Scribd
Upload
5 views14 pages

Demographic Frequency Analysis Report

The document contains frequency tables analyzing various demographic variables and pre-knowledge and post-knowledge scores of 60 nursing students. It shows that most students were between 31-40 years old, female, Hindu, had a diploma in general nursing, earned less than Rs. 15,000 annually, and had less than 5 years of experience. It also shows that students had moderate improvement in their mean knowledge scores from the pre- to post-knowledge assessment across all aspects that were evaluated.

Uploaded by

Prasanna Kumar
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
5 views14 pages

Demographic Frequency Analysis Report

The document contains frequency tables analyzing various demographic variables and pre-knowledge and post-knowledge scores of 60 nursing students. It shows that most students were between 31-40 years old, female, Hindu, had a diploma in general nursing, earned less than Rs. 15,000 annually, and had less than 5 years of experience. It also shows that students had moderate improvement in their mean knowledge scores from the pre- to post-knowledge assessment across all aspects that were evaluated.

Uploaded by

Prasanna Kumar
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Frequency Table

Age

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid 20-30 years 20 33.3 33.3 33.3

31-40 years 32 53.3 53.3 86.7

41-50 years 8 13.3 13.3 100.0

Total 60 100.0 100.0

Sex

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid Male 16 26.7 26.7 26.7

Female 44 73.3 73.3 100.0

Total 60 100.0 100.0

Religion

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid Hindu 36 60.0 60.0 60.0

Muslim 12 20.0 20.0 80.0

Christian 4 6.7 6.7 86.7

4 8 13.3 13.3 100.0

Total 60 100.0 100.0

Education

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid Diploma general nursing 40 66.7 66.7 66.7

PC BSc Nursing 12 20.0 20.0 86.7

BSc Nursing 8 13.3 13.3 100.0


Total 60 100.0 100.0

Family_income

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid Less than Rs. 15000 24 40.0 40.0 40.0

Rs. 15001-25000 28 46.7 46.7 86.7

More than Rs. 25001 8 13.3 13.3 100.0

Total 60 100.0 100.0

Experience

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid Less than 5 years 16 26.7 26.7 26.7

6-10 years 16 26.7 26.7 53.3

11-15 years 16 26.7 26.7 80.0

More than 15 years 12 20.0 20.0 100.0

Total 60 100.0 100.0

Median

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid Below Median 28 46.7 46.7 46.7

Above Median 32 53.3 53.3 100.0

Total 60 100.0 100.0

Median_Post

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid Below Median 23 38.3 38.3 38.3

Above Median 37 61.7 61.7 100.0


Total 60 100.0 100.0

Pre_knowledge

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid Inadequate knowledge 36 60.0 60.0 60.0

Moderate knowledge 24 40.0 40.0 100.0

Total 60 100.0 100.0

Post_knowledge

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid Moderate knowledge 23 38.3 38.3 38.3

Adequate knowledge 37 61.7 61.7 100.0

Total 60 100.0 100.0

FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=Aspect_1 Aspect_2 Aspect_3 Overall Aspect_1_p Aspect_2_p Aspect_3_p Overall_p


/FORMAT=NOTABLE
/STATISTICS=STDDEV MEAN MEDIAN

/ORDER=ANALYSIS.

Frequencies

Notes

Output Created 13-May-2019 19:33:17

Comments

Input Data C:\Users\PayC\Dropbox\Work\thesis\Feb


2019\Shiji Kumuda\Demo data_2.sav

Active Dataset DataSet1

Filter <none>

Weight <none>

Split File <none>

N of Rows in Working Data File 60

Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User-defined missing values are treated as
missing.
Cases Used Statistics are based on all cases with valid
data.

Syntax FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=Aspect_1


Aspect_2 Aspect_3 Overall Aspect_1_p
Aspect_2_p Aspect_3_p Overall_p
/FORMAT=NOTABLE
/STATISTICS=STDDEV MEAN MEDIAN
/ORDER=ANALYSIS.

Resources Processor Time 00:00:00.110

Elapsed Time 00:00:00.110

[DataSet1] C:\Users\PayC\Dropbox\Work\thesis\Feb 2019\Shiji Kumuda\Demo data_2.sav

Statistics

Aspect_1 Aspect_2 Aspect_3 Overall Aspect_1_p Aspect_2_p Aspect_3_p Overall_p

N Valid 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60

Missing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Mean 3.20 6.07 5.47 14.73 4.18 8.55 10.22 22.95

Median 3.00 6.00 6.00 15.00 4.00 9.00 11.00 24.00

Std. Deviation .988 1.539 2.012 2.840 .537 1.111 1.842 2.696

T-TEST PAIRS=Aspect_1 WITH Aspect_1_p (PAIRED)


/CRITERIA=CI(.9500)

/MISSING=ANALYSIS.

T-Test

Notes

Output Created 13-May-2019 19:33:26

Comments

Input Data C:\Users\PayC\Dropbox\Work\thesis\Feb


2019\Shiji Kumuda\Demo data_2.sav

Active Dataset DataSet1

Filter <none>

Weight <none>

Split File <none>

N of Rows in Working Data File 60


Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User defined missing values are treated as
missing.

Cases Used Statistics for each analysis are based on


the cases with no missing or out-of-range
data for any variable in the analysis.

Syntax T-TEST PAIRS=Aspect_1 WITH


Aspect_1_p (PAIRED)
/CRITERIA=CI(.9500)
/MISSING=ANALYSIS.

Resources Processor Time 00:00:00.016

Elapsed Time 00:00:00.031

[DataSet1] C:\Users\PayC\Dropbox\Work\thesis\Feb 2019\Shiji Kumuda\Demo data_2.sav

Paired Samples Statistics

Mean N Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean

Pair 1 Aspect_1 3.20 60 .988 .128

Aspect_1_p 4.18 60 .537 .069

Paired Samples Correlations

N Correlation Sig.

Pair 1 Aspect_1 & Aspect_1_p 60 -.166 .204

Paired Samples Test

Paired Differences

95% Confidence Interval of the


Difference

Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Lower Upper t df Sig. (2-tailed)

Pair 1 Aspect_1 - Aspect_1_p -.983 1.200 .155 -1.293 -.673 -6.347 59 .000

T-TEST PAIRS=Aspect_2 WITH Aspect_2_p (PAIRED)


/CRITERIA=CI(.9500)

/MISSING=ANALYSIS.
T-Test

Notes

Output Created 13-May-2019 19:33:33

Comments

Input Data C:\Users\PayC\Dropbox\Work\thesis\Feb


2019\Shiji Kumuda\Demo data_2.sav

Active Dataset DataSet1

Filter <none>

Weight <none>

Split File <none>

N of Rows in Working Data File 60

Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User defined missing values are treated as
missing.

Cases Used Statistics for each analysis are based on


the cases with no missing or out-of-range
data for any variable in the analysis.

Syntax T-TEST PAIRS=Aspect_2 WITH


Aspect_2_p (PAIRED)
/CRITERIA=CI(.9500)
/MISSING=ANALYSIS.

Resources Processor Time 00:00:00.046

Elapsed Time 00:00:00.032

[DataSet1] C:\Users\PayC\Dropbox\Work\thesis\Feb 2019\Shiji Kumuda\Demo data_2.sav

Paired Samples Statistics

Mean N Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean

Pair 1 Aspect_2 6.07 60 1.539 .199

Aspect_2_p 8.55 60 1.111 .143

Paired Samples Correlations

N Correlation Sig.

Pair 1 Aspect_2 & Aspect_2_p 60 .285 .027


Paired Samples Test

Paired Differences

95% Confidence Interval of the


Difference

Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Lower Upper t df Sig. (2-tailed)

Pair 1 Aspect_2 - Aspect_2_p -2.483 1.621 .209 -2.902 -2.065 -11.868 59 .000

T-TEST PAIRS=Aspect_3 WITH Aspect_3_p (PAIRED)


/CRITERIA=CI(.9500)

/MISSING=ANALYSIS.

T-Test

Notes

Output Created 13-May-2019 19:33:39

Comments

Input Data C:\Users\PayC\Dropbox\Work\thesis\Feb


2019\Shiji Kumuda\Demo data_2.sav

Active Dataset DataSet1

Filter <none>

Weight <none>

Split File <none>

N of Rows in Working Data File 60

Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User defined missing values are treated as
missing.

Cases Used Statistics for each analysis are based on


the cases with no missing or out-of-range
data for any variable in the analysis.

Syntax T-TEST PAIRS=Aspect_3 WITH


Aspect_3_p (PAIRED)
/CRITERIA=CI(.9500)
/MISSING=ANALYSIS.

Resources Processor Time 00:00:00.063

Elapsed Time 00:00:00.047

[DataSet1] C:\Users\PayC\Dropbox\Work\thesis\Feb 2019\Shiji Kumuda\Demo data_2.sav


Paired Samples Statistics

Mean N Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean

Pair 1 Aspect_3 5.47 60 2.012 .260

Aspect_3_p 10.22 60 1.842 .238

Paired Samples Correlations

N Correlation Sig.

Pair 1 Aspect_3 & Aspect_3_p 60 .036 .783

Paired Samples Test

Paired Differences

95% Confidence Interval of the


Difference

Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Lower Upper t df Sig. (2-tailed)

Pair 1 Aspect_3 - Aspect_3_p -4.750 2.678 .346 -5.442 -4.058 -13.737 59 .000

T-TEST PAIRS=Overall WITH Overall_p (PAIRED)


/CRITERIA=CI(.9500)

/MISSING=ANALYSIS.

T-Test

Notes

Output Created 13-May-2019 19:33:46

Comments

Input Data C:\Users\PayC\Dropbox\Work\thesis\Feb


2019\Shiji Kumuda\Demo data_2.sav

Active Dataset DataSet1

Filter <none>

Weight <none>

Split File <none>

N of Rows in Working Data File 60

Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User defined missing values are treated as
missing.
Cases Used Statistics for each analysis are based on
the cases with no missing or out-of-range
data for any variable in the analysis.

Syntax T-TEST PAIRS=Overall WITH Overall_p


(PAIRED)
/CRITERIA=CI(.9500)
/MISSING=ANALYSIS.

Resources Processor Time 00:00:00.046

Elapsed Time 00:00:00.031

[DataSet1] C:\Users\PayC\Dropbox\Work\thesis\Feb 2019\Shiji Kumuda\Demo data_2.sav

Paired Samples Statistics

Mean N Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean

Pair 1 Overall 14.73 60 2.840 .367

Overall_p 22.95 60 2.696 .348

Paired Samples Correlations

N Correlation Sig.

Pair 1 Overall & Overall_p 60 .140 .286

Paired Samples Test

Paired Differences

95% Confidence Interval of the


Difference

Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Lower Upper t df Sig. (2-tailed)

Pair 1 Overall - Overall_p -8.217 3.632 .469 -9.155 -7.278 -17.525 59 .000

CROSSTABS
/TABLES=Age Sex Religion Education Family_income Experience BY Median
/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
/STATISTICS=CHISQ
/CELLS=COUNT

/COUNT ROUND CELL.


Crosstabs

Notes

Output Created 13-May-2019 19:34:07

Comments

Input Data C:\Users\PayC\Dropbox\Work\thesis\Feb


2019\Shiji Kumuda\Demo data_2.sav

Active Dataset DataSet1

Filter <none>

Weight <none>

Split File <none>

N of Rows in Working Data File 60

Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User-defined missing values are treated as
missing.

Cases Used Statistics for each table are based on all the
cases with valid data in the specified
range(s) for all variables in each table.

Syntax CROSSTABS
/TABLES=Age Sex Religion Education
Family_income Experience BY Median
/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
/STATISTICS=CHISQ
/CELLS=COUNT
/COUNT ROUND CELL.

Resources Processor Time 00:00:00.031

Elapsed Time 00:00:00.017

Dimensions Requested 2

Cells Available 174762

[DataSet1] C:\Users\PayC\Dropbox\Work\thesis\Feb 2019\Shiji Kumuda\Demo data_2.sav

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Age * Median 60 100.0% 0 .0% 60 100.0%


Sex * Median 60 100.0% 0 .0% 60 100.0%

Religion * Median 60 100.0% 0 .0% 60 100.0%

Education * Median 60 100.0% 0 .0% 60 100.0%

Family_income * Median 60 100.0% 0 .0% 60 100.0%

Experience * Median 60 100.0% 0 .0% 60 100.0%

Age * Median

Crosstab

Count

Median

Below Median Above Median Total

Age 20-30 years 8 12 20

31-40 years 20 12 32

41-50 years 0 8 8

Total 28 32 60

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-


Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 10.580a 2 .005

Likelihood Ratio 13.650 2 .001

N of Valid Cases 60

a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum


expected count is 3.73.

Sex * Median

Crosstab

Count

Median

Below Median Above Median Total

Sex Male 4 12 16
Female 24 20 44

Total 28 32 60

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-


Value df sided) sided) sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 4.115a 1 .042

Continuity Correctionb 3.014 1 .083

Likelihood Ratio 4.283 1 .038

Fisher's Exact Test .077 .040

N of Valid Casesb 60

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.47.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Religion * Median

Crosstab

Count

Median

Below Median Above Median Total

Religion Hindu 8 28 36

Muslim 8 4 12

Christian 4 0 4

4 8 0 8

Total 28 32 60

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-


Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 24.286a 3 .000

Likelihood Ratio 29.496 3 .000

N of Valid Cases 60
a. 4 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum
expected count is 1.87.

Education * Median

Crosstab

Count

Median

Below Median Above Median Total

Education Diploma general nursing 12 28 40

PC BSc Nursing 8 4 12

BSc Nursing 8 0 8

Total 28 32 60

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-


Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 15.536a 2 .000

Likelihood Ratio 18.765 2 .000

N of Valid Cases 60

a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum


expected count is 3.73.

Family_income * Median

Crosstab

Count

Median

Below Median Above Median Total

Family_income Less than Rs. 15000 16 8 24

Rs. 15001-25000 12 16 28

More than Rs. 25001 0 8 8

Total 28 32 60
Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-


Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 11.020a 2 .004

Likelihood Ratio 14.115 2 .001

N of Valid Cases 60

a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum


expected count is 3.73.

Experience * Median

Crosstab

Count

Median

Below Median Above Median Total

Experience Less than 5 years 8 8 16

6-10 years 12 4 16

11-15 years 4 12 16

More than 15 years 4 8 12

Total 28 32 60

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-


Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 9.107a 3 .028

Likelihood Ratio 9.464 3 .024

N of Valid Cases 60

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected
count is 5.60.

You might also like