Effects of Freeze-Drying on HMOs
Effects of Freeze-Drying on HMOs
Won-ho Hahn, Jaehan Kim, Seunghyun Song, Suyeon Park & Nam Mi Kang
To cite this article: Won-ho Hahn, Jaehan Kim, Seunghyun Song, Suyeon Park & Nam Mi Kang
(2017): The human milk oligosaccharides are not affected by pasteurization and freeze-drying, The
Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1397122
Download by: [University of New England] Date: 08 November 2017, At: 07:18
THE JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2017
[Link]
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
storage method to improve the processes of human milk banks. However, the effects of pasteur- Accepted 23 October 2017
ization and freeze-drying on HMOs were not evaluated yet. The purpose of this study is to ana-
lyze and compare the HMOs profiles of human milk collected before and after the pasteurization KEYWORDS
and freeze-drying. Freeze-drying; human milk;
Methods: Totally nine fresh human milk samples were collected from three healthy mothers at mass spectrometry;
the first, second, and third week after delivery. The samples were treated with Holder pasteuriza- oligosaccharides;
tion and freeze-drying. HMOs profiles were analyzed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ioniza- pasteurization
tion (MALDI) time-of-flight/time-of-flight (TOF/TOF) mass spectrometry and compared between
samples collected before and after the treatments.
Results: Human milk samples showed significantly different HMO patterns between mothers.
However, HMOs were not affected by lactation periods within 3 weeks after delivery
(r2 ¼ 0.972–0.999, p < .001). Moreover, both of pasteurization and freeze-drying were found not
to affect HMO patterns in a correlation analysis (r2 ¼ 0.989–0.999, p < .001).
Conclusion: HMO patterns were found not to be affected by pasteurization and freeze-drying of
donor milks. We hope that introducing freeze-drying to the human milk banks would be encour-
aged by the present study. However, the storage length without composition changes of HMOs
after freeze-drying needs to be evaluated in the further studies.
CONTACT Nam Mi Kang nmkang03@[Link] 268 Chungwondaero, Chungcheongbuk-do, College of Nursing, Konkuk University, Chungju-si,
Republic of Korea
Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here.
! 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
2 W.-H. HAHN ET AL.
conducted this study to evaluate the changes of the at 13,000 rpm for 30 min at 4 # C. Carefully extract the
HMOs after these treatments. middle layer into a 15 mL centrifuge tube and add
four volumes of chloroform/methanol (2:1, v/v). The
mixture was centrifuged at 4000 % g for 30 min at 4 # C.
Methods
The aqueous layer was recovered and subjected to an
Milk samples ethanol precipitation for removal of protein. Proteins
Human donor milk was obtained from the mothers who were precipitated at "40 # C for 1 h. After 30 min of
agreed to participate in the present study in April 2016. centrifugation at 4000 % g at 4 # C, the upper liquid
This study was approved by the ethics review commit- fraction was collected and dried to completion using a
tee of the Medical Research Institute, Konkuk University speed vacuum.
hospital (KUH-7001355-201511-HR-093). Inclusion crite-
ria were the milks donated from nonsmoking healthy Reduction and purification of HMOs
mothers who delivered their baby vaginally without
Dried samples dissolved in 0.5 mL of deionized water.
positive results in the serologic tests for hepatitis B virus,
Fifty microliters of aqueous HMOs were reduced to an
syphilis and human immunodeficiency virus, and who
alditol form by adding 1.0 M NaBH4 and incubating at
Downloaded by [University of New England] at 07:18 08 November 2017
range from 400 to 3000 and in the negative mode Impact of the pasteurization on the HMOs
over the m/z range from 900 to 3000 for a total of
Table 1 demonstrates the HMO patterns in the pas-
2400 laser shots using a 1 kHz laser. Raw MS and MS/
teurized milks from three different mothers. In the
MS data were produced with flexAnalysis software
Wilcoxon signed rank test, no significant difference of
(version 3.3, Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany).
HMO composition was found between milks collected
before and after the pasteurization (p ¼ .899). Similarly,
Statistical analysis there was strong correlation between the amounts of
HMOs of the milks collected before and after the pas-
The mean percentage of peak intensities of each HMO teurization, which indicated there was no significant
was compared between paired data sets (pre- and post- change of HMOs patterns after the pasteurization
pasteurized milks, and between pre- and post-freeze (r ¼ 0.925, p < .001, Figure 2(A)).
dried milks) were calculated by Wilcoxon signed rank
test using SPSSV version 18.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL) to
R
find out the effects of each treatment on the HMO com- Impact of the freeze-drying on HMOs
position. Spearman’s correlation test was performed The HMO levels before and after the freeze-drying is
using MedCalcV version 12.3 (MedCalc, Mariakerke,
R
Downloaded by [University of New England] at 07:18 08 November 2017
Figure 1. Quantitative correlation of the human milk oligosaccharides between different lactation periods and different three
mothers. Notice that the samples from individual mothers are strongly grouped and there is strong correlation between the differ-
ent periods in the samples from same mother.
4 W.-H. HAHN ET AL.
Table 1. List and mean percent of peak intensities of human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs) found in the pre-
and postpasteurized milks from different three mothers.
Pre-pasteurization Post-pasteurization
a
Code m/z Mother A Mother B Mother C Mother A Mother B Mother C
2_0_1_0 513.164 0.0 ± 0.0 55.6 ± 3.7 5.4 ± 0.8 0.0 ± 0.0 61.2 ± 11.3 7.1 ± 1.1
2_0_2_0 659.236 0.0 ± 0.0 6.2 ± 0.6 0.3 ± 0.1 0.0 ± 0.0 6.1 ± 0.9 0.5 ± 0.3
3_1_0_0 732.254 67.7 ± 2.6 4.5 ± 0.6 37.9 ± 3.3 66.8 ± 3.6 4.6 ± 0.3 34.6 ± 3.5
3_1_1_0 878.311 1.2 ± 0.5 18.1 ± 1.4 28.4 ± 0.7 1.0 ± 0.2 16.9 ± 1.1 27.7 ± 1.3
4_1_0_0 894.27 0.4 ± 0.1 0.0 ± 0.0 0.1 ± 0.1 0.4 ± 0.1 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.1
3_2_0_0 935.337 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.2 ± 0.2 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0
3_1_2_0 1024.368 0.0 ± 0.0 12.8 ± 1.5 9.6 ± 1.0 0.0 ± 0.0 11.4 ± 1.6 10.7 ± 2.6
4_1_1_0 1040.362 0.0 ± 0.0 0.5 ± 0.2 0.1 ± 0.1 0.0 ± 0.0 0.6 ± 0.1 0.1 ± 0.1
4_2_0_0 1097.386 26.2 ± 2.4 0.0 ± 0.0 1.4 ± 0.2 27.1 ± 2.7 0.0 ± 0.0 1.2 ± 0.2
4_2_1_0 1243.440 1.1 ± 0.1 0.3 ± 0.2 10.2 ± 1.4 1.0 ± 0.2 0.5 ± 0.2 10.9 ± 1.8
4_2_2_0 1389.501 0.0 ± 0.0 2.0 ± 0.5 4.2 ± 0.8 0.0 ± 0.0 2.0 ± 0.4 4.6 ± 0.8
5_3_0_0 1462.520 2.9 ± 0.3 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 2.9 ± 0.6 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0
4_2_3_0 1535.530 0.0 ± 0.0 0.1 ± 0.2 0.6 ± 0.2 0.0 ± 0.0 0.1 ± 0.2 0.7 ± 0.2
5_3_1_0 1608.576 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.9 ± 0.1 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.8 ± 0.1
5_3_2_0 1754.628 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.7 ± 0.1 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.7 ± 0.1
6_4_0_0 1827.650 0.5 ± 0.1 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.6 ± 0.3 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0
5_3_3_0 1900.680 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.2 ± 0.1 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.2 ± 0.0
Downloaded by [University of New England] at 07:18 08 November 2017
6_4_1_0 1973.700 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.1 ± 0.1 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.1 ± 0.1
6_4_2_0 2119.739 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0
3_1_0_1 999.352 41.3 ± 2.4 0.0 ± 0.0 62.3 ± 7.9 41.3 ± 2.3 0.0 ± 0.0 55.3 ± 7.8
3_1_0_2 1290.462 0.4 ± 0.2 0.0 ± 0.0 0.6 ± 0.2 0.3 ± 0.2 0.0 ± 0.0 0.6 ± 0.2
3_2_0_1 1202.376 0.1 ± 0.1 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.2 ± 0.2 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0
4_2_0_1 1364.484 53.8 ± 1.4 0.0 ± 0.0 9.6 ± 1.5 54.2 ± 2.8 0.0 ± 0.0 10.7 ± 2.1
4_2_0_2 1655.515 0.3 ± 0.5 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.1 ± 0.1 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0
4_2_1_1 1510.492 0.4 ± 0.5 0.0 ± 0.0 24.1 ± 6.0 0.3 ± 0.1 0.0 ± 0.0 29.9 ± 6.3
4_2_2_1 1656.535 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 1.2 ± 0.4 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 1.3 ± 0.3
5_3_0_1 1729.622 3.1 ± 1.6 0.0 ± 0.0 0.1 ± 0.1 3.1 ± 1.6 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.1
5_3_1_1 1875.604 0.3 ± 0.8 0.0 ± 0.0 1.2 ± 0.2 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 1.3 ± 0.3
5_3_2_1 2021.658 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.7 ± 0.1 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.6 ± 0.3
6_4_0_1 2094.793 0.7 ± 0.6 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.1 0.5 ± 0.6 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.1
6_4_1_1 2240.891 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.2 ± 0.1 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.2 ± 0.1
6_4_2_1 2386.924 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.1 ± 0.1
7_5_0_1 2459.808 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0
a
Code is the glycan composition of HMOs designated by the number of monosaccharides; from left to right, hexose, N-acetylhexos-
amine, fucose and N-acetylneuraminic acid, respectively.
(A) 90 (B) 90
80 80
70 70
Post-pasteurization
Post-freeze drying
60 60
50 50
40 40
30 30
20 20
Figure 2. Quantitative correlation of the human milk oligosaccharides between the milk samples collected pre- and post-pasteur-
ization (A), and between pre- and post-freeze drying (B).
Discussion
on the HMO patterns. In addition, the lactation stages
In the present study, the authors report the presence did not influence the HMO profiles.
of large differences in HMOs between mothers and no The pasteurization and freezing is the most
significant effects of pasteurization and freeze-drying essential processes of human milk banking [10].
THE JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE 5
Table 2. List and mean percent of human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs) found in the pre- and post-freeze
dried milks from three mothers.
Pre-freeze drying Post-freeze drying
a
Code m/z Mother A Mother B Mother C Mother A Mother B Mother C
2_0_1_0 513.164 0.0 ± 0.0 56.5 ± 3.9 6.4 ± 1.2 0.0 ± 0.0 60.3 ± 11.7 6.1 ± 1.4
2_0_2_0 659.236 0.0 ± 0.0 6.0 ± 0.5 0.4 ± 0.2 0.0 ± 0.0 6.3 ± 0.9 0.4 ± 0.3
3_1_0_0 732.254 68.1 ± 3.1 4.6 ± 0.5 36.7 ± 3.9 66.5 ± 2.9 4.5 ± 0.3 35.8 ± 3.7
3_1_1_0 878.311 1.2 ± 0.4 17.4 ± 1.2 27.9 ± 1.3 1.0 ± 0.3 17.6 ± 1.6 28.1 ± 0.9
4_1_0_0 894.270 0.4 ± 0.1 0.0 ± 0.0 0.1 ± 0.1 0.4 ± 0.1 0.0 ± 0.0 0.1 ± 0.1
3_2_0_0 935.337 0.1 ± 0.2 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.1 ± 0.2 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0
3_1_2_0 1024.368 0.0 ± 0.0 12.3 ± 1.8 10.1 ± 2.1 0.0 ± 0.0 11.9 ± 1.6 10.2 ± 2.0
4_1_1_0 1040.362 0.0 ± 0.0 0.6 ± 0.1 0.1 ± 0.1 0.0 ± 0.0 0.5 ± 0.2 0.1 ± 0.1
4_2_0_0 1097.386 25.7 ± 2.4 0.0 ± 0.0 1.3 ± 0.2 27.5 ± 2.4 0.0 ± 0.0 1.3 ± 0.3
4_2_1_0 1243.440 1.0 ± 0.1 0.5 ± 0.1 10.3 ± 1.8 1.1 ± 0.2 0.3 ± 0.3 10.9 ± 1.3
4_2_2_0 1389.501 0.0 ± 0.0 2.1 ± 0.4 4.3 ± 0.9 0.0 ± 0.0 1.9 ± 0.5 4.5 ± 0.7
5_3_0_0 1462.520 2.9 ± 0.5 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 2.9 ± 0.4 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0
4_2_3_0 1535.530 0.0 ± 0.0 0.1 ± 0.2 0.6 ± 0.2 0.0 ± 0.0 0.1 ± 0.2 0.7 ± 0.2
5_3_1_0 1608.576 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.9 ± 0.1 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.9 ± 0.1
5_3_2_0 1754.628 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.7 ± 0.1 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.7 ± 0.1
6_4_0_0 1827.650 0.6 ± 0.3 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.5 ± 0.1 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0
5_3_3_0 1900.680 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.2 ± 0.1 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.2 ± 0.0
Downloaded by [University of New England] at 07:18 08 November 2017
6_4_1_0 1973.700 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.1 ± 0.1 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.1 ± 0.1
6_4_2_0 2119.739 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0
3_1_0_1 999.352 40.6 ± 2.6 0.0 ± 0.0 58.7 ± 8.7 42.0 ± 1.7 0.0 ± 0.0 58.9 ± 8.7
3_1_0_2 1290.462 0.3 ± 0.2 0.0 ± 0.0 0.7 ± 0.2 0.5 ± 0.1 0.0 ± 0.0 0.5 ± 0.1
3_2_0_1 1202.376 0.2 ± 0.2 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.1 ± 0.1 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0
4_2_0_1 1364.484 54.9 ± 2.0 0.0 ± 0.0 10.6 ± 1.6 53.1 ± 2.0 0.0 ± 0.0 9.8 ± 2.1
4_2_0_2 1655.515 0.2 ± 0.1 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.3 ± 0.5 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0
4_2_1_1 1510.492 0.3 ± 0.1 0.0 ± 0.0 27.0 ± 7.2 0.5 ± 0.4 0.0 ± 0.0 27.1 ± 6.7
4_2_2_1 1656.535 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 1.2 ± 0.4 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 1.3 ± 0.4
5_3_0_1 1729.622 3.1 ± 1.6 0.0 ± 0.0 0.1 ± 0.1 3.1 ± 1.5 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.1
5_3_1_1 1875.604 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 1.2 ± 0.1 0.3 ± 0.8 0.0 ± 0.0 1.3 ± 0.3
5_3_2_1 2021.658 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.5 ± 0.3 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.8 ± 0.1
6_4_0_1 2094.793 0.5 ± 0.5 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.1 0.8 ± 0.6 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.1
6_4_1_1 2240.891 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.1 ± 0.1 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.3 ± 0.1
6_4_2_1 2386.924 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.1 ± 0.1
7_5_0_1 2459.808 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0
a
Code is the glycan composition of HMOs designated by the number of monosaccharides; from left to right, hexose, N-acetyl-
hexosamine, fucose and N-acetylneuraminic acid, respectively.
However, the pasteurization is known to significantly polyphenol-related functionality, and oxidative integ-
reduce the content of lipid, energy, and/or carbohy- rity of human milk [11,12].
drates especially when it is combined with the freez- These evidences commonly imply that freeze-drying
ing process at both of "20 and "80 # C [16,17]. The is a promising option to improve the preservation of
pasteurization and/or freezing of raw human milk are human milk in banks. Small numbers of human milk
found to affect the vitamin D level, lactoferrin level banks are storing pasteurized human milk up to 12
and antioxidative capacity as well [18–22]. Even months after freeze-drying and transporting freeze-
though the gold standard method for human milk dried milks at room temperature [13,14]. However, the
banking is freezing milks at "70 or "80 # C, it requires effects of freeze-drying on the HMOs are not evaluated
lot of resources. Thus, there is an agreement on the yet. There is only one study that freeze-drying in the
freezing between "20 and "25 # C for milk storage stool samples does not make significant HMO changes
despite of less effective bacterial killing and nutrients in neonates [25].
preserving performance [16,23,24]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report
Recently, the freeze-drying is suggested as a better about the effects of pasteurization and freeze-drying
method to store longer maintaining nutrients and bac- on the HMO profiles. HMOs seem to be very stable to
teriostatic properties. Salcedo et al. [23] reported that the treatments and it would support the benefits of
freeze-drying showed similar bactericidal activity com- introducing freeze-drying in human milk bank for lon-
pared with storing at "80 # C and was superior to stor- ger, safer, and easier storage and transport of the
ing at "20 # C. Moreover, the freeze-drying could donor milks. However, there are several limitations in
achieve suitable protection of the milk properties the present study. First, the numbers of samples were
including protein, fatty acids, triglycerides, vitamins, not sufficient to emphasize the stability of HMOs
6 W.-H. HAHN ET AL.
against the treatments. It could be one of the major [6] O’Hara AM, Shanahan F. The gut flora as a forgotten
limitations because the composition of human milk organ. EMBO Rep. 2006;7:688–693.
[7] Andreas NJ, Al-Khalidi A, Jaiteh M, et al. Role of
does vary between individuals [26–29]. However,
human milk oligosaccharides in group b streptococ-
studying large numbers of samples with mass spec- cus colonisation. Clin Transl Immunol. 2016;5:e99.
trometry was not easy to access technically. Second, [8] Wang B. Sialic acid is an essential nutrient for brain
the samples were not stored for longer than months. development and cognition. Annu Rev Nutr.
Thus, in the further study, it would be necessary to 2009;29:177–222.
[9] Wang B, McVeagh P, Petocz P, et al. Brain ganglioside
study how long HMOs could be preserved after freeze-
and glycoprotein sialic acid in breastfed compared
drying. Finally, the milk samples collected within only with formula-fed infants. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;78:
3 weeks of lactation were analyzed. As HMO profiles 1024–1029.
might be affected by 4 months of lactation stages, [10] DeMarchis A, Israel-Ballard K, Mansen KA, et al.
milks of later stages need to be investigated [30,31]. Establishing an integrated human milk banking
In summary, the HMOs were found not to be approach to strengthen newborn care. J Perinatol.
2017;37:469–474.
affected by pasteurization and freeze-drying.
[11] Lozano B, Castellote AI, Montes R, et al. Vitamins, fatty
Moreover, there were large differences between the acids, and antioxidant capacity stability during storage
Downloaded by [University of New England] at 07:18 08 November 2017
mothers. As significant changes of HMOs were not of freeze-dried human milk. Int J Food Sci Nutr.
detected after pasteurization and freeze-drying, we 2014;65:703–707.
hope introducing freeze-drying in human milk banks [12] Cortez MV, Soria EA. The effect of freeze-drying on
the nutrient, polyphenol, and oxidant levels of breast
to be encouraged. However, the storage length with-
milk. Breastfeed Med. 2016;11:551–554.
out composition changes of HMOs after freeze-drying [13] Guti! errez D, de Almeida JA. Human milk banks in bra-
needs to be evaluated in the further studies. zil. J Hum Lact. 1998;14:333–335.
[14] Centre for Clinical Practice. National Institute for
Health and Clinical Excellence: guidance; Donor breast
Disclosure statement milk banks: the operation of donor milk bank services.
London: National Institute for Health and Clinical
The authors report no conflicts of interest. Excellence; 2010.
[15] Leung AK, Sauve RS. Breast is best for babies. J Natl
Med Assoc. 2005;97:1010–1019.
Funding [16] Garc!ıa-Lara NR, Vieco DE, De la Cruz-B! ertolo J, et al.
Effect of holder pasteurization and frozen storage
This work was supported by the National Research
on macronutrients and energy content of breast milk.
Foundation (NRF) of Korea grant funded by the Korean gov-
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013;57:377–382.
ernment (MSIP) [No. 2015R1A2A1A15056046;
[17] Lev HM, Ovental A, Mandel D, et al. Major losses of
2017R1D1A1B03034270].
fat, carbohydrates and energy content of preterm
human milk frozen at "80 # C. J Perinatol. 2014;34:
References 396–398.
[18] Marinkovi!c V, Rankovi!c-Janevski M, Spasi!c S, et al.
[1] Underwood MA, Gaerlan S, De Leoz ML, et al. Human Antioxidative activity of colostrum and human milk:
milk oligosaccharides in premature infants: absorp- effects of pasteurization and storage. J Pediatr
tion, excretion, and influence on the intestinal micro- Gastroenterol Nutr. 2016;62:901–906.
biota. Pediatr Res. 2015;78:670–677. [19] Xavier AM, Rai K, Hegde AM. Total antioxidant con-
[2] Zivkovic AM, German JB, Lebrilla CB, et al. Human centrations of breastmilk – an eye-opener to the neg-
milk glycobiome and its impact on the infant gastro- ligent. J Health Popul Nutr. 2011;29:605–611.
intestinal microbiota. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. [20] Aksu T, Atalay Y, T€ urky{lmaz C, et al. The effects of
2011;108(Suppl 1):4653–4658. breast milk storage and freezing procedure on inter-
[3] Newburg DS, Ruiz-Palacios GM, Morrow AL. Human leukine-10 levels and total antioxidant activity.
milk glycans protect infants against enteric patho- J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;28:1799–1802.
gens. Annu Rev Nutr. 2005;25:37–58. [21] Gomes F, Shaw N, Whitfield K, et al. Effect of pasteur-
[4] Morrow AL, Meinzen-Derr J, Huang P, et al. isation on the concentrations of vitamin D com-
Fucosyltransferase 2 non-secretor and low secretor pounds in donor breast milk. Arch Dis Child.
status predicts severe outcomes in premature infants. 2016;101:e2.
J Pediatr. 2011;158:745–751. [22] Rollo DE, Radmacher PG, Turcu RM, et al. Stability of
[5] Morrow AL, Ruiz-Palacios GM, Altaye M, et al. Human lactoferrin in stored human milk. J Perinatol.
milk oligosaccharide blood group epitopes and innate 2014;34:284–286.
immune protection against campylobacter and calici- [23] Salcedo J, Gormaz M, Lo !pez-Mendoza MC, et al.
virus diarrhea in breastfed infants. Adv Exp Med Biol. Human milk bactericidal properties: effect of lyophil-
2004;554:443–446. ization and relation to maternal factors and milk
THE JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE 7
components. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2015;60: permeability of the lactating breast during inflamma-
527–532. tion. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85:20–25.
[24] Italian Association of Human Milk Banks/Associazione [28] Gidrewicz DA, Fenton TR. A systematic review and
Italiana Banche del Latte, Umano D, Arslanoglu S, meta-analysis of the nutrient content of preterm and
et al. Guidelines for the establishment and operation term breast milk. BMC Pediatr. 2014;14:216.
of a donor human milk bank. J Matern Fetal Neonatal [29] Semba RD, Kumwenda N, Taha TE, et al. Mastitis and
Med. 2010;23:1–20. immunological factors in breast milk of lactating
[25] Lewis ZT, Davis JC, Smilowitz JT, et al. The impact of women in Malawi. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1999;6:
freeze-drying infant fecal samples on measures of 671–674.
their bacterial community profiles and milk-derived [30] Xu G, Davis JC, Goonatilleke E, et al. Absolute
oligosaccharide content. PeerJ. 2016;4:e1612. quantitation of human milk oligosaccharides
[26] Arthur PG, Kent JC, Hartmann PE. Metabolites of lac- reveals phenotypic variations during lactation. J Nutr.
tose synthesis in milk from diabetic and nondiabetic 2017;147:117–124.
women during lactogenesis ii. J Pediatr Gastroenterol [31] Thurl S, Munzert M, Henker J, et al. Variation of
Nutr. 1994;19:100–108. human milk oligosaccharides in relation to milk
[27] Fetherston CM, Lai CT, Mitoulas LR, et al. Excretion of groups and lactational periods. Br J Nutr. 2010;104:
lactose in urine as a measure of increased 1261–1271.
Downloaded by [University of New England] at 07:18 08 November 2017