JACQUELINE LEONCIA M.
ALINO
LLM, San Beda College
“Human rights must work to uplift human dignity. But human rights cannot be
used as a shield or an excuse to destroy the country — your country and my
country.” President Rodrigo Roa Duterte
In his first State of the Nation Address, the 16th President of the
Philippine Republic declared the afore-cited quote. The statement appeals
greatly to one’s emotions. It rouses patriotism. Most agreed that the first part
of the statement is spot-on and fitting. However, many have argued that the
latter part is flawed and offensive.
While the President’s will and determination to lead the country
towards glorious heights is admirable, the path he chooses to take and the
measures he uses to reach such heights are problematic- for one, the
seemingly State-sanctioned extrajudicial killings to advance the peace and
order situation. As a lawyer who took an oath “to support the Constitution and
obey laws as well as the legal orders of the duly constituted authorities,” I
cannot acquiesce to the notion that human rights can be used to constrain the
government from achieving its lawful ends.
We live under the rule of law. Under this principle of governance, all
persons, institutions and entities, public and private, including the State itself,
are accountable to laws that are publicly promulgated, equally enforced and
independently adjudicated1. In other words, no one is above the law. Yes, not
even the President is above the law. As such, his actions and chosen measures
must conform to established laws.
1
[Link]
JACQUELINE LEONCIA M. ALINO
LLM, San Beda College
The Constitution, our fundamental law, enshrines due process. Section 1
of the Bill of Rights is unequivocal: “No person shall be deprived of life, liberty
or property without due process of law.” Evidently, there is no due process in
summary executions as the victims are deprived of all their rights outright
and upfront in an instant.
The Chief Executive is not solely the President of law-abiding Filipino
citizens. He too is the President of law-breakers and criminals. Furthermore,
the “person” described in the Bill of Rights also includes “bad” persons.
Nowhere in the Constitution has the protection been limited to “virtuous”
persons. I do not condone or applaud criminals. They must be punished
accordingly. Appropriate penalties must be meted against them. Perhaps, if
the State thorough the legislature thinks it is wise, death penalty may even be
imposed. However, in enforcing punishments and penalties, due process must
be observed and human rights must be upheld. For a civilized society which
recognizes human dignity and his rights, this is the only way forward.
JACQUELINE LEONCIA M. ALINO
LLM, San Beda College