Law of Contract
DIPLOMA IN LAW & MANAGEMENT
INTRODUCTORY READING MATERIALS
LAW OF CONTRACT
Introduction
The Law of Contract is a very important part of the business world. The law and rules
in this area touch every one of us almost daily, particularly at the workplace.
Knowledge of the law and the rules would help you to plan and manage your business
activities better and also to protect your personal interests.
These materials are designed to give you a general overview of the laws which govern
contractual relationship.
You are strongly urged to read at least one of the RECOMMENDED textbooks listed
in your ‘Contract General Instructions’.
In ADDITION, you may also refer to one of the following texts as a very basic and
INTRODUCTORY reference:
1. Contract law: ‘A Layman’s Guide’ by Catherine Tay Swee Kian
2. Basic Business Law in Singapore by Walter Woon.
3. Singapore Business Law by Benny S Tabalujan.
Prepared by Mrs. Annie P. Gomez
Lecturer, Diploma in Law & Management. 2006
1
Law of Contract
Prepared by Mrs. Annie P. Gomez
Lecturer, Diploma in Law & Management. 2006
2
Law of Contract
CONTRACT LECTURE 1
ELEMENTS OF A CONTRACT
LEARNING OBJECTIVES - OFFER
1. To understand the four elements of a contract.
2. To understand the following rules on “Offer”:
(a) An offer can be Oral or in writing
(b) Who an Offer can be made to
(c) Must the Offer be communicated?
3. To distinguish an offer from
(a) Invitation to treat.
(b) Supply of Information
(c) Declaration of Intent
4. To understand how offers can be terminated by:
(a) Revocation of the Offer
(b) Rejection by the Offeree
(c) Lapse of Time.
Elements of a Contract
A contract is an agreement which is enforceable by law between two or more
persons for some purpose, their intention being to create a legally binding
contract.
Prepared by Mrs. Annie P. Gomez
Lecturer, Diploma in Law & Management. 2006
3
Law of Contract
Prepared by Mrs. Annie P. Gomez
Lecturer, Diploma in Law & Management. 2006
4
Law of Contract
1. Elements of a contract
a. offer } agreement
b. acceptance }
c. intention to create legal relations
d. consideration
All four elements must be present in order for a contract to be valid.
The basis of a contract is an agreement. To have an agreement, there must be a
meeting of minds. Thus, if one party has one thing in mind and the other party
has something else in mind, there is no agreement.
An agreement is usually found to exist when one party makes an offer which the
other party accepts. The use of ‘Offer’ and ‘Acceptance’ is essentially for
determining whether there is agreement between two parties for a contract to
exist.
ELEMENT 1: OFFER
What is an offer?
A person is said to make an offer when he indicates to another his willingness to
enter into a contract on the terms which he sets out in the offer.
Terminology
OFFEROR: The party who makes the offer.
OFFEREE: The party to whom the offer is made.
Prepared by Mrs. Annie P. Gomez
Lecturer, Diploma in Law & Management. 2006
5
Law of Contract
Once the offeree accepts the offer, an AGREEMENT or contract comes into
being.
Prepared by Mrs. Annie P. Gomez
Lecturer, Diploma in Law & Management. 2006
6
Law of Contract
2. General Rules on Offer
2(a) An offer may be:
oral or
in writing or
it may be partly oral and partly in writing.
Examples:
i) Offer made orally:
A makes a phone call to B and asks B if he would like to buy A’s car.
ii) Offer made in writing:
X sends an email to Y and says that he would like to buy Y’s latest 3G
mobile phone.
iii) Offer made partly orally and partly in writing
S asks J if she would like to buy S’s used law text books. S then sends an
SMS to J stating that the books can be bought at an 80% discount.
2(b) An offer may be made to:
i. a single, definite person - if so, only that person can accept the offer;
ii a group of persons - if so, someone from the group can accept; or
iii the world at large - if so, anyone may accept by complying with the
terms:
Examples:
i) Offer to a single person:
Tan asks Lim if he is interested in buying Tan’s ticket to the concert by the
‘Black Eyed Peas’.
Prepared by Mrs. Annie P. Gomez
Lecturer, Diploma in Law & Management. 2006
7
Law of Contract
ii) Ram sends an SMS to his project group mates to ask if any one of them is
interested in buying his classic limited edition DVD album by the rock
group ‘U2’.
iii) Siti posts a notice on her website offering to sell her collection of Barbie
dolls and accessories to the first person who answers her all if her ‘Barbie’
quiz questions correctly.
Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.
In their advertisement, the defendants promised to pay 100 pounds to any person who
contracted influenza after using their product - “the Carbolic Smoke Ball” and that
1,000 pounds had been deposited in a bank to prove their sincerity. Carlill used the
smoke ball as prescribed but still contracted influenza. She sued the defendants for 100
pounds.
Held: The advertisement was an offer to the world and is a valid offer even though
the contract was made with a limited portion of the public who came forward
and accepted the offer.
2(c) An offer must be communicated
An offer must be communicated or made known to the offeree before it can be
accepted. The offeree cannot accept an offer unless he knows of its existence.
Example:
Prepared by Mrs. Annie P. Gomez
Lecturer, Diploma in Law & Management. 2006
8
Law of Contract
The police offer $10,000 to anyone in the public who can give information on a wanted criminal.
A, who is not aware of the reward but who knows of the criminal's whereabouts, cannot collect
the reward because he cannot accept an offer he did not know of.
Prepared by Mrs. Annie P. Gomez
Lecturer, Diploma in Law & Management. 2006
9
Law of Contract
3. Situations which do not amount to an Offer
An offer is the last step before acceptance by the offeree. Once accepted, you
have an agreement. Therefore there is a difference between an offer and the
following situations:
a. invitations to treat
b. supply of information
c. declaration of intent
In these instances, the courts have ruled that these are not "offers" but only a step
in the negotiations which may or may not lead to an offer being made.
3(a) Invitation to Treat
An invitation to treat is an invitation to others to enter into negotiations which
may lead to the making of an offer:
Example: The display of goods in a self-service shop or in a shop window is an
invitation to treat, not an offer.
Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash Chemists (Southern)
Ltd
It was an offence to effect any sale of prescriptive drugs in a
pharmacy without consulting a registered pharmacist. In the
defendant’s pharmacy, customers could select any of the products
(including prescriptive drugs) and bring them to the counter for
payment where the pharmacist could remove any prescriptive drugs.
Whether the pharmacy committed an offence depended on whether a sale
(contract) was concluded when the customer brought the drugs to the
counter.
Held: The display of goods on the shelves was merely an invitation to treat. Hence,
when the customer selects a prescriptive drug from a shelf and brings it to the
counter, it is an offer from the customer to buy the drug. There is therefore no
Prepared by Mrs. Annie P. Gomez
Lecturer, Diploma in Law & Management. 2006
10
Law of Contract
sale (no contract) until the customer’s offer to buy the product is accepted by
the Pharmacist.
3(b) Supply of Information
The supply of information or a statement of selling prices given in reply to a
request is not an offer.
Example:
A asks B: "What is the lowest price for your car?"
B replies:"$30,000."
A says: "I agree to buy your car for $30,000."
Is there a contract between A and B?
No contract as B is merely stating the lowest price. It is not an offer. B never stated that
he wanted to sell the car to A.
Harvey v Facey
Harvey telegraphed Facey in relation to a piece of property known as “Bumper
Hall Pen” :”What is the lowest price for Bumper Hall pen?”
Facey replied “Lowest price for Bumper Hall Pen is 900 pounds”
Harvey replied “We agree to buy Bumper Hall Pen for 900 pounds asked by
you”.
Held: No contract. Facey was merely stating the lowest price (supplying
information) as requested by Harvey. He was not offering to sell the property to
Harvey.
3(c) Declaration of Intent
Prepared by Mrs. Annie P. Gomez
Lecturer, Diploma in Law & Management. 2006
11
Law of Contract
A statement expressing an intention to do something is not an offer
capable of being accepted:
Example:
Robinson’s Department Store announces that there will be a big mid-year sale but it was later
cancelled. If you had gone to Robinson’s believing there to be a sale, can you sue Robinson’s for
breach of contract? NO.
Why? The reason is that Robinson’s did not make an offer, they were merely declaring their
intention of holding a sale.
4. Termination of Offers
An offer may be terminated in three ways:
a. revocation of the offer
b. rejection by the offeree
c. lapse of time
4(a) Revocation of the offer
An offer can be revoked at any time before it is accepted but the revocation must
be communicated to the offeree. This means that the offeree must actually know
of the revocation of the offer by the offeror:
Byrne v Van Tienhoven
Oct 1st: A of UK sends a letter offering to sell goods to B in New York
Oct 11th: B receives the letter and immediately telegraphs his acceptance
Oct 8th: A writes another letter revoking his earlier offer
Oct 20th: B receives the letter of revocation
Prepared by Mrs. Annie P. Gomez
Lecturer, Diploma in Law & Management. 2006
12
Law of Contract
Held: Applying the postal rule, the offer was accepted on Oct 11. The
revocation is therefore ineffective as it was received after the offer was
accepted.
4(b) Rejection by offeree
Rejection of an offer can take place when:
i the offeree communicates his rejection of the offer to the offeror or
ii the offeree makes a counter offer. A counter offer is a new offer made by
the offeree by modifying the original terms of the offeror's offer.
The party who made the original offer may accept the counter offer
which then becomes a binding contract but the offeree who makes the
counter offer cannot change his mind and revive the original offer unless
the offeror agrees to do so.
Hyde v Wrench
Facts:
W offered to sell a farm to H for 1000L. H rejected the offer and made a
counter offer to W to buy the farm at 950L. W rejected it. H then said he
would pay 1000L after all. W by now had decided that he did not want to
sell to H for 1000L. H sued for breach of contract.
Held:
H failed in his suit because his offer of 950L was a counter offer which
terminated W's original offer of 1000L which could not be revived after
the rejection by H.
Prepared by Mrs. Annie P. Gomez
Lecturer, Diploma in Law & Management. 2006
13
Law of Contract
4(c) Lapse of offer
An offer lapses in the following situations:
i Death of either offeror or offeree before acceptance. Death after
acceptance does not affect the contract unless personal service of
contracting party is crucial to the contract.
ii Where the offer has not been accepted within the prescribed time. If there
is no time limit set, it lapses after a reasonable time:
CONTRACT LECTURE 2
LEARNING OBJECTIVES : ACCEPTANCE
1. To understand what is meant by acceptance.
2. To understand the following rules on Acceptance:
(a) Acceptance can be oral, written or by conduct
(b) Acceptance must be absolute and unconditional
(c) Methods of acceptance
(d) Acceptance must be communicated
3. To understand the following exceptions to the general rule that acceptance must be
communicated:
(a) The Postal Rule
(b) Waiver of communication.
INTENTION TO CREATE LEGAL RELATIONS
Prepared by Mrs. Annie P. Gomez
Lecturer, Diploma in Law & Management. 2006
14
Law of Contract
4. To understand why intention to create legal relations is necessary
5. To discuss the use of presumptions in determining an intention to create legal
relations
CONSIDERATION
6. To understand what is “consideration”.
7. To understand the following rules on Consideration.
(a) Consideration must be real
(b) Consideration need not be adequate
(c) Consideration must move from the promisee
(d) Consideration must be legal
(e) Consideration must not be past
ELEMENT 2: ACCEPTANCE
1. What is Acceptance?
It is the unconditional consent by the offeree to all the terms of the offer.
2. General Rules on Acceptance
2(a) Acceptance may be oral, in writing or by conduct (for eg. sending a cheque by
post for some goods) to indicate that you have accepted the offer to buy those
goods at the stated price.
2(b) Acceptance must be absolute and unconditional ie. the offeree must accept all
the terms of the offer without modification.
2(c) The acceptance must conform to the prescribed method. If a particular method
of acceptance is prescribed by the offeror, then that method should be followed.
Prepared by Mrs. Annie P. Gomez
Lecturer, Diploma in Law & Management. 2006
15
Law of Contract
If, however, if no particular method of acceptance has been indicated, whatever
mode of acceptance which is deemed to be reasonable in that trade would be
acceptance.
EXAMPLE
A offers to sell his Reebok shoes for $30 and indicates that acceptance should be by
phone. B sends his acceptance by leaving a note on A's table. Has there been effective
acceptance? Why?
No. Not accepted by the method specified.
2(d) Acceptance must be communicated.
Therefore, silence is not acceptance.
Felthouse v Bindley
Felthouse wrote to his nephew offering to buy his horse for 30 pounds and
added “If I do not hear from you, I will consider the horse mine at that price”.
The nephew did not reply and subsequently sold his horse to a third party2
weeks later.
Held: No contract since the nephew’s silence in this situation could not be
taken as acceptance.
3 Two exceptions to this rule that acceptance must be communicated are:
(a) Acceptance by post (The Postal Rule)
Acceptance by letter or telegram is complete when the letter is posted, even if it
arrives late or never arrives. This is known as the "Postal Rule".
Prepared by Mrs. Annie P. Gomez
Lecturer, Diploma in Law & Management. 2006
16
Law of Contract
Exception to the Postal Rule: But in all other types of communication, eg.
telephone, telex and fax, the Postal Rule DOES NOT APPLY and acceptance
of the offer must be actually communicated to the offeror.
Entores Ltd v Miles Far East Corporation
The plaintiffs, a London company, offered to sell goods to the defendants who
the were in Amsterdam. The defendants communicated their acceptance of offer
to the plaintiffs in London by Telex. The defendants breached the contract and
the plaintiffs sought to establish that the contract was formed in London (where
the acceptance telex was received) and not in Amsterdam (where the acceptance
telex was sent).
Held: For instantaneous communications, the contract is formed when the
acceptance is received. Hence, the contract was formed in London.
(b) Waiver of communication
If the offeror expressly or impliedly waives the need for communication, then
acceptance need not be communicated.
ELEMENT 3: INTENTION TO CREATE LEGAL RELATIONS
4. What is Intention to Create Legal Relations?
Before a contract can be legally enforceable, it must be shown that the parties
had intended the contract to be legally binding. If they expressly state that
intention, the courts will respect it.
Prepared by Mrs. Annie P. Gomez
Lecturer, Diploma in Law & Management. 2006
17
Law of Contract
5 Where it is unclear what the intention of the parties' is, the courts will then
make some presumptions:
2 types of presumptions:
a) for commercial and business agreements – ‘intention to be bound’
b) for domestic and social agreements - ‘no intention to be bound’
a) Commercial and business agreements
The court presumes that the parties want their contract to be legally
binding. But the parties to a business agreement can easily get out of this
by expressly indicating that the contract is to be binding "in honour
only",i.e. not enforceable.
b) Domestic and social agreements
The court presumes that the parties do not intend their agreement to
have legal effect. Again, this can be rebutted if the parties indicate
expressly that they want to have a legally binding contract.
EXAMPLE A
Mr and Mrs Tan agree that Mr Tan's salary will be used to pay for all of Mrs Tan's
personal expenses if she stopped working to look after the children. Can Mrs Tan sue Mr
Tan for the money if he stops paying? NO.
EXAMPLE B
Prepared by Mrs. Annie P. Gomez
Lecturer, Diploma in Law & Management. 2006
18
Law of Contract
But if Mr Tan had made the promise at a time when the couple was planning to separate
and especially if the couple had written down this agreement, then would Mrs Tan be
able to sue? YES.
ELEMENT 4: CONSIDERATION
6. What is Consideration?
It is some benefit or profit accruing to one party or some detriment or loss
suffered or undertaken by the other.
Every agreement involves a promise, either to do something or not to do
something. A promise is only legally binding if it is made in return for another
promise or an act. This requirement for "something for something" is called
consideration. The party making the promise must gain some benefit for the
promise while the party receiving the promise must suffer some detriment.
Terminology
PROMISOR:
The party who makes the promise to do something or not to do something.
PROMISEE:
The party to whom the promise is made.
7. General Rules on Consideration
All contracts must be supported by consideration to be legally binding. An
important exception is contracts under seal, or deeds. These are very formal
contracts which are clearly and carefully worded to be legally binding, where the
Prepared by Mrs. Annie P. Gomez
Lecturer, Diploma in Law & Management. 2006
19
Law of Contract
parties sign their consent and their signatures are witnessed by a third party,
usually a lawyer.
Rules on Consideration
7(a) Rule 1: Consideration must be real.
This means that there must be some value, however small.
Examples of acts which are NOT consideration:
i. acts of love and affection, eg. between parent and child or husband and wife
ii. acts done out of a moral or social duty, eg. the act of a lifeguard saving a
drowning child is not valuable consideration because he is employed to do it.
7(b) Rule 2: Consideration need not be adequate.
The general rule is that the parties are free to decide on the terms of their
contract. As long as some value is given, it does not matter whether it is
proportionate in value to the thing given in return.
7(c) Rule 3: Consideration must move from the promisee (Privity of Contract).
Privity of contract means that only a party to a contract can sue or be sued on
that contract. This means that the person to whom the promise is made must
furnish the consideration. No third party can derive any benefit or incur any
liability on a contract to which he is not a party to. If a person has given nothing,
he cannot enforce the promise if it is not kept.
Price v Easton
Prepared by Mrs. Annie P. Gomez
Lecturer, Diploma in Law & Management. 2006
20
Law of Contract
X owed some money to Price. Price therefore worked out a scheme whereby X
would work for one Easton and in return Easton would pay Price. X did the
work as agreed but Easton did not pay the money to Price. Price sued Easton.
Held:
Price was not a party to the contract between X and Easton. Since there was no
contract between Price and Easton, Price is not entitled to sue Easton for the
debt.
7(d) Rule 4: Consideration must be legal.
EXAMPLE
David agrees to pay Philip $50,000 if Philip poisons Charlie's coffee. Philip's act of
poisoning Charlie is illegal. He cannot therefore sue David for the money even if Charlie
is poisoned.
7(e) Rule 5: Consideration must not be past.
When a promise is made in exchange for an act which has already taken place in
the past, then there is no value for the promise.
EXAMPLE
A saves B's child from drowning in a pool. B then promises to pay A $500 for the act
of saving. A's act of saving the child is past consideration and he cannot sue B for
the $500 because past consideration is no consideration.
Prepared by Mrs. Annie P. Gomez
Lecturer, Diploma in Law & Management. 2006
21