0% found this document useful (0 votes)
38 views5 pages

Drying Oil Production Feasibility Analysis

This document outlines a design project to determine the feasibility of constructing a chemical plant to produce 50,000 tonnes/year of drying oil. Students are asked to recommend operating conditions for the reactor and reactor choice in order to maximize gross profit. The process involves thermally cracking acetylated castor oil to produce drying oil and acetic acid. The key deliverables are a word-processed report with recommendations, calculations in an appendix, and an oral presentation. Students will work in groups of 3-4.

Uploaded by

ibrahim abbas
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
38 views5 pages

Drying Oil Production Feasibility Analysis

This document outlines a design project to determine the feasibility of constructing a chemical plant to produce 50,000 tonnes/year of drying oil. Students are asked to recommend operating conditions for the reactor and reactor choice in order to maximize gross profit. The process involves thermally cracking acetylated castor oil to produce drying oil and acetic acid. The key deliverables are a word-processed report with recommendations, calculations in an appendix, and an oral presentation. Students will work in groups of 3-4.

Uploaded by

ibrahim abbas
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Material Balances

Design Project

Production of a Drying Oil

Drying oils are additives to products like paint and varnish to aid the drying process when
these products are coated on a surface.

The purpose of this project is to do a preliminary analysis to determine the feasibility of


constructing a chemical plant to manufacture 50,000 tonne/y drying oil.

A suggested process flow diagram is attached. You should use this as a starting point. Your
primary task is to recommend operating conditions for the reactor and a reactor choice that
maximizes the gross profit (defined later). However, any change that you can justify that does
not violate the laws of nature is allowed. Your assignment is to develop a “best” case, where
“best” is dependent upon economic considerations.

Chemical Reaction

The raw material is acetylated castor oil, which we will model as palmitic acid
(C15H31COOH). The primary reaction is one in which the acetylated castor oil is thermally
cracked to the drying oil (which we will model as tetradecene, C14H28) and acetic acid
(CH3COOH). There is an undesired reaction in which the drying oil dimerizes to form a gum,
which we will model as C28H56.

The chemical reactions are as follows:

C16 H 32 O2 (l ) → CH 3COOH ( g ) + C14 H 28 (l ) (1)

2C14 H 28 (l ) → C 28 H 56 ( s ) (2)

Process Description

The process is illustrated in Figure 1. The acetylated castor oil (ACO) feed is mixed with
recycled ACO and is fed to the reactor. In the reactor, reactions in Eqs. (1) and (2) occur.
Immediately following the reactor, there is a filter that removes any solid gum formed in the
reactor. Following the filter, there are two distillation columns that purify the ACO for recycle,
the drying oil (DO) for sale, and the acetic acid (AA) for sale as a by-product.
V-501 R-501 F-501 T-501 T-502
Recycle Reactor Gum ACO DO Purification
Mixing Filter Recycle Column
Vessel Column

acetylated
castor oil
V-501

acetic acid

R-501

T-502

T-501
drying oil
F-501

gum

Figure 1: Preliminary Process Flowsheet for Drying Oil Production

2
3

Process Details

Feed Stream and Effluent Streams

Stream 1: ACO – $0.59/kg

Stream 4: Gum waste – no value

Stream 8: Acetic acid by-product – $0.99/kg

Stream 9: DO – $1.19/kg

Equipment

Vessel (V-501): location where feed and recycle streams mix

Reactor (R-501): where the reactions in Eqs. (1) and (2) occur

Filter (F-501): all gum is removed in Stream 4, all AA, ACO, and DO go to Stream 5

Distillation Column (T-501): all AA in Stream 5 goes to Stream 6, all ACO in Stream 5
goes to Stream 7, 99.5% of DO in Stream 5 goes to
Stream 6

Distillation Column (T-502): 99.5% of AA in Stream 6 goes to Stream 8, 99.5% of DO


in Stream 6 goes to Stream 9

Economic Analysis

When evaluating alternative cases, the following relationship should be used:

gross profit estimate = value of products – cost of feed – cost of recycle – cost of separations (3)

The value of products and cost of feed were given earlier in the Process Details section.
There is a cost for recycle, since equipment and utilities (not shown on the current flowsheet)
cost more if there is more recycle. The cost of recycle may be estimated by

cost of recycle ($/kg ACO leaving reactor) = 3 × 10 −2 (m& ACO / m& DO ) 2 (4)

where m& ACO / m& DO is the ratio of the mass flowrate of ACO/mass flowrate of DO in Stream 3.

There is also a cost associated with removing the gum, which can be ignored (and F-501
removed) if the gum level is below 1 ppm (mass basis) in Stream 3. This cost is function is
4

cost of gum removal ($/kg DO leaving reactor) = 10 −3 [(ppm gum in Stream 3) − 1] (5)

If the cost of gum removal in Eq. (5) is less than zero, the cost is zero.

Reactor Information

The reaction conditions are limited to temperatures between 310°C and 400°C. Table 1 gives
conversion and selectivity information for the reactor for two different size reactors. You should
recommend whether to use the smaller or larger reactor. The lower the space time, the smaller
the reactor.

Table 1: Reactor Conversions and Selectivities


T X selectivity X selectivity
(°°C) conversion to AA moles DO/moles gum conversion to AA moles DO/moles gum
space time 10 min space time 10 min space time 4 min space time 4 min
310 0.130 6.43×107 0.069 6.41×108
320 0.184 4.97×106 0.107 6.44×107
330 0.245 9.18×105 0.161 4.28×106
340 0.314 2.38×105 0.214 7.58×105
350 0.375 7.08×104 0.283 1.74×105
360 0.444 2.29×104 0.345 4.92×104
370 0.513 8.55×103 0.413 1.61×104
380 0.559 3.38×103 0.475 3.78×103
390 0.597 1.43×103 0.528 2.22×103
400 0.635 5.58×102 0.574 9.17×102

Other Information

You should assume that a year equals 8000 hours. This is about 330 days, which allows for
periodic shut down and maintenance.

Deliverables

Each group must deliver a word-processed report. It should be clear and concise. The format
is explained in a separate document. When presenting results for different cases, graphs are
superior to tables. The body of the report should be short, emphasizing only the results and
briefly summarizing computational strategies. The report appendix should contain details of
calculations that are easy to follow. Calculations that cannot be followed easily will lose credit.

The project is due November 6, 2002, at the beginning of class. There will be oral
presentations of project results on that day.

Anyone not participating in this project will automatically receive an F for ChE 201,
regardless of other grades earned in this class.
5

Groups

You will work on this project in groups of 3 or 4. More details of group formation and peer
evaluation will be discussed in class.

Revisions

As with any open-ended problem; i.e., a problem with no single correct answer, the problem
statement above is deliberately vague. The possibility exists that as you work on this problem,
your questions will require revisions and/or clarifications. You should be aware that these
revisions/clarifications may be forthcoming.

Common questions

Powered by AI

Gross profit is estimated using the formula: gross profit estimate = value of products – cost of feed – cost of recycle – cost of separations . The value of products and cost of feed are provided in the process details . Additionally, the cost of recycle can be calculated based on the ratio of ACO to DO mass flow rates, and the gum removal cost is also factored in if relevant .

Potential process modifications could include adjusting reactor temperatures and space-times to enhance conversion rates and selectivity ratios, while minimizing undesired side products like gum . Streamlining distillation processes to increase purities and recovery efficiency could enhance product value . Introducing process control systems that optimize recycle rates might lower overall costs. Analyzing alternative raw materials or catalysts that might improve the reaction efficiency and lower feedstock costs could also be beneficial . These modifications should align with achieving a high gross profit .

The cost of recycle influences economic feasibility as it is affected by the equipment and utility costs, which increase with recycled mass. The recycle cost is estimated based on the mass flowrate ratio of ACO to DO in Stream 3, affecting the gross profit. A higher recycle cost reduces gross profit, making the process potentially less economically viable . Managing the recycle efficiently to maintain low costs is crucial for the process to be economically feasible .

The primary chemical reaction involves the thermal cracking of acetylated castor oil, modeled as palmitic acid (C15H31COOH), into drying oil, modeled as tetradecene (C14H28), and acetic acid (CH3COOH). The undesired reaction is the dimerization of the drying oil to form a solid gum, which is modeled as C28H56 .

A smaller reactor is associated with a reduced space-time, which can enhance conversion efficiency as it reduces the time reactants spend in the reactor. For example, at 400°C, a smaller reactor with space-time of 4 minutes achieves a conversion of 0.574 for acetic acid, compared to 0.635 for a larger reactor with space-time of 10 minutes . However, the smaller reactor might lead to higher energy costs due to increased throughput and may require more precise control to avoid selectivity loss or increased gum formation .

Operating conditions for the reactor should be optimized to increase conversion to acetic acid and enhance selectivity for drying oil over gum formation. Reactor temperature should be chosen within the limit of 310°C to 400°C . The space-time and reactor size (smaller or larger reactor) must be considered for optimal conversion and selectivity. Additionally, economic factors such as feed cost, product value, and cost of separations and recycle should be weighed to ensure maximum gross profit .

Temperature variation directly affects both conversion and selectivity. As temperature increases from 310°C to 400°C, conversion increases (from 0.130 to 0.635 for space-time of 10 minutes) and selectivity shifts, indicating a favored reaction towards producing more desiring product vs. undesired ones . Higher temperatures tend to enable higher conversion rates of acetylated castor oil into acetic acid and drying oil. However, there exists a trade-off between achieving high conversion and maintaining product selectivity to minimize gum formation, thus affecting overall reactor performance .

The gum level in the process determines whether gum removal costs can be ignored. If gum is kept below 1 ppm in Stream 3, these costs are negligible, allowing the removal of the gum filter (F-501), thus optimizing operational efficiency and reducing separation costs . If gum formation exceeds this threshold, costs increase due to the need for persistent gum removal, negatively impacting the economic feasibility . This requires balancing reactor conditions to optimize selectivity and conversion rates that minimize gum formation .

The distillation process plays a crucial role in purifying and recovering valuable components from the reaction mixture. It separates acetic acid, acetylated castor oil, and drying oil, ensuring their high-quality recovery for sale or reuse . The first distillation column purifies ACO for recycling and directs AA and DO to subsequent purification. The second column ensures a high recovery purity of AA and DO, integral to maximizing product value and reducing waste, thereby enhancing gross profit . Efficient distillation is key to economic viability and operational success .

Maintaining gum levels below 1 ppm is challenging due to the sensitivity of the polymerization in the reactor which can escalate beyond control under certain conditions. Fluctuations in reaction temperature, insufficient control over reactant concentrations, and variations in catalyst activity can increase gum formation . Addressing these issues requires precise temperature controls, robust monitoring systems, and possibly introducing inhibitors to prevent dimerization . Regular equipment maintenance and process optimization strategies further help in managing gum levels efficiently .

You might also like