Revision No. Revision Date Page No. 00 01/01/11 1 OF 2 Document No FSM-01
Revision No. Revision Date Page No. 00 01/01/11 1 OF 2 Document No FSM-01
,
NAGPUR.
REVISION NO. 00
FOOD SAFETY INDEX REVISION DATE 01/01/11
MANUAL PAGE NO. 1 OF 2
DOCUMENT NO FSM-01
Approved By : Issued By
SURUCHI SPICES PVT. LTD.,
NAGPUR.
REVISION NO. 00
FOOD SAFETY INDEX REVISION DATE 01/01/11
MANUAL PAGE NO. 2 OF 2
DOCUMENT NO FSM-01
Approved By : Issued By
SURUCHI SPICES PVT. LTD.,
NAGPUR.
REVISION NO. 00
FOOD SAFETY COPYRIGHT REVISION DATE 01/01/11
MANUAL PAGE NO. 1 OF 1
DOCUMENT NO FSM-02
Approved By : Issued By
SURUCHI SPICES PVT. LTD.,
NAGPUR.
REVISION NO. 00
FOOD SAFETY DISTRIBUTION LIST REVISION DATE 01/01/11
MANUAL PAGE NO. 1 OF 1
DOCUMENT NO FSM-03
Approved By : Issued By
SURUCHI SPICES PVT. LTD.,
NAGPUR.
REVISION NO. 00
FOOD SAFETY REVISION RECORD REVISION DATE 01/01/11
MANUAL PAGE NO. 1 OF 1
DOCUMENT NO FSM-04
Approved By : Issued By
SURUCHI SPICES PVT. LTD.,
NAGPUR.
REVISION NO. 00
FOOD SAFETY COMPANY PROFILE REVISION DATE 01/01/11
MANUAL PAGE NO. 1 OF 1
DOCUMENT NO FSM-05
INTRODUCTION
Approved By : Issued By
SURUCHI SPICES PVT. LTD.,
NAGPUR.
REVISION NO. 00
FOOD SAFETY INTRODUCTION REVISION DATE 01/01/11
MANUAL AND PAGE NO. 1 OF 1
SCOPE DOCUMENT NO FSM-06
This Food Safety Manual outlines the Policies and Practices with regard to safety & hygiene of food product,
adopted by Suruchi Spices Pvt. Ltd.
This manual describes Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) system for Manufacturing and
supply of Variety of Papad, Hing ,Instant Mixes, Spices.& whole spices
This manual is designed to meet the requirements of ISO 22000:2005 & Codex Alimentarius Commission
requirements.
This Manual is supported by Standard Operating Procedures, Ingredients Charts, Quality Plans, Work
Instruction, Process flow charts, Operation PRP, HACCP Plans and related Formats & Records.
The products are categorized into nine groups (Papad, Hing, Masala Powder, Turmeric & Coriander
Powder, Chilly Powder, Papad Atta , Methi Leaves ,Instant Mixes & whole spices according to process
patterns and are supported by Operation PRP & HACCP Plans
Approved By : Issued By
Food Safety
SURUCHI SPICES PVT. LTD.,
concept that food will not cause harm to the NAGPUR.
consumer when it is prepared and/or eaten according to
its intended use REVISION NO. 00
FOOD SAFETY ABBREVIATION, TERMS & REVISION DATE 01/01/11
MANUAL
Food Chain DEFINITIONS PAGE NO. 1 OF 2
DOCUMENT NO FSM-07
sequence of the stages and operations involved in the production, processing, distribution, storage
and handling of a food and its ingredients, from primary production to consumption
End Product
product that will undergo no further processing or transformation by the organization
flow diagram
schematic and systematic presentation of the sequence and interactions of steps
control measure (food safety) action or activity that can be used to prevent or eliminate a food
safety hazard (3.3) or reduce it to an acceptable level
PRP
prerequisite programme
(food safety) basic conditions and activities that are necessary to maintain a hygienic environment
throughout the food chain (3.2) suitable for the production, handling and provision of safe end
products (3.5) and safe food for human consumption
operational PRP
operational prerequisite programme
PRP (3.8) identified by the hazard analysis as essential in order to control the likelihood of
introducing food safety hazards (3.3) to and/or the contamination or proliferation of food safety
hazards in the product(s) or in the processing environment
Approved By : Issued By
(food safety) step at which control can be applied and is essential to prevent or eliminate a food
safety hazard (33) or reduce it to an acceptable level
critical limit
criterion which separates acceptability from unacceptability
monitoring
conducting a planned sequence of observations or measurements to assess whether control
measures (3.7) are operating as intended
correction
action to eliminate a detected nonconformity
corrective action
action to eliminate the cause of a detected nonconformity or other undesirable situation
validation
(food safety) obtaining evidence that the control measures (3.7) managed by the HACCP plan and
by the operational PRPs (3.9) are capable of being effective.
verification
confirmation, through the provision of objective evidence, that specified requirements have been
fulfilled
updating
immediate and/or planned activity to ensure application of the most recent information
A documented system including this manual, food safety policy, related objective and those
described under scope (Refer FSM-06) is established and maintained in order to ensure
product conformance and food safety.
Approved By : Issued By
Control of Documents & Records :
Control of Documents
To ensure that changes and the current revision status of documents are identified,
To ensure that documents of external origin are identified and their distribution
controlled, and
Control of Records
This procedure describes the responsibility, authority and the methodology for the
identification, storage, protection, retrieval, retention time and disposition of quality
records.
It is ensured that the records remain legible, readily identifiable and retrievable.
PROCEDURE FOR DOCUMENT & RECORD: (REFER FSM-21)
Food Safety Policy and related Objective are established. The importance of meeting the
requirements of ISO 22000:2005, customer as well as statutory & regulatory requirements are
communicated within the organisation.
Management Reviews are conducted to ensure continuing suitability, adequacy and
effectiveness, and availability of adequate resources.
The food safety management system is in address the requirements of ISO 22000:2005. The
Approved By : Issued By
system also includes any outsourced process.
It is ensured that integrity of the food safety management system is maintained when
changes to the food safety management system are planned and implemented.
Responsibility and authorities are defined and communicated within the organization to ensure
the effective operation and maintenance of the food safety management system.
All personnel have responsibility to report problems with the food safety management system
to identified persons. Designated persons have defined responsibility and authority to initiate
and record actions. (Refer QMP-01)
Communication
External Communication
To ensure that sufficient information on issues concerning food safety is available throughout
the food chain, following channels are established, implemented and maintained ts for effective
communication.
Approved By : Issued By
a) Suppliers and Food safety of Supplier selection MD/WM/
contractors RM/PKG/Ingredients & process, supplier QA Mgr.
Services such as Pest evaluation including
control / maintenance supplier assessment visit
report
b) i) Customers or Product information Instructions on Packing / Director
Consumers including instruction Labelling. Mktg. /
regarding intended use, QA Mgr.
specific storage
requirements and as
appropriate, shelf life
ii) Customer/ Product information i) Product information Director
Stockists / enquiries, contracts or sheet Mktg.
Dealers etc. order handling including ii) Enquiry / Order
amendments. handling process
iii) Marketing Product information i) Product information Director
personnel / customer feedback/ sheet Mktg.
Agents complaints. ii) Customer complaints /
feedback process
c) Statutory & Applicable statutory / Correspondence & WM/
Regulatory regulatory requirements compliance records Director
authority Mktg.
(FDA/PFA/
Agmark. Factory
Inspection
d) Other Affected effectiveness or Correspondence & Director
organisation updating of the food safety compliance records Mktg.
management system.
Approved By : Issued By
SURUCHI SPICES PVT. LTD.,
NAGPUR.
REVISION NO. 00
FOOD SAFETY MANAGEMENT REVISION DATE 01/01/11
MANUAL RESPONSIBILITY PAGE NO. 3 OF 4
& IMPROVEMENT DOCUMENT NO FSM - 9
Internal communication
Internal communication with personnel on issues having an impact on food safety at various
levels are effected through System documentation, notices , displays, e-mails, briefings,
meetings and training sessions (Class room & 0n-the job).
.
In order to maintain the effectiveness of the food safety management system, it is ensured that
the food safety team is informed in a timely manner of changes, including but not limited to the
following :
a) products or new products;
b) raw materials, ingredients and services;
c) production system and equipments;
d) production premises, location of equipment, surrounding environment;
e) Product information, Hazard analysis, PRP,OPRP, HACCP Plans.
f) cleaning and sanitation programmes;
g) packaging, storage and distribution system;
h) personnel qualification levels and/or allocation of responsibilities and
authorizations;
i) personnel qualification levels and/or allocation of responsibilities and
authorizations;
j) customer, sector and other requirements that the organization observes;
k) relevant enquiries from external interested parties;
l) complaints indicating food safety hazards associated with the product;
m) other conditions that have an impact on food safety;
The food safety team ensures that this information is included in the updating of the food safety
management system. Top management ensures that relevant information is included as input to
the management review.
Approved By : Issued By
SURUCHI SPICES PVT. LTD.,
NAGPUR.
FOODMANAGEMENT
SAFETY / QUALITY REVISION NO. 00
FOOD SAFETY RESPONSIBILITY
POLICY & REVISION DATE 01/01/11
MANUAL AUTHORITY PAGE NO. 4 OF 24
1
DOCUMENT NO FSM - 109
Emergency Preparedness and Response
Adequate precautions are in place to counter emergency situations such as fires, floods, etc. In
the eventuality of an emergency situation , any affected or damaged product and material are
handled according to control of non –conformity (FSM 18)
Management Review
Food Safety Management System is reviewed every six months to ensure its continuing
suitability, adequacy and effectiveness. The review includes assessing opportunity for
improvement and the need for change to the Food Safety Management System, including
Food Safety policy and related Objective.
Review Input
The input to the management review includes the following information on
Follow up actions from previous management review
Quality / Food Safety Policy,
Objective,
Results of Internal Audits and Verification activities,
External Audits,
Changes that could affect the QMS & FSMS,
Emergency Situations , accidents and withdrawals,
Customer feedback and Complaints,
Communication activities (Internal and External),
Process performance & product conformity,
Status of preventive & corrective actions,
Recommendations for improvement.
Review output
The output from management review includes any decisions and actions related to
Improvement of the effectiveness of the QMS & FSMS including policy and objectives,
Improvement of product related to customer requirements,
Output results of follow up actions from previous management reviews, and
Resource needs.
The action points and decisions arising out of the review process, including resource provision are
implemented and recorded.
Improvement
Continual Improvement
Effectiveness and efficiency of the QMS & FSMS is improved continually. This is achieved through the
use of Quality Policy, Quality Objectives, Audit and Verification results, Analysis of data, Review of
Hazard analysis, OPRP and HACCP plan, corrective & preventive actions and management Review
To implement and maintain the Food Safety Management system and continually improve
its effectiveness, and Date – 01/01/11
Director
To enhance customer satisfaction by meeting customer requirements.
Human Resources
(Mr.
General
Prakash Kataria)
It is ensured that personnel performing work affecting product quality hygiene & safety
are competent on the basis of appropriate education, training, skills and experience, and
are made aware of the relevance and importance of their activities in achieving quality
objectives.
Competence, Awareness and Training
Necessary competencies required for performing work affecting product quality are
Approved By : Issued By
determined.
Approved By : Issued By
SURUCHI SPICES PVT. LTD.,
SURUCHI SPICES
[Link]. LTD.,
Product characteristics NAGPUR. REVISION NO. 00
TheFOOD minimum SAFETY qualification setSURUCHI for FOOD
FOOD SAFETY SAFETY
SPICES TEAM Team PVT. Member LTD.,
REVISION is : NO.
DATE 01/01/11
00
Raw materials,
Graduation in ingredients and Packing
Science/Diploma/Degree food materials
technology /Engineering with minimum 5
Flow FOODdiagrams,
MANUAL SAFETY process steps PRODUCTand control measures
NAGPUR.
INFORMATION -PAGE NO. DATE
REVISION 1 years
01/01/11
OF 1
Operational
experience
All rawMANUAL in prerequisite
related industry,
materials, ingredientsSURUCHI programmes(PRPs)
sufficient
and product-contact hands SPICES
& TRACEABILITY on knowledge
materials
PVT. LTD., ofareproduct,
DOCUMENT
PAGE
REVISIONdescribed trained
NO. NO. inNO through
product00 1FSM various
information
OF -1 13
Hazard
Validation
FOOD
sheet
Flow to identification
SAFETY
the
diagrams
FOOD SAFETY of control
extent measure
activities.
needed and to determination
combinations
conduct
SURUCHI
PROCESS the hazard of
SPICESacceptable
analysis.
[Link]. LTD.,
INFORMATION levels
The information
DOCUMENTDATE
REVISION include
NO the FSM - 14 :
following
01/01/11
The
Internal
Flow operational
audit
diagrams
MANUAL PRPs
are prepared are documented
for and the following that include
NAGPUR. the following
products categories PAGE information
REVISION : Papad,
NO. NO. :Hing, Masala 1 OF 1Powder,
00
All
Prior a)
Withdrawals
Severity
Control
a)
food
to of
food biological,
ofhazards
document
implementation
safety safety Impact chemical
and
hazard(s) that
of (SEVERITY)
record
control
are
to be
reasonably physicalexpected
procedure
controlled
measures characteristics;
by
to be
the included
programme
to occur inin operational
(see
relation 7.4.4);to the
PRP(s) type and
of product,
the
The qualification
(Turmeric
FOOD
b) & records
Coriander)
SAFETY of formulated
composition
of
Powderindividual
SURUCHI &
HAZARD member
Chilly
ingredients,SPICES
Powder,
ANALYSIS are maintained
[Link]
instant
including
in
LTD.,
mixes,Whole their
DOCUMENT
REVISION respective
and Spices
NO.
DATENO
processing FSM on HACCP
Competency
based 01/01/11
00
aids; 15type
-process
of
plan
Internal
process
b)and
record.
similarity
Level
FOOD control
1)audits
after
ofand
MANUAL any
actual
measure(s)
are change
ToCorresponding
SAFETYenable conducted
processing
and therein
facilitate at HAZARD
Number planned
facilities
the arecomplete
tovalidated
beintervals
are and
entered identified
ANALYSIS
[Link]
ensure
i.e. withdrawal
into once
theand
that in
recorded.
Hazard Six months
lots The
of Identification
PAGE
REVISION of end
NO. identification
toDATE
determine
products
and Risk which
1 OFwhether
is based
01/01/11 have been
2 the
on
c)
CONTROL
Quality
c) packaging
monitoringOF
identified
management DOCUMENTS
asandandfood
unsafe.
procedures delivery that
safety methods;
demonstrate
management that system
the operational PRPs are implemented;
Analysis
d) MANUAL Worksheet
storage conditions SURUCHI
and shelf OF life; SPICES PVT. LTD., DOCUMENT
PAGE
REVISION NO. [Link] 2FSM
00 OF -2 16
I.
d)
a)
Corrections
SR.
Flow DOCUMENT
corrections
the
2)
diagrams the
selected
Carry preliminary
out III.
and
NAME
include the PREPARATION
control
corrective
CONTROL
traceability
the CONTROL
information
measures
following: ofactions
the are
and to MEASURES
APPROVAL
DOCUMENTS
capable
data
be
DESIGNATION
potentially taken
collected,
unsafe AND
ofifproduct
achieving
monitoring
OF ISSUE
by EXTERNAL
pouchtheshowsintended that
no.(series),Lot ORIGIN
the
POSITIONcontrol
operational
of the
no., 01/01/11
packing PRPs
food
date(on
FOOD
e) WillSAFETY definitely
preparation result
and/or in
handling an unsafe
before product
NAGPUR.
usetoor the processing; CRITICADOCUMENT
REVISION 10
DATENO FSM - 16
b)
a)
NO. MANUALare 1.
safety
conforms
not Preparation
experience,
pouch)hazard(s)
in control
to the forof Master
planned
which theycopy
arrangements,OPERATIONAL
are of FSM
designated, and requirements of ISO 22000:2005, food
a. Identification of NC products beyond acceptable Lstandard
REVISION
PAGE NO. NO. criticalmaterials
limit, 00
1 limit
OF 1 or loss
The1f)c)
e)
b)
1.
a) 3) 2. Food
responsibilities
[Link]
the
BasedReviewing
responsibilities
the
Identifying
safety external
control safety-related
management documents
measures
and
Mankar
sequence
on above for
information
and and adequacy
requirements acceptance
authorities;
system
are
of
interaction
information external
effective
including,
carry and
requirements
for
MR of
out PRP
origin
&
all
criteria
Approving
planning
and to (OPRP)
capable
Chief
steps
traceability
or
established
the and
in extent
forthe
specifications
documents
of,
conducting
inand
possible,
operation;
actual
SERIOUS
(Sr.
combination,
packing No of
audits,
Expert
date of1)
purchased
epidemiological
and
the ensuring
for reporting
(Technical)/team
product. control and and
results
ofother
leader the
FOOD WillSAFETY likely
of
ingredients control result on
appropriatein an
oPRP’S. unsafe
toCONTROL
their product
intended OF uses. REVISION
DOCUMENT 8
DATENO 01/01/11
FSM - 17
and b)f)
b) [Link]
maintaining
arranging
record(s)
identified
any Preparation
historical
for records,
ofthe
foodmonitoring.
outsourced data, of
implemented
procurement
safety
areandMaster
defined
hazard(s)
processes ofcopy
and in a of
relevant
and &Quality
updated.
to
documented
obtain
Microbiologist revisions
subcontracted Plans,
end procedure. Guidelines,
products
work; (MR/QP/11)
that meet Checklists,the defined Work acceptable
g) MANUAL
4) May After result
Identified conforming in anactual
statutory unsafe andpacking product NONCONFORITY
regulatory date againfood safety
carry out MAJOR PAGEforNO.
requirements
traceability related
dispatch 5 to the
details 1the
above.
of OFproduct
2 i.e
Evaluation
i) d)
2c) Mr. levels.
Qualityb. Nitin
where Determine
Instructions,
Information
of individual
systemOswal
raw related
from the
Process
verification
materials, type
the food HACCP
of
flow Non-conformance
charts,
results
ingredients,chain
Factory PLAN)
and
on Operation
food
analysis
Manager
intermediate safety occurred
PRP,
of HACCP
hazards
results inof the
that
Team product
Plans
verification
may
Member beand during
of related
activities
relevance all stages
Formats,
(Internal
for the of
packing
Will not advice,
result bills,
in anname unsafe of parties product order book etc. products MINOR DOCUMENT and packing 3 NOmaterials FSMenter - 18 the
HACCP
An
and
ii) audit
External
Characteristics [Link]
Product
programme
plan
flow: :process
Review
Audits)
related
ofofend [Link],
and
the
are endApproving
carried
products products,out
taking ofintermediate
by documents
food safety (Sr.
into consideration team
products [Link] 3)and
order importance
the food at ofconsumption.
the processes and areas
If be
to
iii) 3the
e) 5.
audited, Likelihood
5)[Link]
Informed
Statutory
resultthe Confirming
as
of
steps
well
and
the the relevant
preceding of
kushwaha
Issue
Regulatory
as
validation
any Occurrence
parties
controls
updating
and related
shows aboutchemist
following
actionsthe product.
namelythat the revision
resulting
onespecified
or No.
fromboth & date,
operation,
previous
of Team
the Approved Member
audits.
above by correction
elements signature cannotand be
The4d)characteristics
Mrs. where
c. Manjusha
Level reworking
depending
of of end
Corresponding
S. upon andSURUCHI
products
Mankar recycling
the type
are
Number of
describedSPICES
take
to
Microbiologist beplace;
non-conformance PVT.
in documents
entered into LTD.,
the carry theout
toHazard
Team extent properneeded
Identification
Member to andconduct on the
confirmed,
The f)audit
a)
[Link] criteria,
Preparing
6) confirm
the affixing
theplan
process
Withdrawal areissue
control
master
scope,
that of documented
equipment,
the
measure
list
same signature
frequency
overall
showing
product and/or and "Master
utilities/services
performance
and document
depending combinations
methods
shall uponinclude copy
title
ofarethe
and
stock and "system
defined.
are
the stamp
surroundings,
statuscurrent
modified
following
of (on
meets the
revision
parties. rear
appropriately
information
the
and no side
plannedand of
copy
for
andall pages
arrangements
each
re-assessed.
holder )andand
identified
5e)
hazard
critical Mrs.
the 6.
g) generating
control
7)
where
analysis.
Risk
food
the
Handling
[Link]
The
Analysis
Dinesh
Generating
preceding
point
safety
required
of (CCP)
products,
information
waghmare Worksheet
required
management
and
withdrawn copies
: following
intermediate
products
include
copies Chemist
systemas as
links
the
well
NAGPUR.
per
products,
following
Master
requirements
in
as the
affectedfood
: by-products
List,
[Link]
established
of the
Team
products issue
by
and
member
the
still
waste
controls
organization,
in stock,
are
and
and the
released
affixing
sequence
or
of
removed. CONTROL OF REVISION NO. from 00
6a)
Verification
3. toMr.
product
d.
h) Distributing
b) Prakash
identify
Statutoryensure
Stamp
planning
actions
name
tothe ofBothara
that
controlled
beand
include
need
taken.
orthe
“ Controlled
similar
regulatory
for thecopies
updating
identification;
non-conformance
Copy
following Production
orNo”
requirements,
and exercising
improvinginsoredSupervisor
occurred
ink
customer
issue
the food isfood
indicating
control totally
safety Team
as copy
safetyper Member
eliminated
[Link].
management
Sr. on each
requirements, I (5) ofthe
page
system, the
thisproduct.
and
intended
Likely to happen HIGH 10
7FOOD
a)
c) food
to
SAFETY
b) [Link]:
procedure.
use
e. Ajuram
identify
safety
distributing
by the
verify Sindurkar
trends
Note
hazard(s)
customer
the :which
copies
The tooriginal
correction and
be
indicate
to controlled
copy
other
, by
NONCONFORRMI
Production
copyholders
a relevant
higher
of
reanalysing atto Supervisor
external
the
Note
incidence
data.
CCP;
the:In document
case
REVISION
of potentially
product of safety Team
Formats
for received Member
unsafe
[Link]
DATE
istotreated
the products,
master
01/01/11
asaccuracy.
Master
copies
On-site8)
MANUAL verification
Primary Could on
responsibility thehappen
flow
DH-SMD diagramand WM is done
TY by
initiateMEDIUMthe food
/executing the
PAGE team
withdrawal,
forNO. 5 ensure
safety; 2 OF 2
8c)
b) Copy
a)
d) Mr.
control
the
to
biological,
Gunesh
establish
PRP(s)
maintained
measure(s);
are D. chemical
Shukla
information
implemented
in theSURUCHI
and physical
Format
for Main.
planning
Manual
characteristics
Supervisor
ofhas thethe internal
Master
relevant
audit Team
copyprogramme
food
Member
stamp and3 Approved. concerningand the issue
status
d) 9)[Link]
intended
The cause,pawar
[Link]
approval Not
shelf
extent oflikely
life
and and tostorage
result
product. happen
of aSupervisor SPICES
conditions;
withdrawal are recorded PVT.
LOW andLTD.,
DOCUMENT
reported tomember NO
top management FSM - 18to the
as input
The 9c)
b)
[Link](s)
critical
input
and
Interacting
atsignatures
to which
limit(s);
the with
hazard
eachof
&
agencies
areas
Rev.
analysis
food No.
to safety
andbe is
& arranging
audited,
continually
Date
hazard andmay
to updated,
receive
be introduced
latest Team
revisions
(from raw materials, processing
Description of processreview. steps and control measures NAGPUR.
10e) packaging;
management
and d)
c)
e)
5.
Primarydespatch)
monitoring
the
to
Reviewing
[Link]
operational
Maintaining
are considered.
responsibility the
evidence
procedure(s);
revisions
PRP(s)
:all Master
DH thatMfgand list
any approving
the
andshowing
corrections
elements
DH-QAD. Document
for anddistribution
within
Secondarycorrective
title
the ,LTD.,
HACCP
of
Document
copies
actions
responsibility plan
toNo.
that
concerned
[Link]
,have
Revision
implemented
beenfunctions
Notaken& and are
f) 10) labelling
The relating
effectiveness of toSURUCHI
the food
withdrawal safetyprogramme SPICES
and/or is
PVT.
instructions
verified REVISION
for
through handling,
mock NO.
preparation
withdrawal . 00 and usage;
The 116.
e)existing
Hazard
corrections
effective,
effective.
Distributing
is
date.,
considered
control Copy
and
copies corrective
measures, holder
significant
to concerned
and action(s)
process Copy
only functions
no.
iftoNAGPUR.
parameters thebe product
taken andifexternal
critical
of severity limits and
requirementsareoccurrence
exceeded);
(e.g. from is 30regulatory
Ref FOOD
g) SAFETY
records:method(s)NC register, of distribution.
Traceability VALIDATION
records. Verification REVISION
records. DATE 01/01/11
Hazardf)
d)
7. or
authorities responsibilities
hazard
Maintaining
more.
assessment
8. or Displaying
or
levelswhere
customers) relevant
are andlegal
of
withinWI,
authorities;
that document
compliance
Charts
mayidentified
impact etc. is
acceptable
Inrequired.
the part
choice or full
levels,
and for the convenience
rigorousness / effectiveness
of the control with
1 OFmeasures
h) MANUAL identify statutory and regulatory food safety requirements PAGE related
REVISION NO. NO. to the above. 00 1
Handling
The g)
e)management
.
are described of
record(s)
other potentially
appropriate
procedures
in of
theresponsible
monitoring.
hazard unsafe
required
document for products
SURUCHI
analysis the
by no the
area
sheet and organization
being
torevision
SPICES
the audited
extent status
are ensure
[Link]
needed that
LTD.,
to conductactions
and the effective,
are taken
hazard without
analysis. undue
FOOD Risk SAFETY Matrix VERIFICATION DOCUMENT
REVISION DATENO FSM
01/01/11 - 19
Intended
delay
A hazard
f) to use
Review
9.
CONTROL
eliminate
assessment
Maintaining
of thedetected
HACCP
OF
is conducted
relevant
RECORDS
nonconformities
system documents
to and
determine,
its corresponding
and fortheireach causes.
food
records;
safety
Follow-up hazard activities
identified included
of product that may have been affected NAGPUR.
All lotsMANUAL by a nonconforming
LIKELIHOOD situation
PAGE OF NO. are held under1control
OCCURRENCE OF 2 of the
whether its
the
elimination
verification
Theg)intended
organization Analysis of
oruse,
until the
reduction
ofactions
they customer
the have taken
to acceptable
been
reasonably and and consumer
evaluated. the reporting
expected levels complaints
is of
handling essential
theof related
verification
theto to
endthehygiene
REVISION
DOCUMENT production
results.
product, and andfood
NO. NO of
anyasafety;
safeFSMfood,
unintended
00 - 20 andbut
whether
h) Analysis
II.
its control DOCUMENT
1. of Generation
is
withdrawals
needed to CHANGES
of enable
andfood product
safety
the HIGH
defined
/ MODIFICATIONS
dispositions;
records (10)
acceptable
at various MEDIUM
levels
stages to be
as(5)met.
per LOW
FSSP (3)
The
The controls
descriptions
reasonably
FOOD and related
SAFETY
expected are updatedresponses
mishandling as and
appropriate. authorization
VERIFICATION
and misuse of for dealing
the end with
product REVISION potentially
are considered unsafeand
DATE products
01/01/11
described shall be in
The i)results
Compliance
1. SEVERITY
of the
Initiation
2. Maintaining
analysis
of the of actual
document
and of
theflow
food resulting
change
diagrams
safety activities
through
records
and layout
document
in
are the recorded
with
form the
change
of documented
and
Files,
note
reported,
Registers, situation;
in an
etc appropriate
documented
productMANUAL .
information sheet(10) to the extent needed to conduct the hazardPAGE analysis
NO.
Each
manner,
j) foodReview CRITICAL
tosafety
2.
top Reviewing
3.
management
ofand,
hazard
analytical
Maintaining isand evaluated
outcome
asapproving
of
inputMaster according
of
to random
the
change
List management S possible
oftosampling
food
required
the safety review
andrecords asSidentified
severity
analysis anofinput adverse
products;
for S 2 OF
updating
health
2
effects
the
Groups
Evaluation of users
forof
SERIOUS release where
(8)the appropriate, groups of consumers
S specifies; DOCUMENT
are S ofcopy for
NO each FSM
product,
NS as conformity - 20food
and
and
the
safetylikelihood
k) management
Evaluation
consumer groups 3. Amending
4. their
Master
ofsystem.
known conformity
occurrence.
List documents
of food
with
to be especially vulnerable safety
applicable
and preparing
Records legislation revised and master
Title
regulations records, (as well
Record No,
Each lotto [Link]
foreseeable
Reviewing (5)
Indexing changesformodeadequacy
in, Location
legislation
and SPICES
approving
ofas and S to
records,
specific food
regulations)
the Retention
documents NS
and
safety hazardsNS
periodNote
identification
, Designated
: Any
are considered.
changeofperson
changes
/ sampling, in
Product of product
characteristics
MINOR
affected
(3)
by
information the nonconformity
SURUCHI is updated are
andonly
when
Ssafety;
be
PVT. released LTD.,
necessary. as
NS
safe when the results of
analysis legislation
and/or other verification
Modification
and
responsible
regulations to for activities
the maintaining
concerning
documents demonstrate food
are
the that the
reviewed
quality record
byaffected
the . original product NS
lot of approving complies
authority with&the in
NAGPUR.
Traceability
identified
l) Review system
acceptable their
[Link] gapslevels
Maintenance
absence for the
between food
designated
ofcurrent
foodsafety person
safety
and hazard(s)
desired
having
records concerned.
level
access
to keepof knowledge,
to them
pertinent in legiblebackground
awareness
SURUCHI SPICES PVT. LTD.,
REVISION [Link] good and
information
00condition
training of
Disposition
TheFOOD staff 5.
of
traceability with Following
respect
during
nonconforming
SAFETY system is products Sr.
the
to 4,5
retention
hygiene&6
established
PROCEDUREunder
and
period (I)
food
andNAGPUR. safety,
maintained
FOR to identifyresulting REVISIONin effective
incoming (on-the-job)
DATEmaterial 01/01/11 training
from the
immediate sessions;
MANUAL 6.
suppliersMaintaining
6. Retrieving
and thefor Revision
food
initial safety
record
distribution records
CONTROL and obsolete
within
route ofOF reasonable
copy along
the endREVISION product.
PAGE time
with
NO. [Link]
change records 1OF 2
00 Note :
Lot of product not acceptable release is either
m)
Traceability
FOOD Consistency Absolute
7.
records
SAFETY Making
of arethe documents
current
records
maintained documentation.
accessible
related
PROCEDURE for a to
DOCUMENT to
Surgical
defined
a) reprocess or further process within or outside the organization to ensure that the food safety
personnel
FOR Skin
period
& concerned
Marker
for system
DOCUMENT
REVISION arewithretained
the records
assessment
DATENO for 3 years
toFSM enable
01/01/11 - 21 the
hazard is
handling Significant
of
MANUAL Absolute
8.
potentially Making
hazard documents
unsafe are
eliminated or reduced to acceptable levels;records
further
products available
related
subject
and to
CONTROL to
intoSurgical
RECORD outside
CCP
the
or eventdetermination
OFSkin
parties
of Marker
including
product
PAGE NO. using
are retained
customer
[Link] for
This/tree
customer’s
3 years
(Codex
Records
2 OF 2 are in
Selection
accordance Alimentarius
b) Destroyedof7. auditors
with Removingrepresentative
statutory
and Commission
and obsolete
disposed the of
and conduct
asifwaste.
SURUCHI
regulatory–document
agreed
Food ofDOCUMENT
Hygiene.
audits
contractually
SPICES
requirements are done & in
PVT.
and manner
LTD.,
customer
DOCUMENT to ensure
requirements. NOthe objectivityFSM - 21 and
Approved
impartiality By
Hazards :
of [Link]
audit
Destruction process.
as CCP ofAuditors
old
arerecords
managed doRECORD Issued
notthrough
NAGPUR. By
audit their HACCP own work. plan.
Those hazards 10. Preserving with severity old records 5 or more after clearly but aremarking CCP are themmanaged
REVISION as “ OBSOLETE
through operational
NO. ” if kept for
00
PRP
FOOD SAFETY (OPRP). reference purposes PROCEDURE FOR REVISION DATE 01/01/11
MANUAL INTERNAL AUDIT PAGE NO. 1OF 2
DOCUMENT NO FSM - 22
PROCEDURE FOR INTERNAL AUDIT
1. .eparation Annual plan covering all activities under the scope of Food Safety
Management System.
2. Preparation of Audit schedule covering all the related activities in the organization.
3. Carrying out unscheduledSURUCHI audits SPICES
in the eventPVT. LTD.,
of major customer complaint, major
PROCEDURE change FOR CUSTOMER
in organization COMPLAINTS
structure change&inPRODUCT
NAGPUR.
and RECOLL
production process.
4. Circulating audit schedule well in advance to the In-charges andNO.
REVISION auditors 00
1. Recording
FOOD SAFETY
5. Informing Customer Complaints
the auditee about theReceived
Customer Complaintsby any means
audit programme REVISION
and ensuring hisDATE 01/01/11
availability for the
2. MANUAL
Investigating
audit. & collecting & information
Product related
Recall to customer
PAGE complaint
NO. to determine
1OF 2
genuineness
6. Confirming & magnitude
date of auditof with
the complaint.
the auditees prior to the DOCUMENT
audi. NO FSM - 23
3. Initiating appropriate
7. Conducting audit andaction to resolve
recording the complaint
Nonconformity. Note :atFor
theFood
earliest
SafetytoAudit
customer’s
PRP &
satisfaction.
Verification checklist are employed additionally
Note : Action May be corrective
8. Recording : action and proposed date of completion.. NOTE :The auditee is
a)
responsible for implementing through
Clarifying with customer correspondence
the corrective action / visits by appropriate function.
9. b) Providinand
Completion compensation
signing of NCR including replacement
c) Product Recall
10. Taking Corrective actions on detected NCs within the proposed completion date and
1without
Evaluation
undueofdelay
severity of complaints.
11. Retaining the NCR till&completion
2. assessing Severity Extent of Complaints.
of corrective action
12. [Link] for recall
Informing auditor of the
/ MR afteraffected batchaction
corrective / batches.
is taken and completed.
[Link] Management Representative for appropriate
13. Verifying and confirming effective implementation of corrective action. action and forwarding
5notifying
copy to MRall distribution outlets / users for identification & quarantine the batches.
14. [Link]
Verifying NCR for collection
status and & disposal
closing the of
NCRaffected batches.
15. [Link]
ReviewingDirector Mktg., preparation
audit reports on the status. and presenting the summary in Management
Review Meeting
4. Compiling customer complaints & presenting for review & data analysis iin MRM.
Approved By : Issued By