0% found this document useful (0 votes)
532 views1 page

Speech-Language Screening Report

X was screened for speech and language skills. While his language abilities were found to be within normal limits, he exhibited multiple misarticulations that significantly compromised his intelligibility. It is recommended that X receive Tier 2 interventions from his teacher and parents for 4 weeks to address his articulation errors before being rescreened to determine if referral to a speech-language program is needed.

Uploaded by

api-438091798
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
532 views1 page

Speech-Language Screening Report

X was screened for speech and language skills. While his language abilities were found to be within normal limits, he exhibited multiple misarticulations that significantly compromised his intelligibility. It is recommended that X receive Tier 2 interventions from his teacher and parents for 4 weeks to address his articulation errors before being rescreened to determine if referral to a speech-language program is needed.

Uploaded by

api-438091798
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
  • Speech-Language Screening Report

____________ Elementary School

Speech-Language Screening Report

Student:
Date of Birth:
Age:
Teacher:
Date of Screening:

X was screened on 10/21/16, using the Communication Appraisal Summary (CAS), an


informal 5-10 minute conversational speech sample; the Caroline Bowen Articulation
Screener; oral-motor examination; and the Fluharty Preschool Speech and Language
Screening Test-Second Edition (FLUHARTY-2).

X initiated verbal interaction, responded appropriately to questions, followed directions,


described actions, and repeated sentences. Oral structures and function were deemed
adequate for speech production.

In the area of Articulation, X exhibited multiple substitutions, including g/d; f/p; w/l; sh/ch;
b/v; distortion of /s/; and the phonological process of cluster reduction. He was not
stimulable for any of the misproduced speech sounds. His intelligibility is significantly
compromised by his misarticulations.

In the area of Language, he achieved a General Language Composite Quotient Score of


98 on the FLUHARTY-2, which indicates language understanding and use within normal
limits.

Based on the results of this screening, it is recommended that X be placed in Tier 2 of


Response to Intervention (RTI). Teacher and parent(s) will be given interventions/
suggestions/ examples/ materials to use in working with him to correct his
misarticulations. If sufficient progress is not indicated at the end of four weeks, he will
be moved to Tier 3, where he will receive an increase in the intensity and/or frequency of
intervention. At the end of 8-12 weeks, he will be rescreened to determine the need for
referral to the Speech-Language Impaired program.

c: teacher
parent(s)
file

____________ Elementary School 
Speech-Language Screening Report
Student:  
Date of Birth:  
Age:
Teacher: 
Date of Screening

You might also like