Scribd
Upload
21 views2 pages

Basement Wall Design Analysis Summary

The summary analyzes the design of a concrete basement wall based on input parameters. It determines factored loads and section forces for two analysis cases. It checks minimum horizontal reinforcement, vertical flexure capacity, and shear capacity. The wall design is found to be adequate with satisfactory reinforcement and capacity.

Uploaded by

Karimullah Salaar
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
21 views2 pages

Basement Wall Design Analysis Summary

The summary analyzes the design of a concrete basement wall based on input parameters. It determines factored loads and section forces for two analysis cases. It checks minimum horizontal reinforcement, vertical flexure capacity, and shear capacity. The wall design is found to be adequate with satisfactory reinforcement and capacity.

Uploaded by

Karimullah Salaar
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Basement Concrete Wall Design Based on ACI 318-08

INPUT DATA & DESIGN SUMMARY


CONCRETE STRENGTH fc' = 4 ksi
REBAR YIELD STRESS fy = 60 ksi
LATERAL SOIL PRESSURE Pa = 33 pcf (equivalent fluid pressure)
BACKFILL SPECIFIC WEIGHT b = 120 pcf
SURCHARGE WEIGHT ws = 963 psf
WALL LATERAL FORCE, ASD wLat = 0 psf
SERVICE GRAVITY LOAD P = 5 kips / ft
ECCENTRICITY e = 0 in
SEISMIC GROUND SHAKING PE = 48 psf / ft (for H > 12 ft, CBC 07 1806A.1)
HEIGHT ABOVE GROUND H1 = 4.3 ft
HEIGHT UNDER GROUND H2 = 5 ft
THICKNESS OF WALL t = 8 in
WALL VERT. REINF. (As) # 4 @ 18 in o.c.
As LOCATION (1=at middle, 2=at each face) 2 at each face
WALL HORIZ. REINF. 2 # 4 @ 18 in o.c.

[THE WALL DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.]

ANALYSIS
Case A: Fixed Bottom & Pinned Top, with Lateral Soil Pressure Increasing Uniformly to Bottom
SERVICE LOADS
Hb = 0.5 Pa H22 = 0.41 kips / ft
Hs = ws Pa H2 / b = 1.32 kips / ft
HLat = wLat (H1 + H2) = 0.00 kips / ft
HE = 0.5 PE (H2)2 = 0.60 kips / ft
Ww = t ( H1 + H2 ) c = 0.93 kips / ft
FACTORED LOADS
Hb = 1.6 Hb =
0.66 kips / ft
Hs = 1.6 Hs =
2.12 kips / ft
HLat = 1.6 HLat =
0.00 kips / ft
HE = 1.6 HE =
0.96 kips / ft
Ww = 1.2 Ww =
1.12 kips / ft
P = 1.6 P =
8.00 kips / ft
DETERMINE FACTORED SECTION FORCES

RT = 0.49 kips / ft
RB = 3.25 kips / ft
PB = 9.12 kips / ft
MB = 5.08 ft-kips / ft
S = 4.40 ft, at max moment
PM = 8.59 kips / ft
MM = 2.24 ft-kips / ft
(cont'd)
Case B: Pinned both Bottom & Top, with Lateral Soil Pressure Trapezium Distributed

L = 0.6 H2
Hb = 0.13 kips / ft
Hb = 0.21 kips / ft
RT = 0.97 kips / ft
RB = 2.32 kips / ft
S = 3.77 ft, at max moment
PM = 8.66 kips / ft
MM = 4.78 ft-kips / ft

CHECK MINIMUN HORIZ. REINF.


ProvD = 0.00278
> MIN = 0.002
(ACI 318-08 14.3.3)
[Satisfactory]

CHECK VERT. FLEXURE CAPACITY


ProvD = 0.00193 < MAX = 0.04 (tension face only, ACI 318-05 10.3.5 or 10.9.1)
> MIN = 0.0006 (tension face only, ACI 318-05 10.5.1, 10.5.3 or 14.3.2)
[Satisfactory]

200.0
 Pn  Mn
180.0 AT AXIAL LOAD ONLY 177.6 0.0
160.0 AT MAXIMUM LOAD 177.6 7.4
140.0 AT MIDDLE 119.9 16.1
ATt = 0.002 62.3 16.9
120.0
AT BALANCED 61.1 16.9
 Pn (k) 100.0 ATt = 0.005 48.2 18.3
80.0 AT FLEXURE ONLY 0.0 3.4
60.0 (Note: For middle reforcing the max  M n is at c
40.0 equal to 0.5 t /  1 , not at balanced condition.)
Case A Case B
20.0
at bottom at middle
0.0
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 Pu 9.12 8.59 8.66
Mu 5.08 2.24 4.78
 Mn (ft-k) [Satisfactory]
CHECK SHEAR CAPACITY (ACI 318-08 SEC.15.5.2, [Link], & 11.2)

V u  Max. Horiz. Shear = 3.25 kips, at bottom

V n  2 bd fc
'
= 6.55 kips > Vu [Satisfactory]

You might also like