75;
with 47% lower risk of sepsis (n = 8; 7). I2 = 95%) (Supplemental Fig 11,
95% CI, 0.34 to 0.83; I2 = 25%) but Supplemental Table 11). One study
did not have an effect on methicillin- Respiration and Oxygenation reported length of hospital and NICU
resistant Staphylococcus aureus or Compared with conventional care, stays stratified by birth weight and
other severe infections (n = 4; RR KMC was associated with a non– found shorter hospital stays in the KMC
1.00; 95% CI, 0.40 to 2.46; I2 = 77%) statistically significant reduction group compared with controls among
(Supplemental Fig 6). KMC did not in risk of apnea among 6 studies of infants <1500 g and in length of NICU
have a significant effect on risk of LBW infants <2000 g (RR 0.39; 95% stay among infants 1201 to 1500 g.120
necrotizing enterocolitis (n = 3; RR CI, 0.13 to 1.14; I2 = 42%) (Table
0.96; 95% CI, 0.45 to 2.04) (Table 2). 2). On average, newborns receiving Growth
All studies that examined sepsis and KMC had a respiratory rate 3 breaths Various infant growth outcomes
necrotizing enterocolitis were among per minute slower (n = 12; 95% CI, were examined across studies.
infants <2250 g at birth. −5.15 to −1.19; I2 = 75%) and oxygen We looked at the effect of KMC on

6 BOUNDY et al
TABLE 2 RR and 95% CI for the Effect of KMC Compared With Conventional Care on Dichotomous Neonatal Outcomes
Outcome All Studies RCT and Adjusted Observational Studies
n RR (95% CI)a P Test for I2, %b n RR (95% CI)a p Test for I2, %b
Heterogeneity Heterogeneity
(P) (P)
Mortality
Latest follow-up46–61 16 0.77 (0.60 to .05 <.01 67 12 0.95 (0.73 to 1.23) .69 .13 32
0.99)
≤45 d46–55,58 11c 0.79 (0.57 to .17 <.01 77 7 1.16 (0.91 to 1.47) .23 .29 18
1.10)
3–12 mo46,47,56,57,59–61 7c 0.59 (0.43 to <.01 .63 0 6 0.67 (0.47 to 0.96) .03 .88 0
0.82)
LBW <2000 g46–54,56–61 15 0.64 (0.46 to .01 <.01 72 11 0.86 (0.59 to 1.24) .41 .10 38
0.89)
All birth weights50,55 2 1.04 (0.82 to .73 .83 0 1 1.06 (0.80 to 1.41) .70 — —
1.33)
Exclusive breastfeeding
Discharge or 40–41 wk 13 1.50 (1.26 to <.01 <.01 93 8 1.25 (1.10 to 1.42) <.01 <.01 59
PMA28,50,59,62–71 1.78)
1–4 mo old45,62,63,65,69,72–74 8 1.39 (1.11 to .01 .02 60 6 1.53 (1.08 to 2.18) .02 <.01 71
1.74)
Other
Infection15,27,28,48,52,53,58,60,65,67,75,76 12 0.67 (0.43 to .08 <.01 60 10 0.60 (0.36 to 1.01) 0.05 <.01 65
1.05)
Sepsis15,27,28,48,52,53,58,65 8 0.53 (0.34 to .01 .23 25 7 0.44 (0.29 to 0.66) <.01 .49 0
0.83)
NEC49,58,65 3 0.96 (0.45 to .92 .45 0 3 0.96 (0.45 to 2.04) .92 .45 0
2.04)
Hypothermia15,18,36,48,52,58,65,77,78 9 0.22 (0.12 to <.01 <.01 71 7 0.28 (0.15 to 0.53) <.01 .01 65
0.41)
Hyperthermia15,48,52 3 0.77 (0.59 to .06 .88 0 3 0.77 (0.59 to 1.01) .06 .88 0
1.01)
Apnea27,46,48,52,58,65 6 0.39 (0.13 to .09 .12 42 6 0.39 (0.13 to 1.14) .09 .12 42
1.14)
Hypoglycemia27,48 2 0.12 (0.05 to <.01 .53 0 2 0.12 (0.05 to 0.32) <.01 .53 0
0.32)
Readmission60,74 2 0.42 (0.23 to <.01 1.00 0 1 0.42 (0.14 to 1.29) .13 — —
0.76)
NEC, necrotizing enterocolitis; PMA, postmenstrual age.
a Random effects estimates.
b I2 variation in RR or MD attributable to heterogeneity.
c Two studies contributed data to estimates at both follow-up times of ≤45 d and 3–12 mo.15,50

measures of weight gain individually the risk of being malnourished, 88%).122 Studies using the Neonatal
and by combining them using the overweight, or obese at 5 to 6 years Infant Pain Scale123 (n = 3) and the
SMD (Table 3, Supplemental Fig old and found no difference between Neonatal Facial Coding System121,124
12). We did not find a significant the KMC and control groups.121
(n = 2) showed nonsignificant
association between KMC and the
SMD in weight gain or body length Pain decreases in pain among infants
growth. Infants receiving KMC had receiving SSC during painful
head circumference growth 0.19 cm Several studies examined pain- procedures compared with controls.
per week higher than controls in 3 related outcomes, including crying,
When combined across scales using
studies of infants <2000 g at birth heart rate, and pain scores during
and after painful procedures (Table the SMD, a decrease in pain score was
(95% CI, 0.01 to 0.37; I2 = 89%).
3). According the Premature Infant again noted in infants receiving SSC
Among studies reporting weight gain
Pain Profile scale, with a range from compared with conventional care
outcomes, there were no important
differences in the effect of KMC by 0 to 21, infants receiving SSC during (SMD −0.63; 95% CI, −1.09 to −0.16;
subgroups of study, infant, or KMC a painful procedure had a mean pain I2 = 89%) (Supplemental Fig 13). This
characteristics (Supplemental Table score 0.83 points lower than controls effect was similar across subgroups
12). One additional study examined (n = 7; 95% CI, −1.53 to −0.13; I2 = (Supplemental Table 13).

PEDIATRICS Volume 137, number 1, January 2016 7


8
TABLE 3 MD and 95% CI for the Effect of KMC Compared With Conventional Care on Continuous Neonatal Outcomes
Outcome All Studies RCT and Randomized Crossover Studies
n MD (95% CI)a P Test for Heterogeneity I2, %b n MD (95% CI)a P Test for Heterogeneity I2, %b
(P) (P)
Vital signs
Heart rate, beats/min38,65,79–91 15 −0.41 (−2.25 to 1.42) .66 .03 46 2 0.04 (−1.60 to 1.68) .96 .60 0
Respiratory rate, breaths/ 12 −3.17 (−5.15 to −1.19) <0.01 <.01 75 3 −5.49 (-8.80 to −2.18) <.01 <.01 88
min52,65,79,81,83–90
Oxygen saturation, %52,65,79–81,83– 14 0.90 (0.35 to 1.45) <.01 <.01 92 4 1.28 (0.39 to 2.17) .01 <.01 86
90,92

Temperature, °C65,78–83,85–87,89,93–95 14 0.24 (0.15 to 0.33) <.01 <.01 82 3 0.24 (0.04 to 0.44) .02 <.01 91
Breastfeeding initiation time, 4 −1.07 (−2.30 to 0.17) .09 <.01 97 4 −1.07 (−2.30 to 0.17) .09 <.01 97
SMD48,52,96,97
Growth
Wt change, g14,18,53,59,98 5 3.29 (−4.95 to 11.52) .43 .02 67 2 8.30 (1.16 to 15.43) .02 .31 3
Wt change, g/day28,48,58,99,100 5 2.58 (−0.51 to 5.67) .10 <.01 81 4 3.04 (−1.35 to 7.43) .18 <.01 84
Wt change, g/kg/day49,99 2 −0.84 (−3.39 to 1.70) .52 .02 81 0 — — — —
Wt change, SMD14,18,28,48,49,53,58,59,98– 11 0.16 (−0.08 to 0.40) .21 <.01 81 6 0.33 (−0.05 to 0.70) .09 <.01 83
100

Length change, cm/wk18,96 2 0.15 (−0.09 to 0.39) 0.21 .03 79 2 0.15 (−0.09 to 0.39) .21 .03 79
Length change, SMD18,48,58 3 0.24 (−0.02 to 0.49) .07 .26 25 3 0.24 (−0.02 to 0.49) .07 .26 25
Head circumference change, cm/ 3 0.19 (0.01 to 0.37) .04 <.01 89 3 0.19 (0.01 to 0.37) .04 <.01 89
wk18,28,48
Head circumference change, 4 0.61 (0.20 to 1.02) <.01 <.01 77 4 0.61 (0.20 to 1.02) <.01 <.01 77
SMD18,28,48,58
Pain
Pain score, SMD38,101–109 10 −0.63 (−1.09 to −0.16) .01 <.01 89 8 −0.75 (−1.28 to −0.22) .01 <.01 89
Premature Infant Pain Profile 7 −0.83 (−1.53 to −0.13) .02 <.01 88 5 −0.98 (−1.83 to −0.13) .02 <.01 91
score, 0–2138,103–105,107–109
Neonatal Infant Pain Scale score, 3 −1.14 (−2.34 to 0.05) .06 <.01 85 2 −1.21 (−2.88 to 0.45) .15 <.01 91
0–738,102,106
Neonatal Facial Coding System 2 −1.40 −3.08 to 0.28) .10 <.01 91 2 −1.40 (−3.08 to 0.28) .10 <.01 91
score, 0–10101,102
Crying duration after painful 3 −11.30(-19.79 to-2.80) .01 .80 0 3 −11.30(−19.79 to −2.80) .01 .80 0
stimulus, s110–112
Heart rate during painful stimulus, 3 −7.46 (−12.98 to −1.93) .01 .25 29 3 −7.46 (−12.98 to −1.93) .01 .25 29
beats/min111–113
Heart rate after painful stimulus, 4 −4.00 (−8.93 to 0.93) .11 <.01 87 3 −7.52 (−8.47 to −6.58) <.01 .54 0
beats/min101,103,114,115
Other
Length of hospital stay, days14,18,48,4 12 −0.68 (−2.11 to 0.75) .35 <.01 95 5 −0.38 (−2.99 to 2.23) .78 <.01 91
9,52,53,68,71,99,100,116,117

Cortisol, SMD38,95,107 3 −0.44 (−0.94 to 0.06) .08 .12 54 2 −0.58 (−0.88 to −0.29) <.01 .33 0
SMD, standardized mean difference.
a Random effects MD.
b I2: variation in RR or MD attributable to heterogeneity.

BOUNDY et al
FIGURE 2
Forest plot for effect of KMC compared with conventional care on mortality at latest follow-up time, grouped by follow-up time. BW, birth weight.

After a painful stimulus, infants into a summary measure. Those Several studies also examined the
receiving SSC cried on average 11 outcomes related to illness included effect of KMC on neurocognitive
seconds less than control group retinopathy, bronchopulmonary outcomes. These data were reported
infants (n = 3; 95% CI, −19.79 to dysplasia, regurgitation, across different scales with endpoints
−2.80; I2 = 0%) (Table 3). Among respiratory tract disease, at different ages and thus could
studies using infant heart rate during diarrhea, and intraventricular not be combined into summary
painful stimulus as a proxy pain hemorrhage.48,49,58,60,125 measures. They included
measure, mean heart rate was 7 beats Other outcomes included assessments of behavior, mental
per minute slower in the SSC groups hyperbilirubinemia, blood pressure, and psychomotor development,
than controls (n = 3; 95% CI, −12.98 reflexes, temperament,
stratum corneum hydration, oxygen
to −1.93; I2 = 29%). brain maturation, and
requirement, carbon dioxide
sleep.16,61,77,90,91,95,110,113,115,140–151
production, low-frequency/high-
Other Outcomes
frequency ratio, thyroid measures,
A variety of other neonatal water loss, home observation of Risk of Bias
outcomes were reported in a single the environment, stabilization After evaluating 5 domains of bias
study or in different ways across of cardiopulmonary system, and among the 55 RCTs, we classified
studies that could not be combined cost of care.13,44,71,79,80,89,125–139 25 (45%) as overall low risk of bias,

PEDIATRICS Volume 137, number 1, January 2016 9


14 (25%) as high, and 16 (29%) did not find evidence of harm related inclusion of all study types, outcomes,
unclear (Supplemental Table 14; to KMC. and infant populations. Therefore,
Supplemental Fig 14). When the we were able to look at as many
We found a similar magnitude in
same 5 bias domains were used plus studies as available for each outcome
reduction of mortality risk among
a domain for confounding for the and perform sensitivity analyses.
LBW infants exposed to KMC as
69 observational studies, overall We were able to assess the effect
in previous reviews.7,8 We did
risk of bias was considered low in of KMC on normal weight and term
not find a significant difference in
29 (42%), high in 24 (35%), and infants, albeit with limited data,
mortality in the 2 studies including
unclear in 16 (23%) (Supplemental and to examine several outcomes
all birth weights, which had not been
Table 15; Supplemental Fig 15). related to vital signs and procedural
examined in previous reviews. We
When restricted to studies with low pain parameters that were not
noted a similar protective effect of
overall risk of bias, the protective included in the most recent review
KMC against sepsis and hypothermia,
effects of KMC on mortality, exclusive of KMC among LBW infants.8 We
increased likelihood of exclusive
breastfeeding, and infection were also collected detailed information
breastfeeding, and lower Premature
stronger than results obtained with on study design, newborn
Infant Pain Profile score as described
all studies (Supplemental Tables characteristics, and KMC components
in previous work.8–10 We did not
4–6). Effect estimates for continuous to look for differences in the effect of
find a significant difference in length
outcomes did not materially change KMC in subgroup and metaregression
of hospital stay, which could reflect
when restricted to studies with low analyses.
differences in study inclusion
risk of bias (Supplemental Tables
criteria and infant characteristics How much of KMC’s effect is through
7–13).
compared with a previous review.8 SSC alone compared with KMC that
We found greater head circumference includes additional components
Publication Bias
growth, but no difference in remains unclear because of the
We assessed publication bias length or weight gain, with most sparsity of details available on
for mortality at latest follow-up measurements taken across the the KMC intervention practiced
time, exclusive breastfeeding at hospital stay period. Conde-Agudelo in many studies. When they were
discharge, and infection outcomes. and Díaz-Rossello8 reported an described, we noted heterogeneity
No evidence of publication bias was increase in growth parameters for in the definition and components of
noted for mortality by Begg’s (P = KMC-exposed infants compared with KMC and conventional care across
.89) or Egger’s (P = .36) tests or by controls at latest follow-up, but studies. We attempted to address this
visual inspection of the funnel plot as in our results, no important limitation by performing subgroup
(Supplemental Fig 16). Similarly, differences in growth measured analyses by KMC components,
no evidence of publication bias was at discharge or 40 to 41 weeks’ duration, and initiation time. The
found for exclusive breastfeeding postmenstrual age.8 effects of KMC may be confounded
(Begg’s P = .25; Egger’s P = .12) or with breastfeeding as a component of
infection (Begg’s P = .45; Egger’s P = Although the improvements in KMC. We explored this possibility by
.75). respiratory rate, oxygenation, comparing subgroups of studies that
and temperature that we found encouraged exclusive breastfeeding
associated with KMC exposure as part of their intervention
DISCUSSION may each be of modest clinical compared with those that did not; we
significance, when taken together did not see a consistent difference in
When compared with conventional
they support the hypothesis that effect.
care, KMC is associated with
KMC improves overall physiologic
decreased mortality among We were limited in our ability to
regulation in the neonate, which
newborns who survive to receive it, adequately examine the dose–
could have important effects on other
particularly among LBW infants. response relationship between
longer-term outcomes. Lower pain
KMC also increases likelihood of duration of SSC and neonatal
measures among infants receiving
exclusive breastfeeding up to 4 outcomes because there were few
KMC may also provide additional
months of age and decreases risk studies with duration of 4 to 21
benefits for LBW infants who
of newborn sepsis, hypothermia, hours per day, and for any given
experience numerous injections
hypoglycemia, and hospital outcome there was little variation in
during hospitalization.
readmission. Additionally, infants the SSC duration promoted across
receiving KMC have improved vital This meta-analysis provides a studies. We still attempted to look at
signs, greater head circumference comprehensive picture of the effects the data available on SSC duration
growth, and lower pain scores. We of KMC on neonatal health by its as a covariate in metaregression

10 BOUNDY et al
analyses, and we found that variation provides support for widespread
in duration did not appear to have implementation of KMC as standard
ABBREVIATIONS
an important impact on the effect of care for newborns. Additional AIM: African Index Medicus
of KMC in these data. We could research is needed to determine the CI: confidence interval
not adequately assess the impact ideal duration and components IMEMR: Index Medicus for the
of number of days of SSC because of KMC. Successful strategies for Eastern Mediterranean
the majority of studies promoted a KMC implementation in various Region
similar duration of 1 to contexts should be disseminated IMSEAR: Index Medicus for the
5 days. among clinicians and South-East Asian Region
policymakers. KMC: kangaroo mother care
LBW: low birth weight
LILACS: Latin American and
CONCLUSIONS Caribbean Health
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Sciences Information
KMC is protective against a wide
System
variety of adverse neonatal outcomes The authors would like to
MD: mean difference
and has not shown evidence of harm. acknowledge the contributions to
RCT: randomized controlled trial
This safe, low-cost intervention data abstraction and referencing
RR: relative risk
has the potential to prevent many by Stacie Constantian, Tobi
SMD: standardized mean
complications associated with Skotnes, Ilana Bergelson, Rodrigo
difference
preterm birth and may also provide Kuromoto and Eduardo Toledo.
SSC: skin-to-skin contact
benefits to full-term newborns. The We acknowledge Kate Lobner
WPRIM: Western Pacific Region
consistency of these findings across for developing the search
Index Medicus
study settings and infant populations strategy.

instruments, conducted the literature review, coordinated and supervised data collection and analyses, and critically reviewed the manuscript; and all authors
approved the final manuscript as submitted.
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2015-2238
Accepted for publication Oct 20, 2015
Address correspondence to Grace J. Chan, MD, MPH, PhD, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail: [Link]@childrens.
[Link]
PEDIATRICS (ISSN Numbers: Print, 0031-4005; Online, 1098-4275).
Copyright © 2016 by the American Academy of Pediatrics
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.
FUNDING: This study was supported by the Saving Newborn Lives initiative (SNL) of Save the Children. Dr Boundy received support from training grant
T32HD060454 in reproductive, perinatal, and pediatric epidemiology from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of
Health, and training grant T76MC00001 from the Maternal and Child Health Bureau. Funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

REFERENCES
1. Lawn JE, Cousens S, Zupan J; Lancet at: [Link]/mediacentre/ 6. World Health Organization Department
Neonatal Survival Steering Team. 4 factsheets/fs363/en/. Accessed of Reproductive Health and Research.
million neonatal deaths: when? Where? December 17, 2014 Kangaroo Mother Care: A Practical
Why? Lancet. 2005;365(9462): Guide. Geneva, Switzerland: World
891–900 4. United Nations Children’s Fund and Health Organization; 2003
World Health Organization. Low
2. Bryce J, Black RE, Victora CG. Birthweight: Country, Regional and 7. Lawn JE, Mwansa-Kambafwile J,
Millennium Development Goals 4 and Global Estimates. New York, NY: UNICEF; Horta BL, Barros FC, Cousens S.
5: progress and challenges. BMC Med. 2004 ‘Kangaroo mother care’ to prevent
2013;11:225 neonatal deaths due to preterm
5. Charpak N, Ruiz JG, Zupan J, et al. birth complications. Int J
3. World Health Organization. Preterm Kangaroo Mother Care: 25 years after. Epidemiol. 2010;39(Suppl 1):
birth fact sheet no. 363. 2014 Available Acta Paediatr. 2005;94(5):514–522 i144–i154

PEDIATRICS Volume 137, number 1, January 2016 11


8. Conde-Agudelo A, Díaz-Rossello JL. birth weight babies at a tertiary low birth weight infants. Acta Paediatr.
Kangaroo mother care to reduce level hospital. J Nepal Paediatr Soci. 2012;101(12):e545–e549
morbidity and mortality in low 2014;34(1):18–23
28. Boo NY, Jamli FM. Short duration of
birthweight infants. Cochrane 19. Almeida CM, Almeida AFN, Forti EMP. skin-to-skin contact: effects on growth
Database Syst Rev. 2011;3:CD002771 Effects of kangaroo mother care and breastfeeding. J Paediatr Child
9. Moore ER, Anderson GC, Bergman on the vital signs of low-weight Health. 2007;43(12):831–836
N. Early skin-to-skin contact for preterm newborns. Braz J Phys Ther.
29. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying
mothers and their healthy newborn 2007;11(1):1–5
heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat
infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
20. Almeida H, Venancio SI, Sanches MT, Med. 2002;21(11):1539–1558
2007;3:CD003519
Onuki D. The impact of kangaroo care
30. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks
10. Johnston CC-Y, Fernandes A, Inglis D, on exclusive breastfeeding in low birth
JJ, Altman DG. Measuring
Streiner D, Zee R. Skin-to-skin care for weight newborns. J Pediatr (Rio J).
inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ.
procedural pain in neonates. Cochrane 2010;86(3):250–253
2003;327(7414):557–560
Database Syst Rev. 2014;1:CD008435
21. Bohnhorst B, Heyne T, Peter CS,
31. World Bank. Data: country and
11. Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane Poets CF. Skin-to-skin (kangaroo)
lending groups. 2014. Available at:
Handbook for Systematic Reviews of care, respiratory control, and
[Link]
Interventions. London, England: The thermoregulation. J Pediatr.
country-and-lending-groups
Cochrane Collaboration; 2011 2001;138(2):193–197
12. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis 32. UN Inter-agency Group for Childhood
22. Lyngstad LT, Tandberg BS, Storm H,
in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. Mortality Estimation. (UNICEF, WHO,
Ekeberg BL, Moen A. Does skin-to-skin
1986;7(3):177–188 World Bank, UN DESA Population
contact reduce stress during diaper
Division). Data: mortality rate,
13. Karlsson V, Heinemann AB, Sjörs change in preterm infants? Early Hum
neonatal (per 1000 live births). 2014.
G, Nykvist KH, Agren J. Early skin- Dev. 2014;90(4):169–172
Available at: [Link]
to-skin care in extremely preterm 23. Priya JJ. Kangaroo care for low indicator/[Link]
infants: thermal balance and birth weight babies. Nurs J India.
care environment. J Pediatr. 33. Miettinen O. Theoretical Epidemiology:
2004;95(9):209–212
2012;161(3):422–426 Principles of Occurrence Research in
24. Saeidi R, Asnaashari Z, Amirnejad Medicine. New York, NY: John Wiley &
14. Broughton EI, Gomez I, Sanchez M, Esmaeili H, Robatsangi MG. Use Sons; 1985
N, Vindell C. The cost-savings of of “kangaroo care” to alleviate
implementing kangaroo mother 34. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider
the intensity of vaccination pain
care in Nicaragua. Rev Panam Salud M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis
in newborns. Iran J Pediatr.
Publica. 2013;34(3):176–182 detected by a simple, graphical test.
2011;21(1):99–102
BMJ. 1997;315(7109):629–634
15. Eka Pratiwi IGAP. Soetjiningsih, Made 25. Singh A, Yadav A, Singh A. Utilization of
Kardana I. Effect of kangaroo method 35. Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating
postnatal care for newborns and its
on the risk of hypothermia and characteristics of a rank correlation
association with neonatal mortality
duration of birth weight regain in low test for publication bias. Biometrics.
in India: an analytical appraisal.
birth weight infants: a randomized 1994;50(4):1088–1101
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth.
controlled trial. Paediatr Indones. 2012;12:33 36. Nimbalkar SM, Patel VK, Patel DV,
2009;49:253–258 Nimbalkar AS, Sethi A, Phatak A. Effect
26. Toma TS, Venâncio SI, Andretto DDA. of early skin-to-skin contact following
16. Azevedo VMGO, David RB, Xavier CC. Maternal perception of low birth
Kangaroo mother care in preterm normal delivery on incidence of
weight babies before and following hypothermia in neonates more than
newborns on artificial ventilation: the implementation of the kangaroo
an evaluation of behavior patterns. 1800 g: randomized control trial. J
mother care in a public hospital, in Perinatol. 2014;34(5):364–368
Cuidado mãe canguru em recém- the city of São Paulo, Brazil. Percepção
nascidospré-termo sob suporte das mães sobre o cuidado do bebê de 37. Gray L, Watt L, Blass EM. Skin-to-
ventilatório: avaliação dos estados baixo peso antes e após implantação skin contact is analgesic in healthy
comportamentais. Rev Bras Saude do método mãe-canguru em hospital newborns. Pediatrics. 2000;105(1
Mater Infant. 2011;11(2):133–138 público da cidade de São Paulo, II):110–111
17. Kambarami RA, Chidede O, Kowo DT. Brasil. Rev Bras Saude Mater Infant. 38. Mörelius E, Theodorsson E, Nelson N.
Kangaroo care versus incubator care 2007;7(3):297–307 Salivary cortisol and mood and pain
in the management of well preterm 27. Ghavane S, Murki S, Subramanian S, profiles during skin-to-skin care for
infants--a pilot study. Ann Trop Gaddam P, Kandraju H, Thumalla S. an unselected group of mothers and
Paediatr. 1998;18(2):81–86 Kangaroo Mother Care in Kangaroo infants in neonatal intensive care.
18. Acharya N, Singh RR, Bhatta NK, ward for improving the growth Pediatrics. 2005;116(5):1105–1113
Poudel P. Randomized control trial and breastfeeding outcomes when 39. Bigelow A, Power M, MacLellan-
of kangaroo mother care in low reaching term gestational age in very Peters J, Alex M, McDonald C. Effect

12 BOUNDY et al
of mother/infant skin-to-skin contact 50. Ahmed S, Mitra SN, Chowdhury AM, method of care for stabilised
on postpartum depressive symptoms Camacho LL, Winikoff B, Sloan NL. low-birthweight infants. Lancet.
and maternal physiological stress. Community Kangaroo Mother Care: 1994;344(8925):782–785
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. implementation and potential for 61. Whitelaw A, Heisterkamp G, Sleath
2012;41(3):369–382 neonatal survival and health in very K, Acolet D, Richards M. Skin to skin
40. Ludington-Hoe SM, Hosseini R, low-income settings. J Perinatol. contact for very low birthweight
Torowicz DL. Skin-to-skin contact 2011;31(5):361–367 infants and their mothers. Arch Dis
(Kangaroo Care) analgesia for preterm 51. Blay S. Ghana KMC study results Child. 1988;63(11):1377–1381
infant heel stick. AACN Clin Issues. [program report]. 2009
62. Thukral A, Sankar MJ, Agarwal R,
2005;16(3):373–387 52. Kadam S, Binoy S, Kanbur W, Mondkar Gupta N, Deorari AK, Paul VK. Early
41. Ferber SG, Makhoul IR. JA, Fernandez A. Feasibility of kangaroo skin-to-skin contact and breast-
Neurobehavioural assessment of mother care in Mumbai. Indian J feeding behavior in term neonates:
skin-to-skin effects on reaction to pain Pediatr. 2005;72(1):35–38 a randomized controlled trial.
in preterm infants: a randomized, 53. McMaster P, Haina T, Vince JD. Neonatology. 2012;102(2):114–119
controlled within-subject trial. Acta Kangaroo care in Port Moresby, 63. Marín Gabriel MA, Llana Martín I,
Paediatr. 2008;97(2):171–176 Papua New Guinea. Trop Doct. López Escobar A, Fernández Villalba
42. Campbell-Yeo M, Johnston C, Benoit B, 2000;30(3):136–138 E, Romero Blanco I, Touza Pol P.
et al. Trial of repeated analgesia with 54. Pattinson RC, Bergh AM, Malan AF, Randomized controlled trial of early
Kangaroo Mother Care (TRAKC Trial). Prinsloo R. Does kangaroo mother skin-to-skin contact: effects on
BMC Pediatr. 2013;13:182 care save lives? J Trop Pediatr. the mother and the newborn. Acta
2006;52(6):438–441 Paediatr. 2010;99(11):1630–1634
43. van Zanten HA, Havenaar AJ, Stigt HJH,
Ligthart PAH, Walther FJ. The kangaroo 55. Sloan NL, Ahmed S, Mitra SN, 64. Heidarzadeh M, Hosseini MB,
method is safe for premature infants et al. Community-based kangaroo Ershadmanesh M, Gholamitabar Tabari
under 30 weeks of gestation during mother care to prevent neonatal M, Khazaee S. The effect of kangaroo
ventilatory support. J Neonatal Nurs. and infant mortality: a randomized, mother care (KMC) on breast feeding
2007;13(5):186–190 controlled cluster trial. Pediatrics. at the time of NICU discharge. Iran Red
2008;121(5):e1047–e1059 www. Crescent Med J. 2013;15(4):302–306
44. Ludington-Hoe SM, Swinth JY. Kangaroo
[Link]/cgi/content/full/121/5/
mother care during phototherapy: 65. Ali SMSJ, Sharma R, Alam S.
e1047
effect on bilirubin profile. Neonatal Kangaroo mother care as compared
Netw. 2001;20(5):41–48 56. Charpak N, Ruiz-Peláez JG, Charpak to conventional care for low
Y. Rey-Martinez Kangaroo Mother birth weight babies. Dicle Med J.
45. Suzuki S. Effect of early skin-to-skin Program: an alternative way of caring 2009;36(3):155–160
contact on breast-feeding. J Obstet for low birth weight infants? One
Gynaecol. 2013;33(7):695–696 year mortality in a two cohort study. 66. Bramson L, Lee JW, Moore E,
Pediatrics. 1994;94(6 Pt 1):804–810 et al. Effect of early skin-to-skin
46. Charpak N, Ruiz-Pelaez JG, Figueroa
mother--infant contact during the
de C Z, Charpak Y. A randomized, 57. Worku B, Kassie A. Kangaroo mother first 3 hours following birth on
controlled trial of kangaroo mother care: a randomized controlled trial on exclusive breastfeeding during the
care: results of follow-up at 1 effectiveness of early kangaroo mother maternity hospital stay. J Hum Lact.
year of corrected age. Pediatrics. care for the low birthweight infants in 2010;26(2):130–137
2001;108(5):1072–1079 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. J Trop Pediatr.
2005;51(2):93–97 67. Charpak N, Ruiz-Peláez JG, Figueroa
47. Lincetto O, Nazir AI, Cattaneo
de C Z, Charpak Y. Kangaroo mother
A. Kangaroo mother care with 58. Rojas MA, Kaplan M, Quevedo M, et al. versus traditional care for newborn
limited resources. J Trop Pediatr. Somatic growth of preterm infants infants
2000;46(5):293–295 during skin-to-skin care versus
traditional holding: a randomized, 68. Gregson S, Blacker J. Kangaroo care
48. Suman RP, Udani R, Nanavati R.
controlled trial. J Dev Behav Pediatr. in pre-term or low birth weight babies
Kangaroo mother care for low
2003;24(3):163–168 in a postnatal ward. Br J Midwifery.
birth weight infants: a randomized
2011;19(9):568–577
controlled trial. Indian Pediatr. 59. Cattaneo A, Davanzo R, Worku B,
2008;45(1):17–23 et al. Kangaroo mother care for low 69. Hake-Brooks SJ, Anderson GC.
birthweight infants: a randomized Kangaroo care and breastfeeding of
49. Lamy Filho F, Silva AA, Lamy ZC, Gomes
controlled trial in different settings. mother-preterm infant dyads 0-18
MA, Moreira ME; Grupo de Avaliação do
Acta Paediatr. 1998;87(9):976–985 months: a randomized, controlled trial.
Método Canguru; Rede Brasileira de
Neonatal Netw. 2008;27(3):151–159
Pesquisas Neonatais. Evaluation of the 60. Sloan NL, Camacho LW, Rojas EP, Stern
neonatal outcomes of the kangaroo C; Maternidad Isidro Ayora Study Team. 70. Niela-Vilén H, Axelin A, Salanterä S,
mother method in Brazil. J Pediatr (Rio Kangaroo mother method: randomised et al. Early physical contact between
J). 2008;84(5):428–435 controlled trial of an alternative a mother and her NICU-infant in

PEDIATRICS Volume 137, number 1, January 2016 13


two university hospitals in Finland. contact during the first weeks of life. aplicação do método mãe-canguru.
Midwifery. 2013;29(12):1321–1330 Acta Paediatr. 2010;99(8):1145–1149 Evaluation of physiological parameters
in preterm newborns with low weight
71. Wahlberg V, Affonso DD, Persson B. A 80. Bauer J, Sontheimer D, Fischer C,
before and after application of the
retrospective, comparative study using Linderkamp O. Metabolic rate and
kangaroo mother care. Fisioter Bras.
the kangaroo method as a complement energy balance in very low birth
2010;11(1):44–48
to the standard incubator care. Eur J weight infants during kangaroo
Public Health. 1992;2(1):34–37 holding by their mothers and fathers. J 89. Lee J, Bang KS. The effects of kangaroo
72. Carfoot S, Williamson PR, Dickson Pediatr. 1996;129(4):608–611 care on maternal self-esteem and
R. The value of a pilot study in premature infants’ physiological
81. Begum EA, Bonno M, Ohtani N, et al.
breast-feeding research. Midwifery. stability. Korean J Women Health Nurs.
Cerebral oxygenation responses
2004;20(2):188–193 2011;17(5):454–462
during kangaroo care in low birth
73. Ramanathan K, Paul VK, Deorari weight infants. BMC Pediatr. 2008;8:51 90. Messmer PR, Rodriguez S, Adams
AK, Taneja U, George G. Kangaroo J, et al. Effect of kangaroo care on
82. Bergström A, Okong P, Ransjö-
Mother Care in very low birth sleep time for neonates. Pediatr Nurs.
Arvidson AB. Immediate maternal
weight infants. Indian J Pediatr. 1997;23(4):408–414
thermal response to skin-to-skin
2001;68(11):1019–1023 care of newborn. Acta Paediatr. 91. Feldman R, Eidelman AI. Skin-to-skin
74. Acosta Díaz R, Piña Borrego CE, 2007;96(5):655–658 contact (Kangaroo Care) accelerates
Acosta González LR, López Fernández autonomic and neurobehavioural
83. Boju SL, Gopi Krishna M, Uppala R,
L. Método piel a piel. Evaluación maturation in preterm infants. Dev
Chodavarapu P, Chodavarapu R. Short
del neurocomportamiento hasta el Med Child Neurol. 2003;45(4):
spell kangaroo mother care and its
año de edad corregida kangaroo 274–281
differential physiological influence in
mother care method. Evaluation of
subgroups of preterm babies. J Trop 92. Sajedi F, Kashaninia Z, Rahgozar M,
the neurodevelopment at first year of
Pediatr. 2012;58(3):189–193 Noghabi FA. The effect of kangaroo
corrected age. Rev Cubana Pediatr.
care on physiologic responses to
2003;75(3) 84. Collados-Gómez L, Aragonés-Corral pain of an intramuscular injection
B, Contreras-Olivares I, García-Feced in neonates. Iran J Pediatr.
75. Park HK, Choi BS, Lee SJ, Son IA, Seol
E, Vila-Piqueras ME. [Assessing 2007;17(4):339–344
IJ, Lee HJ. Practical application of
the impact of kangaroo care on
kangaroo mother care in preterm
preterm infant stress]. Enferm Clin. 93. Heimann K, Jergus K, Abbas AK,
infants: clinical characteristics and
2011;21(2):69–74 Heussen N, Leonhardt S, Orlikowsky
safety of kangaroo mother care. J
T. Infrared thermography for detailed
Perinat Med. 2014;42(2):239–245 85. Legault M, Goulet C. Comparison of registration of thermoregulation in
76. Sakaki H, Nishioka M, Kanda K, kangaroo and traditional methods premature infants. J Perinat Med.
Takahashi Y. An investigation of of removing preterm infants from 2013;41(5):613–620
the risk factors for infection with incubators. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Nurs. 1995;24(6):501–506 94. Ludington-Hoe SM, Nguyen N, Swinth
aureus among patients in a neonatal JY, Satyshur RD. Kangaroo care
86. Ludington-Hoe SM, Anderson GC, compared to incubators in maintaining
intensive care unit. Am J Infect Control. Swinth JY, Thompson C, Hadeed
2009;37(7):580–586 body warmth in preterm infants. Biol
AJ. Randomized controlled trial of Res Nurs. 2000;2(1):60–73
77. Mohammed El-Nagger NS, Abed El-Azim kangaroo care: cardiorespiratory
H, Mahmoud Zaki Hassan S. Effect of and thermal effects on healthy 95. Keshavarz M, Haghighi NB. Effects
kangaroo mother care on premature preterm infants. Neonatal Netw. of kangaroo contact on some
infants’ physiological, behavioral 2004;23(3):39–48 physiological parameters in term
and psychosocial outcomes in Ain neonates and pain score in mothers
87. Miltersteiner AR, Miltersteiner with cesarean section. Koomesh.
Shams Maternity and Gynecological DR, Rech VV, Molle LD. Respostas
Hospital, Cairo, Egypt. Life Sci J. 2010;11(2):91–99
fisiológicas da posição mãe-canguru
2013;10(1):703–716 em bebês pré-termos, de baixo peso 96. Mahmood I, Jamal M, Khan N.
78. Ibe OE, Austin T, Sullivan K, Fabanwo e ventilando espontaneamente. Effect of mother-infant early skin-
O, Disu E, Costello AM. A comparison Physiological responses of the to-skin contact on breastfeeding
of kangaroo mother care and kangaroo mother position in low status: a randomized controlled
conventional incubator care for birth weight, spontaneous ventilating trial. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak.
thermal regulation of infants <2000 premature babies. Rev Bras Saude 2011;21(10):601–605
g in Nigeria using continuous Mater Infant. 2003;3(4):447–455
97. Aghdas K, Talat K, Sepideh B. Effect
ambulatory temperature monitoring.
88. Tenório EAM, Mota GC, Gutierres of immediate and continuous
Ann Trop Paediatr. 2004;24(3):245–251
SB, et al. Avaliação dos parâmetros mother-infant skin-to-skin contact
79. Maastrup R, Greisen G. Extremely fisiológicos em recém-nascidos pré- on breastfeeding self-efficacy of
preterm infants tolerate skin-to-skin termos de baixo peso antes e após a primiparous women: a randomised

14 BOUNDY et al
control trial. Women Birth. 107. Mitchell AJ, Yates CC, Williams DK, Mother Care: four years of experience
2014;27(1):37–40 Chang JY, Hall RW. Does daily kangaroo in very low birth weight and
care provide sustained pain and stress preterm infants. Minerva Pediatr.
98. Ahn HY, Lee J, Shin HJ. Kangaroo care
relief in preterm infants? J Neonatal 2012;64(4):377–383
on premature infant growth and
Perinatal Med. 2013;6(1):45–52
maternal attachment and post-partum 118. Bier JAB, Ferguson AE, Morales Y,
depression in South Korea. J Trop 108. Nanavati RN, Balan R, Kabra NS. Effect et al. Comparison of skin-to-skin
Pediatr. 2010;56(5):342–344 of kangaroo mother care vs expressed contact with standard contact in
breast milk administration on pain low-birth-weight infants who are
99. Rodrigues MAG, Cano MAT. Estudo
associated with removal of adhesive breast-fed. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med.
do ganho de peso e duração da
tape in very low birth weight neonates: 1996;150(12):1265–1269
internação do recém-nascido pré-
a randomized controlled trial. Indian
termo de baixo peso com a utilização 119. Furman L, Minich N, Hack M. Correlates
Pediatr. 2013;50(11):1011–1015
do método canguru. Trial gain of of lactation in mothers of very low
weight and hospital length stay 109. Nimbalkar SM, Chaudhary NS, Gadhavi birth weight infants. Pediatrics.
of the low birth weight preterm KV, Phatak A. Kangaroo Mother Care 2002;109(4):e57 [Link]/
infant in assistance for kangaroo in reducing pain in preterm neonates cgi/content/full/109/4/e57
mother care. Rev Eletrônica Enferm. on heel prick. Indian J Pediatr.
2009;8(2):185–191 2013;80(1):6–10 120. Tessier R, Cristo M, Velez S, et al.
Kangaroo mother care and the
100. Roberts KL, Paynter C, McEwan B. 110. Schneider C, Charpak N, Ruiz-Peláez JG, bonding hypothesis. Pediatrics.
A comparison of kangaroo mother Tessier R. Cerebral motor function in 1998;102(2):e17 [Link]/
care and conventional cuddling care. very premature-at-birth adolescents: cgi/content/full/102/2/e17
Neonatal Netw. 2000;19(4):31–35 a brain stimulation exploration of
kangaroo mother care effects. Acta 121. Acosta Díaz R, Brito Miliáns L, Miliáns
101. Castral TC, Warnock F, Leite AM, Haas Uriarte RD, Morera Betancourt O.
Paediatr. 2012;101(10):1045–1053
VJ, Scochi CGS. The effects of skin- Método piel a piel. Repercusión sobre
to-skin contact during acute pain 111. Kostandy RR, Ludington-Hoe SM, Cong el desarrollo físico-intelectual a la
in preterm newborns. Eur J Pain. X, et al. Kangaroo Care (skin contact) edad preescolar. Kangaroo mother
2008;12(4):464–471 reduces crying response to pain in care method. Impact on the physical
preterm neonates: pilot results. Pain and intellectual development at
102. Chermont AG, Falcão LFM, de Souza Manag Nurs. 2008;9(2):55–65
Silva EH, de Cássia Xavier Balda R, preschool age. Rev Cubana Pediatr.
Guinsburg R. Skin-to-skin contact and/ 112. Saeedi R, Asnaashri Z, Amirinejad 2003;75(3)
or oral 25% dextrose for procedural M, Esmaili H. Effect of kangaroo
122. Stevens B, Johnston C, Petryshen P,
pain relief for term newborn infants. care method on the pain intensity of
Taddio A. Premature Infant Pain Profile:
Pediatrics. 2009;124(6):e1101–e1107 vaccination in newborns. Journal of
development and initial validation. Clin
[Link]/cgi/content/full/ Sabzevar School of Medical Sciences.
J Pain. 1996;12(1):13–22
124/6/e1101 2011;13(4):172–177
113. Kashaninia Z, Sajedi F, Rahgozar M, 123. Lawrence J, Alcock D, McGrath P,
103. Chidambaram AG, Manjula S, Kay J, MacMurray SB, Dulberg C.
Adhisivam B, Vishnu Bhat B. Effect of Noghabi FA. The effect of Kangaroo
Care on behavioral responses to The development of a tool to assess
kangaroo mother care in reducing neonatal pain. Neonatal Netw.
pain due to heel prick among pain of an intramuscular injection
in neonates. J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 1993;12(6):59–66
preterm neonates: a crossover
trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008;13(4):275–280 124. Grunau RV, Craig KD. Pain expression
2014;27(5):488–490 114. Cong X, Ludington-Hoe SM, McCain in neonates: facial action and cry. Pain.
G, Fu P. Kangaroo Care modifies 1987;28(3):395–410
104. Freire NB, Garcia JB, Lamy ZC.
Evaluation of analgesic effect of skin- preterm infant heart rate variability in 125. Christensson K, Bhat GJ, Amadi BC,
to-skin contact compared to oral response to heel stick pain: pilot study. Eriksson B, Höjer B. Randomised study
glucose in preterm neonates. Pain. Early Hum Dev. 2009;85(9):561–567 of skin-to-skin versus incubator care
2008;139(1):28–33 115. Neu M, Robinson J. Maternal holding for rewarming low-risk hypothermic
of preterm infants during the early neonates. Lancet. 1998;352(9134):1115
105. Johnston CC, Filion F, Campbell-Yeo
M, et al. Kangaroo mother care weeks after birth and dyad interaction 126. Cong X, Cusson RM, Walsh S, Hussain N,
diminishes pain from heel lance in at six months. J Obstet Gynecol Ludington-Hoe SM, Zhang D. Effects of
very preterm neonates: a crossover Neonatal Nurs. 2010;39(4):401–414 skin-to-skin contact on autonomic pain
trial. BMC Pediatr. 2008;8:13 116. Gathwala G, Singh B, Balhara B. KMC responses in preterm infants. J Pain.
facilitates mother baby attachment 2012;13(7):636–645
106. Marín Gabriel MA, López Escobar A,
Galán Redondo M, et al. [Evaluation of in low birth weight infants. Indian J 127. Dageville C, Pignol J, De Smet S.
pain in a neonatal intensive care unit Pediatr. 2008;75(1):43–47 Very early neonatal apparent life-
during endocrine-metabolic tests]. An 117. Tuoni C, Scaramuzzo RT, Ghirri P, threatening events and sudden
Pediatr (Barc). 2008;69(4):316–321 Boldrini A, Bartalena L. Kangaroo unexpected deaths: incidence

PEDIATRICS Volume 137, number 1, January 2016 15


and risk factors. Acta Paediatr. 136. Nimbalkar SM, Tandon R, Chaudhary preliminary study. Clin Neurophysiol.
2008;97(7):866–869 NS. Reduced duration of CPAP in 2013;124(2):238–246
128. Mitchell AJYC, Yates C, Williams K, Hall preterm babies receiving kangaroo 144. Saeidi R, Tafazoli M, Robatsangi
RW. Effects of daily kangaroo care care within an hour of birth: MG. Kangaroo mother care for
on cardiorespiratory parameters in randomized trial. Arch Dis Child. infantile colic: a randomized
preterm infants. J Neonatal Perinatal 2012;97:A512 clinical trial. Tehran Univ Med J.
Med. 2013;6(3):243–249 137. Samra NM, El Taweel A, Cadwell K. 2010;67(12):870–875
129. Abouelfettoh A, Ludington-Hoe SM, The effect of kangaroo mother care
145. Tessier R, Cristo MB, Velez S, et al.
Burant CJ, Visscher MO. Effect of on the duration of phototherapy of
Kangaroo mother care: a method
skin-to-skin contact on preterm infant infants re-admitted for neonatal
for protecting high-risk low-birth
skin barrier function and hospital- jaundice. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med.
weight and premature infants against
acquired infection. J Clin Med Res. 2012;25(8):1354–1357
developmental delay. Infant Behav Dev.
2011;3(1):36–46 138. Weller A, Rozin A, Goldstein A, et 2003;26(3):384–397
130. Tessier R, Charpak N, Giron M, al. Longitudinal assessment of
146. Scher MS, Ludington-Hoe S, Kaffashi F,
Cristo M, de Calume ZF, Ruiz-Peláez pituitary-thyroid axis and adrenal
Johnson MW, Holditch-Davis D, Loparo
JG. Kangaroo Mother Care, home function in preterm infants raised by
KA. Neurophysiologic assessment
environment and father involvement ‘kangaroo mother care’. Horm Res.
of brain maturation after an 8-week
in the first year of life: a randomized 2002;57(1-2):22–26
trial of skin-to-skin contact on
controlled study. Acta Paediatr. 139. Anderson GC, Chiu SH, Dombrowski MA, preterm infants. Clin Neurophysiol.
2009;98(9):1444–1450 Swinth JY, Albert JM, Wada N. Mother- 2009;120(10):1812–1818
131. Vesel L, ten Asbroek AH, Manu A, newborn contact in a randomized
trial of kangaroo (skin-to-skin) care. 147. Morgan BE, Horn AR, Bergman NJ.
et al. Promoting skin-to-skin care
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. Should neonates sleep alone? Biol
for low birthweight babies: findings
2003;32(5):604–611 Psychiatry. 2011;70(9):817–825
from the Ghana Newhints cluster-
randomised trial. Trop Med Int Health. 140. Constantinou JC, Adamson-Macedo EN, 148. Neu M, Robinson J, Schmiege SJ.
2013;18(8):952–961 Stevenson DK, Mirmiran M, Fleisher Influence of holding practice on
BE. Effects of skin-to-skin holding on preterm infant development.
132. Bergman NJ, Linley LL, Fawcus
general movements of preterm infants. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs.
SR. Randomized controlled trial
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1999;38(8): 2013;38(3):136–143
of skin-to-skin contact from birth
versus conventional incubator for 467–471 149. Bera A, Ghosh J, Singh AK, Hazra A,
physiological stabilization in 1200- to 141. Acosta Díaz R, Vara Cuesta OL, Fuentes Mukherjee S, Mukherjee R. Effect of
2199-gram newborns. Acta Paediatr. Guerra JM, Iglesias Castro D, Piloña kangaroo mother care on growth
2004;93(6):779–785 Ruiz S. Método piel a piel. Evaluación and development of low birthweight
133. Azevedo VM, Xavier CC, Gontijo FO. clínica-humoral durante el primer año babies up to 12 months of age: a
Safety of Kangaroo Mother Care in de edad corregida Kangaroo mother controlled clinical trial. Acta Paediatr.
intubated neonates under 1500 g. J care method. Clinical and humoral 2014;103(6):643–650
Trop Pediatr. 2012;58(1):38–42 assessment during the first year of 150. Miles R, Cowan F, Glover V, Stevenson
corrected age. Rev Cubana Pediatr. J, Modi N. A controlled trial of
134. Carbasse A, Kracher S, Hausser M, et
2003;75(3) skin-to-skin contact in extremely
al. Safety and effectiveness of skin-
to-skin contact in the NICU to support 142. Ohgi S, Fukuda M, Moriuchi H, preterm infants. Early Hum Dev.
neurodevelopment in vulnerable et al. Comparison of kangaroo care 2006;82(7):447–455
preterm infants. J Perinat Neonatal and standard care: behavioral
151. Andrade ISND, Guedes ZCF. Sucção
Nurs. 2013;27(3):255–262 organization, development, and
do recém-nascido prematuro:
temperament in healthy, low-birth-
135. Entringer AP, Gomes MA, Pinto M, comparação do método mãe-canguru
weight infants through 1 year. J
Caetano R, Magluta C, Lamy ZC. com os cuidados tradicionais. Suckling
Perinatol. 2002;22(5):374–379
[Cost analysis of hospital care for of the premature newborn child:
newborns at risk: comparison of an 143. Kaffashi F, Scher MS, Ludington- comparison between the kangaroo
Intermediate Neonatal Care Unit and Hoe SM, Loparo KA. An analysis of mother method with traditional
a Kangaroo Unit]. Cad Saude Publica. the kangaroo care intervention care. Rev Bras Saude Mater Infant.
2013;29(6):1205–1216 using neonatal EEG complexity: a 2005;5(1):61–69

16 BOUNDY et al

You might also like