0% found this document useful (0 votes)
36 views4 pages

Column Design Verification in ETABS

This document summarizes an example problem that checks the demand to capacity ratio of a reinforced concrete column subjected to axial load and moment. The column geometry, material properties, and loads are described. Hand calculations of the column capacity are shown and compared to results from the ETABS software, finding less than 0.1% difference. The technical feature tested is the design of a tied reinforced concrete column.

Uploaded by

RMM
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
36 views4 pages

Column Design Verification in ETABS

This document summarizes an example problem that checks the demand to capacity ratio of a reinforced concrete column subjected to axial load and moment. The column geometry, material properties, and loads are described. Hand calculations of the column capacity are shown and compared to results from the ETABS software, finding less than 0.1% difference. The technical feature tested is the design of a tied reinforced concrete column.

Uploaded by

RMM
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.

Software Verification

PROGRAM NAME: ETABS


REVISION NO.: 0

RCDF 2004 Example 002


P-M INTERACTION CHECK FOR COMPRESSION-CONTROLLED RECTANGULAR COLUMN

EXAMPLE DESCRIPTION
The Demand/Capacity ratio for a given axial loading and moment is tested in this
example.

A reinforced concrete column is subjected to factored axial load N = 1794 kN


and moment My = 448 kN-m. This column is reinforced with five 25M bars. The
design capacity ratio is checked by hand calculations and the result is compared
with a computed result. The column is designed as a short, non-sway member.

GEOMETRY, PROPERTIES AND LOADING


1794 kN

My= 448 kN-m


550mm

A A 60 mm 350mm
3m

Section A-A

Material Properties Section Properties Design Properties

Ec = 25x106 kN/m2 b = 350 m fcu = 30 MPa


ν = 0.2 d = 490 mm fy = 460 MPa
G = 10416666.7kN/m2

TECHNICAL FEATURES TESTED


 Tied reinforced concrete column design

RCDF 2004 Example 002 - 1


Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: ETABS
REVISION NO.: 0

RESULTS COMPARISON
Independent results are hand calculated and compared.

Percent
Output Parameter ETABS Independent Difference

Column Demand/Capacity Ratio 0.999 1.00 0.10%

COMPUTER FILE: RCDF 2004 EX002

CONCLUSION
The computed results show an acceptable comparison with the independent
results.

RCDF 2004 Example 002 - 2


Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: ETABS
REVISION NO.: 0

HAND CALCULATION

Column Strength under compression control


fcu = 30 MPa fy = 460 MPa
b = 350 mm d = 490 mm

1) Because e = 250 mm < (2/3)d = 327 mm, assume compression failure. This
assumption will be checked later. Calculate the distance to the neutral axis for a
balanced condition, cb:
Position of neutral axis at balance condition:
600 600
=cb = dt = ( 490 ) 277 mm
600 + f y 600 + 460

2) From the equation of equilibrium:


N = Cc + C s − T
where
= =
Cc 0.85 f *c ab 0.85 • 0.8 • =
30 • 350a 7140a
Cs =As′ ( f y − 0.85 f *c ) =
2500 ( 460 − 0.85 • 0.8 • 30 ) =
1, 099, 000 N
Assume compression steels yields, (this assumption will be checked later).
= T A= s fs 2500 fs ( fs < f y )
N1 =
7140a + 1, 099, 000 − 2500 fs (Eqn. 1)

3) Taking moments about As:


1  a 
= N Cc  d −  + C s ( d − d ′ ) 
e′   2 
The plastic centroid is at the center of the section and d ′′ = 215 mm
e′ =e + d ′′ =250 + 215 =465 mm
1   a 
= N  7140a  490 −  + 1, 099, 000 ( 490 − 60 ) 
465   2 
N 2 =7542a − 7.677 a + 1, 016, 280
2
(Eqn. 2)

RCDF 2004 Example 002 - 3


Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: ETABS
REVISION NO.: 0

4) Assume c = 347 mm, which exceeds cb (277 mm).


a = β1a = 0.836 • 347 = 290 mm
Substitute in Eqn. 2:

N 2 = 7542 • 290 − 7.677 ( 290 ) + 1, 016, 280 = 2,557,824 N


2

5) Calculate fs from the strain diagram when c = 365 mm.


 490 − 347 
=fs =  600 247.3 MPa
 347 
ε s =εt =fs Es = 0.0012

6) Substitute a = 290 mm and fs = 247.3 MPa in Eqn. 1 to calculate N1:


N1 = 7140 ( 290 ) + 1, 099, 000 − 2500 ( 247.3) = 2,551,350 N
which is very close to the calculated N2 of 2,557,824 (less than 1% difference)
 250 
= Ne
M = 2552  =  638 kN-m
 1000 

7) Check if compression steel yields. From strain diagram,


 347 - 60 
ε s' =   ( 0.003) = 0.0025 > ε y = 0.0023
 347 
Compression steel yields, as assumed.

8) Therefore, section capacity is

N = FR ( 2551) = 1794 kN
M = FR ( 638 ) = 448 kN-m

RCDF 2004 Example 002 - 4

You might also like