0% found this document useful (0 votes)
151 views11 pages

Submarine Missile Launch Dynamics Study

1) The student developed a numerical model and UDFs in ANSYS Fluent to simulate the launch of an underwater missile from a submarine. 2) Initial results validated the simulation setup by matching results from a reference study, showing cavitation beginning and velocity/acceleration profiles over time. 3) Future work includes optimizing the inlet gas pressure and studying the effect of missile shape on cavitation and pressure requirements.

Uploaded by

Muhammad zubair
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
151 views11 pages

Submarine Missile Launch Dynamics Study

1) The student developed a numerical model and UDFs in ANSYS Fluent to simulate the launch of an underwater missile from a submarine. 2) Initial results validated the simulation setup by matching results from a reference study, showing cavitation beginning and velocity/acceleration profiles over time. 3) Future work includes optimizing the inlet gas pressure and studying the effect of missile shape on cavitation and pressure requirements.

Uploaded by

Muhammad zubair
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Numerical study of submarine launch

underwater vehicle

Name: Muhammad Zubair Zahid


Department: Chemical (Process)
Roll Number: PE-09
Mobile Number: 0300-0757525
Email: mzubair_1992@[Link]

Supervisor Dr. Muhammad Ismael


Co-supervisor Dr. Muhammad Nadeem

Pakistan institute of engineering and


applied sciences
Introduction:
A forward movement of Navy in weapons is the development of such missile which can be
launched from underwater via submarine so it can across water media and on coming into
open air atmosphere missile rocket’s motor turned on and ballistic push comes into play which
navigate the missile to its target. This technology has advantage of un-detectability, good
tracking, spotting its target and devastation. this technology termed as “cold launched of
missile” [1] Projectile is pushed by high pressure gas from the tube of submarine and moves
through the water until it comes out of sea water, this launching process consist of three stages
which is listed below [2]

1. tube-exit stage
2. water moving stage
3. water-exit stage
Stage of tube-exit is the most important stage for its complex mechanical environment. when
projectile comes out of the tube, gas behind it expands into water then it shrinks and finally it
breaks into two parts one part moves toward tube and other part remain attach at the
projectile bottom until it comes out of water, water moving stage leaves behind a zig-zag
pattern of air bubbles.

Natural Cavitation form around the missile shoulder due to high speed, which effects missile
material strength. Pressure profile at the bottom of missile, pressure is high in the centre of
bottom than average pressure of bottom, it may cause instrument damage at this point.
Pressure fluctuate on the deck takes place due to cavity formed by interaction of gas and water
so mechanical strength of launching pad is important concern. There are many parameters
which can effect trajectory, pressure requirement at gas inlet and material strength of missile
and launching pad which are listed below as

1. Cavitation at shoulder of missile

2. Flow of water

3. Shape of missile

4. Gas cavity at bottom of missile

5. Pressure of gas

6. Mass of projectile

7. Length of projectile

when the static pressure is less than vapour pressure at certain location, vapour condense back
to liquid when it reaches a location with pressure higher than vapour pressure known as
cavitation phenomena it is avoided in the design of machines such as turbines or propellers,
since the shock waves formed by collapse of the voids are strong enough to cause significant
damage to moving parts. [3]
Cavitation is undesirable. As velocity of projectile increases, pressure at nose increases as it is
facing the liquid flow and low pressure on the behind forming an air bubble. Flow get separated
a little bit and drag on missile increases.

In static water field projectile moves almost with no trajectory deviation, with the increase in
flow of water, trajectory is affected, speed of projectile fluctuates and distance travelled in
water changes [4] similarly shape It cause the variation in Drag force and spinning of projectile
might occur if cavity at shoulder grow large causing lift force, with which trajectory of projectile
changes [5]

Increasing pressure in tube, increases the speed of projectile in water hence cavitation length at
shoulder increases which in turn have effects on drag force and strength of missile at this
location.

Mathematical model
It’s 2D planar and transient problem so for multiphase fluid (Gas, liquid and air) mixture model
following equation will be solved to capture the dynamics of missile launching process

 Continuity equation

 Momentum equation

 Appropriate Turbulent model

 Cavitation model equations

Continuity equation
For liquid
𝜕(𝜌𝑚 𝛼𝑙 )
+ 𝛻. (𝜌𝑚 𝛼𝑙 𝑉𝑚 ) = 0
𝜕𝑡
For vapor

𝜕(𝜌𝑚 𝛼𝑣 ) − +
+ 𝛻. (𝜌𝑚 𝛼𝑣 𝑉𝑚 ) = 𝑚𝑙→𝑣 − 𝑚𝑣→𝑙
𝜕𝑡
Where,
− √𝑘 2 𝑃 −𝑃
𝑚𝑙→𝑣 = 𝐶𝑒 𝜌𝑙 𝜌𝑣 √ 𝑣 (1 − 𝑓𝑣 − 𝑓𝑔 )
𝜎 3 𝜌𝑣

+ √𝑘 2 𝑃−𝑃𝑣
𝑚𝑣→𝑙 = 𝐶𝑐 𝜌𝜌√ (𝑓𝑣 )
𝜎 𝑙 𝑙 3 𝜌𝑣

For air

𝜕(𝜌𝑚 𝛼𝑔 )
+ 𝛻. (𝜌𝑚 𝛼𝑔 𝑉𝑚 ) = 0 [2]
𝜕𝑡

Momentum equation

𝜕(𝜌𝑚 𝑉𝑚 )
+ 𝛻. (𝜌𝑚 𝑉𝑚 𝑉𝑚 ) = −𝛻𝑃 + 𝐹̅ + 𝜌𝑔 + 𝛻. [𝜇𝑚 (𝛻𝑉𝑚 + 𝛻𝑉𝑚𝑇 )] [6]
𝜕𝑡

Transport equation for k:

𝜕(𝜌𝑘) 𝜇𝑡
+ div(𝜌𝑘𝑈) = div [ grad 𝑘] + 𝑃𝑘 + 𝑃𝑏 − 𝜌𝜀 − 𝑌𝑀 + 𝑆𝑘
𝜕𝑡 𝜎𝑘

Where

1
C 
U *k k2
Ao  As  t  C 
 
transport equation for dissipation rate, 

D   t    2 
        c1S  c2  c1 c3 Gb
Dt x j    x j  k   k
Cavitation Model (Zwart-Gerber model)

𝜕(𝜌𝑣 𝛼𝑣 )
+ 𝛻. (𝜌𝑣 𝛼𝑣 𝑣𝑣 ) = 𝑅𝑒 − 𝑅𝑐
𝜕𝑡
3𝛼𝑛𝑢𝑐 (1−𝛼𝑣 )𝜌𝑣 2 𝑃𝑣 −𝑃
If 𝑃 ≤ 𝑃𝑣 𝑅𝑒 = 𝐹𝑣𝑎𝑝 √3
𝑅𝐵 𝜌𝑙

3𝛼𝑣 𝜌𝑣 2 𝑃−𝑃𝑣
If 𝑃 > 𝑃𝑣 𝑅𝑒 = 𝐹𝑣𝑎𝑝 √3 [7]
𝑅𝐵 𝜌𝑙

Methodology
Ansys Fluent software will be used to perform CFD simulations. UDF (user defined function) file
will be used for following purpose

1. Varying pressure inlet profile of air

2. To calculate the force on missile and then update its velocity

Until now develop the udf for both above listed purposes, for varying pressure profile as fallow
according to [2]

16

14

12
Pressure (Bar)

10

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5


time (sec)
It’s a one degree of freedom problem (ODF), In process of submarine launch forces including
gas and liquid on the bottom of missile are represented by following differential equation

𝑑(𝑚𝑉)
= 𝐺 + 𝐹𝑔𝑎𝑠 + 𝐹𝑙𝑖𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑑 [2]
𝑑𝑡

These forces will update the velocity of projectile at every time step. Its udf is as fallow
Results
I run the simulation for 6500kg mass of missile and found the following results to validate [2]
my setup procedure, volume fraction contour when the cavitation begins to start are as fallow
Velocity and acceleration variation with time is as fallow

35 100
Velocity
30 Acceleration
80

Acceleration (m/sec )
2
25
60
Velocity (m/sec)

20
40

15
20
10
0
5
-20
0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0

time (sec)
Results of [2] with which it validate are as fallow
Summary and future work
Until now following work has been done

1. Develop the udf for both


a. Pressure inlet boundary condition
b. To calculate the forces on missile body which will update its velocity
2. Run the simulation
3. Make the results mesh independence
4. Validate the results with [2] for right setup procedure

Now further I have to study following things

1. To find how much pressure should be given at pressure inlet cartridge to push the
missile out of the sea water with varying height of sea water and mass of projectile to
achieve minimum 15m/sec velocity when it comes out of sea water surface.
2. Effect of shape of missile on cavitation and how the requirement of inlet pressure will
change by changing shapes.
References
[1] J. Y. Cao, C. J. Lu, Y. Chen, X. Chen, and J. Li, “Research on the base cavity of a sub-launched
projectile,” J. Hydrodyn., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 244–249, 2012.

[2] R. Li, G. Le, D. Ma, and S. Chen, “A study on the tube-exit cavity surrounding submarine-launched
missile,” in 3rd International Conference on Engineering Technology and Applications, 2016, pp.
737–741.

[3] “cavitation.” [Online]. Available: [Link]

[4] S. Uuv and A. V. O. F. Method, “Numerical Analysis for Water-Exit Trajectory of,” vol. 159, no.
Mmsa, pp. 276–279, 2018.

[5] D. G. Ang, “Shape and Size Matter for Projectile Drag Shape and Size Matter for Projectile Drag,”
vol. 1, no. 1, 2013.

[6] “mixture model.” [Online]. Available:


[Link]

[7] P. J. Zwart, A. G. Gerber, and T. Belamri, “A Two-Phase Flow Model for Predicting Cavitation
Dynamics,” Int. Conf. Multiph. Flow, no. 152, p. 152, 2004.

Common questions

Powered by AI

Cavitation is undesirable because it can cause significant damage to missile components. It occurs when the static pressure in a liquid falls below its vapor pressure, creating vapor-filled cavities that collapse violently upon reaching higher pressure regions. These collapses can produce shock waves capable of damaging mechanical parts, such as missile rivets or propellers. Thus, missile designs aim to minimize cavitation to prevent material fatigue and maintain structural integrity .

Mesh independence is crucial because it ensures that simulation results are not sensitive to the discretization of the computational domain. Achieving mesh independence confirms the accuracy and reliability of the results, allowing the simulation to predict launch parameters like velocity and cavitation accurately, regardless of the mesh's granularity. This independence is vital for validating and generalizing the simulation findings across different scenarios .

The simulation employs Ansys Fluent for CFD simulations, incorporating User Defined Functions (UDFs) to manage varying inlet pressure profiles and calculate forces affecting the missile's velocity. The process involves solving equations for multiphase flow dynamics, including continuity, momentum, and cavitation models. This simulation approach ensures an accurate representation of the launch dynamics and offers valuable insights into design optimizations .

Differential equations play a crucial role in modeling the forces acting on a missile during its underwater launch. The equation d(mV)/dt = G + F_gas + F_liquid represents how the forces, including gravitational, gas, and liquid influences, impact the missile's motion. These equations update the missile’s velocity at each timestep, offering insights into dynamic interactions under varying conditions .

Inlet pressure variations directly affect the projectile's velocity and cavitation length. Increasing the pressure boosts the missile's speed in water, which extends the cavitation length at the shoulder, impacting the drag force and missile structure at this location. This relationship highlights the need to carefully control pressure to balance performance and integrity during the launch .

The submarine launch of an underwater missile involves three stages: tube-exit, water moving, and water-exit stages. The tube-exit stage is crucial due to its complex mechanical environment. When the projectile exits the tube, the gas behind it expands into the water, later shrinking and breaking into two parts, affecting the projectile and the tube. The significance of this stage lies in managing gas expansion and the mechanical dynamics required to ensure a smooth transition into the water .

The simulation of the submarine launch process utilizes a 2D planar, transient, and multiphase fluid model. The key mathematical models include the continuity equation for liquid, vapor, and air, the momentum equation, and the Zwart-Gerber cavitation model. These equations model the dynamic behavior of the gas-liquid interaction, capturing the complex interplay of forces during the missile launch .

The project aims to extend its research scope by investigating optimal pressure conditions needed at the inlet to achieve a minimum exit velocity of 15 m/s under various sea heights and missile masses. Additionally, it plans to study how modifying missile shapes affects cavitation and pressure requirements, potentially leading to improved designs that minimize cavitation phenomena and optimize performance .

Missile shape significantly influences its trajectory and cavitation effects. An improperly designed shape could increase the drag force and create lift due to a larger cavity at the shoulder, altering the missile's trajectory. It can also intensify cavitation effects that weaken structural integrity. A streamlined shape reduces drag and minimizes the risk of trajectory deviations and cavitation damages .

The simulation validated that a 6500 kg missile reaches the expected velocity and acceleration profiles when subjected to the specified forces, aligning well with the theoretical expectations outlined in previous studies. Volume fraction contours indicated cavitation onset, with velocity and acceleration data showing consistency with established models, thereby affirming the simulation’s precision and setup correctness .

You might also like