i
PROSPERIDAD NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL DEPARTMENT
References
angrist, j. d.; guryan, j. (2004). “Teacher Testing, Teacher Education and Teacher
Characteristics”. American Economic Review, AEA Papers and Proceedings. May, pp. 241-246.
angrist, j. d.; lavy, v. (2002). “New Evidence on Classroom Computers and Pupil Learning”.
Economic Journal. No. 112, pp. 735-765. antonelli, c. (2003). “The Digital Divide:
Understanding the Economies of New Information and Communication Technology in the
Global Economy”. Information Economics and Policy. No. 15, pp. 173-199. arias, j. j.; walker, d.
m. (2004). “Additional Evidence on the Relationship between Class Size and Student
Performance”. Journal of Economic Education. Vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 311-329. attwell, p.; battle, j.
(1999). “Home Computers and School Performance”. The Information Society. No. 15, pp. 1-10.
banerjee, a.; cole, s.; duflo, e.; linden, l. (2004). “Remedying Education: Evidence from Two
Randomized Experiments in India” [mimeo]. MIT. becker, h. j. (2000). “Pedagogical Motivations
for Student Computer Use that Leads to Student Engagement”. Education Technology. Vol. 40,
no. 5, pp. 5-17. becker, w. e. (1997). “Teaching Economics to Undergraduates”. Journal of
Economic Literature. Vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 1347-73. ben youssef, a. (2008). “Uses of Information
and Communication Technologies in Europe’s High Education Institutions: From Digital Divides
To Digital Trajectories”. Working Paper ADIS. betts, j.; zau, a.; rice, l. (2003). Determinants of
Student Achievement: New Evidences from San Diego. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of
California. bloom, b. s. (1979). Caractéristiques individuelles et apprentissages scolaires.
Brussels and Paris: Labor / Nathan. bradley, s.; taylor, j. (1998). “The Effect of School Size on
Exam Performance in Secondary Schools”. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. No. 60,
pp. 291- 324. bratti, m.; checchi, d.; filippin, a.
PROSPERIDAD NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
(2007). “Territorial
SENIOR Differences in ItalianDEPARTMENT
HIGH SCHOOL Students’ Mathematical
Competencies: Evidence from PISA 2003”. IZA Discussion Paper. No. 2603. February. Bonn:
Institute for the Study of Labor. brown, b. w.; liedholm, c. e. (2002). “Can Web Courses Replace
the Classroom in Principles of Microeconomics?”. American Economic Review. Vol. 92, no. 2,
pp 444-448. clotfelter; c. t.; ladd, h. f.; vigdor, j. l. (2004). “Teacher Sorting, Teacher Shopping,
and the Assessment of Teacher Effectiveness” [online]. Duke University. coates, d.; humphreys,
b. r. [et al.] (2004). “’No Significant Distance’ between Face-to-face and Online Instruction:
Evidence from Principles of Economics”. Economics of Education Review. Vol. 23, no. 6, pp 533-
546. conger, r. d.; conger, k. j.; elder, g. h. (1997). “Family Economic Hardship and Adolescent
Adjustment: Mediating and Moderating Processes”. In: g. duncan; j. brooks-gunn (ed).
Consequences of Growing up Poor. New York: The Russell Sage Foundation. didia, d.; hasnat, b.
(1998). “The Determinants of Performance in the University Introductory Finance Course”.
Journal of Financial Practice and Education. Vol. 8, no. 1, pp..102-107. downes, t.; arthur, l.;
beecher, b. (2001). “Effective Learning Environments for Young Children Using Digital
Resources: An Australian Perspective”. Information Technology in Childhood Education. No. 1,
pp. 129-143. dustmann, c. (2003). “The Class Size Debate and Educational Mechanisms:
Editorial”. Economic Journal. Vol. 113, pp. F1-F2. fuchs, t.; woessmann, l. (2004). “Computers
and Student Learning: Bivariate and Multivariate Evidence on the Availability and Use of
Computers at Home and at School”, CESifo Working Paper. No. 1321. November. Munich.
fullan, m. (1999). Change Forces: The Sequel. London: The Falmer Press. glen, w.j. (2006).
“Separate But Not Yet Equal: The Relation between School Finance Adequacy Litigation And
African American Student Achievement”. Peabody Journal of Education. Vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 63-
PROSPERIDAD NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
93. glewwe, p. kremer, m. (2006).
SENIOR HIGH “Schools,
SCHOOL Teachers, and Education Outcomes
DEPARTMENT
in Developing Countries”. In: e. hanushek; f. welch (ed.). Handbook on the Economics of
Education. Vol. 2. Oxford: Elsevier. glewwe, p.; kremer, m.; moulin, s.; zitzewitz, e. (2004).
“Retrospective vs. Prospective Analysis of Flip Charts in Kenya”. Journal of Development
Economics. Vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 251-268. goolsbee, a., guryan, j. (2002). “The Impact of Internet
Subsidies in Public Schools”. NBER Working Paper. No. 9090. greenan, n., mairesse, j. (2004). “A
Firm Level Investigation of the Complementarity between Information and Communication
Technologies and New Organizational Practices”. In: Annual conference of the Western
Economic Association. June 29-July 3, 2004: Vancouver, Canada. hanushek, e. a. (2003). “The
Failure of Input-Based Schooling Policies”. Economic Journal. No. 113, pp. 64-98. hanushek, e.
a. (1996). “School Resources and Student Performance”. In: g. burtless (ed.). Does Money
Matter? The Effect of School Resources on Student Achievement and Adult Success.
Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution. hanushek, e. a. (1971). “Teacher Characteristics and
Gains in Student Achievement: Estimation Using Micro Data”. American Economic Review. No.
61.