HUDA (DELL)
What is development?
Development is the overall term which is used to measure how advanced a country
is compared to others. There are different types of development:
Economic development - This is considered to be the most important and
involves ways of making money. Governments around the world wish for
this type of development to happen because it means the money they can
gain through taxes can go to develop other aspects of the country, e.g.
infrastructure projects such as roads, hospitals, schools.
Socio-political development - This type of development relates more to
society and involves things like education, health care provisions, safety, or
freedom of speech.
Sustainable development - This type of development takes into account
not only the social and economic factors, but also the environmental
factors.
Development is quite difficult to measure because accurate data is not readily
available, and because the things we want to measure are difficult to measure.
Factors to consider when evaluating development
Economic Physical wellbeing Mental wellbeing Social
- income - diet - freedom - access to education
- type of industries - access to clean water - security - access to health
- security of jobs - environment - happiness care
(including climate, - access to leisure
hazards, etc.) facilities
Measuring Development
Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
Gross Domestic Product per capita is the total income of a country in a year divided
by its population. It shows the average money per person in the population and
can be used to measure development.
Advantages Disadvantages
- Available for every country - Because GDP is the average
with an economic structure money per person, it covers up
any gaps between the rich and
poor.
HUDA (DELL)
Human Development Index (HDI)
The Human Development Index is scale combining several different factors of
development, including income, education and life expectancy. In 2011 the UK
ranked 28th in the HDI out of 187 countries, while Brazil ranked 84th and Tanzania
152nd.
Advantages Disadvantages
- Covers a wide range of - Some data is not available for
aspects of development, e.g. all countries
social and economic - Does not recognise the natural
environment
- Doesn't consider inequalities
Happy Planet Index (HPI)
The Happy Planet Index looks at how efficiently a country is using its resources to
benefit its population, without causing long-term damage to its environment. In
2012, Brazil ranked 21st on the HPI, UK 41st and Tanzania 133rd out of 151
countries.
Advantages Disadvantages
- Considers sustainability and - Doesn't take into
how well the government consideration the economic
supports its population aspect of development
Gender Inequality Index
The Gender Inequality Index considers the level of female participation, and
decision-making process in the workplace, the level of education of women, and
their degree of control over pregnancy. The lower the score, the lower the level of
inequality.
Advantages Disadvantages
- It specifically targets a - The role of women in different
group that is often excluded societies can vary quite
during the development of a considerably, and therefore
country some of the indicators may be
biased in certain situations.
Political Freedom
HUDA (DELL)
Political freedom measures political rights and civil liberties, including the freedom
of elections, the number of people voting or the number of people with the right to
vote, freedom of speech and individual rights.
Advantages Disadvantages
- Uses 7 different measures - Bias towards western ideas of
as well as 25 key questions freedom
judged by experts.
- Data has been collected
since 1973, so trends can be
identified.
Corruption Perception Index
The Corruption Perception Index looks at perceived corruption in governments and
their departments. Governments should be working for their people for
development to happen. The reason perceptions are used is because if corruption
was happening, it would often be hidden and data would be difficult to find.
Advantages Disadvantages
- Covers 183 countries
- Uses various different
sources of information
Environmental Performance Index
The Environmental Performance Index uses 22 indicators to determine the health
of people and the natural environment.
Advantages Disadvantages
- Shows how countries are - Does not look at economic
looking after their natural factors
environment and their
people
- Uses lots of different
indicators
The development gap
HUDA (DELL)
Due to geographical and historical factors, the world is made up of countries which
'have' and some which 'have not' - the development gap. Some of the social
indicators which can separate a country in terms of development include:
Birth Rate
Life expectancy
Number of people per doctor
Literacy rate
Gender equality
Infant mortality
In the 1980s, the world had a clear north/south divide where Europe economically
dominated, and had been since the 19th century, later joined by the USA, Japan
and more recently the East Asia region.
In terms of HDI, Norway is the most developed with an HDI of 0.955.
The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Niger are the least developed
with a HDI with a score of 0.304.
The standard of living between Norway and the DRC is the most extreme
example of the development gap.
Although development is perceived to be continuous as many countries are
continuously developing, this is not always the case as some countries
regress as well as develop. Recent figures for HDI in some countries may be
very similar to those 30 years ago.
The development gap is not really closing between the most and least
developed nations.
HUDA (DELL)
Development Case Study - Rwanda
Development in Rwanda has neither been a smooth or continuous process as the
HDI graph above shows.
Development Successes Barriers to development
GDP per capita has There's been an
increased from $333 to increasing number of
$644 and poverty rates floods and droughts.
have fallen by 12%
between 2006-2011. Its a landlocked
country - trade with
Primary school other countries is
attendance, child difficult
mortality and access to
clean water have all There is a risk of
dramatically improved. conflict breaking out
again, although it is
The reliance on coffee is still much reduced.
not as high as before as
the economy is The DRC is next to
increasingly divergent. Rwanda and very
Agriculture is still unstable and there is
HUDA (DELL)
important though a risk that conflict
may spread and
Development has been refugees flood into
made a priority by the Rwanda..
government
Although AIDs and
HIV is low compared
to other Sub-Saharan
African countries, it
is high compared to
the rest of the world
at 3%.
Theories of Development
There are many different theories to explain why societies develop. The two which
are discussed here are Rostow's modernisation theory and the dependency theory
The Rostow Model
Not every theory is going to be entirely correct and there are going to be some
problems with each theory. The issues with the Rostow Model are:
It makes the assumption that all countries start at the same level of
development
It disregards the fact that a each country will have different qualities,
quantities of resources, population or climate/natural hazards.
Out of date and based on the 18th and 19th century development of
European countries
Doesn't take into account that European development came at a cost to
other countries (colonisation).
Dependency Theory
The dependency theory evolved in the late 1950s and is based around the idea that
developed rich countries (core) are limiting the level of development of the poorer
countries (periphery) from the control of the world economy. The most developed
countries are able to exploit less developed countries through the use of their
economic and political power. The Dependency theory also suggests that the
unequal pattern of development has been reinforced by:
rich countries imposing trade barriers and conditions for loans
unbalanced trade - poor countries sell materials cheaply but buy expensive
products
HUDA (DELL)
the selling of unessential products to poor countries
poor countries getting into debt
o 25% of aid received by African countries each year is used to repay
debt rather than build infrastructure.
The problems with the Dependency theory are:
written in the late 1950s so it is out of date.
natural disasters, lack of resources, conflict are just a few examples of
things which may limit development that isn't taken into consideration in
the Dependency theory.
Regional disparity
Regions within a country are all going to develop unequally and at different rates.
Core regions
The core regions are the rich and usually urban areas of a country. They are well
connected and have the majority of the services, business and people, generating
wealth. It is where big businesses, industries and government have their
headquarters. The majority of people live here and services are good.
Periphery regions
The periphery regions are poor and remote rural areas often involved in producing
raw materials which the core regions will use.
Case study - India
India provides us with a good example of how different regions of a country
develops at different rates. In 2010, average income per capita in Bihar (a rural
periphery) was £251 per year, while in Maharashtra (a urban core
) it was £1,011.
Urban core - Maharashtra
Maharashtra is home to three of India's largest cities: Mumbai, Pune, and
Nagpur.
Mumbai:
HUDA (DELL)
o home to 13 million people
o thriving business district, centre for banking, insurance and call
centres
o manufacturing industry
o Bollywood
o Hub for media + technology
Rural periphery - Bihar
Average income at £251 is 25% less than Maharashtra at £1,011
26 of India's 100 poorest districts are in Bihar
80% of people live in rural areas
Poor education and high birth rates
58% of households have electricity
Many people working as landless farm labourers producing barely enough
food to feed their own family
Government is more corrupt than other parts of India
Multiplier effects and downwards spirals
Core regions will often have advantages over the periphery regions.
Core region advantages Periphery region disadvantages
- Fertile soils - poor soils
- located near important - distant from the core and
markets (trade) trade routes
- good communication links - difficult communications,
- healthy, warm climate especially by road
- river/sea ports providing - disease, e.g. malaria
important trade routes - climate hazards, e.g. droughts,
floods, etc.
Types of development
There are two different types of development schemes, top-down and bottom-up.
HUDA (DELL)
Top-down
Top-down development schemes are usually very expensive and a country often
has to borrow money from large organisation like the World Bank or from
companies in developed countries. The decisions related to any top-down scheme
will usually be made by the government and any external groups involved. Local
people who will be affected by the scheme will have little say in the process and
had little influence in the project.
There are problems which exist with all top-down development projects. These
are:
the country will more than likely go into debt from the loans borrowed to
fund the scheme
the loan may also have some conditions attached, leaving the country to
be under some external control over the economy or other development
aspects of the country
jobs are not provided for the local people, instead a lot of machinery and
technology is used
the end product will be expensive to operate
Top-down case study - Three Gorges Dam, China
The Three Gorges Dam in China is the largest dam in the world. It was designed to
meet the benefits of China as a country. It took 14 years to build, created a 405
square miles reservoir behind the dam and generated 22,500 MW of electricity.
The official cost of the project was US$26 billion but some estimates claim that it
cost as high as US$75 billion.
Benefits Costs
Helps with flood 1.3 million people had to
control - protects relocate for the reservoir
100 million
people from o They received little
flooding compensation
Generates 1300 archaeological sites
hydroelectric were flooded
power, 22,500
Yangtze wildlife/species
MW
threatened, e.g. Yangtze
Large ships can river dolphin
now travel on the
Silt will get trapped behind
Yangtze -
the dam, in 50 years the silt
HUDA (DELL)
improving trade will begin to cause
problems with flood
Jobs for people control
working at the
dam, power The reservoir may become
companies and polluted with sewage, farm
cities upstream and industrial waste
who will receive
more trade Farmers downstream no
longer receive the annual
Reduces the need floodwaters which would
for coal-fired irrigate their fields
power stations -
less polluted air The dam is built on fault
lines in an earthquake zone
Tourism may be negatively
affected
Very expensive - US$26
billion or more
Top-down case study - Madeira River Project, South America
The Madeira River project is the largest project in the Amazon region's history. It's
a multinational project to build four dams, a navigation channel, three highways
and a electricity lines. The Santo Antonio dam is one of the dams in the Madeira
River Project and is 5km upstream from Pôrto Velho, the capital of Rondônia. The
dam will be producing 3,150 MW of electricity while costing $5.3 billion to build.
Impacts of the Santo Antonio dam on different groups of people
Benefits Costs
Residents of Porto Velho Residents of Porto Velho
$30 million given to An increase in the
improve the sewage number of immigrants
system in Porto Velho in the area (up to
100,000) will cause a
Mercury poisoning will strain on services and
be closely monitored living space
amongst residents
The increase in water
New jobs available water area will likely
HUDA (DELL)
from the expansion of cause an increase in
agriculture malaria
Local farmers and fishermen
Social support Local farmers and fishermen
programmes put in
place to help local, Loss of culture and
rural communities way of life
(subsistence fishing)
Infrastructure affecting 5,000
improvements fishermen
Fish allowed to Commercial fishing
migrate through fish (worth $1 bn) is at risk
channels created in because preferred fish
the dam catch will be disturbed
- 2,400 jobs at risk
Irrigation water lost
and fisheries affected
downstream from the
Indigenous tribes
dam
The consortium has
Indigenous tribes
paid for two Indian
reservations Flooding and erosion
poses a risk to the
Poor people living in South-
land of Indigenous
East Brazil
tribes
20,000 jobs created
Poor people living in South-
and 100,000 people
East Brazil
attracted to the area
No negative impacts
An education and
training centre for
immigrants and job
seekers established
Brazilian Government
Better infrastructure, Brazilian Government
e.g. roads and
waterways Political conflict - part
of Bolivia will be
Waterway for barges flooded to make way
will make it easier to for the dam
transport soy, timber
and minerals Very expensive - $22
billion
HUDA (DELL)
The dams will provide
energy for Brazil and
Rondônia - 8% of
Brazil's electricity will
be supplied by the
Madeira project Environmental and
conservation groups
Environmental and
conservation groups Expansion of Soya
agriculture results in
Hydro electric power is
more clearance of the
created, reducing the
rainforest
need for oil or nuclear
power The Environmental
Impact Assessment
Flooding is minimised
was based on
using 'run of the river'
insufficient data,
technology
therefore lacking
Two new forest thoroughness.
reserves created
Businesses in South-East Brazil
Businesses in South-East Brazil
Produce the cheapest
Too much
electricity in Brazil
dependence on on
HEP
Bottom-up
Bottom-up development schemes are projects that are planned and controlled by
local communities to help their local periphery area. They are not expensive
because they use smaller, more appropriate technology, which the local people will
have to pay for. Because the project is on a smaller scale compared to a top-down
project, the environmental damage is often much less.
Bottom-up case study - Micro-hydro scheme, Peru
Micro hydro projects are an example of a bottom-up development scheme because
instead of using expensive technology which will require large loans from other
countries or TNCs, they use appropriate, affordable technology and involve local
people in the whole process. Micro hydro schemes are those with a generating
capacity under 100KW. Most are similar to the Santo Antonio scheme by using a
'run of the river' method, but on a much smaller scale.
HUDA (DELL)
Peru is home to the Andes mountains, where there are steep slopes and plenty of
streams and rivers. On the eastern side of the Andes, 44% of the population live on
less than $2 a day. Because of the terrain, around the mountains and the high
rainfall it receives, a micro hydro scheme to produce electricity to the area is a
good investment.
The charity, 'Practical Action', has helped install nearly 50 micro hydro schemes,
now providing electricity to 30,000 people. Part of the costs are paid for by the
local people. The government also has a ten year plan to provide more micro hydro
schemes.
Impacts of the micro-hydro project on different groups of people
Benefits Costs
Villagers Villagers
Reliable electricity Poor people can't
supply afford the electricity
which is metered
The available use of
refrigerators from Population pressures
electricity allows as village size increases
medicine to be stored
properly thus For a poor village, the
improving health care initial cost is quite high
(£500 per household)
Electricity for schools
allows the use of
electrical equipment
Small businesses can
use electricity for their
machinery Peruvian Government
Peruvian Government Some of the resources
needed to build it had
Ease the pressures of
to be sourced from
rapid urban growth as
other countries which
young adults and
creates dependency
teachers are
and expense
encouraged to stay or
return to the village
for new opportunities
Cheaper electricity -
Environmental and
HUDA (DELL)
$0.14 per KW conservation groups
Low running costs The components
needed for the project
Environmental and ruins the landscape.
conservation groups
Ecosystems and
habitats are saved as
there is no need to
flood the area
No need for villagers
to burn wood - less
deforestation and soil
erosion
Bottom-up case study - Wells and Hand Pumps, Africa
WaterAid, a UK NGO install wells and hand pumps in Africa, an example of a
bottom-up development scheme. They only cost £292 pounds each, and use
technology that the local people can use, maintain and repair if necessary. They
provide clean water for a village, eliminating the need for women and children to
go and travel long distances to collect water. Children are now able to spend more
time studying instead of having to collect water.