0% found this document useful (0 votes)
45 views14 pages

Retaining Wall Structural Analysis

The document provides a detailed analysis of a cantilever retaining wall according to EN1997-1:2004 standards. It includes specifications for wall dimensions, soil properties, loading details, and calculations for stability against sliding, overturning, and bearing pressure. The results indicate that the wall passes all stability checks with adequate factors of safety.

Uploaded by

Reab Simanth
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
45 views14 pages

Retaining Wall Structural Analysis

The document provides a detailed analysis of a cantilever retaining wall according to EN1997-1:2004 standards. It includes specifications for wall dimensions, soil properties, loading details, and calculations for stability against sliding, overturning, and bearing pressure. The results indicate that the wall passes all stability checks with adequate factors of safety.

Uploaded by

Reab Simanth
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Project Job Ref.

Private Section Sheet no./rev.


1
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
L 2/1/2017

RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS


In accordance with EN1997-1:2004 incorporating Corrigendum dated February 2009 and the recommended values
Tedds calculation version 2.6.11

Retaining wall details


Stem type; Cantilever
Stem height; hstem = 2000 mm
Stem thickness; tstem = 300 mm
Angle to rear face of stem;  = 90 deg
Stem density; stem = 25 kN/m3
Toe length; ltoe = 1000 mm
Heel length; lheel = 1000 mm
Base thickness; tbase = 350 mm
Key position; pkey = 1950 mm
Key depth; dkey = 200 mm
Key thickness; tkey = 350 mm
Base density; base = 25 kN/m3
Height of retained soil; hret = 1500 mm
Angle of soil surface;  = 0 deg
Depth of cover; dcover = 500 mm
Depth of excavation; dexc = 200 mm
Retained soil properties
Soil type; Medium dense well graded sand
Moist density; mr = 21 kN/m3
Saturated density; sr = 23 kN/m3
Characteristic effective shear resistance angle; 'r.k = 30 deg
Characteristic wall friction angle; r.k = 0 deg

Base soil properties


Soil type; Medium dense well graded sand
Soil density; b = 19.5 kN/m3
Characteristic cohesion; c'b.k = 0 kN/m2
Characteristic effective shear resistance angle; 'b.k = 30 deg
Characteristic wall friction angle; b.k = 15 deg
Characteristic base friction angle; bb.k = 20 deg

Loading details
Permanent surcharge load; SurchargeG = 7 kN/m2
Variable surcharge load; SurchargeQ = 4 kN/m2
Project Job Ref.

Private Section Sheet no./rev.


2
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
L 2/1/2017

1000 300 1000


12.2 kN/m 2

5 kN/m 2
1500
2000

2550
200
500
3 50

25.2 kN/m 2
200

45.2 kN/m2 45.2 kN/m 2

1950 350

2300

General arrangement

Calculate retaining wall geometry


Base length; lbase = ltoe + tstem + lheel = 2300 mm
Base height; hbase = tbase + dkey = 550 mm
Moist soil height; hmoist = hsoil = 2000 mm
Length of surcharge load; lsur = lheel = 1000 mm
- Distance to vertical component; xsur_v = lbase - lheel / 2 = 1800 mm
Effective height of wall; heff = hbase + dcover + hret = 2550 mm
- Distance to horizontal component; xsur_h = heff / 2 - dkey = 1075 mm
- Distance to horizontal component above key; xsur_h_a = (heff - dkey) / 2 = 1175 mm
Area of wall stem; Astem = hstem  tstem = 0.6 m2
- Distance to vertical component; xstem = ltoe + tstem / 2 = 1150 mm
Area of wall base; Abase = lbase  tbase + dkey  tkey = 0.875 m2
- Distance to vertical component; xbase = (lbase2  tbase / 2 + dkey  tkey  (pkey + tkey / 2)) / Abase = 1228 mm
Area of moist soil; Amoist = hmoist  lheel = 2 m2
- Distance to vertical component; xmoist_v = lbase - (hmoist  lheel2 / 2) / Amoist = 1800 mm
- Distance to horizontal component; xmoist_h = heff / 3 - dkey = 650 mm
- Distance to horizontal component above key; xmoist_h_a = (heff - dkey) / 3 = 783 mm
Area of base soil; Apass = dcover  ltoe = 0.5 m2
- Distance to vertical component; xpass_v = lbase - (dcover  ltoe (lbase - ltoe / 2)) / Apass = 500 mm
- Distance to horizontal component; xpass_h = (dcover + hbase) / 3- dkey = 150 mm
Project Job Ref.

Private Section Sheet no./rev.


3
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
L 2/1/2017

Area of excavated base soil; Aexc = hpass  ltoe = 0.3 m2


- Distance to vertical component; xexc_v = lbase - (hpass  ltoe (lbase - ltoe / 2)) / Aexc = 500 mm
- Distance to horizontal component; xexc_h = (hpass + hbase) / 3- dkey = 83 mm
Partial factors on actions - Table A.3 - Combination 1
Permanent unfavourable action; G = 1.35
Permanent favourable action; Gf = 1.00
Variable unfavourable action; Q = 1.50
Variable favourable action; Qf = 0.00

Partial factors for soil parameters – Table A.4 - Combination 1


Angle of shearing resistance; ' = 1.00
Effective cohesion; c' = 1.00
Weight density;  = 1.00

Retained soil properties


Design moist density; mr' = mr /  = 21 kN/m3
Design saturated density; sr' = sr /  = 23 kN/m3
Design effective shear resistance angle; 'r.d = atan(tan('r.k) / ') = 30 deg
Design wall friction angle; r.d = atan(tan(r.k) / ') = 0 deg

Base soil properties


Design soil density; b' = b /  = 19.5 kN/m3
Design effective shear resistance angle; 'b.d = atan(tan('b.k) / ') = 30 deg
Design wall friction angle; b.d = atan(tan(b.k) / ') = 15 deg
Design base friction angle; bb.d = atan(tan(bb.k) / ') = 20 deg
Design effective cohesion; c'b.d = c'b.k / c' = 0 kN/m2

Using Coulomb theory


Active pressure coefficient; KA = sin( + 'r.d)2 / (sin()2  sin( - r.d)  [1 + [sin('r.d + r.d)  sin('r.d - )
/ (sin( - r.d)  sin( + ))]]2) = 0.333
Passive pressure coefficient; KP = sin(90 - 'b.d)2 / (sin(90 + b.d)  [1 - [sin('b.d + b.d)  sin('b.d) / (sin(90
+ b.d))]]2) = 4.977

Sliding check
Vertical forces on wall
Wall stem; Fstem = Gf  Astem  stem = 15 kN/m
Wall base; Fbase = Gf  Abase  base = 21.9 kN/m
Moist retained soil; Fmoist_v = Gf  Amoist  mr' = 42 kN/m
Base soil; Fexc_v = Gf  Aexc  b' = 5.9 kN/m
Total; Ftotal_v = Fstem + Fbase + Fmoist_v + Fexc_v = 84.7 kN/m
Horizontal forces on wall
Surcharge load; Fsur_h = KA  (G  SurchargeG + Q  SurchargeQ)  heff = 13.1 kN/m
Moist retained soil; Fmoist_h = G  KA  mr'  heff2 / 2 = 30.7 kN/m
Total; Ftotal_h = Fmoist_h + Fsur_h = 43.9 kN/m
Check stability against sliding
Base soil resistance; Fexc_h = Gf  KP  cos(b.d)  b'  (hpass + hbase)2 / 2 = 33.9 kN/m
Project Job Ref.

Private Section Sheet no./rev.


4
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
L 2/1/2017

Base friction; Ffriction = Ftotal_v  tan(bb.d) = 30.8 kN/m


Resistance to sliding; Frest = Fexc_h + Ffriction = 64.7 kN/m
Factor of safety; FoSsl = Frest / Ftotal_h = 1.475
PASS - Resistance to sliding is greater than sliding force
Overturning check
Vertical forces on wall
Wall stem; Fstem = Gf  Astem  stem = 15 kN/m
Wall base; Fbase = Gf  Abase  base = 21.9 kN/m
Moist retained soil; Fmoist_v = Gf  Amoist  mr' = 42 kN/m
Base soil; Fexc_v = Gf  Aexc  b' = 5.9 kN/m
Total; Ftotal_v = Fstem + Fbase + Fmoist_v + Fexc_v = 84.7 kN/m
Horizontal forces on wall
Surcharge load; Fsur_h = KA  (G  SurchargeG + Q  SurchargeQ)  (heff - dkey) = 12.1 kN/m
Moist retained soil; Fmoist_h = G  KA  mr'  (heff - dkey)2 / 2 = 26.1 kN/m
Base soil; Fexc_h = -Gf  KP  cos(b.d)  b'  (hpass + hbase)2 / 2 = -33.9 kN/m
Total; Ftotal_h = Fmoist_h + Fexc_h + Fsur_h = 4.3 kN/m
Overturning moments on wall
Surcharge load; Msur_OT = Fsur_h  xsur_h_a = 14.2 kNm/m
Moist retained soil; Mmoist_OT = Fmoist_h  xmoist_h_a = 20.4 kNm/m
Total; Mtotal_OT = Mmoist_OT + Msur_OT = 34.7 kNm/m
Restoring moments on wall
Wall stem; Mstem_R = Fstem  xstem = 17.3 kNm/m
Wall base; Mbase_R = Fbase  xbase = 26.9 kNm/m
Moist retained soil; Mmoist_R = Fmoist_v  xmoist_v = 75.6 kNm/m
Base soil; Mexc_R = Fexc_v  xexc_v - Fexc_h  xexc_h = 5.7 kNm/m
Total; Mtotal_R = Mstem_R + Mbase_R + Mmoist_R + Mexc_R = 125.5 kNm/m
Check stability against overturning
Factor of safety; FoSot = Mtotal_R / Mtotal_OT = 3.62
PASS - Maximum restoring moment is greater than overturning moment
Bearing pressure check
Vertical forces on wall
Wall stem; Fstem = G  Astem  stem = 20.3 kN/m
Wall base; Fbase = G  Abase  base = 29.5 kN/m
Surcharge load; Fsur_v = (G  SurchargeG + Q  SurchargeQ)  lheel = 15.5 kN/m
Moist retained soil; Fmoist_v = G  Amoist  mr' = 56.7 kN/m
Base soil; Fpass_v = G  Apass  b' = 13.2 kN/m
Total; Ftotal_v = Fstem + Fbase + Fmoist_v + Fpass_v + Fsur_v = 135.1 kN/m
Horizontal forces on wall
Surcharge load; Fsur_h = KA  (G  SurchargeG + Q  SurchargeQ)  (heff - dkey) = 12.1 kN/m
Moist retained soil; Fmoist_h = G  KA  mr'  (heff - dkey)2 / 2 = 26.1 kN/m
Project Job Ref.

Private Section Sheet no./rev.


5
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
L 2/1/2017

Base soil; Fpass_h = max(-Gf  KP  cos(b.d)  b'  (dcover + hbase)2 / 2, -(Fmoist_h +


Fsur_h)) = -38.2 kN/m
Total; Ftotal_h = max(Fmoist_h + Fpass_h + Fsur_h - Ftotal_v  tan(bb.d), 0 kN/m) = 0 kN/m

Moments on wall
Wall stem; Mstem = Fstem  xstem = 23.3 kNm/m
Wall base; Mbase = Fbase  xbase = 36.3 kNm/m
Surcharge load; Msur = Fsur_v  xsur_v - Fsur_h  xsur_h_a = 13.6 kNm/m
Moist retained soil; Mmoist = Fmoist_v  xmoist_v - Fmoist_h  xmoist_h_a = 81.6 kNm/m
Base soil; Mpass = Fpass_v  xpass_v - Fpass_h  xpass_h = 12.3 kNm/m
Total; Mtotal = Mstem + Mbase + Mmoist + Mpass + Msur = 167.1 kNm/m
Check bearing pressure
Distance to reaction; x = Mtotal / Ftotal_v = 1237 mm
Eccentricity of reaction; e = x - lbase / 2 = 87 mm
Loaded length of base; lload = 2  (lbase - x) = 2127 mm
Bearing pressure at toe; qtoe = 0 kN/m2
Bearing pressure at heel; qheel = Ftotal_v / lload = 63.5 kN/m2
Effective overburden pressure; q = (tbase + dcover)  b' = 16.6 kN/m2
Design effective overburden pressure; q' = q /  = 16.6 kN/m2
Bearing resistance factors; Nq = Exp(  tan('b.d))  (tan(45 deg + 'b.d / 2))2 = 18.401
Nc = (Nq - 1)  cot('b.d) = 30.14
N = 2  (Nq - 1)  tan('b.d) = 20.093
Foundation shape factors; sq = 1
s = 1
sc = 1
Load inclination factors; H = Fsur_h + Fmoist_h + Fpass_h = 0 kN/m
V = Ftotal_v = 135.1 kN/m
m=2
iq = [1 - H / (V + lload  c'b.d  cot('b.d))]m = 1
i = [1 - H / (V + lload  c'b.d  cot('b.d))](m + 1) = 1
ic = iq - (1 - iq) / (Nc  tan('b.d)) = 1
Net ultimate bearing capacity; nf = c'b.d  Nc  sc  ic + q'  Nq  sq  iq + 0.5  b'  lload  N  s  i
nf = 721.6 kN/m2
Factor of safety; FoSbp = nf / max(qtoe, qheel) = 11.359
PASS - Allowable bearing pressure exceeds maximum applied bearing pressure
Partial factors on actions - Table A.3 - Combination 2
Permanent unfavourable action; G = 1.00
Permanent favourable action; Gf = 1.00
Variable unfavourable action; Q = 1.30
Variable favourable action; Qf = 0.00

Partial factors for soil parameters – Table A.4 - Combination 2


Angle of shearing resistance; ' = 1.25
Effective cohesion; c' = 1.25
Project Job Ref.

Private Section Sheet no./rev.


6
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
L 2/1/2017

Weight density;  = 1.00

Retained soil properties


Design moist density; mr' = mr /  = 21 kN/m3
Design saturated density; sr' = sr /  = 23 kN/m3
Design effective shear resistance angle; 'r.d = atan(tan('r.k) / ') = 24.8 deg
Design wall friction angle; r.d = atan(tan(r.k) / ') = 0 deg

Base soil properties


Design soil density; b' = b /  = 19.5 kN/m3
Design effective shear resistance angle; 'b.d = atan(tan('b.k) / ') = 24.8 deg
Design wall friction angle; b.d = atan(tan(b.k) / ') = 12.1 deg
Design base friction angle; bb.d = atan(tan(bb.k) / ') = 16.2 deg
Design effective cohesion; c'b.d = c'b.k / c' = 0 kN/m2

Using Coulomb theory


Active pressure coefficient; KA = sin( + 'r.d)2 / (sin()2  sin( - r.d)  [1 + [sin('r.d + r.d)  sin('r.d - )
/ (sin( - r.d)  sin( + ))]]2) = 0.409
Passive pressure coefficient; KP = sin(90 - 'b.d)2 / (sin(90 + b.d)  [1 - [sin('b.d + b.d)  sin('b.d) / (sin(90
+ b.d))]]2) = 3.473

Sliding check
Vertical forces on wall
Wall stem; Fstem = Gf  Astem  stem = 15 kN/m
Wall base; Fbase = Gf  Abase  base = 21.9 kN/m
Moist retained soil; Fmoist_v = Gf  Amoist  mr' = 42 kN/m
Base soil; Fexc_v = Gf  Aexc  b' = 5.9 kN/m
Total; Ftotal_v = Fstem + Fbase + Fmoist_v + Fexc_v = 84.7 kN/m
Horizontal forces on wall
Surcharge load; Fsur_h = KA  (G  SurchargeG + Q  SurchargeQ)  heff = 12.7 kN/m
Moist retained soil; Fmoist_h = G  KA  mr'  heff2 / 2 = 27.9 kN/m
Total; Ftotal_h = Fmoist_h + Fsur_h = 40.7 kN/m
Check stability against sliding
Base soil resistance; Fexc_h = Gf  KP  cos(b.d)  b'  (hpass + hbase)2 / 2 = 23.9 kN/m
Base friction; Ffriction = Ftotal_v  tan(bb.d) = 24.7 kN/m
Resistance to sliding; Frest = Fexc_h + Ffriction = 48.6 kN/m
Factor of safety; FoSsl = Frest / Ftotal_h = 1.195
PASS - Resistance to sliding is greater than sliding force
Overturning check
Vertical forces on wall
Wall stem; Fstem = Gf  Astem  stem = 15 kN/m
Wall base; Fbase = Gf  Abase  base = 21.9 kN/m
Moist retained soil; Fmoist_v = Gf  Amoist  mr' = 42 kN/m
Base soil; Fexc_v = Gf  Aexc  b' = 5.9 kN/m
Total; Ftotal_v = Fstem + Fbase + Fmoist_v + Fexc_v = 84.7 kN/m
Project Job Ref.

Private Section Sheet no./rev.


7
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
L 2/1/2017

Horizontal forces on wall


Surcharge load; Fsur_h = KA  (G  SurchargeG + Q  SurchargeQ)  (heff - dkey) = 11.7 kN/m
Moist retained soil; Fmoist_h = G  KA  mr'  (heff - dkey)2 / 2 = 23.7 kN/m
Base soil; Fexc_h = -Gf  KP  cos(b.d)  b'  (hpass + hbase)2 / 2 = -23.9 kN/m
Total; Ftotal_h = Fmoist_h + Fexc_h + Fsur_h = 11.5 kN/m
Overturning moments on wall
Surcharge load; Msur_OT = Fsur_h  xsur_h_a = 13.8 kNm/m
Moist retained soil; Mmoist_OT = Fmoist_h  xmoist_h_a = 18.6 kNm/m
Total; Mtotal_OT = Mmoist_OT + Msur_OT = 32.4 kNm/m
Restoring moments on wall
Wall stem; Mstem_R = Fstem  xstem = 17.3 kNm/m
Wall base; Mbase_R = Fbase  xbase = 26.9 kNm/m
Moist retained soil; Mmoist_R = Fmoist_v  xmoist_v = 75.6 kNm/m
Base soil; Mexc_R = Fexc_v  xexc_v - Fexc_h  xexc_h = 4.9 kNm/m
Total; Mtotal_R = Mstem_R + Mbase_R + Mmoist_R + Mexc_R = 124.6 kNm/m
Check stability against overturning
Factor of safety; FoSot = Mtotal_R / Mtotal_OT = 3.851
PASS - Maximum restoring moment is greater than overturning moment
Bearing pressure check
Vertical forces on wall
Wall stem; Fstem = G  Astem  stem = 15 kN/m
Wall base; Fbase = G  Abase  base = 21.9 kN/m
Surcharge load; Fsur_v = (G  SurchargeG + Q  SurchargeQ)  lheel = 12.2 kN/m
Moist retained soil; Fmoist_v = G  Amoist  mr' = 42 kN/m
Base soil; Fpass_v = G  Apass  b' = 9.8 kN/m
Total; Ftotal_v = Fstem + Fbase + Fmoist_v + Fpass_v + Fsur_v = 100.8 kN/m
Horizontal forces on wall
Surcharge load; Fsur_h = KA  (G  SurchargeG + Q  SurchargeQ)  (heff - dkey) = 11.7 kN/m
Moist retained soil; Fmoist_h = G  KA  mr'  (heff - dkey)2 / 2 = 23.7 kN/m
Base soil; Fpass_h = max(-Gf  KP  cos(b.d)  b'  (dcover + hbase)2 / 2, -(Fmoist_h +
Fsur_h)) = -35.5 kN/m
Total; Ftotal_h = max(Fmoist_h + Fpass_h + Fsur_h - Ftotal_v  tan(bb.d), 0 kN/m) = 0 kN/m

Moments on wall
Wall stem; Mstem = Fstem  xstem = 17.3 kNm/m
Wall base; Mbase = Fbase  xbase = 26.9 kNm/m
Surcharge load; Msur = Fsur_v  xsur_v - Fsur_h  xsur_h_a = 8.2 kNm/m
Moist retained soil; Mmoist = Fmoist_v  xmoist_v - Fmoist_h  xmoist_h_a = 57 kNm/m
Base soil; Mpass = Fpass_v  xpass_v - Fpass_h  xpass_h = 10.2 kNm/m
Total; Mtotal = Mstem + Mbase + Mmoist + Mpass + Msur = 119.5 kNm/m
Check bearing pressure
Distance to reaction; x = Mtotal / Ftotal_v = 1185 mm
Project Job Ref.

Private Section Sheet no./rev.


8
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
L 2/1/2017

Eccentricity of reaction; e = x - lbase / 2 = 35 mm


Loaded length of base; lload = 2  (lbase - x) = 2230 mm
Bearing pressure at toe; qtoe = 0 kN/m2
Bearing pressure at heel; qheel = Ftotal_v / lload = 45.2 kN/m2
Effective overburden pressure; q = (tbase + dcover)  b' = 16.6 kN/m2
Design effective overburden pressure; q' = q /  = 16.6 kN/m2
Bearing resistance factors; Nq = Exp(  tan('b.d))  (tan(45 deg + 'b.d / 2))2 = 10.431
Nc = (Nq - 1)  cot('b.d) = 20.418
N = 2  (Nq - 1)  tan('b.d) = 8.712
Foundation shape factors; sq = 1
s = 1
sc = 1
Load inclination factors; H = Fsur_h + Fmoist_h + Fpass_h = 0 kN/m
V = Ftotal_v = 100.8 kN/m
m=2
iq = [1 - H / (V + lload  c'b.d  cot('b.d))]m = 1
i = [1 - H / (V + lload  c'b.d  cot('b.d))](m + 1) = 1
ic = iq - (1 - iq) / (Nc  tan('b.d)) = 1
Net ultimate bearing capacity; nf = c'b.d  Nc  sc  ic + q'  Nq  sq  iq + 0.5  b'  lload  N  s  i
nf = 362.3 kN/m2
Factor of safety; FoSbp = nf / max(qtoe, qheel) = 8.011
PASS - Allowable bearing pressure exceeds maximum applied bearing pressure

RETAINING WALL DESIGN


In accordance with EN1992-1-1:2004 incorporating Corrigendum dated January 2008 and the recommended values
Tedds calculation version 2.6.11

Concrete details - Table 3.1 - Strength and deformation characteristics for concrete
Concrete strength class; C30/37
Characteristic compressive cylinder strength; fck = 30 N/mm2
Characteristic compressive cube strength; fck,cube = 37 N/mm2
Mean value of compressive cylinder strength; fcm = fck + 8 N/mm2 = 38 N/mm2
Mean value of axial tensile strength; fctm = 0.3 N/mm2  (fck / 1 N/mm2)2/3 = 2.9 N/mm2
5% fractile of axial tensile strength; fctk,0.05 = 0.7  fctm = 2.0 N/mm2
Secant modulus of elasticity of concrete; Ecm = 22 kN/mm2  (fcm / 10 N/mm2)0.3 = 32837 N/mm2
Partial factor for concrete - Table 2.1N; C = 1.50
Compressive strength coefficient - cl.3.1.6(1); cc = 1.00
Design compressive concrete strength - exp.3.15; fcd = cc  fck / C = 20.0 N/mm2
Maximum aggregate size; hagg = 20 mm
Reinforcement details
Characteristic yield strength of reinforcement; fyk = 500 N/mm2
Modulus of elasticity of reinforcement; Es = 200000 N/mm2
Partial factor for reinforcing steel - Table 2.1N; S = 1.15
Design yield strength of reinforcement; fyd = fyk / S = 435 N/mm2
Project Job Ref.

Private Section Sheet no./rev.


9
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
L 2/1/2017

Cover to reinforcement
Front face of stem; csf = 40 mm
Rear face of stem; csr = 50 mm
Top face of base; cbt = 50 mm
Bottom face of base; cbb = 75 mm

Loading details - Combination No.1 - kN/m 2 Shear force - Combination No.1 - kN/m Bending moment - Combination No.1 - kNm/m

3.15
2
Stem

26.3
20.1
56.7

56.7
13.16

13.16
11.81

11.81
11.81

11.81

-9.8
69.45

9.45
6.75

6.75

3.15
2
18.9
6

79.67
18.9
3.15
2
Key

-29.2 -22.6 22.9 2.3


45.45

57

Toe Heel
60.47

72.02

98.42
18.9
3.15
2
X 12.2

Check stem design at base of stem


Depth of section; h = 300 mm
Rectangular section in flexure - Section 6.1
Design bending moment combination 1; M = 22.9 kNm/m
Depth to tension reinforcement; d = h - csr - sr / 2 = 244 mm
K = M / (d2  fck) = 0.013
K' = 0.196
K' > K - No compression reinforcement is required
Lever arm; z = min(0.5 + 0.5  (1 - 3.53  K)0.5, 0.95)  d = 232 mm
Depth of neutral axis; x = 2.5  (d – z) = 31 mm
Area of tension reinforcement required; [Link] = M / (fyd  z) = 227 mm2/m
Tension reinforcement provided; 12 [Link] @ 200 c/c
Area of tension reinforcement provided; [Link] =   sr2 / (4  ssr) = 565 mm2/m
Minimum area of reinforcement - exp.9.1N; [Link] = max(0.26  fctm / fyk, 0.0013)  d = 368 mm2/m
Maximum area of reinforcement - cl.[Link](3); [Link] = 0.04  h = 12000 mm2/m
max([Link], [Link]) / [Link] = 0.65
PASS - Area of reinforcement provided is greater than area of reinforcement required
Deflection control - Section 7.4
Reference reinforcement ratio;  = (fck / 1 N/mm2) / 1000 = 0.005
Required tension reinforcement ratio;  = [Link] / d = 0.001
Required compression reinforcement ratio; ' = [Link] / d2 = 0.000
Project Job Ref.

Private Section Sheet no./rev.


10
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
L 2/1/2017

Structural system factor - Table 7.4N; Kb = 0.4


Reinforcement factor - exp.7.17; Ks = min(500 N/mm2 / (fyk  [Link] / [Link]), 1.5) = 1.5
Limiting span to depth ratio - exp.7.16.a; Ks  Kb  [11 + 1.5  (fck / 1 N/mm2)  0 /  + 3.2  (fck / 1 N/mm2)  (0 /
 - 1)3/2] = 149
Actual span to depth ratio; hstem / d = 8.2
PASS - Span to depth ratio is less than deflection control limit
Crack control - Section 7.3
Limiting crack width; wmax = 0.3 mm
Variable load factor - EN1990 – Table A1.1; 2 = 0.6
Serviceability bending moment; Msls = 15.6 kNm/m
Tensile stress in reinforcement; s = Msls / ([Link]  z) = 119 N/mm2
Load duration; Long term
Load duration factor; kt = 0.4
Effective area of concrete in tension; [Link] = min(2.5  (h - d), (h – x) / 3, h / 2) = 89833 mm2/m
Mean value of concrete tensile strength; [Link] = fctm = 2.9 N/mm2
Reinforcement ratio; [Link] = [Link] / [Link] = 0.006
Modular ratio; e = Es / Ecm = 6.091
Bond property coefficient; k1 = 0.8
Strain distribution coefficient; k2 = 0.5
k3 = 3.4
k4 = 0.425
Maximum crack spacing - exp.7.11; [Link] = k3  csr + k1  k2  k4  sr / [Link] = 494 mm
Maximum crack width - exp.7.8; wk = [Link]  max(s – kt  ([Link] / [Link])  (1 + e  [Link]), 0.6  s) / Es
wk = 0.176 mm
wk / wmax = 0.588
PASS - Maximum crack width is less than limiting crack width
Rectangular section in shear - Section 6.2
Design shear force; V = 29.2 kN/m
CRd,c = 0.18 / C = 0.120
k = min(1 + (200 mm / d), 2) = 1.905
Longitudinal reinforcement ratio; l = min([Link] / d, 0.02) = 0.002
vmin = 0.035 N1/2/mm  k3/2  fck0.5 = 0.504 N/mm2
Design shear resistance - exp.6.2a & 6.2b; VRd.c = max(CRd.c  k  (100 N2/mm4  l  fck)1/3, vmin)  d
VRd.c = 123 kN/m
V / VRd.c = 0.237
PASS - Design shear resistance exceeds design shear force
Horizontal reinforcement parallel to face of stem - Section 9.6
Minimum area of reinforcement – cl.9.6.3(1); [Link] = max(0.25  [Link], 0.001  tstem) = 300 mm2/m
Maximum spacing of reinforcement – cl.9.6.3(2); ssx_max = 400 mm
Transverse reinforcement provided; 10 [Link] @ 200 c/c
Area of transverse reinforcement provided; [Link] =   sx2 / (4  ssx) = 393 mm2/m
PASS - Area of reinforcement provided is greater than area of reinforcement required
Project Job Ref.

Private Section Sheet no./rev.


11
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
L 2/1/2017

Check base design at toe


Depth of section; h = 350 mm
Rectangular section in flexure - Section 6.1
Design bending moment combination 1; M = 12.2 kNm/m
Depth to tension reinforcement; d = h - cbb - bb / 2 = 269 mm
K = M / (d2  fck) = 0.006
K' = 0.196
K' > K - No compression reinforcement is required
Lever arm; z = min(0.5 + 0.5  (1 - 3.53  K)0.5, 0.95)  d = 256 mm
Depth of neutral axis; x = 2.5  (d – z) = 34 mm
Area of tension reinforcement required; [Link] = M / (fyd  z) = 109 mm2/m
Tension reinforcement provided; 12 [Link] @ 200 c/c
Area of tension reinforcement provided; [Link] =   bb2 / (4  sbb) = 565 mm2/m
Minimum area of reinforcement - exp.9.1N; [Link] = max(0.26  fctm / fyk, 0.0013)  d = 405 mm2/m
Maximum area of reinforcement - cl.[Link](3); [Link] = 0.04  h = 14000 mm2/m
max([Link], [Link]) / [Link] = 0.716
PASS - Area of reinforcement provided is greater than area of reinforcement required
Crack control - Section 7.3
Limiting crack width; wmax = 0.3 mm
Variable load factor - EN1990 – Table A1.1; 2 = 0.6
Serviceability bending moment; Msls = 7.5 kNm/m
Tensile stress in reinforcement; s = Msls / ([Link]  z) = 51.9 N/mm2
Load duration; Long term
Load duration factor; kt = 0.4
Effective area of concrete in tension; [Link] = min(2.5  (h - d), (h – x) / 3, h / 2) = 105458 mm2/m
Mean value of concrete tensile strength; [Link] = fctm = 2.9 N/mm2
Reinforcement ratio; [Link] = [Link] / [Link] = 0.005
Modular ratio; e = Es / Ecm = 6.091
Bond property coefficient; k1 = 0.8
Strain distribution coefficient; k2 = 0.5
k3 = 3.4
k4 = 0.425
Maximum crack spacing - exp.7.11; [Link] = k3  cbb + k1  k2  k4  bb / [Link] = 635 mm
Maximum crack width - exp.7.8; wk = [Link]  max(s – kt  ([Link] / [Link])  (1 + e  [Link]), 0.6  s) / Es
wk = 0.099 mm
wk / wmax = 0.33
PASS - Maximum crack width is less than limiting crack width
Rectangular section in shear - Section 6.2
Design shear force; V = 26.3 kN/m
CRd,c = 0.18 / C = 0.120
k = min(1 + (200 mm / d), 2) = 1.862
Longitudinal reinforcement ratio; l = min([Link] / d, 0.02) = 0.002
vmin = 0.035 N1/2/mm  k3/2  fck0.5 = 0.487 N/mm2
Project Job Ref.

Private Section Sheet no./rev.


12
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
L 2/1/2017

Design shear resistance - exp.6.2a & 6.2b; VRd.c = max(CRd.c  k  (100 N2/mm4  l  fck)1/3, vmin)  d
VRd.c = 131.1 kN/m
V / VRd.c = 0.200
PASS - Design shear resistance exceeds design shear force
Check base design at heel
Depth of section; h = 350 mm
Rectangular section in flexure - Section 6.1
Design bending moment combination 1; M = 9.8 kNm/m
Depth to tension reinforcement; d = h - cbt - bt / 2 = 294 mm
K = M / (d2  fck) = 0.004
K' = 0.196
K' > K - No compression reinforcement is required
Lever arm; z = min(0.5 + 0.5  (1 - 3.53  K)0.5, 0.95)  d = 279 mm
Depth of neutral axis; x = 2.5  (d – z) = 37 mm
Area of tension reinforcement required; [Link] = M / (fyd  z) = 81 mm2/m
Tension reinforcement provided; 12 [Link] @ 200 c/c
Area of tension reinforcement provided; [Link] =   bt2 / (4  sbt) = 565 mm2/m
Minimum area of reinforcement - exp.9.1N; [Link] = max(0.26  fctm / fyk, 0.0013)  d = 443 mm2/m
Maximum area of reinforcement - cl.[Link](3); [Link] = 0.04  h = 14000 mm2/m
max([Link], [Link]) / [Link] = 0.783
PASS - Area of reinforcement provided is greater than area of reinforcement required
Crack control - Section 7.3
Limiting crack width; wmax = 0.3 mm
Variable load factor - EN1990 – Table A1.1; 2 = 0.6
Serviceability bending moment; Msls = 5 kNm/m
Tensile stress in reinforcement; s = Msls / ([Link]  z) = 31.4 N/mm2
Load duration; Long term
Load duration factor; kt = 0.4
Effective area of concrete in tension; [Link] = min(2.5  (h - d), (h – x) / 3, h / 2) = 104417 mm2/m
Mean value of concrete tensile strength; [Link] = fctm = 2.9 N/mm2
Reinforcement ratio; [Link] = [Link] / [Link] = 0.005
Modular ratio; e = Es / Ecm = 6.091
Bond property coefficient; k1 = 0.8
Strain distribution coefficient; k2 = 0.5
k3 = 3.4
k4 = 0.425
Maximum crack spacing - exp.7.11; [Link] = k3  cbt + k1  k2  k4  bt / [Link] = 547 mm
Maximum crack width - exp.7.8; wk = [Link]  max(s – kt  ([Link] / [Link])  (1 + e  [Link]), 0.6  s) / Es
wk = 0.051 mm
wk / wmax = 0.171
PASS - Maximum crack width is less than limiting crack width
Rectangular section in shear - Section 6.2
Design shear force; V = 20.1 kN/m
Project Job Ref.

Private Section Sheet no./rev.


13
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
L 2/1/2017

CRd,c = 0.18 / C = 0.120


k = min(1 + (200 mm / d), 2) = 1.825
Longitudinal reinforcement ratio; l = min([Link] / d, 0.02) = 0.002
vmin = 0.035 N1/2/mm  k3/2  fck0.5 = 0.473 N/mm2
Design shear resistance - exp.6.2a & 6.2b; VRd.c = max(CRd.c  k  (100 N2/mm4  l  fck)1/3, vmin)  d
VRd.c = 138.9 kN/m
V / VRd.c = 0.145
PASS - Design shear resistance exceeds design shear force
Check key design
Depth of section; h = 350 mm
Rectangular section in flexure - Section 6.1
Design bending moment combination 1; M = 2.3 kNm/m
Depth to tension reinforcement; d = h - cbb - k / 2 = 269 mm
K = M / (d2  fck) = 0.001
K' = 0.196
K' > K - No compression reinforcement is required
Lever arm; z = min(0.5 + 0.5  (1 - 3.53  K)0.5, 0.95)  d = 256 mm
Depth of neutral axis; x = 2.5  (d – z) = 34 mm
Area of tension reinforcement required; [Link] = M / (fyd  z) = 21 mm2/m
Tension reinforcement provided; 12 [Link] @ 200 c/c
Area of tension reinforcement provided; [Link] =   k2 / (4  sk) = 565 mm2/m
Minimum area of reinforcement - exp.9.1N; [Link] = max(0.26  fctm / fyk, 0.0013)  d = 405 mm2/m
Maximum area of reinforcement - cl.[Link](3); [Link] = 0.04  h = 14000 mm2/m
max([Link], [Link]) / [Link] = 0.716
PASS - Area of reinforcement provided is greater than area of reinforcement required
Crack control - Section 7.3
Limiting crack width; wmax = 0.3 mm
Variable load factor - EN1990 – Table A1.1; 2 = 0.6
Serviceability bending moment; Msls = 1.3 kNm/m
Tensile stress in reinforcement; s = Msls / ([Link]  z) = 9.3 N/mm2
Load duration; Long term
Load duration factor; kt = 0.4
Effective area of concrete in tension; [Link] = min(2.5  (h - d), (h – x) / 3, h / 2) = 105458 mm2/m
Mean value of concrete tensile strength; [Link] = fctm = 2.9 N/mm2
Reinforcement ratio; [Link] = [Link] / [Link] = 0.005
Modular ratio; e = Es / Ecm = 6.091
Bond property coefficient; k1 = 0.8
Strain distribution coefficient; k2 = 0.5
k3 = 3.4
k4 = 0.425
Maximum crack spacing - exp.7.11; [Link] = k3  cbb + k1  k2  k4  k / [Link] = 635 mm
Maximum crack width - exp.7.8; wk = [Link]  max(s – kt  ([Link] / [Link])  (1 + e  [Link]), 0.6  s) / Es
wk = 0.018 mm
Project Job Ref.

Private Section Sheet no./rev.


14
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
L 2/1/2017

wk / wmax = 0.059
PASS - Maximum crack width is less than limiting crack width
Rectangular section in shear - Section 6.2
Design shear force; V = 22.6 kN/m
CRd,c = 0.18 / C = 0.120
k = min(1 + (200 mm / d), 2) = 1.862
Longitudinal reinforcement ratio; l = min([Link] / d, 0.02) = 0.002
vmin = 0.035 N1/2/mm  k3/2  fck0.5 = 0.487 N/mm2
Design shear resistance - exp.6.2a & 6.2b; VRd.c = max(CRd.c  k  (100 N2/mm4  l  fck)1/3, vmin)  d
VRd.c = 131.1 kN/m
V / VRd.c = 0.173
PASS - Design shear resistance exceeds design shear force
Secondary transverse reinforcement to base - Section 9.3
Minimum area of reinforcement – cl.[Link](2); [Link] = 0.2  [Link] = 113 mm2/m
Maximum spacing of reinforcement – cl.[Link](3); sbx_max = 450 mm
Transverse reinforcement provided; 10 [Link] @ 200 c/c
Area of transverse reinforcement provided; [Link] =   bx2 / (4  sbx) = 393 mm2/m
PASS - Area of reinforcement provided is greater than area of reinforcement required

40 50

10 [Link] @ 200 c/c


horizontal reinforcement
parallel to face of stem

10 [Link] @ 200 c/c 12 [Link] @ 200 c/c


12 [Link] @ 200 c/c
50
150

75
12 [Link] @ 200 c/c
10 [Link] @ 200 c/c
transverse reinforcement 12 [Link] @ 200 c/c
in base

Reinforcement details

You might also like