Political science

The examples and perspective in this article

deal primarily with the United States and domore
Learn not

Political science is a social science

which deals with systems of governance,
and the analysis of political activities,
political thoughts, and political
behavior.[1] It deals extensively with the
theory and practice of politics which is
commonly thought of as determining of
the distribution of power and resources.
Political scientists "see themselves
engaged in revealing the relationships
underlying political events and
conditions, and from these revelations
they attempt to construct general
principles about the way the world of
politics works."[2]

Political science—occasionally called

politicology—comprises numerous
subfields, including comparative politics,
political economy, international relations,
political theory, public administration,
public policy, and political methodology.
Furthermore, political science is related
to, and draws upon, the fields of
economics, law, sociology, history,
philosophy, geography,
psychology/psychiatry, and
anthropology.

Comparative politics is the science of

comparison and teaching of different
types of constitutions, political actors,
legislature and associated fields, all of
them from an intrastate perspective.
International relations deals with the
interaction between nation-states as well
as intergovernmental and transnational
organizations. Political theory is more
concerned with contributions of various
classical and contemporary thinkers and
philosophers.

Political science is methodologically

diverse and appropriates many methods
originating in social research.
Approaches include positivism,
interpretivism, rational choice theory,
behaviouralism, structuralism, post-
structuralism, realism, institutionalism,
and pluralism. Political science, as one of
the social sciences, uses methods and
techniques that relate to the kinds of
inquiries sought: primary sources such
as historical documents and official
records, secondary sources such as
scholarly journal articles, survey
research, statistical analysis, case
studies, experimental research, and
model building.

Overview
Political scientists study matters
concerning the allocation and transfer of
power in decision making, the roles and
systems of governance including
governments and international
organizations, political behaviour and
public policies. They measure the
success of governance and specific
policies by examining many factors,
including stability, justice, material
wealth, peace and public health. Some
political scientists seek to advance
positive (attempt to describe how things
are, as opposed to how they should be)
theses by analysing politics. Others
advance normative theses, by making
specific policy recommendations.
Political scientists provide the
frameworks from which journalists,
special interest groups, politicians, and
the electorate analyse issues. According
to Chaturvedy,

Political scientists may serve

as advisers to specific
politicians, or even run for
office as politicians themselves.
Political scientists can be found
working in governments, in
political parties or as civil
servants. They may be involved
with non-governmental
organizations (NGOs) or
 political movements. In a
variety of capacities, people
educated and trained in
political science can add value
and expertise to corporations.
Private enterprises such as
think tanks, research
institutes, polling and public
relations firms often employ
political scientists.[3]

In the United States, political scientists

known as "Americanists" look at a variety
of data including constitutional
development, elections, public opinion,
and public policy such as Social Security
reform, foreign policy, US Congressional
committees, and the US Supreme
Court — to name only a few issues.

Because political science is essentially a

study of human behaviour, in all aspects
of politics, observations in controlled
environments are often challenging to
reproduce or duplicate, though
experimental methods are increasingly
common (see experimental political
science).[4] Citing this difficulty, former
American Political Science Association
President Lawrence Lowell once said
"We are limited by the impossibility of
experiment. Politics is an observational,
not an experimental science."[5] Because
of this, political scientists have
historically observed political elites,
institutions, and individual or group
behaviour in order to identify patterns,
draw generalizations, and build theories
of politics.

Like all social sciences, political science

faces the difficulty of observing human
actors that can only be partially observed
and who have the capacity for making
conscious choices unlike other subjects
such as non-human organisms in biology
or inanimate objects as in physics.
Despite the complexities, contemporary
political science has progressed by
adopting a variety of methods and
theoretical approaches to understanding
politics and methodological pluralism is
a defining feature of contemporary
political science.

The advent of political science as a

university discipline was marked by the
creation of university departments and
chairs with the title of political science
arising in the late 19th century. In fact,
the designation "political scientist" is
typically for those with a doctorate in the
field, but can also apply to those with a
master's in the subject.[6] Integrating
political studies of the past into a unified
discipline is ongoing, and the history of
political science has provided a rich field
for the growth of both normative and
positive political science, with each part
of the discipline sharing some historical
predecessors. The American Political
Science Association and the American
Political Science Review were founded in
1903 and 1906, respectively, in an effort
to distinguish the study of politics from
economics and other social phenomena.

Behavioural revolution and

new institutionalism

In the 1950s and the 1960s, a

behavioural revolution stressing the
systematic and rigorously scientific study
of individual and group behaviour swept
the discipline. A focus on studying
political behaviour, rather than
institutions or interpretation of legal
texts, characterized early behavioural
political science, including work by
Robert Dahl, Philip Converse, and in the
collaboration between sociologist Paul
Lazarsfeld and public opinion scholar
Bernard Berelson.

The late 1960s and early 1970s

witnessed a take off in the use of
deductive, game theoretic formal
modelling techniques aimed at
generating a more analytical corpus of
knowledge in the discipline. This period
saw a surge of research that borrowed
theory and methods from economics to
study political institutions, such as the
United States Congress, as well as
political behaviour, such as voting.
William H. Riker and his colleagues and
students at the University of Rochester
were the main proponents of this shift.

Despite considerable research progress

in the discipline based on all the kinds of
scholarship discussed above, it has been
observed that progress toward
systematic theory has been modest and
uneven.[7]

Anticipating of crises
The theory of political transitions,[8] and
the methods of their analysis and
anticipating of crises,[9] form an
important part of political science.
Several general indicators of crises and
methods were proposed for anticipating
critical transitions.[10] Among them, a
statistical indicator of crisis,
simultaneous increase of variance and
correlations in large groups, was
proposed for crises anticipation and
successfully used in various areas.[11] Its
applicability for early diagnosis of
political crises was demonstrated by the
analysis of the prolonged stress period
preceding the 2014 Ukrainian economic
and political crisis. There was a
simultaneous increase in the total
correlation between the 19 major public
fears in the Ukrainian society (by about
64%) and also in their statistical
dispersion (by 29%) during the pre-crisis
years.[12] A feature shared by certain
major revolutions is that they were not
predicted. The theory of apparent
inevitability of crises and revolutions was
also developed.[13]

Political science in the Soviet

Union

In the Soviet Union, political studies were

carried out under the guise of some other
disciplines like theory of state and law,
area studies, international relations,
studies of labor movement, "critique of
bourgeois theories", etc. Soviet scholars
were represented at the International
Political Science Association (IPSA)
since 1955 (since 1960 by the Soviet
Association of Political and State
Studies).

In 1979, the 11th World Congress of IPSA

took place in Moscow. Until the late
years of the Soviet Union, political
science as a field was subjected to tight
control of the Communist Party of the
Soviet Union and was thus subjected to
distrust. Anti-communists accused
political scientists of being "false"
scientists and of having served the old
regime.[14]

After the fall of the Soviet Union, two of

the major institutions dealing with
political science, the Institute of
Contemporary Social Theories and the
Institute of International Affairs, were
disbanded, and most of their members
were left without jobs. These institutes
were victims of the first wave of
anticommunist opinion and ideological
attacks. Today, the Russian Political
Science Association unites professional
political scientists from all around
Russia.
Recent developments

In 2000, the Perestroika Movement in

political science was introduced as a
reaction against what supporters of the
movement called the mathematicization
of political science. Those who identified
with the movement argued for a plurality
of methodologies and approaches in
political science and for more relevance
of the discipline to those outside of it.[15]

Some evolutionary psychology theories

argue that humans have evolved a highly
developed set of psychological
mechanisms for dealing with politics.
However, these mechanisms evolved for
dealing with the small group politics that
characterized the ancestral environment
and not the much larger political
structures in today's world. This is
argued to explain many important
features and systematic cognitive biases
of current politics.[16]

Political science education

Political science, possibly like the social
sciences as a whole, "as a discipline lives
on the fault line between the 'two
cultures' in the academy, the sciences
and the humanities."[17] Thus, in some
American colleges where there is no
separate School or College of Arts and
Sciences per se, political science may be
a separate department housed as part of
a division or school of Humanities or
Liberal Arts.[18] Whereas classical
political philosophy is primarily defined
by a concern for Hellenic and
Enlightenment thought, political
scientists are also marked by a great
concern for "modernity" and the
contemporary nation state, along with
the study of classical thought, and as
such share a greater deal of terminology
with sociologists (e.g. structure and
agency).

Most United States colleges and

universities offer B.A. programs in
political science. M.A. or M.A.T. and
Ph.D. or Ed.D. programs are common at
larger universities. The term political
science is more popular in North America
than elsewhere; other institutions,
especially those outside the United
States, see political science as part of a
broader discipline of political studies,
politics, or government. While political
science implies use of the scientific
method, political studies implies a
broader approach, although the naming
of degree courses does not necessarily
reflect their content.[19] Separate degree
granting programs in international
relations and public policy are not
uncommon at both the undergraduate
and graduate levels. Master's level
programs in political science are
common when political scientists
engage in public administration.[20]

The national honor society for college

and university students of government
and politics in the United States is Pi
Sigma Alpha.

Cognate fields

Most political scientists work broadly in

one or more of the following five areas:

Comparative politics, including area

studies
International relations
 Political philosophy or political theory
Public administration
Public law

Some political science departments also

classify methodology as well as
scholarship on the domestic politics of a
particular country as distinct fields. In the
United States, American politics is often
treated as a separate subfield.

In contrast to this traditional

classification, some academic
departments organize scholarship into
thematic categories, including political
philosophy, political behaviour (including
public opinion, collective action, and
identity), and political institutions
(including legislatures and international
organizations). Political science
conferences and journals often
emphasize scholarship in more specific
categories. The American Political
Science Association, for example, has 42
organized sections that address various
methods and topics of political
inquiry.[21]

Research Methods
Program_Evaluation is a systematic
method for collecting, analyzing, and
using information to answer questions
about projects, policies and programs[22],
particularly about their effectiveness and
efficiency. In both the public and private
sectors, stakeholders often want to know
whether the programs they are funding,
implementing, voting for, receiving or
objecting to are producing the intended
effect. While program evaluation first
focuses around this definition, important
considerations often include how much
the program costs per participant, how
the program could be improved, whether
the program is worthwhile, whether there
are better alternatives, if there are
unintended outcomes, and whether the
program goals are appropriate and
useful.[23]
Policy_analysis is a technique used in
public administration to enable civil
servants, activists, and others to examine
and evaluate the available options to
implement the goals of laws and elected
officials.

History
As a social science, contemporary
political science started to take shape in
the latter half of the 19th century. At that
time it began to separate itself from
political philosophy, which traces its
roots back to the works of Aristotle, and
Plato which were written nearly 2,500
years ago. The term "political science"
was not always distinguished from
political philosophy, and the modern
discipline has a clear set of antecedents
including also moral philosophy, political
economy, political theology, history, and
other fields concerned with normative
determinations of what ought to be and
with deducing the characteristics and
functions of the ideal state.

See also
History of political science
Outline of political science –
structured list of political topics,
arranged by subject area
 Index of politics articles – alphabetical
list of political subjects
Political lists – lists of political topics
Political science terminology
Outline of law
Index of law articles
Process tracing

Notes

References
1. Oxford Dictionary: political science
2. Political Science . The University of
North Carolina at Chapel Hill (22
February 1999). Retrieved on 27 May
2014.
3. Chaturvedy, J.C. (2005). Political
Governance: Political theory . Isha
Books. p. 4. ISBN 978-81-8205-317-
5. Retrieved 28 October 2014.
4. Druckman, James; Green, Donald;
Kuklinski, James; et al., eds. (2011).
Cambridge Handbook of
Experimental Political Science. New
York: Cambridge University Press.
ISBN 978-0-521-17455-8.
5. Lowell, A. Lawrence. 1910. "The
Physiology of Politics." American
Political Science Review 4: 1–15.
6. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S.
Department of Labor. "How to
Become a Political Scientist" .
Retrieved 13 September 2016.
7. Kim Quaile Hill, "In Search of General
Theory," Journal of Politics 74
(October 2012), 917–31.
8. Acemoglu D., Robinson J.A. "A theory
of political transitions." American
Economic Review. 2001 Sep 1:938–
63.
 9. McClelland C.A. "The Anticipation of
International Crises: Prospects for
Theory and Research." International
Studies Quarterly, Vol. 21, No. 1,
Special Issue on International Crisis:
Progress and Prospects for Applied
Forecasting and Management
(March 1977), pp. 15–38
10. Scheffer M., Carpenter S.R., Lenton
T.M., Bascompte J., Brock W., Dakos
V., Van De Koppel J., Van De
Leemput I.A., Levin S.A., Van Nes
E.H., Pascual M. "Anticipating critical
transitions." Science. 2012 Oct 19;
338(6105):344–48.
11. Gorban, A.N.; Smirnova, E.V.; Tyukina,
T.A. (August 2010). "Correlations,
risk and crisis: From physiology to
finance" . Physica A: Statistical
Mechanics and its Applications. 389
(16): 3193–217. arXiv:0905.0129 .
Bibcode:2010PhyA..389.3193G .
doi:10.1016/[Link].2010.03.035 .
12. Rybnikov, S.R.; Rybnikova, N.A.;
Portnov, B.A. (March 2017). "Public
fears in Ukrainian society: Are crises
predictable?" . Psychology &
Developing Societies. 29 (1): 98–
123.
doi:10.1177/0971333616689398 .
13. Kuran T. "Sparks and prairie fires: A
theory of unanticipated political
revolution." Public Choice, Vol. 61,
No. 1 (April 1989), pp. 41–74
14. Political Science in Russia:
Institutionalization of the Discipline
and Development of the Professional
Community
15. Perestroika!: The Raucous Rebellion
in Political Science . Yale University
Press. 30 September 2005.
ISBN 978-0-300-13020-1.
16. Michael Bang Petersen. "The
evolutionary psychology of mass
politics". In Roberts, S.C. (2011).
Roberts, S. Craig (ed.). Applied
Evolutionary Psychology. Oxford
University Press.
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/978019958
6073.001.0001 . ISBN 978-0-19-
958607-3.
17. Stoner, J.R. (22 February 2008).
"Political Science and Political
Education" . Paper presented at the
annual meeting of the APSA
Teaching and Learning Conference
(APSA), San Jose Marriott, San Jose,
California. Archived from the
original on 30 November 2009.
Retrieved 19 October 2011. "…
although one might allege the same
for social science as a whole,
political scientists receive funding
from and play an active role in both
the National Science Foundation and
the National Endowment for the
Humanities [in the United States]."
18. See, e.g., the department of Political
Science at Marist College, part of a
Division of Humanities before that
division became the School of
Liberal Arts (c. 2000).
19. Politics is the term used to refer to
this field by Brandeis University;
Cornell College; University of
California, Santa Cruz; Hendrix
College; Lake Forest College;
Monash University; Mount Holyoke
College; New York University;
Occidental College; Princeton
University; Ursinus College;
Washington and Lee University; and
Zeppelin University. Government is
the term used for this field by
Bowdoin College; Colby College;
Cornell University; Dartmouth
College; Georgetown University;
Harvard University; Smith College;
Wesleyan University; the College of
William and Mary; the University of
Sydney; the University of Texas at
Austin; the University of Ulster; the
University of Essex; Victoria
University of Wellington, which has
both a "School of Government" and a
separate "Political Science and
International Relations Programme";
and the London School of
Economics and Political Science.
Politics and government is the term
used by the University of Puget
Sound. Government and politics is
used by the University of Maryland,
College Park.
20. Vernardakis, George (1998).
Graduate education in government .
University Press of America. p. 77.
ISBN 978-0-7618-1171-8. "…existing
practices at Harvard University, the
University of California at Berkeley,
and the University of Michigan."
21. Organized Sections
APSA(subscription required)
22. Administration for Children and
Families (2010) The Program
Manager's Guide to Evaluation .
Chapter 2: What is program
evaluation?.
23. Shackman, Gene. "What Is Program
Evaluation: A Beginner's Guide". The
Global Social Change Research
Project. SSRN 3060080 .

Further reading
The Evolution of Political Science
(November 2006). APSR Centennial
Volume of American Political Science
Review. Apsanet. 4 February 2009.
European Political Processes: Essays
and Readings (1968). [Compiled and]
ed., with original essays, by Henry S.
Albinski [and] Lawrence K. Pettit.
Boston: Allyn & Bacon. vii, 448 p.
Goodin, R.E.; Klingemann, Hans-Dieter
(1996). A New Handbook of Political
Science. Oxford and New York: Oxford
University Press. ISBN 0-19-829471-9.
Grinin, L., Korotayev, A. and Tausch A.
(2016) Economic Cycles, Crises, and
the Global Periphery. Springer
International Publishing, Heidelberg,
New York, Dordrecht, London,
ISBN 978-3-319-17780-9;
Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, ed. (2007)
The State of Political Science in
Western Europe. Opladen: Barbara
Budrich Publishers. ISBN 978-3-86649-
045-1.
Noel, Hans (2010-10-14 | DOI
[Link]
8884.1393 ) "Ten Things Political
Scientists Know that You Don’t" The
Forum: Vol. 8: Iss. 3, Article 12. de
Gruyter.
Roskin, M.; Cord, R.L.; Medeiros, J.A.;
Jones, W.S. (2007). Political Science:
An Introduction. 10th ed. New York:
Pearson Prentice Hall. ISBN 978-0-13-
242575-9.
Schramm, S.F.; Caterino, B., eds.
(2006). Making Political Science
Matter: Debating Knowledge, Research,
and Method . New York and London:
New York University Press. Google
Books 4 February 2009.
Tausch, A.; Prager, F. (1993). Towards a
Socio-Liberal Theory of World
Development. Basingstoke: Macmillan;
New York: St. Martin's Press and
Springer.
Tausch, Arno; Heshmati, Almas; Karoui,
Hichem (2015). The political algebra of
global value change. General models
and implications for the Muslim world
(1st ed.). New York: Nova Science.
ISBN 978-1-62948-899-8.
Oxford Handbooks of Political Science
Zippelius, Reinhold (2003). Geschichte
der Staatsideen (History of political
Ideas), 10th ed. Munich: C.H. Beck.
ISBN 3-406-49494-3.
Zippelius, Reinhold (2010). Allgemeine
Staatslehre, Politikwissenschaft
 (Political Science),16th ed. Munich:
C.H. Beck. ISBN 978-3-406-60342-6.

External links
This article's use of external links may not follow
Wikipedia's policies or guidelines. Learn more

Wikibooks has a book on the topic

of: Political Science

Wikimedia Commons has media

related to Political science.

Wikiquote has quotations related to:

Political science

Institute for Comparative Research in

Human and Social Sciences (ICR) -
Japan
European Consortium for Political
Research
International Political Science
Association
International Studies Association
IPSAPortal : Top 300 websites for
Political Science
International Association for Political
Science Students
"American Political Science Review" .
American Political Science
Association.
Midwest Political Science Association
Southern Political Science
Association
Graduate Institute of International and
Development Studies. "Political
Science Department which offers MA
and PhD programmes "
Dalmacio Negro, Political Science
Emeritus Professor at CEU San Pablo
University, Madrid (SPAIN)
Political Studies Association of the UK
PROL: Political Science Research
Online (prepublished research)
Truman State University Political
Science Research Design Handbook
A New Nation Votes: American
Elections Returns 1787–1825
 Comparative Politics in Argentina &
Latin America : Site dedicated to the
development of comparative politics in
Latin America.
Introduction to Political Science Video

Library guides

Library. "Political Science" . Research

Guides. United States: University of
Michigan.
Bodleian Libraries. "Political Science" .
LibGuides. United Kingdom: University
of Oxford.
Library. "Politics Research Guide" .
LibGuides. New Jersey, United States:
Princeton University.
 Libraries. "Political Science" . Research
Guides. New York, United States:
Syracuse University.
University Libraries. "Political
Science" . Research Guides. United
States: Texas A&M University.

Retrieved from
"[Link]
title=Political_science&oldid=899892655"

Last edited 3 days ago by Gtravel

Content is available under CC BY-SA 3.0 unless

otherwise noted.