Geneva Conventions and Displaced Persons
Geneva Conventions and Displaced Persons
[Link]
Jean-Philippe Lavoyer
International Review of the Red Cross / Volume 35 / Issue 305 / April 1995, pp 162 -
180
DOI: 10.1017/S0020860400090586, Published online: 23 November 2010
1. Introduction
The main purpose of this brief study is to show the importance of
international humanitarian law, in particular the Geneva Conventions of
1949 and their Additional Protocols of 1977, for internally displaced
persons, i.e. persons displaced within their own country, and to refugees,
i.e. persons who have fled their country. Not only does this body of
international law protect them when they are victims of armed conflict,
but its rules — if scrupulously applied — would make it possible to avoid
the majority of displacements.
In addition, attention will be drawn to the particular role played by
the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) on behalf of refu-
gees and displaced persons, a role which combines legal intervention with
operational action. The mandate of the other components of the Interna-
tional Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement (in short, the Movement)
will also be discussed.1
After a brief review of international humanitarian law, the ICRC's
mandate will be outlined and the problems faced by refugees and dis-
placed persons will be examined from a legal and institutional standpoint.
1
In addition to the ICRC, the Movement consists of 163 National Red Cross or Red
Crescent Societies and the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent
Societies (in short, the Federation).
162
2
We suggest the following works for readers wishing to delve more deeply into this
subject: Hans-Peter Gasser, International Humanitarian Law: An Introduction, in Hans
Hang Humanity for All, Henry Dunant Institute/Haupt, Geneva, 1993, and Frits
Kalshoven, Constraints on the Waging of War, ICRC, 1991.
3
As of 31 March 1995: 185.
4
As of 31 March 1995: 137 States (Protocol I); 127 States (Protocol II).
5
Common Article 3 contains several fundamental principles applicable in every
situation of armed conflict, and is itself a "mini-convention". Protocol II has a higher
threshold of application than that of Article 3 inasmuch as the armed opposition must
exercise "such control over a part of the territory whereby it can carry out sustained and
concerted military operations."
163
6
Article 1 common to the Geneva Conventions: "The High Contracting Parties
undertake to respect and to ensure respect for the present Convention in all circumstances"
(emphasis added). See also Article 89 of Protocol I, whereby States undertake to act in
cooperation with the United Nations in situations of serious violations.
7
This involves the principle of universal jurisdiction. Grave breaches (war crimes)
are defined in each of the four Geneva Conventions (Article 50 of the First Convention;
Article 51 of the Second; Article 130 of the Third; and Article 147 of the Fourth), and
in Protocol I (Articles 85 and 11).
8
Also known as the "Turku Declaration". See International Review of the Red Cross
(IRRC), No. 282, May-June 1991, pp. 328-336.
164
— the armed forces must always distinguish between civilians and com-
batants, and between civilian objects and military objectives. It is
prohibited to attack civilians and civilian objects, and all precautions
must be taken to spare the civilian population;
— it is prohibited to attack or destroy objects indispensable to the survival
of the civilian population (e.g. foodstuffs, crops, livestock, drinking
water installations and irrigation works); it is prohibited to use star-
vation as a method of warfare;
— the wounded and sick must be collected and cared for; hospitals,
ambulances, and medical and religious personnel must be respected
and protected; the emblem of the red cross or red crescent, which
symbolizes this protection, must be respected in all circumstances; any
abuse or misuse thereof must be punished;
— parties to a conflict must agree to relief operations of a humanitarian,
impartial and non-discriminatory nature on behalf of the civilian
population; aid agency personnel must be respected and protected.
9
Article 5, para. 2 (c) of the Statutes of the Movement, revised in 1986 by the 25th
International Conference of the Red Cross. It should be noted that the States party to the
Geneva Conventions attend these international conferences as full members of them and
that by participating in the adoption of the Statutes they expressed their desire to allocate
specific tasks to the respective components of the Movement.
10
The ICRC denounces grave violations of humanitarian law when all its represen-
tations fail and it is in the interest of the victims to make such a denouncement. See "Action
by the ICRC in the event of breaches of international humanitarian law", IRRC, No. 221,
March-April 1981, pp. 76-83.
165
So that the ICRC can effectively carry out its duties as the guardian
of international humanitarian law, the Geneva Conventions grant it right
of access to prisoners of war (Third Convention) and to civilians protected
by the Fourth Convention." They also grant it a very broad right of
initiative.12 If there is no Protecting Power, the ICRC can moreover act
as a substitute for it.13 The ICRC also has the legal responsibility "to work
for the understanding and dissemination of knowledge of international
humanitarian law applicable in armed conflicts and to prepare any devel-
opment thereof (Article 5(g) of the Statutes of the Movement).
The States have also assigned the ICRC the task of providing protec-
tion and assistance to victims of armed conflicts and internal strife, and
of their direct results.14 Numerous operational activities have been carried
out in this regard, particularly in situations of internal violence (armed
conflict and unrest).15
The Statutes of the Movement specify the other tasks within the
ICRC's mandate, particularly that of upholding and disseminating the
Fundamental Principles of the Movement16 and of ensuring the operation
of the Central Tracing Agency.17
Finally, the ICRC has the statutory right to take any humanitarian
initiative, i.e. to offer its services whenever it considers that its specific
status as a neutral and independent intermediary can help solve problems
of humanitarian concern.18 This right has the character of customary law.
11
Article 126 of the Third Convention and Article 143 of the Fourth Convention,
which stipulate the following conditions for visits: access to all protected people, right
to interview such people without witnesses, no restrictions on the frequency of visits.
12
Article 9 of the First, Second and Third Conventions; Article 10 of the Fourth
Convention; and Article 81 of Protocol I. Regarding non-international armed conflicts, see
Article 3 common to the four Conventions.
13
Article 10 of the First, Second and Third Conventions; Article 11 of the Fourth
Convention; Article 5 of Protocol I. In practice, the ICRC most often acts on the basis
of its right of initiative.
14
Article 5, para. 2(d) of the Statutes of the Movement.
15
For detailed information, see Marion Harroff-Tavel, "Action taken by the Inter-
national Committee of the Red Cross in situations of internal violence", IRRC, No. 294,
May-June 1993, pp. 195-220.
16
The work of the Movement is governed by the following Fundamental Principles:
humanity, impartiality, neutrality, independence, voluntary service, unity and universality.
17
Article 5, para. 2(e) of the Statutes of the Movement. In particular, the Central
Tracing Agency seeks to restore and maintain ties among members of families split up
by conflicts or disturbances, as well as reuniting members of such families.
18
Article 5, para. 3 of the Statutes of the Movement.
166
4. Refugees
4.1 Protection under international humanitarian law
Whereas refugee law contains a specific definition of refugee,21
humanitarian law is very vague and only rarely employs the term. All the
same, this does not mean that refugees are neglected by humanitarian law,
since they are protected by it when they are in the power of a party to
a conflict.
During international armed conflicts, nationals of a State who flee
hostilities and enter the territory of an enemy State are protected by the
19
Resolution 45/6 of 16 October 1990. See IRRC, No. 279, November-December
1990, pp. 581-586.
20
In particular, headquarters agreements confer legal immunity and the inviolability
of premises and archives. ICRC delegates generally enjoy diplomatic immunity.
21
Article 1 of the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees (28 July 1951);
Article 1 of the Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees (31 January 1967). This
definition was expanded by the OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of
Refugee Problems in Africa (10 September 1969), mainly to include persons having fled
from armed conflict or disturbances.
167
22
Such situations are frequent, e.g. Afghan refugees in Pakistan and Iran; Iraqi
refugees in Iran during the Gulf war; and Rwandan refugees in Zaire, Burundi and
Tanzania.
168
23
See Francoise Krill, "ICRC action in aid of refugees", IRRC, No. 265, July-August
1988, pp. 328-350.
24
During the Iran/Iraq conflict, the ICRC thus took care of Iranian refugees in Iraq
and even helped with their resettlement in other countries. Following the Gulf war, the
ICRC also visited more than 20,000 Iraqis held in the Rafha camp in Saudi Arabia;
activities by the ICRC and UNHCR were mutually complementary.
25
The ICRC intervened on several occasions during the initial phase of an influx of
refugees, e.g. in the following cases: Iraqi Kurd refugees in Iran at the end of the Gulf
war (1991); Rwandan refugees in Goma (Zaire) and Ngara (Tanzania) in 1994. When
UNHCR was not present, the ICRC looked after Mozambican refugees in South Africa
and Iranian refugees in Iraq during the IranAraq war.
26
For example, hospitals for Afghan refugees in Peshawar and Quetta (Pakistan), and
for Cambodian refugees in Thailand.
27
For example, the ICRC launched an extensive operation in aid of Cambodian
refugees on the Thai-Cambodian border. See Ren6 Kosirnik, "Droit international
humanitaire et protection des camps de r6fugieV', in Studies and essays on international
humanitarian law and Red Cross principles, in honour of Jean Pictet, ICRC/Geneva;
Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague 1984, p. 387 ff.
169
28
The ICRC does, however, supervise large-scale repatriations, of prisoners of war
in particular, such as those that took place between Iraq and Iran in 1990 (approximately
79,000 prisoners), and between Saudi Arabia and Iraq in 1991 (approximately
80,000 prisoners). The ICRC always ensured that each prisoner of war was willing to
be repatriated.
29
The ICRC has spoken out in particular against the repatriation of refugees to
Afghanistan, Cambodia, Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina and Rwanda. As regards Cambodia,
see ICRC Memorandum of 14 November 1990, partially reprinted in Frederic Maurice
and Jean de Courten, "ICRC activities for refugees and displaced civilians", IRRC,
No. 280, January-February 1991, pp. 9-21.
170
30
Article 49 of the Fourth Convention: the Occupying Power may, as an exception,
undertake evacuations "if the security of the population or imperative military reasons so
demand. Persons thus evacuated shall be transferred back to their homes as soon as
hostilities in the area in question have ceased".
31
See Denise Plattner, "The protection of displaced persons in non-international
armed conflicts", 1RRC, No. 291, November-December 1992, pp. 567-580.
171
After pointing out that persons taking no active part in the hostilities must
be treated humanely in all circumstances, it prohibits the following acts:
violence to life and person, in particular murder of all kinds, mutilation,
cruel treatment and torture; the taking of hostages; outrages upon personal
dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading treatment; the passing of
sentences and the carrying out of executions without previous judgment
pronounced by a regularly constituted court, affording all the [fundamen-
tal] judicial guarantees. The Article also states that the wounded and sick
are to be collected and cared for.
These fundamental guarantees are repeated in Protocol II which, in
addition to the guarantees given in common Article 3, prohibits collective
punishments, acts of terrorism, and pillage (Article 4, paras 1 and 2). In
addition, the prohibition of outrages upon personal dignity explicitly
includes rape, enforced prostitution and any form of indecent assault.
Persons deprived of liberty also enjoy additional guarantees (Article 5).
Article 6 specifies judicial guarantees, while Articles 7 to 12 stipulate that
the wounded and sick, as well as those caring for them, must be respected
and protected. Finally, special protection is laid down for women and
children (particularly in Article 4, para. 3).
Afterwards, Protocol II stipulates that the civilian population is to be
protected from the effects of hostilities (Part IV): "The civilian
population...shall enjoy general protection against the dangers arising
from military operations" (Article 13). In particular, it must not be the
object of attack. Also prohibited are acts or threats of violence intended
to spread terror among the civilian population.
In addition, the use of starvation of civilians as a method of combat
is prohibited (Article 14). It is also prohibited to attack, destroy or remove
objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population or render
them unusable (such as foodstuffs, agricultural areas, crops, livestock,
drinking water installations and supplies and irrigation works). Works and
installations containing dangerous forces — dams, dykes and nuclear
power stations — must not be attacked if such attacks may cause severe
losses among the civilian population (Article 15). Cultural objects and
places of worship are likewise protected (Article 16).
Protocol II also prohibitsforced movement of civilians. Such displace-
ments may be carried out only if required for the security of the civilians
involved or for imperative military reasons. When such is the case, all
possible measures must be taken in order that the civilian population may
be received under satisfactory conditions of shelter, hygiene, health, safety
and nutrition (Article 17). Although not expressly stipulated, it is under-
stood that such movements may be only temporary.
172
32
Article 18, para. 2 of Protocol II. When these conditions exist, the State must in
principle give its consent. As regards relief actions under humanitarian law, see Denise
Plattner, "Assistance to the civilian population: the development and present state of
international humanitarian law", IRRC, No. 288, May-June 1992, pp. 249-263.
33
The civilian population can suffer collateral or incidental damage loss (see Ar-
ticle 51, para. 5 and Article 57, para. 2 of Protocol I). Attacks are prohibited, or must be
stopped, if the loss of human life among the civilian population would be excessive in relation
to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated (principle of proportionality).
173
34
See Maurice and de Courten, op. cit.
35
See Harroff-Tavel, op. cit.
36
The purpose of these visits is to verify the detention conditions and the treatment
of detainees. In 1994, the ICRC visited more than 99,000 persons held in 2,470 places
of detention in 58 countries.
37
In 1994, the ICRC distributed 167,000 tonnes of supplies of all kinds in 45 coun-
tries.
174
38
In 1994, the Central Tracing Agency delivered 7,721,650 Red Cross messages to
and from separated family members.
39
See Jean-Luc Blondel, "Assistance to protected persons", IRRC, No. 260,
September-October 1987, pp. 451-468.
40
The ICRC's material aid, essentially in food and agricultural rehabilitation, is also
directed toward the particularly vulnerable members of the local population and, as the
need arises, toward returnees. The ICRC also carries out the following work in Rwanda:
visits to persons deprived of liberty; restoring family ties, particularly by registering
unaccompanied children; rehabilitation of the drinking water supply system; and basic
medical programmes.
175
zones has thus been proposed, such as those provided for in international
humanitarian law41 or inspired by it. Practical experience has shown,
however, how difficult it is to set up such areas, and especially to ensure
their safety, which requires strict control over the area and therefore a
considerable deployment of personnel. It has also shown that a safety zone
will be all the more effective when it has been accepted by all parties
concerned. Moreover, a protected zone that has been imposed on the
parties fails to meet the requirements of international humanitarian law.
The ICRC has managed — in cases of extreme urgency and with the
consent of all parties — to render limited areas neutral by placing them
under its own control.
Great caution must be taken when creating safety zones, for they tend
to create a false sense of security among those they are meant to protect.
In certain cases, they may also have the undesired effect of placing those
outside the zone in even greater danger, detracting from the effectiveness
of the international humanitarian law which is destined to protect the
civilian population as a whole, without discrimination.
Care should also be taken to ensure that such measures do not limit
the right of displaced persons to leave their country and request asylum
abroad.
41
As regards protection of civilians, see Article 14 of the Fourth Convention ("Hos-
pital and safety zones and localities"), Article 15 of the Fourth Convention ("Neutralized
zones"), Article 59 of Protocol I ("Non-defended localities"), and Article 60 of Protocol
I ("Demilitarized zones"). For a more detailed study of the matter, see Yves Sandoz, "The
Establishment of Safety Zones for Persons Displaced within their Country of Origin,"
presented at the Multi-choice Conference on International Legal Issues arising under the
United Nations Decade of International Law, Doha, Qatar, 22-25 March 1994.
176
held in Manila, that the role of the Movement was clearly defined for the
first time, with the adoption of a resolution and a 10-point "Statement of
Policy" (Resolution XXI and Annex). Of particular note therein is a
general appeal to the Movement to help refugees, displaced persons and
returnees. It is also specified that all action undertaken must be in strict
accordance with the Fundamental Principles of the Movement.
In addition, the components of the Movement are invited to cooperate
with UNHCR and other institutions and organizations working on behalf
of refugees. Provision is made for consultations with UNHCR and for the
coordination of activities to ensure that efforts will be complementary. In
order to ensure consistency in the Movement's work, National Societies
are expected to inform the ICRC and/or Federation of any negotiations
likely to lead to an agreement with UNHCR. The ICRC and/or Federation
should be associated with the Society in the negotiations and concur with
the terms of agreement.
This Statement of Policy also demonstrates the specific protection the
ICRC offers as a neutral and independent institution. Furthermore, the role
of its Central Tracing Agency is stressed; in cooperation with National
Societies, the agency seeks to facilitate the reunification of dispersed
families, the exchange of family news and the tracing of missing persons.
The 25th International Conference, held in Geneva in 1986, reaffirmed
the role of the Movement in aid of refugees, displaced persons and
returnees (Resolution XVII), as did the Council of Delegates42 at its 1991
meeting in Budapest (Resolution 9), and in 1993 in Birmingham (Reso-
lution 7). The Resolution adopted in Birmingham "invites the components
of the Movement, in accordance with their respective mandates...to con-
tinue to act vigorously in favour of refugees, asylum-seekers, displaced
persons and returnees".
The Movement's efforts in favour of displaced persons are centred
around the specific roles of each of its components. Respect for these
roles, in a spirit of complementarity, is indeed the best guarantee for
effective action. The Statutes of the Movement and the Agreement con-
cluded in 1989 between the ICRC and the League (now known as the
Federation) provide the general framework for the various activities.
Broadly speaking, the assignment of tasks is as follows:
42
The Council of Delegates is the statutory body where the components of the
Movement meet to discuss matters which concern the Movement as a whole.
177
7. Current challenges
The problem of population displacements, whether the people con-
cerned are refugees or persons displaced within their own country, pre-
sents a big challenge for the international community. Aspects concerning
displaced persons will be considered here.45
First of all there is the important work being carried out by Mr Francis
Deng, Representative of the UN Secretary-General on Internally Dis-
placed Persons.46 Input on this subject has been provided by the Human
Rights Commission, the UN Department of Humanitarian Affairs,47
UNHCR, the Centre for Human Rights and many non-governmental
organizations, some of which have been assigned the task by Mr Deng
of investigating certain legal48 and institutional49 aspects of the phenom-
43
Article 5, para. 4 of the Statutes of the Movement; Articles 18 and 20 of the 1989
Agreement.
44
Article 19 of the 1989 Agreement.
45
The current number of displaced persons is estimated to be around 25 million, or
even more, although the concept of 'displaced person' is not clearly defined. The causes
of displacement vary widely: armed conflict, disturbances, repression, natural disasters,
socio-economic conditions, and infrastructural projects (e.g. dams).
46
See in particular his latest report to the Commission on Human Rights, dated
2 February 1995 (ref. E/CN.4/1995/50).
47
The Department of Humanitarian Affairs has created an inter-agency work group
on displaced persons.
48
The Lugwig Boltzmann Institute for Human Rights (Austria), the American Society
of International Law and the International Human Rights Law Group (United States).
49
The Refugee Policy Group (United States) and the Norwegian Refugee Council
(Norway).
178
enon of displaced persons. Many States are also joining in. As the subject
is of great importance to the ICRC, it is taking an active part in the debate
as well, in particular through dialogue with the Representative of the
Secretary-General.50
Careful consideration by the international community of how to ad-
dress the growing problem of displaced persons is essential. Present
efforts to increase awareness are commendable, valuable as they are in
drawing attention to a matter of serious humanitarian concern. Current
ideas on the subject are reviewed below.
To begin with, what should be done to improve humanitarian action
on behalf of displaced persons? In view of the large numbers and vast
needs of these people, greater cooperation between the humanitarian
agencies, particularly UN bodies and non-governmental organizations, is
of paramount importance. This cooperation must be increased in a spirit
of complementarity and must take their respective mandates into account.
To be truly neutral and impartial, humanitarian action must moreover be
independent of all political and military considerations, for only then is
it possible to reach all victims.51 States must also recognize that humani-
tarian action has its limits; although indispensable, it is but a temporary
remedy for problems that can be solved only by political means, with
assistance from the international community when required.
The question then arises as to a possible development of the law. This
is a delicate matter, for there are already many legal regulations, and, when
new rules are created (e.g. a convention on displaced persons), care must
be taken not to undermine the existing law. Another moot point is the
advisability of creating rules aimed solely at protecting displaced persons,
which could result in discrimination against other victims who also de-
serve to be protected. The traditional humanitarian law approach, based
on needs arising from a given situation (armed conflict), therefore appears
preferable to an approach centred on specific categories of people in every
situation.
Proposals intended to reaffirm certain essential principles and rules
of humanitarian law and human rights law in order to improve protection
of displaced persons must on the other hand be encouraged, provided that
50
See the ICRC's reply November 1992 to Mr Deng which is reproduced in this issue
of the IRRC, pp. 181-191.
51
See Code of conduct for the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement
and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in disaster relief.
179
the existing law is upheld and not weakened (there has been talk of a set
of principles, a code of conduct or a declaration). It is true that in situations
not covered by international humanitarian law, existing law perhaps does
not yet provide optimum protection for the civilian population, and con-
sequently for displaced persons, although the power to waive certain
human rights at times of exceptional public danger is limited. It should
be noted that population displacements are mentioned in Article 7 of the
Turku Declaration.
In general, however, efforts by the international community should be
concentrated first and foremost on improved implementation of interna-
tional humanitarian law by all belligerents. This should help to bring
about a considerable reduction in the number of displaced persons and
refugees.52
52
In an effort to increase respect for humanitarian law, in 1993 the Swiss Government,
at the ICRC's suggestion, organized the International Conference for the Protection of War
Victims. The next International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent, to be held
in Geneva in December 1995, will also discuss measures to be taken to increase this
respect.
180